FDG-PET/CT for differentiating between aseptic and septic delayed union in the lower extremity

Inguinal draining-lymph node in 18F-FDG PET/CT images could be a new indicator for the diagnosis of fracture-related infection in the lower extremities

Purpose

The imaging diagnosis of fracture-related infection is often challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of fracture-related infection (FRI) with internal fixation after orthopedic surgery in lower extremities.

Methods

A total of 254 consecutive patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scans with suspected FRI with internal fixation in lower extremities were retrospectively investigated 18F-FDG PET/CT images were semiquantitatively evaluated with multiple metabolic parameters. Additionally, morphological information of the inguinal draining lymph nodes (DLN) with the highest SUV value was also collected and analyzed.

Results

Patients were divided into two groups according to final diagnosis: the infected (N=197) and the non-infected group (N=57). The differences in the inguinal DLN-related parameters, including the long diameter, short diameter, maximum cross-sectional area, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic volume (MV) 60%, MV70%, MV80%, total lesional glycolysis (TLG) 60%, TLG70%, TLG80%, and the infection suspected area related parameters, including SUVmax, MV25%, MV30%, MV35%, MV40%, MV50%, and TLG70%, between the two groups were statistically significant. We then compared the highest area under the curves (AUCs) among the morphological parameters of DLN, metabolic parameters of DLN, and metabolic parameters of the suspected infection area. The result demonstrated that SUVmax of the inguinal DLN showed the best diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.939 (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Semiquantitative analysis (especially SUVmax) of the inguinal DLN in 18F-FDG PET/CT images could be a promising method for the diagnosis of suspected FRI with internal fixation after orthopedic surgery in lower extremities.

Research Status and Hotspots of Chronic Osteomyelitis: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis (COM) is extremely challenging for physicians and patients. It is of great significance to explore the research status, development trend and future research hotspots in the field of COM to promote the development of this field. This study is aimed to explore the global research status of COM and predict its future research hotspots based on bibliometric and visualized analysis.

METHODS

Web of Science core collection database was used to search the related literature of COM from 1994 to 2020. All data were imported into Microsoft Excel 2019 for collation. Additionally, the literature quality of countries, authors, journals, and institutions is evaluated. The VOS viewer software was used for conducting co-analysis, co-citation analysis, and keyword co-occurrence analysis of literature to analyze the global status and predict the future hotspots of the COM field.

RESULTS

A total of 726 articles were retrieved in this study. The number of global publications shows a trend of wave growth, but the increase is not significant. It is expected that the number of COM articles will remain at more than 50 per year in the next decade. The COM literature published in the United States (Publications = 160, H index = 37, average citations per item = 28.63) is of the highest quality. Girschick HJ (Publications = 16, H index = 14, average citations per item = 52.25) is the most contributed scholar in the field of COM. UNIV IOWA (Publications = 15, H index = 11, average citations per item = 57.27) and UNIV WURZBURG (Publications = 18, H index = 15, average citations per item = 47.5) are influential institutions in the field of COM. The results of co-occurrence analysis show that the field of COM can be roughly divided into the following five modules: COM surgical research, COM basic research, COM diagnosis-related research, chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO)-related research, risk factors of COM. Risk factors of COM are the module with the highest concentration of hot words.

CONCLUSION

COM-related research will continue to develop further in the next decade. The diagnosis research and risk factors of COM are the most popular research modules in recent years. Some controversial or troubled issues including the efficacy of perforator flap and fascia flap covering soft tissue, searching exclusive detection methods for the diagnosis of COM and bisphosphonates and biological agents in the treatment of CRMO may lead to the development of the COM field.

Hybrid imaging of complicating osteomyelitis in the peripheral skeleton

Diagnosing complicating osteomyelitis (COM) is clinically challenging. Laboratory tests are of limited utility, and other than isolation of the offending organism, diagnostic imaging tests are of paramount importance. Nuclear Medicine techniques play an important role in noninvasive evaluation of osteomyelitis, using both single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals. It is well-known that those conventional imaging modalities are not performing well in the distinction between soft-tissue and deep bone infection due to the lack of anatomical information. These difficulties have been overcome, to a great extent, with the introduction of in-line SPECT-CT and PET-CT systems which have revolutionized the field of diagnostic medical imaging. Hybrid imaging is especially useful in sites of suspected COM with underlying structural bone alterations. The first clinical studies with these integrated hybrid machines in the field of COM, including metallic implants imaging, are highly promising. In summary, WBC/AGA SPECT-CT and FDG-PET-CT seem to be the most accurate hybrid imaging modality for COM of the peripheral bone. However, there are still false positives, especially in aseptic tibial nonunions and/or metallic implants, as well as in the immediate postoperative setting. Furthermore, there is a lack of well-designed large multicentre prospective studies. Hopefully, in the future, the complementary use of morphological and functional hybrid imaging modalities may overcome some of the challenges faced in the assessment of COM.

