Effects of tibial baseplate shape on rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: three-dimensional surgical simulation using osteoarthritis knees

Comparison of the coverage and rotation of asymmetrical and symmetrical tibial components: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An optimized fit of the tibial component to the resection platform and correct rotational alignment are critical for successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there remains controversy regarding the superiority of symmetric tibial component versus asymmetric tibial component. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence for comparing the coverage and rotation of asymmetrical and symmetrical tibial component.

METHODS

We searched potentially relevant studies form PubMed, Web of science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), up to 1 March 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles were identified. Compared to symmetric tibial component, asymmetric tibial component increased the coverage of the proximal tibial cut surface (MD, -2.87; 95%CI, -3.45 to -2.28; P < 0.00001), improved the prevalence of tibial baseplate underhang (OR, 0.16; 95%CI, 0.07 to 0.33; P < 0.00001) and malrotation (OR, 0.13; 95%CI, 0.02 to 0.90; P = 0.04), and reduced the degree of tibial component rotation (MD, -3.11; 95%CI, -5.76 to -0.47; P = 0.02). But there was no statistical significance for improving tibial baseplate overhang (OR, 0.58; 95%CI, 0.08 to 3.97; P = 0.58). Additionally, no revision had occurred for the two tibial components in the included studies.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence shows asymmetric tibial component offer advantages in terms of coverage and rotation compared with symmetric tibial component in TKA.

The use of an anatomic tibial baseplate in total knee arthroplasty optimizes coverage without compromising rotation: A propensity-matched evaluation

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were (1) to compare in vivo coverage and rotational alignment of 2 tibial component designs: anatomic and symmetrical; and (2) to determine if coronal deformity and tibial torsion were related to rotation and coverage.

METHODS

Postoperative CT scans of 200 propensity score-matched patients who underwent TKA with either an anatomic (ATC) or symmetrical tibia component (STC) were analyzed. Rotation was measured using four axes: surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), Berger's protocol, medio-lateral (ML) axis and posterior borders of the tibial plateau, while coverage was assessed by measuring fit and surface area. The relationship between coronal deformity, tibial torsion, rotation, and coverage was investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, STCs had more internal rotation when measured using the sTEA (-0.6° ± 3.5 vs 0.5° ± 3.6, p = 0.03), Berger's protocol (-21.6° ± 7.1 vs -17.9° ± 6.2, p = 0.000) and ML axes (2.9° ± 3.9 vs 8.1° ± 5.1, p = 0.000) compared to ATCs. STCs also had more posteromedial underhang (-3.3 mm ± 2.4 mm vs -1.7 mm ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.000) but smaller change in tibial torsion postoperatively (-18.4° ± 9.9° vs -13.1° ± 9.4°, p = 0.000). Tibial torsion was more pronounced in valgus than varus knees both preoperative (-25.4° ± 6.5° vs -20.2° ± 9.3°, p = 0.02) and postoperatively (-19.7° ± 7.2° vs -14.7° ± 10.3°, p = 0.04), but there was no difference in postoperative tibial torsion between ATCs and STCs in this subgroup.

CONCLUSION

The use of an anatomic tibial baseplate optimizes coverage by reducing posterolateral overhang and posteromedial underhang. It also achieved better rotational profiles compared to STCs. However, it resulted in a larger change in tibial torsion after TKA.

Favorable outcomes of posterior cruciate-stabilized inserts over ultracongruent inserts in total knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

Posterior cruciate-stabilized (PS) and ultracongruent (UC) inserts are used during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but superiority in gaining postoperative knee flexion and functionality remains contested. Therefore, this study compared postoperative outcomes between PS and UC inserts.

METHODS

A retrospective review evaluated unilateral or bilateral TKAs with PS or UC inserts from August 2011 to March 2020. Nonparametric statistics were performed to evaluate differences in patient demographics, pre- and postknee flexion and Knee Society Knee (KSS-K) and Function Score (KSS-F). Univariate and multivariable regressions were performed to evaluate the influence on postoperative knee flexion ≥ 120°, presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Patient demographics were not significantly different between the 577 PS and 399 UC knees evaluated. Postoperatively, a larger proportion of UC knees demonstrated knee flexion < 120° (36.0% vs. 18.6%, p < 0.001) and lower KSS-K (91.0 ± 8.7 vs. 91.6 ± 10.3, p < 0.001) and KSS-F (76.8 ± 21.6 vs. 79.9 ± 21.6, p = 0.007) than the PS group. The PS group had greater improvement in flexion angle (4.9° ± 14.9° vs. 1.0° ± 15.6°, p < 0.001) and KSS-F (27.3 ± 23.3 vs. 23.1 ± 25.3, p = 0.007) as compared to that of UC patients. Patients with preoperative flexion < 120° (OR 2.787, CI 2.066-3.761; p < 0.001), higher body mass index (OR 1.033, CI 1.006-1.061; p = 0.017) and UC insert (OR 2.461, CI 1.832-3.307; p < 0.001) were less likely to achieve flexion ≥ 120°.

