The femoral component alignment resulting from spacer block technique is not worse than after intramedullary guided technique in medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty

What effect does preoperative flexion contracture have on the component angles in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

The indication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been extended to cases with some degree of preoperative knee flexion contracture recently. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of flexion contracture on component angles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five fixed-bearing UKAs using the spacer block technique with preoperative flexion contracture (Group FC) and 35 UKAs using the same technique without preoperative flexion contracture (Group NC) were included. Using radiographs, the coronal femoral component angle, coronal tibial component angle, sagittal femoral component angle, and sagittal tibial component angle were determined. Also, extension and flexion angles of the knee as well as coronal Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angles in long-leg standing radiographs were measured. The data about the thickness of the selected insert were also collected. The above results were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The femoral component tended to be placed in a more varus and flexed position in Group FC, while no significant difference was found about the tibial component angles. While there was no significant difference in pre- and postoperative knee flexion angles between the two groups, flexion contracture remained postoperatively in Group FC. Preoperative HKA angle was greater in Group FC while the difference was no longer significant postoperatively. Regarding the thickness of the selected insert, thicker inserts tended to be used in Group FC.

CONCLUSIONS

In fixed-bearing UKA with the spacer block technique, the femoral component tended to be placed in a flexed and varus position in the knees with preoperative flexion contracture.

Spacer Block Technique Was Superior to Intramedullary Guide Technique in Coronal Alignment of Femoral Component after Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Case-Control Study

Backgrounds and Objectives: The spacer block technique in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has still a concern related to the precise position of the component in the coronal and sagittal planes compared to intramedullary guide technique. The purposes of this study were to explore whether the spacer block technique would improve the radiological alignment of implants and clinical outcomes compared with the outcomes of the intramedullary guide technique in fixed-bearing medial UKA. Materials and Methods: In total, 115 patients who underwent unilateral, fixed-bearing medial UKA were retrospectively reviewed and divided into group IM (intramedullary guides; n = 39) and group SB (spacer blocks; n = 76). Clinical assessment included range-of-motion and patient-reported outcomes. Radiological assessment included the mechanical femorotibial angle, coronal and sagittal alignments of the femoral and tibial components, and coronal femorotibial congruence angle. Results: All clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between groups. The coronal femoral component angle was valgus 2.4° ± 4.9° in IM group and varus 1.1° ± 3.2° (p < 0.001). In group IM, the number of outlier in coronal femoral component angle (<−10° or 10°<) was 3 cases, while in group SB, there was no outlier (p = 0.014). The coronal femorotibial congruence angle was significantly less in group SB (mean 1.9°, range, −3.2°~8.2°) than in group IM (mean 3.4°, range, −9.6°~16.5°) (p = 0.028). Conclusions: In the group SB, the coronal alignment of femoral component was closer to neutral, and outlier was less frequent than in the group IM. The spacer block technique was more beneficial in achieving proper coronal alignment of the femoral component and congruence of femorotibial components compared to the intramedullary guide technique in fixed-bearing medial UKAs.

Hybrid fixation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty shows equivalent short-term implant survivorship and clinical scores compared to standard fixation techniques

INTRODUCTION

There is a paucity of data regarding hybrid-fixated unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and no study directly compared all three available fixation techniques (cementless, cemented, and hybrid). The hypothesis was that hybrid fixation might have a lower incidence of radiolucent lines (RLL) than cemented UKA, with equivalent outcomes to uncemented UKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 104 UKA with a minimal follow-up of 1 year were retrospectively included, of which 40 were cemented, 41 cementless, and 23 hybrid prostheses. The functional outcomes scores included the Oxford Knee (OKS), Subjective Knee (SKS), and Forgotten Joint scores (FJS). RLLs, subsidence, and component positioning were assessed on radiographs.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 28 months, the survival rate was 95% for cemented UKA and 100% for the cementless and hybrid UKA (n.s.), respectively. Postoperative FJS (93 vs. 82 points, p = 0.007) and SKS (4.7 vs. 4.1 points, p = 0.001) were better in cementless than cemented UKA, with hybrid-fixated UKA in between the two (90 and 4.4 points, n.s.). Improvement of OKS preoperatively to postoperatively did not differ between the groups (n.s.). RLLs were more frequent in cemented (23%) compared to cementless (5%, p = 0.021) and hybrid UKA (9%, n.s.). With an incidence of 12%, subsidence occurred more commonly in cementless UKA compared to cemented (5%) and hybrid (0%) (n.s.) UKA.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid fixation achieves equivalent results to standard UKA fixation techniques regarding implant survival and functional and radiological outcomes. Therefore, the hybrid fixation technique seems to be a valuable alternative as it combines the advantages of cemented tibial components with those of uncemented femoral components.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Augmented reality-aided unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Purpose

To illustrate a surgical technique for augmented reality (AR)-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and report preliminary data.