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of respective nuclear imaging for suspected fracture-related infection: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of available nuclear imaging modalities in the diagnosis of suspected fracture-related infection (FRI).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to retrieve diagnostic accuracy studies in which FRI was investigated using different nuclear imaging modalities. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios were constructed using the bivariate meta-analysis framework, while the superior index was pooled using Bayesian network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

22 eligible studies (1,565 patients) were included in the quantitative analysis. A broad overlapping confidence interval (CI) of pooled sensitivity was observed among bone scintigraphy (0.94; 95% CI 0.85-0.98), ¹⁸F-FDG PET and PET/CT (0.91; 95% CI 0.85-0.94) and leukocyte scintigraphy (0.86; 95% CI 0.53-0.97). Bone scintigraphy (0.34; 95% CI 0.08-0.75) seemed to be less specific than all the other modalities, while leukocyte scintigraphy (0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.98) was notably more specific than ¹⁸F-FDG PET and PET/CT (0.78; 95% CI 0.69-0.85). Based on the superiority index, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (3.78; 95% CI 0.14-11.00), ¹⁸F-FDG PET (2.98; 95% CI 0.14-9.00) and leukocyte scintigraphy (1.51; 95% CI 0.11-7.00) all achieved high accuracy in detecting FRI.

CONCLUSION

Bone scintigraphy is a highly sensitive nuclear imaging technique but lacks the specificity needed to unequivocally differentiate among various conditions suspected to be FRI. Leukocyte scintigraphy, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and PET all present good satisfactory accuracy for the diagnosis of FRI, but their costs should be further reduced to promote their wide application.

Radiological evaluation of postoperative osteomyelitis in long bones: Which is the best tool?

Currently, definitive diagnosis of osteomyelitis involves a combination of clinical signs, symptoms, laboratory tests, imaging modalities and cultures from blood, joint or body fluid. Imaging plays a critical role in the osteomyelitis diagnosis. Each of these tests incurs an additional cost to the patient or healthcare system and their use varies according to the preference of the healthcare professional and the healthcare setup. Imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis and management of postoperative long bone osteomyelitis, with the aim of reducing long-term complications such as non-union, amputation and pathological fractures. In this review, we discuss the key findings on different radiological modalities and correlate them with disease pathophysiology. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging is the best available imaging modality due to its sensitivity in detecting early signs of long bone osteomyelitis and high soft tissue resolution. Other modalities such as radio-nuclear medicine, computed tomography and ultrasound have been proved to be useful in different clinical scenarios as described in this narrative review.

Imaging tests for the detection of osteomyelitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Osteomyelitis is an infection of the bone. Medical imaging tests, such as radiography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), are often used to diagnose osteomyelitis.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy, inter-rater reliability and implementation of imaging tests to diagnose osteomyelitis.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic review of imaging tests to diagnose osteomyelitis. We searched MEDLINE and other databases from inception to July 2018.

REVIEW METHODS

Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2 [quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (version 2)]. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using bivariate regression models. Imaging tests were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the location and nature of the suspected osteomyelitis. Studies of children, inter-rater reliability and implementation outcomes were synthesised narratively.

RESULTS

Eighty-one studies were included (diagnostic accuracy: 77 studies; inter-rater reliability: 11 studies; implementation: one study; some studies were included in two reviews). One-quarter of diagnostic accuracy studies were rated as being at a high risk of bias. In adults, MRI had high diagnostic accuracy [95.6% sensitivity, 95% confidence interval (CI) 92.4% to 97.5%; 80.7% specificity, 95% CI 70.8% to 87.8%]. PET also had high accuracy (85.1% sensitivity, 95% CI 71.5% to 92.9%; 92.8% specificity, 95% CI 83.0% to 97.1%), as did SPECT (95.1% sensitivity, 95% CI 87.8% to 98.1%; 82.0% specificity, 95% CI 61.5% to 92.8%). There was similar diagnostic performance with MRI, PET and SPECT. Scintigraphy (83.6% sensitivity, 95% CI 71.8% to 91.1%; 70.6% specificity, 57.7% to 80.8%), computed tomography (69.7% sensitivity, 95% CI 40.1% to 88.7%; 90.2% specificity, 95% CI 57.6% to 98.4%) and radiography (70.4% sensitivity, 95% CI 61.6% to 77.8%; 81.5% specificity, 95% CI 69.6% to 89.5%) all had generally inferior diagnostic accuracy. Technetium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime white blood cell scintigraphy (87.3% sensitivity, 95% CI 75.1% to 94.0%; 94.7% specificity, 95% CI 84.9% to 98.3%) had higher diagnostic accuracy, similar to that of PET or MRI. There was no evidence that diagnostic accuracy varied by scan location or cause of osteomyelitis, although data on many scan locations were limited. Diagnostic accuracy in diabetic foot patients was similar to the overall results. Only three studies in children were identified; results were too limited to draw any conclusions. Eleven studies evaluated inter-rater reliability. MRI had acceptable inter-rater reliability. We found only one study on test implementation and no evidence on patient preferences or cost-effectiveness of imaging tests for osteomyelitis.

