The efficacy and safety of knotless barbed sutures in total joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

The Use of Barbed Sutures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review on Clinical-Surgical Outcomes, Costs, and Complications

PURPOSE

Total hip arthroplasty is among the most successful procedures in orthopaedic surgery. As the total number of total hip arthroplasties is constantly rising and it is expected to further increase, efforts oriented to optimise surgical pathways are investigated, aiming to reduce complications and diminish costs. The wound suturing phase is one of the steps that may be addressed. Barbed sutures have proved to reduce surgical times and enhance suture stability, then reducing wound-related complications in many surgical fields. The evidence on the use of this technology in total hip arthroplasty is still sparse, and its effect on patient outcomes and costs must still be clarified.

METHODS

A systematic search of studies published from 1 January 2000 to 1 March 2023 was performed. Two authors independently reviewed the literature available in eight electronic databases to identify papers eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies investigating 6959 procedures on 6959 patients were included in the final analysis. Five studies were randomised controlled trials, and the overall quality of studies ranged from moderate to high. The mean age of patients ranged from 43.8 to 70 years. BMI ranged from 25 to 31.9 kg/m2. The mean follow-up of studies ranged from 3 to 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence included in the systematic review suggested that the use of barbed sutures is associated with lower suturing times, complication rates, and overall costs when compared to the use of traditional suturing techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, systematic review of level I and II studies.

Knotless suture in revision total joint arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The use of barbed sutures for wound closure in primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been shown to be effective and safe. However, their effectiveness and safety in revision TJA procedures has not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using barbed suture closure in revision TJA setting.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients undergoing revision TJA between September 2020 and November 2022 were included in this randomized controlled trial study. Following informed consent, patients were computer-randomized to the treatment arm (barbed suture wound closure) or to the control arm (conventional wound closure). Closure duration, closure rate, number of sutures used and wound related outcomes including complication rates and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The use of barbed sutures decreased closure time by 6 min (30.1 vs. 36.1 min, P = 0.008) with a higher wound closure rate (6.5 vs. 5.5 mm/minute, P = 0.013). Additionally, the number of sutures used for wound closure in the barbed group was significantly lower than in the control group (6.2 vs. 10.1, respectively, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rate of postoperative wound complications (P = 0.556) or patient and observer POSAS scores (P = 0.211, P = 297, respectively) between the two groups at 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Closure of revision TJA surgical wound utilizing barbed sutures reduced closure time and the number of needles handled by operative staff, with no significant increase in intra- or post-operative complications rate when compared to traditional closure technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Effect of barbed versus standard sutures on wound complications in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

A barbed suture has been demonstrated to be effective in shortening the stitching time and improving the aesthetic appearance of the stitches during the entire knee replacement. However, no meta-analyses have been conducted specifically to evaluate the effect of the barbed thread on wound complications relative to the conventional suture. A comprehensive search of the PubMed database, the Embase database, the Cochrane Library and the Web of Science was performed to obtain search data up to June 2023, and only randomised controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. We used Review Manager 5.3 for data synthesis and analysis. This meta-analysis included eight studies. It was found that the use of barbed sutures did not improve the incidence of the disease, the infection of the wound, the closure of the abscess and the injury. However, because of the limited sample size of the randomised controlled trials for this meta-analysis, the data should be handled with caution. More high-quality, large-sample studies will be required to confirm the results.

Barbed Suture versus Interrupted Suture in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Are They Equivalent?

Introduction

Posterior cervical spine approaches have been associated with increased rates of wound complications compared to anterior approaches. While barbed suture wound closure for lumbar spine surgery has been shown to be safe and efficacious, there is no literature regarding its use in posterior cervical spine surgery. In a cohort of patients undergoing elective posterior cervical spine surgery, we sought to compare postoperative complication rates between barbed and traditional interrupted suture closure.

Methods

A retrospective review of demographics, past medical history, and operative and postoperative variables collected from a prospective registry between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020 was undertaken. All patients 18 years old and above undergoing elective posterior cervical fusion were included. The primary outcome of interest was wound complications, including surgical site infection (SSI), dehiscence, or hematoma. In addition, numerical rating scale (NRS) neck pain (NP), NRS arm pain (AP), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and operative time were collected. A variety of statistical tests were used to compare the two suture groups.

