Biomechanical study of novel unilateral C1 posterior arch screws and C2 laminar screws combined with an ipsilateral crossed C1-C2 pedicle screw-rod fixation for atlantoaxial instability

Unilateral Biplanar Screw-Rod Fixation Technique for the Treatment of Odontoid Fractures in Patients with Atlantoaxial Bone or Vascular Abnormalities

OBJETIVE

This study aims to introduce the unilateral biplanar screw-rod fixation (UBSF) technique (a hybrid fixation technique: 2 sets of atlantoaxial screws were placed on the same side), which serves as a salvage method for traditional posterior atlantoaxial fixation. To summarize the indications of this technique and to assess its safety, feasibility, and clinical effectiveness in the treatment of odontoid fractures.

METHODS

Patients with odontoid fractures were enrolled according to special criteria. Surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss were documented. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. X-ray and computerized tomography scans were conducted and reviewed at 1 day, and patients were asked to return for computerized tomography reviews at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery until fracture union. Recorded and compared the Neck Visual Analog Scale and Neck Disability Index presurgery and at 1 week and 12 months postsurgery.

RESULTS

Between January 2016 and December 2022, our study enrolled 7 patients who were diagnosed with odontoid fractures accompanied by atlantoaxial bone or vascular abnormalities. All 7 patients underwent successful UBSF surgery, and no neurovascular injuries were recorded during surgery. Fracture union was observed in all patients, and the Neck Visual Analog Scale and Neck Disability Index scores improved significantly at 1 week and 12 months postoperative (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The UBSF technique has been demonstrated to be safe, feasible, and effective in treating odontoid fractures. In cases where the atlantoaxial bone or vascular structure exhibits abnormalities, it can function as a supplementary or alternative approach to the conventional posterior C1-2 fixation.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw short-segment fixation and fusion in the treatment of atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the clinical efficacy of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation and fusion in treating atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of unilateral and bilateral fixation and fusion for atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation and to explore the feasibility of the unilateral surgical procedure.

METHODS

Twenty-eight consecutive patients with atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation were included in the study from June 2013 to May 2018. They were divided into a unilateral fixation group and a bilateral fixation group (14 patients in each group with an average age of 43.6 ± 16.3 years and 51.8 ± 15.4 years, respectively). The unilateral group had a unilateral anatomical variation of the pedicle or vertebral artery, or traumatic pedicle destruction. All patients underwent atlantoaxial unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw fixation and fusion. Intraoperative blood loss and operation time were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring systems were used to evaluate pre- and postoperative occipital-neck pain and neurological function. X-ray and computerized tomography (CT) were used to assess atlantoaxial stability, the implants' position, and bone graft fusion.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 39-71 months postoperatively. Intraoperatively, no spinal cord or vertebral artery injury was observed. At the last follow-up, occipital-neck pain and neurological function in the two groups were significantly improved (P< 0.05). The X-ray films and CT showed satisfactory atlantoaxial stability, implant position, and osseous fusion in all the patients at 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation and fusion can restore atlantoaxial stability and improve occipital-neck pain and neurological function in patients with atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation. The unilateral surgical procedure can be a supplementary option for patients with unilateral abnormal atlantoaxial lesions.

The morphological classification and clinical significance of atlas vertebral artery sulcus based on computed tomography three-dimensional reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to research the morphological classification and clinical significance of vertebral artery sulcus on atlas based on CT three-dimensional reconstruction.

METHODS

Three-dimensional reconstruction images of 300 adult atlases were collected. A total of 600 atlas vertebral artery sulci were selected in this study. The parameters required for placement of C1 pedicle screw, including depth of grinding drilling (ao), width (cd), length ab), height (H), lateral wall thickness (L1), inner wall thickness (L2), medial angle (∠α), and the cephalad angle to the transverse plane of atlas pedicle (∠β), were measured.

RESULTS

CT three-dimensional reconstruction images showed that there were five types of atlas vertebral artery sulci: no process type (n = 494 cases, 82.33%), upper process type (n = 29, 4.83%), lower process type (n = 25, 4.17%), double process type (n = 19, 3.17%), and posterior ring type (33, 5.50%). One-way ANOVA tests showed that the five groups differed significantly in the parameter of ao, L2, H, ∠α and ∠β. One-way ANOVA with the LSD post hoc tests showed that the parameter ao of the group of no process type was less than that of the group of upper or lower process type (P < 0.05), and ao of the group of lower process or posterior ring type was less than that of the group of the upper type (P < 0.05). The parameter of ao of the male group was larger than that of the female group.

