Treatment of infra-isthmal femoral fracture with an intramedullary nail: Is retrograde nailing a better option than antegrade nailing?

Imaging risk factors for predicting postoperative complications of intramedullary nailing for tibial fracture

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the ratio of fracture site diameter to tibial isthmus diameter (TFI ratio) as a predictor of postoperative complications, including malunion and delayed union, after tibial intramedullary nailing for middle and lower tibial fractures.

METHODS

Data were collected from all adult patients older than 20 years of age who underwent tibial intramedullary nailing for middle and lower tibial fractures between January 2015 and January 2023 and were followed up for at least 1 year. Diabetes history, smoking history, fracture type, injury mechanism, surgical method, surgical approach, diameter of the medullary cavity at the fracture site, and diameter of the tibial isthmus were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the variables affecting the occurrence of complications. The TFI ratio was used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the parameters, and ROC curves were generated to establish TFI ratio thresholds for predicting complications.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients with middle and lower tibial fractures were treated with intramedullary nails. The mean age of the patients was 43.72 years (range, 21-81 years); 89 were males, and 34 were females. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that fracture type, open reduction surgery, superior patellar approach, and TFI ratio were significantly correlated with postoperative complications after intramedullary nailing of a tibial fracture. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the TFI ratio was an independent risk factor for complications (P = 0.001*). By using the TFI ratio as a predictor of complications, an ROC curve was generated to establish a threshold. The ROC curve showed that a TFI ratio ≥ 1.31 had a sensitivity of 0.89, a specificity of 0.71, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.82 for predicting complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that a wider intramedullary diameter and a shorter fixed length at the fracture site are associated with a higher incidence of complications after tibial intramedullary nailing. The TFI ratio may be used as a reliable parameter for predicting complications after such surgery. In patients with a high TFI ratio (≥ 1.31), additional reduction and fixation techniques may be needed to obtain and maintain fracture reduction.

Surgical Treatments for Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Narrative Review

Femoral shaft fractures are increasingly common due to various traumatic injuries. Intramedullary nail (IMN) is considered the gold standard treatment for these fractures, but comorbidities often require thorough trauma life support and intensive care. The primary goal of treatment is rigid fixation, early mobilisation, and long-term functional recovery. This article reviews current concepts in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, including the effects of early or delayed operation, differences between antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing, alternative methods to using a fracture table, methods to predict nail length before operation, assessing femoral rotation during an operation, and complications.

Early outcome measurement of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy versus continuous passive motion in knee function following retrograde femoral nailing-a prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the efficacy of continuous passive motion (CPM) versus conventional physical therapy (CPT) in the early postoperative period following retrograde femoral nailing (RFILN). Based on the principles of operation of CPM, we hypothesized that it would improve knee function and decrease pain after open reduction and internal fixation with a retrograde femoral interlocking nail.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-eight patients over the age of 18 years who met the inclusion criteria got randomized into one of two groups. The experimental group had CPM, while the control group had CPT. Postoperative knee functions assessed were the degree of knee stiffness, the total arc of motion, and knee pain. Knee stiffness, defined as the range of motion ≤ 90° assessed one week, two weeks, and six weeks postoperatively, while knee pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) on days one, two, three, four, five, six and seven postoperatively.

RESULTS

The CPM group had a significantly lower incidence of knee stiffness at one week, two weeks, and six weeks postoperatively than the CPT group (all p < 0.0001). The VAS scores of the CPM group on days one, two, three, four, five, six and seven were significantly lower than those of the CPT group (p < 0.006 for day one and p < 0.001 for the remaining days). Similarly, the total arc of motion gained postoperatively was significantly greater in the CPM group than in the CPT (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The continuous passive motion effectively reduced the number of patients with knee stiffness and knee pain. It increased the total arc of motion in the early postoperative period compared to CPT. Therefore, we recommend CPM for patients undergoing retrograde femoral nailing use in the early postoperative period.

Locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, fracture table and power reaming: retrograde affords greater procedural efficiency than antegrade approach

PURPOSE

To compare the intraoperative procedural efficiency of antegrade and retrograde locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, power reaming devices and fracture tables.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted on 238 isolated diaphyseal femur fractures fixed with SIGN Standard and Fin nails within three weeks of injury. The data included baseline patient and fracture characteristics, nail type and diameter, fracture reduction methods, operative times and outcome measures.