Results

Of 117 patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion, 89 (76%) were closed with interrupted suture and 28 (24%) with barbed suture. The interrupted cohort were more likely to have >1 comorbidity (p<0.001), diabetes mellitus (p=0.013), and coronary artery disease (p=0.002). No difference in postoperative wound complications between interrupted/barbed sutures was observed after univariate (OR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.27-4.25, p=0.927) and multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.15-4.00, p=0.756). Univariate logistic regression revealed no differences in achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) NRS-NP (OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.28-1.88, p=0.508) or NRS-AP (OR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.25-1.90, p=0.464) at 3 months between suture groups. The interrupted suture group was less likely to achieve MCID NDI at 3 months (OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.80, p=0.016).

Conclusions

Barbed suture closure in posterior cervical spine surgery does not lead to higher rates of postoperative wound complications/SSI compared to traditional interrupted fascial closure.

Barbed Sutures for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Have Shorter Wound Closure Time and are Cost-Effective in Comparison to Traditional Sutures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

Surgical wound closure is of paramount importance, especially in total joint replacement surgeries wherein correct closure technique not only aids in rapid healing, but with lesser complications, we would be looking at a quicker rehabilitation of the patients. Bidirectional barbed sutures appear to reduce the wound closure time in all the planes and are cost-effective in comparison with traditional sutures. This study is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and superiority of bidirectional barbed sutures in comparison to traditional suturing techniques.

METHODS

Electronic databases like Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Lilacs were searched up to February 2021. 16 high-quality randomized-controlled trials (RCT) were selected in this study. The search method identified 2168 total knee replacements (TKR) and 229 total hip replacements (THR) among 2397 patients. All the studies compared barbed sutures with traditional wound closure techniques. Data of wound closure time, overall cost, length of hospital stay, overall wound complications, suture-related complications, range of motion data, and knee society scores were collected and further analyzed.

RESULTS

The baseline patient characteristics were identical among all the included studies. Compared to traditional sutures a significantly decreased wound closure time in both THR and TKRs (p < 0.00001) and cost (p < 0.00001) was noted, although no statistically significant difference was found in overall complications in THRs (p = 0.95) and TKRs (p = 0.69). ROM (p = 0.54-6 weeks after surgery and p = 0.68-3 months after surgery) and Knee society scores (p = 0.92) in both the groups of patients undergoing TKR. However, the length of hospital stay was prolonged in the barbed suture group (p = 0.01), pinpricks (p = 0.02), and broken sutures (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Novel methods of wound closure such as barbed sutures achieve satisfactory surgical implementation being more efficient in the form of decreasing the overall wound closure time, with comparable wound complication rates and being cost-effective. But the drawbacks like the incidence of broken sutures and pinpricks are more. Overall using barbed sutures in place of traditional sutures may be considered safe and a viable alternative choice for suturing in total joint replacements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, Systematic review and Meta-analysis of RCT.

A comparison of barbed continuous suture versus conventional interrupted suture for fascial closure in total hip arthroplasty

A barbed suture is a self-anchoring knotless suture hypothesized to shorten suture time and reduce the tension point of the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare the barbed suture and the interrupted suture for fascial closure in total hip arthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty from March 2014 to June 2020. We evaluated 324 cases among 274 patients consisting of 188 males and 86 females. We collected the following data: demographics, time for wound closure, the number of threads used, hemoglobin level, surgical site pain, and wound complications. Variables were analyzed for their association with closure time using multiple regression analyses between the barbed suture (the SFX group) and the interrupted suture (the Vicryl group). Mean closure time was 5.8 min lower and the mean number of sutures used was 2.2 lower in the SFX group versus the Vicryl group (P < 0.01 and < 0.01, respectively). There were no statistical intergroup differences in the mean largest hemoglobin drop, the incidence of transfusion, surgical site pain, and the incidence of wound complications. The use of barbed sutures for fascial closure in total hip arthroplasty effectively reduces the surgical time without increasing wound complications.