CONCLUSION

No process type of the atlas vertebral artery sulcus was the most common, and the medial angle and cephalad angle of the atlas pedicle in this type were the smallest. When pedicle screws are inserted, the above two angles should not be too large. Male's ao was larger than that of female's. All these findings should be considered to avoid the deviation of the nail track.

Occipitocervical instrumented fixation utilising patient-specific C2 3D-printed spinal screw trajectory guides in complex paediatric skeletal dysplasia

PURPOSE

Instability of the craniocervical junction in paediatric patients with skeletal dysplasia poses a unique set of challenges including anatomical abnormalities, poor bone quality, skeletal immaturity and associated general anaesthetic risks. Instrumented fixation provides optimal stabilisation and fusion rates. The small vertebrae make the placement of C2 pedicle screws technically demanding with low margins of error between the spinal canal and the vertebral artery.

METHODS

We describe a novel clinical strategy utilising 3D-printed spinal screw trajectory guides (3D-SSTG) for individually planned C2 pedicle and laminar screws. The technique is based on a pre-operative CT scan and does not require intraoperative CT imaging. This reduces the radiation burden to the patient and forgoes the associated time and cost. The time for model generation and sterilisation was < 24 h.

RESULTS

We describe two patients (3 and 6 years old) requiring occipitocervical instrumented fixation for cervical myelopathy secondary to Morquio syndrome with 3D-SSTGs. In the second case, bilateral laminar screw trajectories were also incorporated into the same guide due to the presence of high-riding vertebral arteries. Registration of the postoperative CT to the pre-operative imaging revealed that screws were optimally placed and accurately followed the predefined trajectory.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, we present the first clinical report of 3D-printed spinal screw trajectory guides at the craniocervical junction in paediatric patients with skeletal dysplasia. The novel combination of multiple trajectories within the same guide provides the intraoperative flexibility of potential bailout options. Future studies will better define the potential of this technology to optimise personalised non-standard screw trajectories.

[Biomechanical stability evaluation of the fixation technique for crossed rods consisting of occipital plate and C 2 bilateral lamina screws]

Objective

To evaluate the stability of the fixation technique for the crossed rods consisting of occipital plate and C ₂ bilateral lamina screws by biomechanical test.

Methods

Six fresh cervical specimens were harvested and established an atlantoaxial instability model. The models were fixed with parallel rods and crossed rods after occipital plate and C ₂ bilateral laminae screws were implanted. The specimens were tested in the following sequence: atlantoaxial instability model (unstable model group), under parallel rods fixation (parallel fixation group), and under crossed rods fixation (cross fixation group). The range of motion (ROM) of the C _0-2 segments were measured in flexion-extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right axial rotation. After the test, X-ray film was taken to observe the internal fixator position.

Results

The biomechanical test results showed that the ROMs in flexion-extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right axial rotation were significantly lower in the cross fixation group and the parallel fixation group than in the unstable model group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the cross fixation group and the parallel fixation group in flexion-extension and left/right lateral bending ( P>0.05). In the left/right axial rotation, the ROMs of the cross fixation group were significantly lower than those of the parallel fixation group ( P<0.05). After the test, the X-ray film showed the good internal fixator position.

Conclusion

The axial rotational stability of occipitocervical fusion can be further improved by crossed rods fixation when the occipital plate and C ₂ bilateral lamina screws are used.

A biomechanical comparison of crossed and parallel rod configurations in atlantoaxial internal fixation

BACKGROUND

Posterior atlantoaxial fixation with screw rod forms an approximate "II" shape or "H" increasing transverse link for better stability. In order to improve stability and in consideration of difficult placement of transverse connecting rod, possibility of inadequate bone graft, some scholars have preliminarily researched biomechanics of a novel crossed rod as an approximate "X" configuration of screw rod.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the biomechanics of the crossed and parallel rod configurations in the screw rod system for posterior atlantoaxial fixation on a cadaveric model.

METHODS

Six fresh cervical specimens were used to complete the range of motion (ROM) testing by applying pure moments of ± 2.0 nm. Following intact state and under destabilization testing, screws were implanted. The specimens were then tested in the following sequence: Group BLS + PR (C2 bilateral laminar screws + parallel rod), Group BLS + CR (C2 bilateral laminar screws + crossed rod), LPRLS + PR (C2 left pedicle screw and right laminar screw + parallel rod), LPRLS + CR (C2 left pedicle screw and right laminar screw + crossed rod), BPS + PR (C2 bilateral pedicle screws + parallel rod) and BPS + CR (C2 bilateral pedicle screws + crossed rod). The ROM of the C1-2 segments was measured in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Six surgical constructs were compared between the groups and with intact condition, respectively.