RESULTS

There were 84 and 154 fractures in the antegrade and retrograde groups respectively. Both groups were similar vis-a-vis baseline patient and fracture characteristics. Closed reduction of the fractures was significantly easier for retrograde than an antegrade approach. The retrograde approach more readily permitted the use of Fin nails. The mean nail diameter used for retrograde was significantly larger than that for antegrade. The time taken to achieve retrograde nailing was significantly lesser than that of antegrade. There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes of the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of expensive fracture-surgery gadgets, retrograde nailing offers many procedural advantages over antegrade, such as easier closed reduction and canal reaming, the greater possibility of using the Fin nail with fewer interlocking screws and shorter operative times. However, we acknowledge the lack of randomisation and the presence of an unequal number of fractures in the two groups as limitations of this study.

Effect of nailing technique on length of stay in isolated ballistic femoral shaft fractures

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate length of stay, postoperative mobilization and discharge disposition following intramedullary nailing of ballistic femoral shaft fractures stratified by nailing technique.

METHODS

All adult patients with isolated ballistic femoral shaft fractures between May 1, 2018, and September 1, 2021, were reviewed. The final cohort included 69 ballistic femur fractures in 69 patients. Of the 69 patients included, 29 were treated with retrograde nailing while 40 were treated with antegrade nailing.

RESULTS

The average length of stay of patients treated with antegrade nailing was 2.55 days (SD 1.3 days) compared with 3.45 days (SD 2.3 days) for patients treated with retrograde nailing; this was statistically significant (P = 0.04). Median steps on POD1 for antegrade nailing were 20 and 8 for retrograde. There was no significant difference in VAS pain scores between the two cohorts. All patients were discharged home.

CONCLUSION

The average length of stay for patients who underwent antegrade nailing was significantly shorter when compared with the retrograde nailing. Patients in the antegrade cohort mobilized further than the retrograde cohort in the immediate postoperative setting. We found no significant difference in VAS pain scores between the two cohorts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

"Fragment Width Ratio" as a Predictor of Nonunion for Femoral Shaft Fracture With Third Fragments

Previous studies have reported that large fracture fragment with displacement might cause nonunion of femoral shaft fractures. We therefore intended to delineate significant risk factors for developing a nonunion predisposed by a major fracture fragment. We analyzed 61 patients who were operated on using interlocking nails for femoral shaft fractures from 2009 to 2018. We classified patients with modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia fractures scores of less than 11 or needing reoperations by 1 year postoperatively as nonunion. We thereafter measured parameters of the displaced fracture fragment and fracture site to identify the significant difference between the union and non-union groups. We also applied the receiver operating characteristic curve to demonstrate a threshold value for the fragment width (FW) ratio. Among 61 patients with complete follow-up, no significant difference was found regarding length, displacement, and angulation of fragments between patients with and without union. Except for higher mean FW (P=.03) and the FW ratio (P=.01) in patients with nonunion, the logistic regression analysis demonstrated that FW ratio significantly affected union (P=.018; odds ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.001-0.522). Although a fracture fragment greater than 4 cm with displacement greater than 2 cm was reported to significantly cause nonunions, our study showed that an FW ratio greater than 0.55 instead of fragment size or displacement was predictive for the occurrence of nonunion adjoining to the fracture site. Fixation of the third fracture fragment should not be ignored for preventing a nonunion. More attention should be paid to achieve a better fixation for a major fracture fragment with an FW ratio greater than 0.55 to avoid the development of non-union following the use of interlocking nail for femoral shaft fracture. [Orthopedics. 202x;xx(x):xx-xx.].

Surgical outcomes of retrograde nailing enhanced with minimally invasive cerclage cable fixation for infra-isthmal femoral fracture

BACKGROUND

Infra-isthmal femoral fracture has been known as one of the risk factors for femoral nonunion. Retrograde intramedullary nailing can provide reliable stability of the distal fragment in infra-isthmal femoral fracture, but adequate reduction is required to achieve a successful outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of retrograde nailing enhanced with minimally invasive cerclage cable fixation for infra-isthmal femoral fracture.