CONCLUSION

Favorable clinical and functional outcomes were noted in the PS group as compared to UC inserts in TKA. The greater improvement in overall knee flexion may suggest the PS insert may be especially appropriate for patients with lower preoperative range of motion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study.

Gender differences affect the location of the patellar tendon attachment site for tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

This study was carried out to investigate the accuracy of referring different locations of the patellar tendon attachment site and the geometrical center of the osteotomy surface for tibial rotational alignment and observe the influences of gender differences on the results.

Methods

Computed tomography scans of 135 osteoarthritis patients (82 females and 53 males) with varus deformity was obtained to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) models preoperatively. The medial boundary, medial one-sixth, and medial one-third of the patellar tendon attachment site were marked on the tibia. These points were projected on the tibial osteotomy plane and connected to the geometrical center (GC) of the osteotomy plane or the middle of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) to construct six tibial rotational axes (Akagi line, MBPT, MSPT1, MSPT2, MTPT1 and MTPT2). The mismatch angle between the vertical line of the SEA projected on the proximal tibial osteotomy surface and six different reference axes was measured. In additional, the effect of gender differences on rotational alignment for tibial component were assessed.

Results

Relative to the SEA, rotational mismatch angles were − 1.8° ± 5.1° (Akagi line), − 2.5° ± 5.3° (MBPT), 2.8° ± 5.3° (MSPT1), 4.5° ± 5.4° (MSPT2), 7.3° ± 5.4° (MTPT1), and 11.6° ± 5.8° (MTPT2) for different tibial rotational axes in all patients. All measurements differed significantly between the male and female. The tibial rotational axes with the least mean absolute deviation for the female or male were Akagi line or MSPT, respectively. There was no significant difference in whether the GC of the osteotomy surface or the midpoint of PCL termination was chosen as the posterior anatomical landmark when the medial boundary or medial one-sixth point of the patellar tendon attachment site was selected as the anterior anatomical landmark.

Conclusion

When referring patellar tendon attachment site as anterior anatomical landmarks for tibial rotational alignment, the influence of gender difference on the accuracy needs to be taken into account. The geometric center of the tibial osteotomy plane can be used as a substitute for the middle of the PCL termination when reference the medial boundary or medial one-sixth of the patellar tendon attachment site.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03248-5.

[Accuracy of patellar tendon at the attachment as anatomic landmark for rotational alignment of tibial component]

Objective

To investigate the accuracy of the modified Akagi line which referenced the patellar tendon at the attachment and the geometrical center point of the tibial osteotomy surface for tibial rotational alignment.

Methods

Between July 2021 and December 2021, 72 patients who underwent three-dimension (3D) CT for varus osteoarthritis knees were enrolled. Among 72 patients, 18 were male and 54 were female with a mean age of 64.9 years (range, 47-84 years). The preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle ranged from 0° to 26°, with a mean of 9.3°. CT images were imported into Mimics 21.0 medical image control system to establish 3D models of the knees. The prominent point of lateral epicondyle and the medial epicondylar sulcus were identified in femoral 3D models to construct the surgical transepicondylar axis and the vertical line of its projection [anteroposterior (AP) axis]. In tibial 3D models, the patellar tendon at the attachment was used as anatomical landmarks to construct rotational alignment for tibial component, including the line connecting the medial border of the patellar tendon at the attachment (C) and the middle (O) of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion (Akagi line), the line connecting the point C and the geometric center (GC) of the tibial osteotomy plane [medial border axis of the patellar tendon (MBPT)], the line connecting the medial sixth point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and the point GC [medial sixth axis of the patellar tendon (MSPT)], the line connecting the medial third point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and point O [medial third axis of the patellar tendon 1 (MTPT1)], and the line connecting the medial third point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and point GC [medial third axis of the patellar tendon 2 (MTPT2)]. The angles between the five reference axes and the AP axis were measured, and the distribution of the rotational mismatch angles with the AP axis was counted (≤3°, 3°-5°, 5°-10°, and >10°).

