Preoperative PCR analysis of synovial fluid has limited value for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of total knee arthroplasties

Differences in Diagnostic Sensitivity of Cultures Between Sample Types in Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Differences between the bacterial culture results of the preoperative fluid, intraoperative tissue, and sonication fluid of implants in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are important issues in clinical practice. This study aimed to identify the differences in pooled diagnostic accuracy between culture sample types for diagnosing PJI by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Data extraction and study assessment using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies were performed independently by two reviewers. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic curve, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were estimated for each sample type.

RESULTS

There were thirty-two studies that were included in the analysis after screening and eligibility assessment. The pooled sensitivities of preoperative fluid, intraoperative tissue, and sonication fluid for the diagnosis of PJI were 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 to 0.70), 0.71 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.79), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.85), while the specificities were 0.96 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.98), 0.92 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.96), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.95), respectively. The area under the curves for preoperative fluid, intraoperative tissue, and sonication fluid were 0.86, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonication fluid culture demonstrated better sensitivity compared with the conventional culture method, and preoperative fluid culture provided lower sensitivity in diagnosing PJI.

An artificial intelligence framework for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection based on 99mTc-MDP dynamic bone scintigraphy

OBJECTIVES

Dynamic bone scintigraphy (DBS) is the first widely reliable and simple imaging modality in nuclear medicine that can be used to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI). We aimed to apply artificial intelligence to diagnose PJI in patients after total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA) based on 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) DBS.

METHODS

A total of 449 patients (255 THAs and 194 TKAs) with a final diagnosis were retrospectively enrolled and analyzed. The dataset was divided into a training and validation set and an independent test set. A customized framework composed of two data preprocessing algorithms and a diagnosis model (dynamic bone scintigraphy effective neural network, DBS-eNet) was compared with mainstream modified classification models and experienced nuclear medicine specialists on corresponding datasets.

RESULTS

In the fivefold cross-validation test, diagnostic accuracies of 86.48% for prosthetic knee infection (PKI) and 86.33% for prosthetic hip infection (PHI) were obtained using the proposed framework. On the independent test set, the diagnostic accuracies and AUC values were 87.74% and 0.957 for PKI and 86.36% and 0.906 for PHI, respectively. The customized framework demonstrated better overall diagnostic performance compared to other classification models and showed superiority in diagnosing PKI and consistency in diagnosing PHI compared to specialists.

CONCLUSION

The customized framework can be used to effectively and accurately diagnose PJI based on 99mTc-MDP DBS. The excellent diagnostic performance of this method indicates its potential clinical practical value in the future.

KEY POINTS

• The proposed framework in the current study achieved high diagnostic performance for prosthetic knee infection (PKI) and prosthetic hip infection (PHI) with AUC values of 0.957 and 0.906, respectively. • The customized framework demonstrated better overall diagnostic performance compared to other classification models. • Compared to experienced nuclear medicine physicians, the customized framework showed superiority in diagnosing PKI and consistency in diagnosing PHI.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Unrecognized Septic Arthritis-A Descriptive Case Series Study

BACKGROUND

Synovitis, like that associated with chronic bacterial arthritis, is a very rare finding during the implantation of knee endoprostheses. In such cases, we fix the knee prostheses with cement containing two antibiotics and carry out a course of systemic antibiotic administration. The aim was to analyze these cases for incidence, detection of bacteria, risk factors, and outcome.

METHODS

Out of 7534 knee replacements between January 2013 and December 2020, 25 cases were suspected during the surgical procedure to have suffered from bacterial arthritis and were treated accordingly. Total synovectomy was carried out, whereby five intraoperative synovial samples were examined bacteriologically, and the complete synovitis was analyzed histologically. The mean follow-up was 65.3 ± 27.1 (24-85) months.

RESULTS

In nine cases (0.12%), the diagnosis of bacterial arthritis was made histologically and by clinical chemistry (elevated CRP), and in two of these cases, pathogen verification was performed. Eight of these nine patients had previously had injections or surgery associated with the corresponding knee joint or had an underlying immunomodulatory disease. None of the patients developed a periprosthetic infection at a later stage.