METHODS

Between March 2013 and July 2017, 15 patients with infra-isthmal fractures treated with retrograde nailing and minimally invasive cerclage cable fixation were included in this study. Cerclage cable was applied for reduction aid (reduction cable) or prevention of further displacement in non-displaced extension of the distal spiral fracture (prevention cable). Number and function of cerclage cables, operation time, additional surgery, and complications were assessed. Further displacement of the wedge after nailing, coronal and sagittal alignment, displacement of the main fragment, and time from injury to union were evaluated as radiologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 15 patients in this study, 14 were treated with reduction cables. Average postoperative coronal and sagittal angulation was 1.7° (1° varus to 4° valgus) and 1.6° (2° flexion to 11° extension). Mean displacement between the main fragments was 3.5 mm (range 0-22 mm). Four of the 14 cases used additional prevention cables combined with reduction cable. Only one case was treated solely with a prevention cable. A total of five prevention cables were maintained without further displacement. All patients achieved bone union, and the average time to union was 22.7 weeks (range 9-44 weeks). There were no complications as a result of surgery, such as infection or major neurovascular injury.

CONCLUSIONS

The minimally invasive cerclage cable technique could be a useful and safe enhancement in retrograde nailing for infra-isthmal femoral fracture in order to prevent further displacement and to reduce the main fracture.

Retrospective Comparison of Postoperative Fascia Iliaca Block and Multimodal Drug Injection on Early Function of the Knee in Femoral Fractures Using Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing

Introduction

There is a common concern about the pain and rehabilitation of the knee after femoral retrograde intramedullary nailing. It is essential for early postoperative knee function required for physical self-maintenance in daily life. And a favorable rehabilitation of the knee usually promotes the quality of life. However, early rehabilitation is absent or insufficient for many patients in postoperative management. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the effect of early knee function improvement in comparison to postoperative fascia iliaca blocking (FIB) and multimodal drug injection (MDI). Patients and Methods. A retrospective analysis of 41 patients receiving femoral fracture treatment with retrograde intramedullary nailing, was performed during 2018–2020. 19 patients were treated with MDI as postoperative analgesia, and 22 patients were treated with FIB. Rehabilitation started on the first postoperative day and lasted for 3 months. Visual analog scale (VAS), the range of motion (ROM) of the knee, and single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) were assessed.

Results

There was no significant difference shown in any of the demographic, fracture types, and operative time. All patients performed regular and voluntary knee rehabilitation and weight-bearing at home following the instruction from the orthopedic staff. Pain in the FIB group at postoperative 1-day was milder (1.7 ± 1.1), compared with that in the MDI group (2.8 ± 1.3, p=0.038). There was a significant difference in VAS between two groups at postoperative 1-month (p=0.031), with a peak score in the FIB group (3.3 ± 0.9). At postoperative 3-month, both groups had pain relief with similar VAS (p=0.465). The ROM of the knee in both groups was continuously improved during the first three months. The SANE in the MDI group was significantly different compared with FIB at 1-month (p=0.026). However, scores of SANE were similar in both groups at 3 months (p=0.541). All patients were identified as fractures union at 9-month or 12-month follow-up.

Conclusion

The knee pain was commonly experienced in this series of retrograde femoral nailings. Both MDI and FIB provided immediate and effective pain control after femoral fracture surgery. MDI was more beneficial to continuous pain control and knee rehabilitation in the early follow-up. The extent of pain relief and knee function improvement reached the same level at postoperative 3-month.

Closure of the femoral medullary canal after retrograde nailing using an in-situ osteochondral autograft-Technical trick and a case series

Retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) is the favored over antegrade intramedullary nailing in fractures of the distal femur. It provides a longer working length and allows for multiple distal screw insertion and therefore a more stable construct. Concerns remain regarding the violation of the knee cartilage and the effect this has on knee function. Many studies have shown high incidence of knee pain with reports varying from 20 to 86%. We describe a novel technical trick aiming at partially restoring the knee cartilage of the operated side and decreasing the hemorrhage stemming from the medullary canal. Our experience of the technique and the case series shows that closing the entrance point of the medullary canal after a RIMN procedure leads to better function and less knee pain in the postoperative period.

Assessment of clinical and radiographic outcomes following retrograde versus antegrade nailing of infraisthmic femoral shaft fractures without the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy in Tanzania

To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes following antegrade versus retrograde intramedullary nailing of infraisthmic femoral shaft fractures.

Design

Secondary analysis of prospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary hospital in Tanzania.

Participants

Adult patients with infraisthmic diaphyseal femur fractures.

Intervention

Antegrade or retrograde SIGN intramedullary nail.

Outcomes

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL), radiographic healing, knee range of motion, pain, and alignment (defined as less than or equal to 5 degrees of angular deformity in both coronal and sagittal planes) assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks postoperatively.

