A new minimally invasive method for anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments with a Tightrope system

The Distal Fascicle of the Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament: A Potential Landmark for Lateral Ankle Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

A reliable landmark and precise distances from the ligament attachments are needed for lateral ankle stabilization surgery. The distal fascicle of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) has been used to locate the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) or calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) centers on the fibula. However, there is no anatomic study to validate the distal fascicle of the AITFL as a landmark of lateral ankle ligament stabilization, and more importantly, the exact distances from the ATFL or CFL attachments to the distal fascicle of the AITFL are unknown.

METHODS

Sixteen frozen cadaveric specimens (8 paired specimens) with no previous history of ankle injury were used in this study. Whether the distal fascicle of AITFL was present in each specimen was confirmed. Then, the distances from the most distal insertion of the AITFL's distal fascicle to the footprint centers of the ATFL and CFL on the fibula were measured. All measurements were performed by 2 observers, and the intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

The distal fascicle of the AITFL was found in all specimens (100%). The mean distance from the most distal insertion of the AITFL's distal fascicle to the footprint centers of the ATFL, CFL, and the intersection center of the 2 ligaments on the fibula was 6.0 to 7.1 mm, 11.5 to 13.2 mm, and 9.0 to 10.0 mm, respectively. Excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement (all ICCs > 0.9, P < .01) was shown in the anatomic measurements of these distances.

CONCLUSION

In this cadaveric study, we found that the distal fascicle was a constant structure of the AITFL in the lateral ankle. The distances from the most distal insertion of the AITFL's distal fascicle to the ligamentous footprint centers were reliable and may be used to identify the origins of the ATFL and CFL for lateral ankle ligament reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This anatomic study validates the AITFL's distal fascicle as a potential landmark and, more importantly, determines the range of distances from AITFL's distal fascicle to the attachment centers of lateral ankle ligaments by anatomic measurements. The data may be used to identify the ATFL and CFL for lateral ankle stabilization surgery and become particularly valuable for endoscopic or arthroscopic techniques.

Anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ligaments using allograft tendon and suspensory fixation for chronic lateral ankle instability with poor remnant quality: results and complications

PURPOSE

Treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) with poor remnant quality is challenging. The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical results and complications of anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ligaments using allograft tendon and suspensory fixation in the treatment of such patients.

METHODS

One hundred and eight patients with CLAI, who were treated surgically using anatomic reconstruction with allograft tendon and suspensory fixation between April 2016 and January 2018 at our hospital, were retrospectively analysed. None of the patients had sufficient ligament remnants for the modified Broström procedure during the intraoperative evaluation. Eighteen patients were excluded. Seventeen patients were lost to follow-up and 73 patients completed the study. The mean duration of instability symptoms was 39.1 months (range, 6-480 months). The mean follow-up time was 57.5 months (range, 48-69 months). Clinical results were evaluated using the Karlsson scoring scale, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society-Ankle and Hindfoot (AOFAS-AH) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), patients' subjective satisfaction, and incidence of complications. Mechanical stability was evaluated using the varus talar tilt angle (TTA) and anterior talar displacement (ATD).

RESULTS

The AOFAS-AH scores significantly improved from 67.7 ± 8.5 points to 89.8 ± 9.5 (p < 0.001). The Karlsson scoring scales evolved from 58.8 ± 16.5 to 88.4 ± 11.2 (p < 0.001). VAS scores significantly decreased from 2.9 ± 1.3 to 1.1 ± 1.0 (p < 0.001). On stress radiographs, TTA decreased from 15.1 ± 2.5 degrees to 5.8 ± 2.1 degrees (p < 0.001), whereas ATD reduced from 13.4 ± 2.9 mm to 5.7 ± 1.5 mm (p < 0.001). Patients' subjective satisfaction indicated 46 excellent, 20 good, 5 fair, and 2 bad results. Postoperatively, 15 cases (20.5%) did not achieve complete relief of discomfort or swelling, 9 cases (12.3%) experienced joint stiffness or decreased range of motion, and 6 cases (8.2%) had soft tissue irritation. Residual instability and reoperation are rare. Allograft rejection or wound infection was not observed.