Results

Relative to the AP axis, the Akagi line and MBPT were internally rotated (1.6±5.9)° and (2.4±6.9)°, respectively, while MSPT, MTPT1, and MTPT2 were externally rotated (5.4±6.6)°, (7.0±5.8)°, and (11.9±6.6)°, respectively. There were significant differences in the rotational mismatch angle and its distribution between reference axes and the AP axis ( F=68.937, P<0.001; χ 2=248.144, P<0.001). The difference between Akagi line and MBPT showed no significant difference ( P=0.067), and the differences between Akagi line and MSPT, MTPT1, MTPT2 were significant ( P<0.012 5).

Conclusion

When the position of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion can not be accurately identified on total knee arthroplasty, MBPT can be used as the modified Akagi line in reference to the geometrical center point of the tibial osteotomy surface to construct a reliable rotational alignment of the tibial component.

Study on the morphological characteristics and rotational alignment axis of placement plane of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty for hemophilia-related knee arthritis

Background

Abnormal epiphyseal growth plate development of the proximal tibia in hemophilia patients leads to notable morphological changes in the mature knee joint. This study aimed to compare the morphological characteristics of tibial component placement cut surface in patients with hemophilic arthritis (HA) and osteoarthritis (OA) and to determine the tibial component rotational alignment axis’ best position for HA patients.

Methods

Preoperative computed tomography scans of 40 OA and 40 HA patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty were evaluated using a three-dimensional (3D) software. The tibial component’s placement morphological parameters were measured. The tibial component’s rotational mismatch angles were evaluated, and the most appropriate 0°AP axis position for HA patients was investigated.

Results

In the two groups, the morphology was significantly different in some of the parameters (p < 0.05). The tibial component rotational mismatch angles were significantly different between both groups (p < 0.05). The medial 9.26° of the medial 1/3 of the patellar tendon was the point through which 0°AP axis passed for the HA patients. Similarly, the medial 13.02° of the medial 1/3 of the tibial tubercle was also the point through which the 0°AP axis passed.

Conclusions

The ratio of the anteroposterior length to the geometric transverse length of the placement section of the tibial component in HA patients was smaller than that in OA patients. The medial 9.26° of the medial 1/3 of the patellar tendon or the medial 13.02° of the medial 1/3 of the tibial tubercle seem to be an ideal reference position of the rotational alignment axis of the tibial component for HA patients.

Low-Degree Tibial Slope Angle Prevents Component Overhang by Enlarging the Lateral Plateau Surface Area in Total Knee Arthroplasty

This study aimed to investigate whether overhang or underhang around the tibial component that occurs during the placement of tibial baseplates was affected by different slope angles of the tibial plateau and determine the changes in the lateral and medial plateau diameters while changing the slope angle in total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional tibia models were reconstructed using the computed tomography scans of 120 tibial dry bones. Tibial plateau slope cuts were performed with 9, 7, 5, 3, and 0 degrees of slope angles 2-mm below the subchondral bone in the deepest point of the medial plateau. Total, lateral, and medial tibial plateau areas and overhang/underhang rates were measured at each cut level. Digital implantations of the asymmetric and symmetric tibial baseplates were made on the tibial plateau with each slope angles. Following the implantations, the slope angle that prevents overhang or underhang at the bone border and the slope angle that has more surface area was identified. A significant increase was noted in the total tibial surface area, lateral plateau surface area, and lateral anteroposterior distance, whereas the slope cut angles were changed from 9 to 0 degrees in both gender groups. It was found that the amount of posteromedial underhang and posterolateral overhang increased in both the asymmetric and symmetric tibial baseplates when the slope angle was changed from 0 to 9 degrees. Although the mediolateral diameter did not change after the proximal tibia cuts at different slope angles, the surface area and anteroposterior diameter of the lateral plateau could change, leading to increased lateral plateau area. Although prosthesis designs are highly compatible with the tibial surface area, it should be noted that the component overhangs, especially beyond the posterolateral edge, it can be prevented by changing the slope cut angle in males and females.

Biomechanical effect of anatomical tibial component design on load distribution of medial proximal tibial bone in total knee arthroplasty : finite element analysis indicating anatomical design prevents stress-shielding

Aims

This study aimed to identify the effect of anatomical tibial component (ATC) design on load distribution in the periprosthetic tibial bone of Koreans using finite element analysis (FEA).