Impact of Whole-Layer Barbed Suture Closure on the Postoperative Effect and Aesthetic Satisfaction with Incision After Knee Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of whole-layer barbed suture for incision closure on the clinical outcome and aesthetic satisfaction of patients with the incision following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 94 patients (37 men and 57 women, 50-84 years old) who underwent a first TKA between May 2018 and April 2021. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to the suture mode, with 45 cases (group A) receiving closure of the deep tissue with a barbed suture and intradermal suture of the incision with another barbed suture and 49 cases (group B) receiving closure of the deep tissue with absorbable suture and interrupted suture of the incision with nonabsorbable suture. Further comparisons were performed regarding incision length, suture time, postoperative incision complications, Hollander Wound Evaluation Score (HWES), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, American Knee Society (AKS) score, and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). The clinical effects of the two suture modes in TKA and the patients' aesthetic satisfaction with the incision were also evaluated at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the operation.

RESULTS

Compared with group B, group A had higher HWES at 2 weeks after the operation (P < 0.05), shorter suture times (P < 0.05) and lower POSAS scores at 3 and 6 months after the operation (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in incision length, complication rate, HSS or AKS scores (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the interrupted suture, the use of whole-layer barbed suture for incision closure after TKA has the advantages of a safe and effective outcome, short operation time, high cosmesis degree of the wound scar and high patient satisfaction.

Staples versus sutures for skin closure in hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Objective

The purpose of the present study was to estimate complications and other outcomes associated with staple and suture closure after hip arthroplasty through meta-analysis techniques and a systematic review.

Methods

We searched for articles in EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. To determine the eligibility of the searched trials, Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager software was used to perform the meta-analysis.

Results

Five randomized controlled trials and one retrospective cohort trial were included in our study. Our study indicated that for skin closure after hip arthroplasty, the risks of superficial infection and prolonged discharge were higher with staples than with sutures. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of allergic reaction, dehiscence, inflammation, abscess formation, the Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale or patient's satisfaction with skin closure methods. However, suturing required a longer operating time.

Conclusions

Closure with sutures is associated with lower risks of superficial infection and prolonged discharge than closure with staples following hip arthroplasty, but it may take more time.

New Perspective for Soft Tissue Closure in Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) Using Barbed Sutures

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of barbed versus smooth sutures for soft tissue closure of exposed jawbone sites in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) patients. Exposed necrotic jawbone sites surgically managed by intraoral soft tissue closure were evaluated. Either barbed sutures (Stratafix™ or V-Loc™) together with Prolene^® or Vicryl^® sutures were used. We estimated the effect of barbed sutures (BS) with Prolene^® compared to smooth sutures (Vicryl^®) on the hazard rate of intraoral soft tissue dehiscence using a multivariate Cox regression model within a target trial framework, adjusting for relevant confounders. In total, 306 operations were performed in 188 sites. In the primary analysis 182 sites without prior surgery were included. Of these, 113 sites developed a dehiscence during follow-up. 84 sites were operated using BS and Prolene^®. A total of 222 sites were operated with Vicryl^® (control group). In the BS group, the median time to event (i.e., dehiscence) was 148 days (interquartile range (IQR), 42–449 days) compared to 15 days (IQR, 12–52 days) in the control group. The hazard rate of developing intraoral dehiscence was 0.03 times (95%-confidence interval (CI): 0.01; 0.14, p < 0.001) lower for BS patients compared to the control group. Within the limits of a retrospective study, BS showed a high success rate and are therefore recommended for soft tissue closure of exposed jawbone sites in MRONJ patients. Additional studies are warranted to further evaluate this novel application of BS.

Real-World Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Open Colorectal Surgery with Wound Closure Incorporating Triclosan-Coated Barbed Sutures: A Multi-Institution, Retrospective Database Study

Purpose

Open colorectal surgery is associated with a high rate of postoperative wound complications. This is a single-arm study of real-world outcomes of triclosan-coated barbed suture (Ethicon's STRATAFIX^TM Symmetric PDS^TM Plus Knotless Tissue Control Device [SSPP]) used in open colorectal surgery.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study using the Premier Healthcare Database. The study included patients who underwent an inpatient open colorectal surgery with wound closure using SSPP (size 0 or 1 to increase the likelihood the suture was used in fascia) between October 2015-September 2019 (N=593). Wound complications, hospital length of stay, total hospital costs (2019 US$), and all-cause readmissions post-discharge were measured. Post-hoc multivariable analyses compared wound complications between non-elective admissions and elective.