CONCLUSION

For the CLAI patients with poor remnant quality, anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ligaments using allograft tendon and suspensory fixation is an effective procedure, while the top three complications in incidence were residual discomfort, joint stiffness, and soft tissue irritation.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Revision lateral ankle ligament reconstruction for patients with a failed modified Brostrom procedure

PURPOSE

The Brostrom-Gould procedure has been considered as a gold standard operative technique for chronic lateral ankle instability. Despite the popularity and excellent outcomes of the modified Brostrom procedure, some patients still experience recurrence of ankle instability. Few studies reported outcomes of revision reconstruction for patients with a failed modified Brostrom procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a percutaneous anatomic revision lateral ankle ligament reconstruction for patients with a failed modified Brostrom procedure.

METHODS

From March 2017 to April 2020, 21 patients with persistent ankle instability after a modified Brostrom procedure underwent revision lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. The operation was performed through minimally invasive incisions. Functional assessment was performed using the Karlsson-Peterson ankle scoring system (KP) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The questionnaires of KP and VAS were completed before surgery and at the last follow-up. Patients' subjective satisfaction level was graded as excellent, good, fair, and poor. Preoperative and postoperative anterior talar displacement and varus talus tilt angle in stress radiographs were recorded.

RESULTS

The average age at the revision surgery time was 39.6years. The mean follow-up was 39.2months. The VAS score improved from 4.1 ± 1.5 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 1.3 at the final follow-up (p < .05). The KP score improved from 59.0 ± 20.2 preoperatively to 88.2 ± 9.6 at the last follow-up (p < .05). The mean varus talar tilt angle was 14.1 ± 3.9 mm preoperatively versus 4.9 ± 4.7 mm at the final follow-up (p < .05). The mean anterior talar displacement was 12.8 ± 2.2 mm versus 5.6 ± 3.7 mm at the last follow-up (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The revision anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ligaments of the ankle is effective for patients with recurrent instability after a failed modified Broström procedure.

Anatomic reconstruction of lateral ankle ligaments: is there an optimal graft option?

PURPOSE

Different graft options are available for the reconstruction of lateral ankle ligaments to treat chronic ankle instability (CAI), which fall in two categories: allografts and autografts. This study aims to provide an updated comparison of the clinical outcomes after stabilisation procedures using allografts and autografts, to correctly advise the clinician during the choice of the best material to be used for the reconstruction of the lateral ligamentous complex of the ankle.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to analyse the use of autografts and allografts for anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ligamentous complex of the ankle in CAI patients. The presence of a postoperative assessment through outcome measures with proofs of validation in the CAI population or patient's subjective evaluation on the treatment were necessary for inclusion. The quality of the included studies was assessed through the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). Relevant clinical outcome data were pooled to provide a synthetic description of the results in different groups or after different procedures.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies (autograft: 19; allograft: 9; both procedures: 1) accounting for 930 procedures (autograft: 616; allograft: 314) were included. The average mCMS was 55.9 ± 10.5 points. The Karlsson-Peterson scale was the most frequently reported outcome scale, showing a cumulative average post- to preoperative difference of 31.9 points in the autograft group (n = 379, 33.8 months follow-up) and of 35.7 points in the allograft group (n = 227, 25.8 months follow-up). Patient satisfaction was good or excellent in 92.8% of autograft (n = 333, 65.2 months follow-up) and in 92.3% of allograft procedures (n = 153, 25.0 months follow-up). Return to activity after surgery and recurrence of instability were variably reported across the studies with no clear differences between allograft and autograft highlighted by these outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic analysis of validated CAI outcome measures and the patient's subjective satisfaction does not support a specific choice between autograft and allograft for the reconstruction of the ankle lateral ligamentous complex in CAI patients. Both types of grafts were associated to a postoperative Karlsson-Peterson score superior to 80 points and to a similar rate of patient's subjective satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Lack of Definition of Chronic Ankle Instability With Arthrometer-Assisted Ankle Joint Stress Testing: A Systematic Review of In Vivo Studies