LIMITATIONS

Most studies included < 50 participants and were poorly reported. There was limited evidence for children, ultrasonography and on clinical factors other than diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteomyelitis is reliably diagnosed by MRI, PET and SPECT. No clear reason to prefer one test over the other in terms of diagnostic accuracy was identified. The wider availability of MRI machines, and the fact that MRI does not expose patients to harmful ionising radiation, may mean that MRI is preferable in most cases. Diagnostic accuracy does not appear to vary with the potential cause of osteomyelitis or with the body part scanned. Considerable uncertainty remains over the diagnostic accuracy of imaging tests in children. Studies of diagnostic accuracy in children, particularly using MRI and ultrasound, are needed.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017068511.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 61. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

The role of external fixation in the management of infected avascular necrosis after traumatic talus fractures

PURPOSE

Avascular necrosis (AVN) after fractures of the talus is a distinct and challenging clinical entity that is associated with poor outcomes. Although several articles are published on the management of posttraumatic AVN of the talus, very little is known about the management of infected AVN after talus fractures. Therefore, three cases of infected AVN were treated successfully by extensive debridement, external fixation and arthrodesis.

METHODS

Three cases of infected AVN of the talus were encountered after a mean of 3 months (range 2-6 months) after initial reconstructive surgery. Suspected infection was confirmed by positron emission tomography scan (PET-CT). Management involved extensive debridement, PMMA cement if necessary and final fusion using medial external fixator, accompanied by culture guided antibiotics. Functional outcome was assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society hindfoot score (AOFAS). Quality of life (QOL) was measured by the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D).

RESULTS

After a mean follow up of 24 months (range 13-29), FFI index scores ranged from poor to good (23, 50, 56) with similar AOFAS scores indicating poor to fair functional outcome (38, 41, 71). The EQ-5D score was 0.78. Overall patient satisfaction was high with a mean VAS of 8.3 (range 8-9).

CONCLUSION

Infected talar AVN is a rare condition associated with severe long-term morbidity in term of joint function. The authors recommend extensive debridement and arthrodesis by means of external fixation, followed by post-operative culture-guided antibiotics for the treatment of infected avascular necrosis of traumatic talar fractures. Shared decision-making and expectation management are of crucial importance and may lead to high patient satisfaction despite low functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Retrospective case series.

Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infection: Current Concepts and Recommendations

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a severe complication after bone injury and can pose a serious diagnostic challenge. Overall, there is a limited amount of scientific evidence regarding diagnostic criteria for FRI. For this reason, the AO Foundation and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society proposed a consensus definition for FRI to standardize the diagnostic criteria and improve the quality of patient care and applicability of future studies regarding this condition. The aim of this article was to summarize the available evidence and provide recommendations for the diagnosis of FRI. For this purpose, the FRI consensus definition will be discussed together with a proposal for an update based on the available evidence relating to the diagnostic value of clinical parameters, serum inflammatory markers, imaging modalities, tissue and sonication fluid sampling, molecular biology techniques, and histopathological examination. Second, recommendations on microbiology specimen sampling and laboratory operating procedures relevant to FRI will be provided. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Diagnostic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The optimal diagnostic imaging strategy for fracture-related infection (FRI) remains to be established. In this prospective study, the three commonly used advanced imaging techniques for diagnosing FRI will be compared. Primary endpoints are (1) determining the overall diagnostic performances of white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with suspected FRI and (2) establishing the most accurate imaging strategy for diagnosing FRI.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a non-randomised, partially blinded, prospective cohort study involving two level 1 trauma centres in The Netherlands. All adult patients who require advanced medical imaging for suspected FRI are eligible for inclusion. Patients will undergo all three investigational imaging procedures (WBC scintigraphy, FDG-PET and MRI) within a time frame of 14 days after inclusion. The reference standard will be the result of at least five intraoperative sampled microbiology cultures, or, in case of no surgery, the clinical presence or absence of infection at 1 year follow-up. Initially, the results of all three imaging modalities will be available to the treating team as per local protocol. At a later time point, all scans will be centrally reassessed by nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists who are blinded for the identity of the patients and their clinical outcome. The discriminative ability of the imaging modalities will be quantified by several measures of diagnostic accuracy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval of the study by the Institutional Review Board has been obtained prior to the start of this study. The results of this trial will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The IFI trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR7490).