CONCLUSION

With an incidence of 0.12%, it is rare to unexpectedly detect bacterial synovitis during surgery. Total synovectomy, use of bone cement with two antibiotics, and immediate systemic antibiotic therapy seem to keep the risk of periprosthetic infection low.

Reliable Diagnostic Tests and Thresholds for Preoperative Diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Arthritis Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Objective

The current diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are diverse and controversial, leading to delayed diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate and unify their diagnostic accuracy and the threshold selection of serum and synovial routine tests for PJI at an early stage.

Methods

We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases for retrospective or prospective studies which reported preoperative‐available assays (serum, synovial, or culture tests) for the diagnosis of chronic PJI among inflammatory arthritis (IA) or non‐IA populations from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2022. Threshold effective analysis was performed on synovial polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN%), synovial white blood cell (WBC), serum C‐reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) to find the relevant cut‐offs.

Results

Two hundred and sixteen studies and information from 45,316 individuals were included in the final analysis. Synovial laboratory‐based α‐defensin and calprotectin had the best comprehensive sensitivity (0.91 [0.86–0.94], 0.95 [0.88–0.98]) and specificity (0.96 [0.94‐0.97], 0.95 [0.89–0.98]) values. According to the threshold effect analysis, the recommended cut‐offs are 70% (sensitivity 0.89 [0.85–0.92], specificity 0.90 [0.87–0.93]), 4100/μL (sensitivity 0.90 [0.87–0.93], specificity 0.97 [0.93–0.98]), 13.5 mg/L (sensitivity 0.84 [0.78–0.89], specificity 0.83 [0.73–0.89]), and 30 mm/h (sensitivity 0.79 [0.74–0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.72–0.83]) for synovial PMN%, synovial WBC, serum CRP, and ESR, respectively, and tests seem to be more reliable among non‐IA patients.

Conclusions

The laboratory‐based synovial α‐defensin and synovial calprotectin are the two best independent preoperative diagnostic tests for PJI. A cut off of 70% for synovial PMN% and tighter cut‐offs for synovial WBC and serum CRP could have a better diagnostic accuracy for non‐IA patients with chronic PJI.

Meta-analysis of synovial fluid polymerase chain reaction for diagnosing periprosthetic hip and knee infection

Background and objective

The purpose of this study was to estimate the diagnostic performance of synovial fluid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in periprosthetic hip and knee infection, and whether synovial fluid PCR has greater diagnostic significance than conventional methods.

Methods

The literature databases PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science were searched for English articles describing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis by synovial fluid PCR. Articles were limited to the period between January 1990 and December 2019. Subsequently, conventional methods that were used on at least two occasions were included for further analysis. Data analysis was performed using the Meta-DiSc and Stata software.

Results

Eleven studies with 1360 cases were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of synovial fluid PCR were 0.70 (95% CI 0.66–0.74), 0.92 (95% CI 0.90–0.93), and 37.4 (95% CI 17.77–78.74), respectively.

Conclusions

Synovial fluid PCR provides an effective tool for rapid diagnosis of PJI, and also in the early stages of culture-negative bacterial infections.

An automated real-time PCR assay for synovial fluid improves the preoperative etiological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection and septic arthritis

Synovial fluid is important for the preoperative etiological diagnosis of suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or septic arthritis (SA). GENECUBE, an automated real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, was used to detect bacterial mecA (methicillin resistance) and was compared with microbiological cultures for preoperatively diagnosing PJI and SA in 74 patients suspected of these infections and thus earmarked for surgery. PJI and SA were diagnosed in 21 and 6 cases, respectively, using modified ICM 2018 diagnostic criteria. Microbiological cultures determined methicillin-resistant staphylococcus (MRS) as the causative organism in six samples, which were all positive in the GENECUBE assay. Significantly also, the GENECUBE assay detected six MRS infections in culture-negative but infection-diagnosed patients, and in one inconclusive case, suggesting a higher sensitivity of this assay. Compared with microbiological culture, the sensitivity and specificity of the GENECUBE assay for mecAwas 100% and 92.2%, respectively. However, GENECUBE also produced invalid results in three cases, suggesting possible PCR inhibitors in the synovial fluid samples. We additionally validated the accuracy of pan-bacterial real-time PCR targeting 16S rRNA and other tests. Pan-bacterial real-time PCR was as effective as preoperative bacterial culture testing, although the α-defensin assay had the highest sensitivity at 100%. Hence, fully automated real-time PCR targeting of the bacterial mecA gene improves the etiological diagnosis of PJI and SA by reducing the testing time and lowering the false-positive detection rates. A screening approach for α-defensin followed by bacterial mecA gene testing in synovial fluids is therefore a more efficient method of preoperatively diagnosing PJI and SA.