Methods

3D finite element models of 30 tibiae in Korean women were created. A symmetric tibial component (STC, NexGen LPS-Flex) and an ATC (Persona) were used in surgical simulation. We compared the FEA measurements (von Mises stress and principal strains) around the stem tip and in the medial half of the proximal tibial bone, as well as the distance from the distal stem tip to the shortest anteromedial cortical bone. Correlations between this distance and FEA measurements were then analyzed.

Results

The distance from the distal stem tip to the shortest cortical bone showed no statistically significant difference between implants. However, the peak von Mises stress around the distal stem tip was higher with STC than with ATC. In the medial half of the proximal tibial bone: 1) the mean von Mises stress, maximum principal strain, and minimum principal strain were higher with ATC; 2) ATC showed a positive correlation between the distance and mean von Mises stress; 3) ATC showed a negative correlation between the distance and mean minimum principal strain; and 4) STC showed no correlation between the distance and mean measurements.

Conclusion

Implant design affects the load distribution on the periprosthetic tibial bone, and ATC can be more advantageous in preventing stress-shielding than STC. However, under certain circumstances with short distances, the advantage of ATC may be offset.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(5):252–259.

[Application and research progress of robotic-arm in total knee arthroplasty]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the application and research progress of robotic-arm in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Relevant literature at home and abroad was extensively reviewed to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA).

RESULTS

Accurate reconstruction of lower extremity alignment and rotation alignment, accurate osteotomy and implant prosthesis in TKA are very important to improve the effectiveness and prolong the life of the prosthesis. Traditional TKA deviations occur in key links such as osteotomy due to operator's operation. RATKA solves the above problems to a certain extent and can assist accurate osteotomy and implant prosthesis, and protect the soft tissues around the knee joint. Patients' satisfaction after RATKA is high, and the operator's learning curve is shorter, which improves the efficiency of the operation. But it also has disadvantages such as prolonged operation time, increased complications and medical costs.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary clinical application studies have shown that RATKA has satisfactory effectiveness, but its definite advantages compared with traditional TKA need to be confirmed by a large number of randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-up.

Axial But Not Sagittal Hinge Axis Affects Posterior Tibial Slope in Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A 3-Dimensional Surgical Simulation Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this 3-dimensional (3D) surgical simulation study was to investigate the effects of axial and sagittal hinge axes (hinge axes in the axial and sagittal planes) on medial and lateral posterior tibial slope (PTS) in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO), and evaluate the quantitative relationship between hinge axis and PTS change.

METHODS

Preoperative computed tomography data from patients with varus knee deformity were collected. A standard hinge axis (0°) and 12 different hinge axes (6 axial hinge axes and 6 sagittal hinge axes: ±10°, ±20°, and ±30°) were defined in a 3D surgical simulation of OWHTO using a bone model. The differences between before and after simulation surgery in medial and lateral PTS, medial proximal tibial angle, opening gap, and opening wedge angle were measured.

RESULTS

In total, 93 varus knees in 93 patients were included for study. Compared with the standard hinge axis, axial hinge axis significantly affected medial and lateral PTS (P < .001). In contrast, sagittal hinge axis had no significant effect on medial and lateral PTS (P > .05). Every 10° change in axial hinge axis with a mean coronal valgus correction of 10° might result in approximately 1.6° of alteration in PTS. Stepwise regression analysis showed that axial hinge axis is the most significant factors affecting PTS (β coefficient = 0.78, P < .001), followed by opening wedge angle (β coefficient = 0.36, P < .001) and gap ratio (β coefficient = 0.12, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings of 3D OWHTO simulation, axial hinge axis significantly influences medial and lateral PTS in OWHTO, but sagittal hinge axis has no effect on change in PTS. Every 10° change of axial hinge axis with a 10° coronal valgus correction caused approximately 1.6° change of PTS.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Hinge axis in the axial plane significantly affects PTS, but hinge axis in the sagittal plane has no effect on PTS. To maintain PTS, surgeons should make hinge axis at the true lateral position of the tibia in the axial plane. To intentionally alter PTS, an anterolateral axial hinge axis could be used to decrease PTS or a posterolateral axial hinge axis could be used to increase PTS. Opening wedge angle or gap ratio is also useful for intentional modification of PTS.