Despite extensive research on ankle instability a consensual and clear objective definition for pathological mechanical lateral ankle instability is yet to be determined. This systematic review aimed to summarize current available arthrometric devices, measuring methods and lateral ankle laxity outcomes in patients with chronic ankle instability that underwent objective arthrometric stress measurement. Sixty-eight studies comprising a total of 3,235 ankles with chronic ankle instability were included. Studies reported a wide range of arthrometric devices, testing position and procedures, and measuring methods. For the anterior drawer test, the average mean differences between injured and uninjured ankles ranged from -0.9 to 4.1 mm, and total translation in the injured ankle from 3.2 to 21.0 mm. Most common pathological threshold was ≥4 mm or ≥10 mm unilaterally and ≥3 mm bilaterally. For the talar tilt test, the average mean differences between injured and uninjured ankles ranged from 0.0° to 8.0°, and total tilt from injured ankle from 3.3 to 60.2°. Most common pathological threshold was ≥ 10° unilaterally and ≥ 6° mm bilaterally. It was found high heterogeneity in the scientific literature regarding the arthrometric devices, use of concomitant imaging and measuring methods of arthrometer-assisted anterior drawer and talar tilt tests which led to variable laxity outcomes in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Future studies should focus on standardizing the testing and measuring methods for an objective definition of mechanical ankle instability.

Outcomes of ossicle resection and anatomic reconstruction of lateral ligaments for chronic ankle instability with large malleolar accessory ossicles

BACKGROUND

Malleolar accessory ossicles can be found in patients with chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). Ossicle resection combined with the modified Broström procedure is the most commonly used surgical method. However, an unrepairable gap after ossicle resection often occurs in patients with large ossicles.

PURPOSE

This study analysed the clinical outcomes of ossicle resection and anatomic ligament reconstruction (ALR) for CLAI with large malleolar accessory ossicles.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective case series. Since 2014, we have adopted ALR for patients with difficulties using the modified Broström procedure after ossicle resection. Sixteen patients with chronic ankle instability and malleolar accessory ossicles were treated with this method between December 2014 and February 2018. The average age of the patients at the time of surgery was 28.9 (range, 16-65) years. They were followed up for an average time of 26.9 (range, 12-47) months. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale, Karlsson-Peterson ankle scoring system, subjective satisfaction of patients, and radiographic parameters.

RESULTS

All unrepairable cases occurred in patients with ossicles larger than or equal to 10 mm. The VAS score improved from 3.5 ± 1.6 preoperatively to 1.4 ± 1.0 at the final follow-up (p < 0.05), and the Karlsson-Peterson score improved significantly from 52.7 ± 15.1 to 86.4 ± 8.2 (p < 0.05). There was also an obvious change in the varus talar tilt angle (15.4 ± 2.0° vs 6.2 ± 1.6°, p < 0.05) and anterior talar displacement (14.3 ± 2.1 mm vs 6.3 ± 1.4 mm, p < 0.05). Fourteen patients (87.5%) were satisfied (excellent or good) with their clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

If modified Broström procedure is difficult to accomplish effectively after ossicle resection for chronic ankle instability with large malleolar accessory ossicles, ALR is a viable option with satisfactory clinical results.

Sex-Specific Differences Following Lateral Ankle Ligament Repair

BACKGROUND

Chronic ankle instability is a common condition that can be treated with lateral ankle ligament repair. These procedures have a reported success rate greater than 85% in the literature, but little has been reported about the differences in postoperative outcomes between males and females. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sex-specific outcomes following lateral ankle ligament repair.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria to search for articles on electronic databases and included studies in which study participants underwent primary lateral ligament repair and sex-specific outcomes were evaluated. Functional postoperative outcomes for males and females were recorded and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 2768 studies, 7 (0.25%) met inclusion criteria and were analyzed in this review. These studies included 618 patients (402 males [65%] and 216 females [35%]) who underwent primary lateral ligament repair for ankle instability. Karlsson score (P = .1582) and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score (P = .1586) analyses found no statistically significant difference between males and females. Postoperative success rate-defined as a "good" or "excellent" Karlsson score (>81)-was not found to be significantly different between males and females (P = .9374).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in postoperative mean Karlsson scores, AOFAS scores, or success rates between males and females who underwent primary lateral ankle ligament repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic.