Comparison of bacterial culture results of preoperative synovial fluid and intraoperative specimens in patients with joint infection

OBJECTIVES

The details of relationship between bacterial culture results of preoperative and intraoperative specimens in same patients with native joint septic arthritis (NJSA) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are unknown. This study aims to reveal the difference of culture results of preoperative synovial fluid and intraoperative specimens and evaluate the risk factors for detecting different species intraoperatively from preoperative synovial fluid.

METHODS

This study included 55 joints diagnosed with 16 NJSA and 39 PJI. Bacterial culture positive rates and identified bacterial species were compared between preoperative synovial fluid and intraoperative tissue/synovial fluid. We also examined the presence or absence of sinus tracts and antimicrobial agents as risk factors in patients with different bacterial species in intraoperative specimens from preoperative synovial fluid.

RESULTS

The culture positive rates were not significantly different between preoperative synovial fluid and intraoperative specimens. Different bacterium were detected in 10.9% joints by intraoperative tissue and 14.6% joints by intraoperative synovial fluid. The positive rate of sinus tract was significantly higher in patients with different bacterial species (62.5%) than without different bacterial species (12.8%, p < 0.01). Conversely, antimicrobial agent was not significantly difference.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that different bacterium from preoperative culture results were detected in 10-15% joints by intraoperative specimens in NJSA and PJI. The sinus tract was a risk factor for identifying different bacterial species in the intraoperative specimens. Therefore, in cases of sinus tract, it is necessary to examine multiple specimens of both intraoperative tissue and synovial fluid for increasing the detection rate.

Combination Tests in the Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Systematic Review and Development of a Stepwise Clinical Decision-Making Tool

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to identify combination tests used to diagnose chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and develop a stepwise decision-making tool to facilitate diagnosis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of existing combinations of serum, synovial, and tissue-based tests for diagnosing chronic PJI after hip or knee replacement. This work is an extension of our systematic review of single tests, from which we chose eligible studies that also described the diagnostic performance of combination tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven eligible articles described the performance of 56 combination tests, of which 8 combinations had at least 2 studies informing both sensitivity and specificity. We also identified 5 types of combination tests: (1) a type-I Boolean combination, which uses Boolean logic (AND, OR) and usually increases specificity at the cost of sensitivity; (2) a type-II Boolean combination, which usually increases sensitivity at the cost of specificity; (3) a triage-conditional rule, in which the value of 1 test serves to triage the use of another test; (4) an arithmetic operation on the values of 2 tests; and (5) a model-based prediction rule based on a fitted model applied to biomarker values.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians can initiate their diagnostic process with a type-II Boolean combination of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). False negatives of the combination can be minimized when the threshold is chosen to reach 90% to 95% sensitivity for each test. Once a joint infection is suspected on the basis of serum testing, joint aspiration should be performed. If joint aspiration yields a wet tap, a leukocyte esterase (LER) strip is highly recommended for point-of-care testing, with a reading of ++ or greater indicating PJI; a reading below ++ should be followed by one of the laboratory-based synovial tests. If joint aspiration yields a dry tap, clinicians should rely on preoperative tissue culture and histological analysis for diagnosis. Combinations based on triage-conditional, arithmetic, and model-based prediction rules require further research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Current Clinical Methods for Detection of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection

Background: Currently, one of the most pressing problems in the field of orthopedic surgery is peri-prosthetic joint infection [PJI]. While there are numerous ways to detect PJI, current clinical detection methods differ across institutions and have varying criteria and protocols. Some of these methods include the Modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society system, culturing, polymerase chain reaction, the determination of the presence of certain biomarkers, testing for the presence of alpha defensin peptides, and leukocyte level testing. Methods: This review summarizes the most recent publications in the field of PJI detection to highlight current strengths as well as provide future directions to find the system for the quickest, cost-effective, and most accurate way to diagnose these types of infections. Results: The results of this literature review suggest that, while each method of diagnosis has its advantages, each has various drawbacks as well. Current methods can be expensive, take days to weeks to complete, be prone to contamination, and can produce ambiguous results. Conclusions: The findings in this review emphasize the need for a more comprehensive and accurate system for diagnosing PJI. In addition, the specific comparison of advantages and drawbacks can be useful for researchers and clinicians with goals of creating new diagnostic tests for PJIs, as well as in clinical scenarios to determine the correct treatment for patients.