Correlation of tibial component size and rotation with outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Tibial component design and positioning contribute more to patient satisfaction than previously realized. A surgeon needs to decide on the size and rotation, bearing in mind that coverage should be as high as possible, whilst malrotation and overhang should be avoided. No study investigates the impact of each of these components on clinical outcomes in a single cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 1-year postoperative outcomes measured with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Score, as well as a previously validated rotational CT protocol. Coverage, rotation from Insall's axis, and overhang of an asymmetric tibial baseplate were measured, and positive and negative correlations to clinical outcomes were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 499 knees were analyzed. Patient average age was 68.4 years. Rotation within 7° internal and 5° external from Insall's axis was a "safe zone". Mean coverage was 76%. A total of 429 knees (94%) had a coverage of at least 70% and 102 knees (22%) greater than 80%. Overhang was detected in 23% of the cohort. Increased coverage was correlated to increased KOOS score and overhang correlated with a decreased KOOS score (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the individual role of three aspects of tibial component implantation properties in postoperative pain and short-term functional outcomes. Upsizing to the point of overhang with rotational tolerance of 7° internal and 3° external to Insall's axis demonstrates best patient reported outcomes. Overhang decreases the clinical outcome by the same margin as loss of 16% of coverage.

Evaluation of tibial rotational axis in total knee arthroplasty using magnetic resonance imaging

Surgeon-dependent factors such as optimal implant alignment of the tibial component are thought to play a significant role in the outcome following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In addition, tibial component malrotation is associated with pain, stiffness, and altered patellofemoral kinematics in TKA. However, measuring tibial component rotation after TKA is difficult. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to find a reliable method for positioning the tibial component in TKA. To investigate the morphology of the tibial plateau, 977 patients' knees (829 females and 148 males) were evaluated using MRI. The relationships between the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA), Akagi line, posterior tibial margin (PTM), medial third of the tibial tubercle (MTT), and anatomical tibial axis (ATS) were investigated in this study. In addition, gender difference in tibial rotational alignment were evaluated. Relative to the TEA, the MTT and ATS were externally rotated by 0.5° ± 4.4° and 0.5° ± 5.4°, respectively, while Akagi line and PTM were internally rotated by 3.7° ± 4.5° and 9.9° ± 6.1°, respectively. Gender differences were found in MTT, Akagi line and ATS (P < 0.05). Our result showed that the rotational alignment led to notable variance between femoral and tibial components using fixed bone landmarks. The MTT and ATS axes showed the closest perpendicular aspect with projected TEA. And the MTT and Akagi axes showed the reduced variance. In addition, PTM is not a reliable landmark for rotation of the tibial component. Based on the results of this study, surgeons may choose the proper anteroposterior axis of the tibial component in order to reduce rotational mismatch and improve clinical outcomes.

Approximating the maximum tibial coverage in total knee arthroplasty does not necessarily result in implant malrotation

Traditionally, the practice of the tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty has focused on achieving maximum coverage without malrotation. However, the concept of maximizing coverage has not been well defined or researched and yet biased results are often produced. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a prioritizing maximum coverage positioning strategy on the rotational alignment by using a strict computer algorithm. Computed tomographic scans of 103 tibial specimens were used to reconstruct three-dimensional tibia models. A virtual surgery was performed to generate the resection plane with a posterior slope of 7° on the proximal tibia. Symmetrical and anatomical tibial components were placed and analyzed with an automated program designed for approximating the maximum coverage based on the coherent point drift algorithm. We found that the average tibial coverage achieved across all specimens and implants was 85.62 ± 3.65%, ranging from 83.64 ± 4.10% to 86.69 ± 3.07%. When placed for maximal tibial coverage, the mean degree of rotation related to the Insall line was − 0.73° ± 4.53° for all subjects, 23% of the tibial components were malrotated. The average percentage position of the baseplate anteroposterior axis over the patellar tendon was 26.95 ± 14.71% from the medial edge. These results suggest that with specific design and proper placement of the component, approximating the maximum tibial coverage in total knee arthroplasty does not necessarily result in implant malrotation. The current tibial baseplates have shown good performance on the coverage when aligned parallel to the Insall line with the anteroposterior axis positioned between the medial 1/3 and medial 1/6 of the patella tendon.

Tibial tray rotation and posterior slope increase risk for outliers in coronal alignment

AIMS

The extensive variation in axial rotation of tibial components can lead to coronal plane malalignment. We analyzed the change in coronal alignment induced by tray malrotation.

METHODS

We constructed a computer model of knee arthroplasty and used a virtual cutting guide to cut the tibia at 90° to the coronal plane. The virtual guide was rotated axially (15° medial to 15° lateral) and with posterior slopes (0° to 7°). To assess the effect of axial malrotation, we measured the coronal plane alignment of a tibial tray that was axially rotated (25° internal to 15° external), as viewed on a standard anteroposterior (AP) radiograph.