RESULTS

The six fixed modes significantly increased stability compared with both the intact and destabilization group in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation (p < .05). In extension, BPS + CR and BLS + CR showed greater stability than BLS + PR (p < .05). During flexion, the six fixation methods showed no statistical significance (p > .05). In left lateral bending, stability of the other five screw rod fixation techniques significantly increased when compared with BLS + PR (p < .05). In the right lateral bending direction, the stability of BLS + PR was worse than that of BPS + CR and BPS + PR (p < .05). In the left axial rotation, stability of BLS + CR, LPRLS + CR and BPS + CR was greater than that of BLS + PR, LPRLS + PR and BPS + PR (p < .05). In the right axial rotation, the stability of BPS + CR and BLS + CR was greater than that of BLS + PR (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The six investigated fixation methods provide sufficient biomechanical stability. The crossed rod configuration can further enhance the axial rotation stability of the screw rod system, which consists of C1 bilateral pedicle and C2 pedicle, or C2 lamina screws. The crossed rod can also improve the stability of the screw rod system made up of C1 bilateral pedicle and C2 lamina screws in lateral bending and extension. The crossed rod configuration is reliable and provides superior stability for clinical application.

Computed Tomographic Morphometric Analysis of C1 and C2 for Lamina Cross Screw Placement in Malay Ethnicity

Study Design

This is an observational study of computed tomography (CT) data.

Purpose

The C1 and C2 laminas in the Malaysian Malay population were analyzed for the feasibility of fitting 3.5-mm laminar screws in a cross configuration.

Overview of Literature

Morphometric analysis of the C1 and C2 laminas has been performed for various populations but not for the Malaysian Malay population.

Methods

A total of 330 CT cervical images were measured to establish the bicortical diameter of the C1 and C2 laminas as well as their height and length. The C1 posterior tubercle bicortical diameter and height were also determined from these images. All parameters were measured up to 0.1 mm, and statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). An independent t -test and the Pearson chi-square test were used to determine the mean difference and screw acceptance.

Results

The means of the C1 lamina measurements were 5.79±1.19 mm in diameter, 9.76±1.51 mm in height, and 20.70±1.86 mm in length. The means of the measurements of the posterior tubercle were 7.20±1.88 mm in diameter and 10.51±1.68 mm in height. The means of the C2 lamina measurements were 5.74±1.31 mm in diameter, 11.76±1.69 mm in height, and 24.96±2.56 mm in length. Overall 65.5% of C1 and 80.3% of C2 laminas are able to accept 3.5-mm screws in a cross configuration. Screw acceptability is similar between the right and left sides (p>0.05). However, males have a higher screw acceptability compared with females (p<0.05), except for the C2 left lamina.

Conclusions

It is feasible to insert a 3.5-mm screw in a cross configuration in the C1 and C2 laminas of the Malaysian Malay population, especially in males. However, a CT scan should be performed prior to the operation to determine screw acceptability and to estimate screw sizes.

Computed Tomography-Based Feasibility Study of C1 Posterior Arch Crisscrossing Screw Fixation

Study Design

Retrospective radiographic analysis.

Purpose

Posterior fixation of C1 using screws is the most popular technique among the various methods for C1 stabilization, but it places the surrounding neurovascular structures at risk. Approximately 20% of the population has an anomalous groove for the vertebral artery; therefore, salvage methods are necessary. Therefore, we analyzed the feasibility of a newer C1 posterior arch crisscrossing screw fixation technique and studied its feasibility in the Indian population on the basis of the anatomy of the C1 posterior arch.

Overview of Literature

Multiple techniques have been described for C1–C2 fixation, such as wiring techniques, interlaminar clamps, transarticular screws, screw-plate/screw-rod system fixation, and hook-screw system fixation techniques, to provide rigid C1–C2 stability. However, although C1 fixation has evolved with time, it is not complication-free.

Methods

A 100 computed tomography (CT) scans of cervical spines with 1 mm slice thickness in the axial and sagittal sections obtained were randomly selected for the evaluation. Atlantoaxial anomalies due to trauma, deformities, infections, and tumors were excluded. All the images were measured for height of the posterior tubercle, width of the posterior arch, and length of the screw, and the screw projection angle was calculated. Demographic data were collected for all the subjects.

Results

Out of the 88 CT scans analyzed, the mean height of the posterior tubercle was 7.4 mm, wherein 84.09% exceeded 7 mm, and the width of the posterior tubercle was 5.4 mm, wherein 88.6% (n=78) had posterior arch width >3.5 mm. A total of 13.6% (n=12) vertebrae were not suitable for screw placement, whereas 75% (n=66) vertebrae could accommodate 3.5×15 mm or longer screws. The screw projection angles ranged from 11.2° to 35° on the right and from 15.6° to 38.2° on the left.

