Systematic CT evaluation of reduction and hardware positioning of surgically treated calcaneal fractures: a reliability analysis

Surgical experience as a decisive factor for the outcome of calcaneal fractures using locking compression plate: results of 3 years

INTRODUCTION

Calcaneal fractures account for 60-75% of all tarsal fractures and represent surgical challenges because of their frequency and complexity. Despite standardized procedures and new implants, literature reports high revision rates and unsatisfactory results. The study aims to describe the role of the surgeon with respect to the clinical outcome.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2017, 94 calcaneal fractures (all type AO C1-3) were re-examined in 86 patients (67 male and 19 female; mean age: 51 years). The treatment was always carried out by means of locking compression plate via the extensile lateral approach. A comparison was made between treatment by an experienced (ES) and less experienced surgeon (LES). Annually, the ES performed at least 30 procedures for calcaneus fracture treatment as compared to < 10 operations performed by the LES.

RESULTS

The mean AOFAS, VAS FA, and Kiel Score in the ES group were 77.0 (SD 15.9), 69.0 (SD 18.8), and 65.0 (SD 20.6), respectively. The corresponding values in the LES group were 68.1 (SD 21.0), 60.3 (SD 22.4), and 53.0 (SD 21.9) (p < 0.05). The operation time was on average 14 min shorter in the ES group than the LES group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The significantly better scores, along with shorter operation time, shorter duration of incapacity to work, and lower complication rate prove the importance of having an experienced surgeon perform complex intra-articular calcaneal fracture repairs. The extensile lateral approach is still considered the standard method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative series.

Surgically treated calcaneal joint fractures: what does postoperative computed tomography give us?

INTRODUCTION

There is currently great controversy about the ideal treatment of intraarticular calcaneal fractures. The objective of this study is to determine the usefulness of postoperative computed tomography (CT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of patients operated on in the period 2007 to 2015 in our center. Epidemiological variables, specific fracture data, surgical intervention as well as results and complications were collected. The radiological evaluation was performed using simple radiology (Böhler angle) and coronal CT (congruence of posterior subtalar joint). For the functional results we use the AOFAS hindfoot scale and the EVA scale for the level of pain.

RESULTS

We included 46 fractures in 43 patients (three bilateral). Thirty-five were male and eight female, with an average age of 42 years (18-79) and an average follow-up of 57.39 months (33-129). Preoperative CT was performed in all cases, of which 11 were Sanders ii, 23 type iii and 12 type iv. Postoperative CT was only performed in 17 cases. The subsequent subtalar reduction measured by CT was satisfactory (articular step < 2 mm) in 12 cases. The average presurgical Böhler angle was 6.45 ± 10.21 ([-22]-25) and the post-surgical angle of 20.46 ± 7.09 (4-38). Subtalar osteoarthritis developed in 19 cases (symptomatic in 12) and calcaneo-cuboid osteoarthritis in six cases (only one symptomatic). The AOFAS was 74.28 ± 18.98 (27-100) and the EVA was 4.14 ± 2.98 (2-9). A CT scan with a step of less than 2 mm was statistically significant, with a higher result on the AOFAS scale (77.17 average points) as well as lower EVA on average (2.83) (p = 0.002). Regarding the Böhler, it was statistically significant the relationship of an angle > 20° post-surgical with higher AOFAS (80.82) and lower VAS (3.18) (p = 0.001). The literature search obtained a total of 117 articles that met the search criteria, of which only 29 requested postoperative CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The indication of postoperative CT in patients operated by intraarticular calcaneal fracture is the best technique to corroborate the correct reduction of the subtalar joint surface, although it is not universally accepted, according to the literature.

Intraoperative Effect of 2D vs 3D Fluoroscopy on Quality of Reduction and Patient-Related Outcome in Calcaneal Fracture Surgery

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy is thought to be advantageous in the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of calcaneal fractures. The goal of this multicenter randomized controlled trial was to investigate the clinical effect of additional intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy on postoperative quality of reduction and fixation and patient-reported outcome as compared to conventional 2-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy in patients with intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to 3D or conventional 2D fluoroscopy during operative treatment of calcaneal fractures. Primary outcome was the difference in quality of fracture reduction and implant position on postoperative computed tomography (CT). Secondary endpoints included intraoperative corrections (prior to wound closure), complications, and revision surgery (after wound closure). Function and patient-reported outcome were evaluated after surgery and included range of motion, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires, and Kellgren-Lawrence posttraumatic osteoarthritis classification. A total of 102 calcaneal fractures were included in the study in 100 patients. Fifty fractures were randomized to the 3D group and 52 to the 2D group.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference in duration of surgery between the groups (2D 125 min vs 3D 147 min; P < .001). After 3D fluoroscopy, a total of 57 intraoperative corrections were performed in 28 patients (56%). The postoperative CT scan revealed an indication for additional revision of reduction or implant position in 69% of the 3D group vs 60% in the 2D fluoroscopy group. At 2 years, there was no difference in number of revision surgery, complications, FAOS, AOFAS score, SF-36 score, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

The use of intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy in the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures prolongs the operative procedures without improving the quality of reduction and fixation. There was no benefit of intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy with regard to postoperative complications, quality of life, functional outcome, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis.Level of Evidence: Level I, prospective randomized controlled study.