Advantages of 16S rRNA PCR for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection

16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) PCR has been reported to be an effective diagnostic means in patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of the present meta-analysis is to establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of the measurement of 16S rRNA PCR for diagnosing PJI. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Wiley Online Library were searched for studies on 16S rRNA PCR in the diagnosis of PJI. The search incorporated all literature published up until December 2018 and the QUADAS-2 checklist were used for quality assessment. The sensitivity, specificity and other measures of accuracy of 16S rRNA PCR in the diagnosis of PJI were pooled. Statistical analysis was performed by employing Meta-Disc 1.4 and Stata 12.0 software. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The summary estimates for 16S rRNA PCR in the diagnosis of PJI in these studies were pooled: Sensitivity, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67-0.73); specificity, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.94); positive likelihood ratio, 10.93 (95% CI, 5.55-21.51); negative likelihood ratio, 0.33 (95% CI, 0.28-0.40); diagnostic odds ratio, 41.77 (95% CI, 19.90-87.68); and the area under the curve, 0.89. Subgroup analysis showed that the use of sonicate fluid and periprosthetic tissue has higher sensitivity (0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82; and 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.78, respectively), specificity (0.93, 95% CI, 0.90-0.96; and 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98, respectively) and area under the curve (0.93 and 0.98, respectively). 16S rRNA PCR assay plays an important role in the diagnosis of PJI. The results of 16S rRNA PCR assays should be interpreted in parallel with clinical findings, the results of microbiological, and other laboratory tests.

Synovial neutrophilic gelatinase-associated lipocalin in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the diagnosis remains a challenge for clinicians. In 2011, the muscoskeletal infection society (MSIS) criteria provided a consensus which has been updated in 2013, but these criteria are complex and contain tests that are time-consuming. The same is applicable to the pro-Implant guidelines. Therefore, a simpler diagnostic test is desirable.

OBJECTIVES

The value of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), leucocyte esterase (LE) levels, and the white blood cell (WBC) count in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI after TKA was evaluated.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 89 synovial fluid samples from 86 patients with suspected PJI after TKA. Thirteen and 23 of those samples were classified as PJI according to the MSIS and pro-Implant criteria, respectively. Subsequently, NGAL, LE levels, and the WBC count were determined, the former one using an immunoassay. Using either the MSIS or pro-Implant criteria as the golden standard for PJI, sensitivity and specificity of those markers were determined with ROC curves, and medians were compared with Mann-Whitney U and Pearson Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

When applying the MSIS criteria, NGAL revealed 92% sensitivity and 83% specificity. WBC count showed similar sensitivity (92%) and specificity (84%), whereas sensitivity and specificity for LE were 39% and 88% respectively. When applying the pro-Implant criteria, sensitivity was 95% and specificity was 95% for NGAL. Sensitivity and specificity for WBC count were 100% and 97% and for LE 39% and 92% respectively.

CONCLUSION

NGAL and WBC count in synovial fluid has high accuracy in the diagnosis of PJI after TKA and should seriously be considered as part of PJI diagnostics. Leucocyte esterase can serve as rule-in criterion peroperatively. These conclusions are independent of which criteria set was used as golden standard.

The diagnostic value of routine preliminary biopsy in diagnosing late prosthetic joint infection after hip and knee arthroplasty

AIMS

Biopsy of the periprosthetic tissue is an important diagnostic tool for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as it enables the detection of the responsible microorganism with its sensitivity to antibiotics. We aimed to investigate how often the bacteria identified in the tissue analysis differed between samples obtained from preoperative biopsy and intraoperative revision surgery in cases of late PJI; and whether there was a therapeutic consequence.