Clinical application of dual-phase F-18 sodium-fluoride bone PET/CT for diagnosing surgical site infection following orthopedic surgery

F-18 sodium-fluoride (NaF) bone positron emission tomography (PET/CT) has been used for diagnosing various bone and joint diseases, and, with using dual-phase scan protocol, it could give the same information obtained by the 3-phase bone scintigraphy. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of dual-phase F-18 NaF bone PET/CT in detecting surgical site infection after orthopedic surgery.Twenty-three patients who underwent dual-phase F-18 NaF bone PET/CT under clinical suspicion of surgical site infection of the bone following orthopedic surgery were enrolled in this study. Dual-phase bone PET/CT consisted of an early phase scan performed immediately after radiotracer injection and a conventional bone-phase scan. All dual-phase PET/CT images were visually assessed, and, for quantitative analysis, 6 parameters of dual-phase PET/CT (lesion-to-blood pool uptake ratio, lesion-to-bone uptake ratio, and lesion-to-muscle uptake ratio on both early phase and bone-phase scans) were measured.Surgical site infection was diagnosed in 14 patients of the 23 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of visual analysis of dual-phase F-18 NaF bone PET/CT for diagnosing surgical site infection of the bone were 92.9%, 100.0%, and 95.7%, respectively. Among the 6 parameters, the lesion-to-blood pool uptake ratio on early phase scan showed the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value (0.857, 95% confidence interval, 0.649-0.966), with the cut-off value of 0.88 showing sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.7%, 88.9%, and 87.0%, respectively.Our study showed the high diagnostic ability of dual-phase F-18 NaF bone PET/CT for detecting surgical site infection following orthopedic surgery. Further studies are needed to compare the diagnostic ability of dual-phase bone PET/CT with other imaging modalities.

New Imaging, Diagnostic, and Assessment Techniques in Orthopedic Trauma

This article examines new imaging, diagnostic, and assessment techniques that may affect the care of patients with orthopedic trauma and/or infection. Three-dimensional imaging has assisted in fracture assessment preoperatively, whereas improvement in C-arm technology has allowed real-time evaluation of implant placement and periarticular reduction before leaving the operating room. Advances in imaging techniques have allowed earlier and more accurate diagnosis of nonunion and infection. Innovations in bacteriologic testing have improved the sensitivity and specificity of perioperative and peri-implant infections. It is critical that surgeons remain up to date on the options available for optimal patient care.

The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing fracture-related infections

Purpose

¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) is frequently used to diagnose fracture-related infections (FRIs), but its diagnostic performance in this field is still unknown. The aims of this study were: (1) to assess the diagnostic performance of qualitative assessment of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans in diagnosing FRI, (2) to establish the diagnostic performance of standardized uptake values (SUVs) extracted from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans and to determine their associated optimal cut-off values, and (3) to identify variables that predict a false-positive (FP) or false-negative (FN) ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT result.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included all patients with suspected FRI undergoing ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT between 2011 and 2017 in two level-1 trauma centres. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently reassessed all ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans. The reference standard consisted of the result of at least two deep, representative microbiological cultures or the presence/absence of clinical confirmatory signs of FRI (AO/EBJIS consensus definition) during a follow-up of at least 6 months. Diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated. Additionally, SUVs were measured on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans. Volumes of interest were drawn around the suspected and corresponding contralateral areas to obtain absolute values and ratios between suspected and contralateral areas. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was also performed to identify the most important predictor(s) of FP or FN ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT results.

Results

The study included 156 ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans in 135 patients. Qualitative assessment of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans showed a sensitivity of 0.89, specificity of 0.80, PPV of 0.74, NPV of 0.91 and diagnostic accuracy of 0.83. SUVs on their own resulted in lower diagnostic performance, but combining them with qualitative assessments yielded an AUC of 0.89 compared to an AUC of 0.84 when considering only the qualitative assessment results (p = 0.007). ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT performed <1 month after surgery was found to be the independent variable with the highest predictive value for a false test result, with an absolute risk of 46% (95% CI 27–66%), compared with 7% (95% CI 4–12%) in patients with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT performed 1–6 months after surgery.

Conclusion

Qualitative assessment of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans had a diagnostic accuracy of 0.83 and an excellent NPV of 0.91 in diagnosing FRI. Adding SUV measurements to qualitative assessment provided additional accuracy in comparison to qualitative assessment alone. An interval between surgery and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT of <1 month was associated with a sharp increase in false test results.