Results

Of 160 included patients, 141 (88.1%) had 1-year follow-up and were included in analyses: 42 (29.8%) antegrade, 99 (70.2%) retrograde. Antegrade-nailed patients had more loss of coronal alignment (P = .026), but less knee pain at 6 months (P = .017) and increased knee flexion at 6 weeks (P = .021). There were no significant differences in reoperations, HRQOL, hip pain, knee extension, radiographic healing, or sagittal alignment.

Conclusions

Antegrade nailing of infraisthmic femur fractures had higher incidence of alignment loss, but no detectable differences in HRQOL, pain, radiographic healing, or reoperation. Retrograde nailing was associated with increased knee pain and decreased knee range of motion at early time points, but this dissipated by 1 year. To our knowledge, this is the first study to prospectively compare outcomes over 1 year in patients treated with antegrade versus retrograde SIGN intramedullary nailing of infraisthmic femur fractures.Level of Evidence: III.

"Ratio of fracture site diameter to isthmus femoral canal diameter" as a predictor of complication following treatment of infra-isthmal femoral shaft fracture with antegrade intramedullary nailing

INTRODUCTION

Fixation of infra-isthmus femoral shaft fracture using antegrade intramedullary (IM) nailing is difficult and is associated with a high complication rate. This study aimed to identify risk factors for complications following this procedure. The ratio of the fracture site diameter to the diameter of the femoral intramedullary canal of the isthmus (FI ratio) was evaluated as a novel parameter to predict complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent antegrade IM nailing for infra-isthmus femoral shaft fracture between January 2008 and December 2018 and had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was occurrence of complication, including non-union, mal-alignment, fixation failure, or progressive loss of reduction. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors of complication. The sensitivity and specificity of FI ratio as a predictor of complication was calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to establish an FI ratio threshold to predict occurrence of complication following antegrade IM nailing.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with a mean age of 47.1 years were included. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, comminuted fracture pattern (p=0.026), distance from screws to fracture site (< 3cm) (p=0.002), and higher FI ratio (p=0.001) were associated with complication. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, FI ratio was identified as an independent risk factor for complication following antegrade IM nailing (p=0.038). ROC curve indicated that FI ratio ≥ 2 had sensitivity and specificity of 0.72 and 0.72, respectively, in predicting complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that wider intramedullary diameter at the fracture site was associated with higher complication rate following antegrade IM nailing in distal infra-isthmal femoral fractures. The FI ratio could be a reliable predictor of complication after antegrade IM nailing for such fracture, and alternative strategies should be considered for patients with higher FI ratio (≥ 2).

Safety and efficacy of a novel cephalomedullary nail femoral shaft fractures: a retrospective observational cohort in 33 patients

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in femoral shaft fracture fixation, the nonunion rate remains relatively high; and there is limited data on the efficacy and failure rate of specific implants. A novel cephalomedullary nail provides the ability to treat femur shaft fractures in isolation, with associated ipsilateral femur injuries, and provides various options for proximal and distal fixation exists on the market; but literature remains limited on the safety and efficacy of this implant. The aim of this study is to evaluate the early failure rate of this cephalomedullary nail, while comparing the nonunion rate to what is currently presented in the literature. This study is the first of its kind in evaluation of a specific implant for treatment of femoral shaft fractures and ipsilateral pathology.

METHODS

Patients over 18 years of age, with traumatic femur shaft fractures, treated with this particular cephalomedullary nail and available for a minimum of 3-month follow-up were included for analysis. Data was collected by retrospective chart review and review of existing radiographs. Demographic data, injury details, AO/OTA fracture classification, and implant details were recorded for each patient. Primary outcome measured was implant failures (screw or nail breakage). Secondary outcomes measured included malunion, nonunion, deep infection, post-operative complications, and need for reoperation.

RESULTS

Of the 33 patients included for analysis, 1 patient went on to non-union. There were no cases of implant failure. The single nonunion was a high-energy mechanism, open fracture, and higher level AO/OTA classification. The remaining 32 reached radiographic union at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

The nonunion rate of this novel cephalomedullary nail is comparable to what is reported in the literature. This nail is a safe and effective implant to treat femoral shaft fractures with a variety of ipsilateral femoral shaft injuries and reliably leads fracture union. Further studies are needed analyzing implant failure and comparing specific implants.

Surgical outcomes of simple distal femur fractures in elderly patients treated with the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique: can percutaneous cerclage wiring reduce the fracture healing time?