RESULTS

Axial rotation of the cutting guide induced a varus-valgus malalignment up to 1.8° (for 15° of axial rotation combined with 7° of posterior slope). Axial malrotation of tibial tray induced a substantially higher risk of coronal plane malalignment ranging from 1.9° valgus with 15° external rotation, to over 3° varus with 25° of internal rotation. Coronal alignment of the tibial cut changed by 0.07° per degree of axial rotation and 0.22° per degree of posterior slope (linear regression, R² > 0.99).

CONCLUSION

While the effect of axial malalignment has been studied, the impact on coronal alignment is not known. Our results indicate that the direction of the cutting guide and malalignment in axial rotation alter coronal plane alignment and can increase the incidence of outliers. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):43-48.

Optimal rotational positioning of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: determined by linker surgical technique using a high definition CT

INTRODUCTION

The rotational alignment of femoral and tibial components is an important determinant of the success of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal rotational position of the tibial component is still unclear. The purpose of this study was (1) to determine the pre-operative S-TEA (surgical-transepicondylar axis) derived tibialanteroposterior (AP) axis angle and postoperative tibial component axis angle using a "Bird's eye" high-definition CT image in TKA performed by Linker surgical technique; (2) to determine the femorotibial mismatch angle; and (3) to determine the optimal tibial component rotation in a well-aligned femoral and tibial components.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

55 knees in 49 osteoarthritis patients who underwent primary TKA by Linker surgical technique were evaluated. Preoperative tibial AP axis angle, and the postoperative tibial component axis angle were measured. Rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial components was also measured.

RESULTS

The mean angle of the pre-operative tibial AP axis was 17.8° ± 4.0°, ranging from 4.3° to 25.4°. The mean angle of the post-operative tibial component axis was 16.2° ± 4.9°, ranging from 3.8° to 25.2°. The mean postoperative tibial component axis line was at 14.2% ± 11.9%.

CONCLUSION

Because of the variability of pre-operative S-TEA derived tibial AP axis angle, the tibial component axis angle was also variable among the knees, but the two angles bore a strong correlation to each other. Based on our results, the optimal axis of the tibial component passes about halfway through the medial edge and medial one-third of the tibial tuberosity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Bony landmarks with tibial cutting surface are useful to avoid rotational mismatch in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to define various anteroposterior axes of the tibial component as references and to evaluate their accuracy and variability using virtual surgery. It was hypothesized that (1) Akagi's Line could result in high accuracy and low variability in varus osteoarthritic knees; (2) anteroposterior axes defined by using the tibial bony cutting surface as a landmark might be good substitutes for Akagi's Line; and (3) extra-articular bony landmarks might influence the variability of the anteroposterior axis.

METHODS

Three-dimensional bone models were reconstructed from the preoperative computed tomography data of 111 osteoarthritic knees with varus deformities. Seven different anteroposterior axes of the tibial component were defined: Akagi's Line, Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED, Axis of Oval Shape, Axis of Anterior Crest, and Axis Second Metatarsus. The rotational mismatch angle was measured between the tibial anteroposterior axis and the line perpendicular to the transepicondylar axis projected on the cutting surface (positive value: external rotation of the tibial anteroposterior axis).

RESULTS

The average rotational mismatch angles (referring to the projected anatomical/surgical epicondylar axes) were - 2.7° ± 5.8°/1.0° ± 6.0° (Akagi's Line), - 4.2° ± 7.7°/- 0.5° ± 7.8°, 2.9° ± 7.2°/6.6° ± 7.2°, 9.8° ± 7.0°/13.5° ± 6.8° (Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED), - 5.1° ± 7.9°/- 1.4° ± 7.8° (Axis of Oval Shape), and 19.3 ± 9.5°/23.0° ± 9.6°, - 2.0° ± 11.3°/1.7° ± 11.4° (Axis Anterior Crest, Axis Second Metatarsus), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Akagi's Line provided the best accuracy and least variability in varus osteoarthritic knees. Axis 1/6MED and Axis MED are good substitutes for Akagi's Line due to the difficulty of identifying the attachment site of the posterior cruciate ligament after the proximal tibia has been cut. Extra-articular bony landmarks should not be used for alignment due to their high variability. This study will aid surgeons in choosing the proper anteroposterior axis of the tibial component to reduce rotational mismatch and thus achieve good clinical knee outcomes.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

III.