Methods

We developed an AR-based navigation system that enables the surgeon to see the tibial mechanical axis superimposed on the patient’s leg in addition to the tibial cutting angle. We measured the tibial resection angle in 11 UKAs using postoperative radiographs and calculated the absolute difference between preoperative target angle and postoperative measured angle. The target angle was determined for each patient: mean values were 0.7° ± 1.0° varus in coronal alignment and 5.3° ± 1.4° posterior slope in sagittal alignment.

Results

The angles measured on postoperative radiographs were 2.6° ± 1.2° varus in the coronal plane and 4.8° ± 2.5° posterior slope in the sagittal plane. The absolute differences between the target and measured angles were 1.9° ± 1.5° in coronal alignment and 2.6° ± 1.2° in sagittal alignment. No patients experienced complications, including surgical site infection and periprosthetic fracture.

Conclusion

The AR-based portable navigation system may provide passable accuracy in terms of proximal tibial resection during UKA.

Level of Evidence

IV

Evidence-based surgical technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a successful treatment modality in selected patients having advanced, single-compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. The bone and ligament preservation leading to shorter recovery periods, better functional outcomes, lower perioperative complication rates, and easier revision, if needed, are proposed as some of the advantages of UKA over total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite several advantages, UKA is reported to have higher failure rates as compared to TKA. The prosthesis failure of UKA is directly correlated to intraoperative technique-related factors like malpositioning of components and the inability to replicate the target-limb alignment as per preoperative planning. An evidence-based surgical technique for UKA may help surgeons to avoid the intraoperative technique-related errors. The purpose of this paper is to describe a stepwise surgical technique for the fixed-bearing medial UKA.

Influence of patient selection, component positioning and surgeon's caseload on the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Implant malpositioning, low surgical caseload, and improper patient selection have been identified as essential factors, which could negatively affect the longevity of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the impact of the surgeon's caseload on patient selection, component positioning, as well as component survivorship and functional outcomes following a PSI-UKA.

METHODS

A total of 125 patient-specific instrumented (PSI) UKA were included. One hundred and two cases were treated by a high-volume surgeon (usage 40%) and 23 cases by a low-volume surgeon (< 10 cases/year, usage 34%). Preoperative UIS, as well as the postoperative clinical and radiologic outcome, were assessed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Irrespective of the surgeon's UKA caseload, PSI allowed good accuracy in component positioning (p > 0.05). The high-volume surgeon had a more strict indication for UKA with 89% showing a UIS > 25 (considered a good indication) compared to 70% for the low-volume surgeon (p = 0.016). The low-volume surgeon achieved worse results regarding functional outcome (p < 0.05) and a tendency toward an increased risk for UKA failure (p = 0.11) compared to the high-volume surgeon.

CONCLUSION

Due to potential selection errors, mostly connected to a low UKA-caseload, low-volume UKA surgeons might achieve worse outcomes. Very strict indications for UKA might be recommended in low-volume surgeons to achieve excellent clinical outcomes following a UKA.

Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty tolerates higher variance in tibial implant rotation than mobile-bearing designs

BACKGROUND

UKA necessitates a learning period. From this point of view, it would be logical to prefer the design that tolerates suboptimal tibial rotations better, especially for inexperienced surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological results of mobile-bearing and fix-bearing UKA designs in case of suboptimal tibial rotations.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control evaluation was made of all the patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis, treated between January 2011 and January 2015. 324 patients ideal femoral rotation were enrolled in the study. 153 patients (Group 1) were treated with fix-bearing design with a mean 28.8 ± 11.3 month follow-up and 171 patients (Group 2) were treated with mobile-bearing design with a 31 ± 14.3 month follow-up. Each patient in groups was subdivided into (A): optimal tibial rotation, (B): external rotation of tibial component > 5°, (C): internal rotation of tibial component > 5° subgroups. WOMAC and KSS scores of each patient at preoperative and postoperative final control were compared between groups and subgroups.

RESULTS

No significant differences were determined between the groups in terms of mean follow-up time (p = 0.0612), preoperative WOMAC, and KSS scores (p = 0.754 and p = 0.832, respectively). No significant differences were determined between subgroups 1A and 2A in terms of WOMAC and KSS scores at the final evaluation (p = 0.314 and p = 0.546, respectively). A significant difference was determined between subgroups 1B and 2B in terms of WOMAC and KSS scores (p = 0.021 and p = 0.012, respectively). In addition, the difference between subgroups 1C and 2C was significant (p = 0.047 and p = 0.034, respectively) at the final evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Both mobile- and fix-bearing designs are beneficial in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. However, in case of both tibial internal or external suboptimal tibial rotations, fix-bearing design have better results compared to mobile-bearing design.

STUDY DESIGN

Level III retrospective comparative clinical study.