INTRODUCTION

Achieving adequate reduction is difficult when performing minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in elderly patients with simple distal femur fracture. This study aimed to evaluate the elderly patients who had undergone percutaneous wiring-assisted reduction with MIPO for simple distal femur fractures to determine the effect of this technique on reduction quality and fracture union.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2009 and September 2017, 56 patients (56 femurs) with displaced simple distal femur fractures treated with MIPO at three trauma centers were finally enrolled. The MIPO technique with percutaneous cerclage wire reduction was performed in 25 patients (Group A). Among them, 12 patients had a simple spiral metaphyseal fracture (Group A*). In comparison, MIPO without percutaneous cerclage wire reduction was performed in 31 patients (Group B). Among them, seven patients had a simple spiral metaphyseal fracture (Group B*). Medical records containing surgical records were retrospectively reviewed to investigate demographic data, comorbidities, complications, operative time, and fluoroscopic time. Radiographs were evaluated for assessing the quality of the reduction and fracture union.

RESULTS

The mean fracture union time of Group A* was 21.7 weeks, which was significantly shorter than that of Group B* (28.6 weeks). The mean coronal and sagittal angulation in Group A* was 0.6° and 0.7°, respectively, which were significantly lesser than those in Group B* (2.4° and 3.2°, respectively). Mean translation in Group A* was 1.43 mm, which was significantly shorter than that in Group B* (3.81 mm). Nonunion occurred in two patients in Group B.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of simple spiral distal femur fractures with percutaneous cerclage wiring-assisted reduction and the MIPO technique in elderly patients resulted in better reduction and faster union time. Therefore, this technique could be a good solution if used in accordance with the indication.

Reduced Risk of Reoperation Using Intramedullary Nailing with Femoral Neck Protection in Low-Energy Femoral Shaft Fractures

BACKGROUND

In Sweden, approximately 1 in 4 women who are ≥50 years of age will sustain a hip fracture. Patients treated for a femoral shaft fracture are likely to have an even higher risk. We hypothesized that intramedullary nails protecting the femoral neck reduce the risk of subsequent hip fracture and allow the patient to avoid a challenging reoperation.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2010, 5,475 fractures of the femoral shaft, in patients who were ≥55 years of age, were registered in a national registry in Sweden. Of these patients, 897 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We used radiographs and register data to identify the reasons for and the types of reoperation that occurred between the index surgical procedure and December 31, 2014. The categories of implants were determined through a review of radiographs as intramedullary nails with and without femoral neck protection. Reoperations related to peri-implant fractures (including hip fractures) were analyzed as a subgroup of all major reoperations. Multivariable-adjusted, cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to compare the risk of reoperation between cases with nails with and without femoral neck protection.

RESULTS

Among the 897 patients, a total of 82 reoperations were performed. In 640 patients who were treated with intramedullary nails with femoral neck protection, there were 7 peri-implant fractures (no hip fractures) and 27 major reoperations. Among the 257 patients who were treated with intramedullary nails without femoral neck protection, 14 peri-implant hip fractures and 24 major reoperations were identified. Patients who received nails with femoral neck protection had a lower hazard for any peri-implant fracture (multivariable-adjusted cause-specific HR, 0.19 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07 to 0.5]) and major reoperation (multivariable-adjusted cause-specific HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.92]).

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary nails with femoral neck protection in the treatment of low-energy femoral shaft fractures prevent secondary hip fractures and decrease the overall risk of reoperation for 4 to 6 years postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Augmentation plating leaving the nail in situ is an excellent option for treating femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing: a multicentre study

PURPOSE

In recent years, plate augmentation over a retained intramedullary (IM) nail has been shown to be an effective option for managing femur fracture nonunions because it improves the biomechanical environment of the fracture site without causing additional biological damage. In the current study, we present outcome data from 22 consecutive patients treated with plate augmentation for femoral shaft nonunion leaving the nail in situ.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2015 and 2018, 22 consecutive patients with femoral shaft aseptic nonunion after IM nailing were treated with plate augmentation over a retained nail at four different institutions. Nonunion was categorized based on its anatomical location and was classified according to the Weber and Cech classification. Cortical defects greater than 1.0 cm, the type of nailing procedure, and the number of previous interventions were recorded. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically to measure the healing of nonunion sites. The time to fracture union and complications were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used when applicable.

RESULTS

One site location was supra-isthmic, 12 were isthmic, and 9 were infra-isthmic. There were 10 cases of vascular nonunion and 12 cases of avascular nonunion. A cortical defect greater than 1.0 cm was observed in three patients. Antegrade nailing was performed in 11 patients, and retrograde nailing was performed in 11 patients. Reaming was performed in 12 patients. In eight patients, the fracture was openly reduced during the IM nailing index procedure. The average number of previous interventions before augmentation plating was 1.6 (1-4). Bone union was achieved in 19 patients after augmentation plating with an average follow-up of 23.5 months (12-51 months). Excellent and good clinical results were observed in all patients. There was no plate or screw breakage, and no patient developed infection.