METHODS

A total of 508 patients who required revision surgery of total hip arthroplasty (THA) (n = 231) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (n = 277) because of component loosening underwent biopsy before revision surgery. The tissue samples collected at biopsy and during revision surgery were analyzed according to the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS).

RESULTS

In total, 178 (113 THA, 65 TKA) were classified as infected. The biopsy procedure had a sensitivity of 93.8%, a specificity of 97.3%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.9%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.7%, and an accuracy of 96.1%. Of the 178 infected patients, 26 showed a difference in the detected bacteria from the biopsy and the revision surgery (14.6%). This difference required a change to antibiotic therapy in only two cases (1.1%).

CONCLUSION

Biopsy is a useful tool to diagnose PJI, but there may be a difference in the detected bacteria between the biopsy and revision surgery. However, this did not affect the choice of antibiotic therapy in most cases, rendering the clinical relevance of this phenomenon as low. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):329-335.

C-reactive protein is not a screening tool for late periprosthetic joint infection

Background

Preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is important because of the therapeutic consequences. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether the serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level can be used as a screening tool for late PJI.

Materials and methods

A cohort of 390 patients with revision surgery of total hip prostheses (200) or total knee prostheses (190) was assessed for late PJI by determining CRP serum level and performing preoperative aspiration with cultivation and intraoperative tissue analyses with cultivation and histologic examination, using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) and International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria.

Results

A total of 180 joints were rated as PJI (prevalence 46%). Of these, 42.8% (77) showed a CRP level below 10 mg/L and 28.3% (51) showed a normal CRP level of less than 5 mg/L. The 76.9% of the cases with slow-growing bacteria showed a CRP level below 10 mg/L, and 61.5% showed a normal CRP level.

Conclusions

Serum CRP level should not be used as a screening tool to rule out late PJI.

Level of evidence

Level 2 (diagnostic study).

Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum, Synovial, and Tissue Testing for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Hip and Knee Replacements: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that can occur following total joint replacement. Patients with chronic PJI report a substantially lower quality of life and face a higher risk of short-term mortality. Establishing a diagnosis of chronic PJI is challenging because of conflicting guidelines, numerous tests, and limited evidence. Delays in diagnosing PJI are associated with poorer outcomes and morbid revision surgery. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of serum, synovial, and tissue-based tests for chronic PJI.

METHODS

This review adheres to the Cochrane Collaboration's diagnostic test accuracy methods for evidence searching and syntheses. A detailed search of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the grey literature was performed to identify studies involving the diagnosis of chronic PJI in patients with hip or knee replacement. Eligible studies were assessed for quality and bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-analyses were performed on tests with sufficient data points. Summary estimates and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were obtained using a bivariate model.

RESULTS

A total of 12,616 citations were identified, and 203 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these 203 studies, 170 had a high risk of bias. Eighty-three unique PJI diagnostic tests were identified, and 17 underwent meta-analyses. Laboratory-based synovial alpha-defensin tests and leukocyte esterase reagent (LER) strips (2+) had the best performance, followed by white blood-cell (WBC) count, measurement of synovial C-reactive protein (CRP) level, measurement of the polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (PMN%), and the alpha-defensin lateral flow test kit (Youden index ranging from 0.78 to 0.94). Tissue-based tests and 3 serum tests (measurement of interleukin-6 [IL-6] level, CRP level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) had a Youden index between 0.61 to 0.75 but exhibited poorer performance compared with the synovial tests mentioned above.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the literature pertaining to chronic PJI diagnostic tests is heterogeneous, and the studies are at a high risk for bias. We believe that greater transparency and more complete reporting in studies of diagnostic test results should be mandated by peer-reviewed journals. The available literature suggests that several synovial fluid-based tests perform well for diagnosing chronic PJI and their use is recommended in the work-up of any suspected case of chronic PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Editorial Commentary: Bacterial Load and Contamination of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts-Overamplified Dreadful Nuclear Assumption (DNA) or Underestimated Problem?

Bacterial DNA is present in a large percentage in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. A potential concern is the presence of biofilm on both failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts and suture material. Despite the high prevalence of bacterial material observed, microbial cultures are rarely positive. However, it is currently unknown whether these findings have any clinical implications.