Conclusions

C1 posterior arch screw fixation is a feasible and safe method because it poses little risk of injury to the surrounding neurovascular structures.

Atlantoaxial fixation using C1 posterior arch screws: feasibility study, morphometric data, and biomechanical analysis

OBJECTIVE

C1–2 is a highly mobile complex that presents unique surgical challenges to achieving biomechanical rigidity and fusion. Posterior wiring methods have been largely replaced with segmental constructs using the C1 lateral mass, C1 pedicle, C2 pars, and C2 pedicle. Modifications to reduce surgical morbidity led to the development of C2 laminar screws. The C1 posterior arch has been utilized mostly as a salvage technique, but recent data indicate that this method provides significant rigidity in flexion-extension and axial rotation. The authors performed biomechanical testing of a C1 posterior arch screw (PAS)/C2 pars screw construct, collected morphometric data from a population of 150 CT scans, and performed a feasibility study of a freehand C1 PAS technique in 45 cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

Cervical spine CT scans from 150 patients were analyzed to determine the average C1 posterior tubercle thickness and size of C1 posterior arches. Eight cadavers were used to compare biomechanical stability of intact specimens, C1 lateral mass/C2 pars screw, and C1 PAS/C2 pars screw constructs. Paired comparisons were made using repeated-measures ANOVA and Holm-Sidak tests. Forty-five cadaveric specimens were used to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the C1 PAS freehand technique.

RESULTS

Morphometric data showed the average craniocaudal thickness of the C1 posterior tubercle was 12.3 ± 1.94 mm. Eight percent (12/150) of cases showed thin posterior tubercles or midline defects. Average posterior arch thickness was 6.1 ± 1.1 mm and right and left average posterior arch length was 28.7 mm ± 2.53 mm and 28.9 ± 2.29 mm, respectively. Biomechanical testing demonstrated C1 lateral mass/C2 pars and C1 PAS/C2 pars constructs significantly reduced motion in flexion-extension and axial rotation compared with intact specimens (p < 0.05). The C1 lateral mass/C2 pars screw construct provided significant rigidity in lateral bending (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two constructs in flexion-extension, lateral bending, or axial rotation. Of the C1 posterior arches, 91.3% were successfully cannulated using a freehand technique with a low incidence of cortical breach (4.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This biomechanical analysis indicates equivalent stability of the C1 PAS/C2 pars screw construct compared with a traditional C1 lateral mass/C2 pars screw construct. Both provide significant rigidity in flexion-extension and axial rotation. Feasibility testing in 45 cadaveric specimens indicates a high degree of accuracy with low incidence of cortical breach. These findings are supported by a separate radiographic morphometric analysis.

Novel unilateral C1 double screw and ipsilateral C2 pedicle screw placement combined with contralateral laminar screw-rod fixation for atlantoaxial instability

PURPOSE

To investigate the anatomical and biomechanical feasibility of the unilateral C1 double screw [pedicle screw (PS) + lateral mass screw (LMS)] and ipsilateral C2 PS combined with contralateral C2 laminar screw (LS)-rod fixation for atlantoaxial instability by comparison with traditional posterior fixation methods.

METHODS

Fifteen sets of complete dry bony specimens of atlas were used for morphometric analysis. The working length, width and thickness of the C1 PSs and LMSs were manually measured. Ten fresh-frozen cervical spines (C0-C7) were used to complete the range of motion (ROM) testing in their intact condition, under destabilization and after stabilization by the following procedures: unilateral C1-C2 PS rod fixation (Group A), bilateral C1-C2 PS rod fixation (Group B), and unilateral C1 double screw and ipsilateral C2 PS combined with contralateral C2 LS rod fixation (Group C).

RESULTS

The working thickness of the C1 PS was ≤ 3.5 mm in only one (1/15 = 6.7%) specimen. The other parameters were > 3.5 mm in all specimens. In the ROM test, all fixation groups showed significantly reduced flexibility in all directions compared with both the intact and destabilization groups. Further, Groups B and C showed better stability in all directions than Group A. However, no significant differences were observed between Groups B and C.

CONCLUSION

The C1 unilateral lateral mass could mostly contain two screws(PS + LMS) with diameters ≤ 3.5 mm. The novel technique of unilateral C1 double screw and ipsilateral C2 PS combined with contralateral C2 LS rod fixation provided better stability than unilateral PS rod fixation and similar as bilateral PS rod fixation. Therefore, it is a feasible salvage method that provides a new insight into atlantoaxial instability. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.