CONCLUSION

Augmentation plating leaving the nail in situ is an excellent option for treating femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing, with a high union rate and few complications. We believe the technique should gradually replace exchange nailing as the standard of care for the majority of femoral shaft nonunions that occur after IM nailing.

Radiographic, Bone Densitometry and Clinic Outcomes Assessments in Femoral Shaft Fractures Fixed by Plating or Locking Retrograde Nail

Introduction:

Distal femoral shaft fractures are characterized by increasing incidence and complexity and are still considered a challenging problem (high morbidity and mortality). No consensus on best surgical option has been achieved.

Aim:

This study aims is to investigate radiographic, mineral bone densitometry and clinical outcomes of locking retrograde intramedullary (LRN) nailing and anatomical locking plate to surgically treat distal femoral shaft fractures in young adults based on the hypothesis that there is no statistical difference among the two surgical options in terms of results (radiographic, bone densitometry and outcomes assessment).

Methods:

Retrospective study: 30 patients divided into 2 groups (Group 1 LRN, Group 2 Nailing). Average age was 42.67±18.32 for Group 1 and 42.84 ±18.32 for Group 2 (range of age 18-65 for both groups). Gender Ratio (male: female) was 2.75 (11:4) for both Group 1 and 2. AO Classification, NUSS and RUSH score, VAS, Dexa scans, plain radiographs were used. Evaluation endpoint: 12 months after surgery (mean follow up 16.24).

Results:

No statistical difference in terms of surgery time, transfusions, wound healing. Similar results with regard to average time of bone healing, RUSH scores, VAS, regression between RUSH and VAS, average correlation clinical-radiographic results and patients outcomes. Only one patient of each group had reduction of mineral bone densitometry values.

Conclusion:

No statistical difference about the use of LNR or Nailing for treatment of distal femur shaft fractures in terms of radiographic, bone densitometry and outcomes has been found accordingly to our results. Good subjective and objective results are provided by both techniques. The choice among the two techniques must be based on surgeons’ experience, indications and subjective patients’ aspects. The absence of relevant similar data in the published literature does not allow definitive validation (or rejection) of our hypothesis. A more powered study with bigger cohort is needed for definitive validation.

A surgical algorithm for the management of recalcitrant distal femur nonunions based on distal femoral bone stock, fracture alignment, medial void, and stability of fixation

BACKGROUND

Recalcitrant distal femur nonunions (RDFN) are a challenge in management due to factors including poor bone stock, multiple surgeries, metaphyseal bone loss, and joint contractures. There are no specific guidelines in the management of cases of RDFN. Based on our experience, we devised an algorithm and we present the results of 62 cases of RDFN managed following it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our algorithm was formulated after analyzing 34 cases of RDFN and it involved four factors which were hypothesized to influence outcomes namely: distal femoral bone stock, extent of medial void, alignment of the fracture, and stability of fixation. Each factor was addressed specifically to achieve a good outcome. Between 2012 and 2015, 62 patients with RDFN at a mean age of 47.4 years (26-73) and 2.3 prior surgeries (2-6) were managed following the algorithm.

INTERVENTION

58 patients required revision osteosynthesis to improve alignment and achieve a stable fixation. 4 elderly patients with poor bone stock were managed with arthroplasty. Extent of medial void was found to significantly influence surgical decision making. Five patients without medial void required only cancellous autograft bone grafting, 47 patients with < 2 cm void were treated with an allograft fibular strut inserted in the metaphysis and 6 patients with a void > 2 cm were managed with medial plating.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

57 patients treated with osteosynthesis achieved union at an average of 7.4 months (6-11) and the 4 patients managed with arthroplasty also had a favourable outcome. One patient who was managed with revision osteosynthesis had a nonunion with an implant failure and needed an arthroplasty procedure. The average LEFS (lower extremity functional score) of all our patients was 67 (51-76) at an average follow-up of 18.2 months (12-33).

CONCLUSION

Our stepwise surgical algorithm would help surgeons to identify the factors that need to be addressed and guide them towards the interventions that are necessary to achieve a successful outcome while managing cases of RDFN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL CARE

Level I Tertiary trauma centre.