Is arthroscopic surgery as successful as open approach in the treatment of lateral ankle instability?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic repair and open Ahlgren-Larsson method in patients with chronic lateral ankle instability.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 60 patients who were operated in our clinic between 2010 and 2018 with the diagnosis of chronic lateral ankle instability. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations were performed with AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, FAOS, and VAS scores.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with chronic lateral ankle instability were evaluated. 28 patients were treated with Ahlgren-Larsson method, and 32 patients were treated with arthroscopic repair. Follow-up duration was 35 ± 12 months for the open surgery group and 19 ± 2 months for the arthroscopic surgery group. The mean age of the arthroscopy group was 44 ± 9; the mean age of the open surgery group was 46 ± 11. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic features (age, sex, BMI). Postoperative clinical improvement was observed in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of functionality. However, there was a statistically significant difference in VAS in terms of pain and patient satisfaction in favor of arthroscopy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Ahlgren-Larsson method and arthroscopic repair technique are safe and effective for chronic lateral ankle instability. Arthroscopic technique may be preferred for pain and patient satisfaction as it is less invasive and less morbid.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Effectiveness of Hospital-Based Systemic Rehabilitation in Improving Ankle Function after Surgery in Chronic Ankle Instability Patients

We investigated the therapeutic effect of a postoperative hospital-based systemic rehabilitation protocol on ankle function in chronic ankle instability (CAI) patients. Thirty-five patients who underwent a modified Broström procedure for CAI were recruited in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Fifty-minute sessions of hospital-based rehabilitation were performed three times weekly for 12 weeks in the intervention group. Education-based rehabilitation was conducted at home in the control group. The outcomes were evaluated at baseline (T0), 12 weeks (T1), and 16 weeks (T2). The primary outcome was the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS). Ankle motor strength and spatiotemporal gait metrics were assessed as secondary outcomes. There were significant time and group interaction effects on the pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sports activities, and quality of life (QOL) domains of the FAOS (P < 0.05, all). The patients in the intervention group showed larger improvements in all domains of the FAOS than did the control group at both T1 and T2 (P < 0.05, all). The time and group interaction effects on invertor and evertor strength were also significant (P = 0.047 and P = 0.044). Invertor and evertor strength improved significantly more in the intervention group than in the control group at T1 and T2 (P < 0.05, all). The preferred walking velocity, cadence, step length on the affected side, and double stance phase duration tended to improve over time. Postoperative hospital-based rehabilitation helped improve CAI pain, symptoms, independence in activities of daily living, sports activity levels, and QOL more effectively than did conventional rehabilitation at home.

Evaluation modalities for the anatomical repair of chronic ankle instability

PURPOSE

Several evaluation modalities are reported in the literature dealing with the operative treatment of chronic ankle instability (CAI) both to establish the CAI diagnosis leading to the surgical indication and to assess the effectiveness of ankle stabilisation procedure. The purpose of this study is to present an overview of the pre- and postoperative evaluation modalities reported in the literature dealing with CAI operative treatment. The comprehensive analysis of the different modalities chosen by researchers is expected to suggest critical points in current evaluation ability of CAI surgical treatment.

METHODS

Systematic review of the literature on surgical treatment of CAI through anatomic procedures. Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane electronic databases were analysed, from 2004 to 2018.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-four studies met inclusion in this systematic review. 88 out of 104 studies analysed preoperative mechanical laxity of the ankle to depict the ligamentous insufficiency related to the subjective feeling of functional instability. Stress radiographs and manual stress examination of the ankle were the two most common modalities to evaluate joint laxity, reported in 67 and 53 studies, respectively. Clinical Outcome Measurement Scales (COMs) is the most common evaluation modality (102 out of 104 studies) to assess CAI surgical outcome. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot scale (AOFAS) and the Karlsson score are the most frequent COMs, reported in the 66% and 33%, respectively of the included literature. The radiographic analysis of ankle laxity after stabilisation procedures is the second most frequent postoperative evaluation modality, reported in 55 out 104 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of standardization among researchers related to both the criteria to establish the CAI diagnosis leading to the surgical indication and the modality chosen to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatment. Future standardization of evaluation modalities in the CAI population is desirable to increase consistency of reported data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, review of level I, II, III and IV studies.