Results

The overall incidence of wound complications within 30-days post-procedure was 7.1%, with the majority of those being surgical site infections (SSI) (6.0%). Mean operation time was 190 (standard deviation [SD]=64.4) mins, postoperative length of stay was 8.1 (SD=11.9) days, 30-day readmission rate was 11.8%, and total hospital costs were $31,693 (SD=$40,076). As compared with published literature on the rate of SSI in colorectal surgery, the 30-day rate of SSI in the present study (6.0%) fell within the range of 5.4% to 18.2% for open colorectal surgery and from 4.3% to 21.5% for combined open and minimally invasive procedures. Multivariable-adjusted incidence proportions of wound complications were slightly lower for non-elective admissions and did not differ significantly from those of elective admissions.

Conclusion

The rate of wound complications observed in the present study falls within the range of rates previously reported in the literature, suggesting a safe and effective role for SSPP in open colorectal surgery. In post hoc analyses, the adjusted rate of wound complications was similar between non-elective and elective admissions. Head-to-head studies are required to determine comparative advantages or disadvantages for SSPP versus other sutures.

Barbed suture versus traditional suture in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

BACKGROUND

Barbed suture has been widely used in some surgical fields, and it has achieved good results, but the application in total knee arthroplasty is still controversial.

OBJECTIVE

Literature is collected for statistical analysis so as to provide evidence for the use of barbed suture in Total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane library and EMBASE database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using barbed suture and conventional suture to close incisions after primary total knee arthroplasty, and the retrieval time was from July 2019 to the establishment of the database. Literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality evaluation and data extraction were conducted for the final included literature, and statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of six RCTs (826 knees) were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that the re-negative conversion could shorten the wound closure time (MD -4.41, 95% CI -5.11 to -3.72, P < .00001) and reduce the wound closure total cost (MD -282.61, 95% CI -445.36 to -119.85, P = .0007) and acupuncture injury (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.78, P = .02), and did not significantly increasing the incidence of complications (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.05-0.96, P = .38) or suture breakages (RR 4.58, 95% CI 0.16-128.29, P = .37). There were no significant differences in ROM at postoperative 6 weeks and 3 months (MD -0.74, 95% CI -4.19 to 2.71, P = .67; MD -0.30, 95% CI -2.62 to 2.02, P = .80) and no significant differences in KSS at postoperative 6 weeks (MD -0.22, 95% CI -3.10 to 2.66, P = .88).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that barbed suture is a fast, low-cost, safe and effective suture method in total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional suture, we also need more literature and longer follow-up to confirm this conclusion.

Benefits of barbed suture utilisation in gastrointestinal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Anastomosis formation constitutes a critical aspect of many gastrointestinal procedures. Barbed suture materials have been adopted by some surgeons to assist in this task. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the safety and efficacy of barbed suture material for anastomosis formation compared with standard suture materials.

METHODS

An electronic search of Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane databases was performed. Weighted mean differences were calculated for effect size of barbed suture material compared with standard material on continuous variables and pooled odds ratios were calculated for discrete variables.

FINDINGS

There were nine studies included. Barbed suture material was associated with a significant reduction in overall operative time (WMD: -12.87 (95% CI = -20.16 to -5.58) (P = 0.0005)) and anastomosis time (WMD: -4.28 (95% CI = -6.80 to -1.75) (P = 0.0009)). There was no difference in rates of anastomotic leak (POR: 1.24 (95% CI = 0.89 to 1.71) (P = 0.19)), anastomotic bleeding (POR: 0.80 (95% CI = 0.29 to 2.16) (P = 0.41)), or anastomotic stricture (POR: 0.72 (95% CI = 0.21 to 2.41) (P = 0.59)).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of barbed sutures for gastrointestinal anastomosis appears to be associated with shorter overall operative times. There was no difference in rates of complications (including anastomotic leak, bleeding or stricture) compared with standard suture materials.

Enhanced recovery short-stay hip and knee joint replacement program improves patients outcomes while reducing hospital costs

INTRODUCTION

An attractive option to reduce hospital length of stay (LOS) after hip or knee joint replacement (THA, TKA) is to follow the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery principles (ERAS) to improve patient experience to a level where they will feel confident to leave for home earlier. The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of short-stay protocol following the ERAS principles.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that our ERAS THA and TKA short-stay protocol would result in a lower complication rate, shorter hospital LOS and reduced direct health care costs compared to our standard procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We compared the complications rated according to Clavien-Dindo scale, hospital LOS and costs of the episode of care between a prospective cohort of 120 ERAS short-stay THA or TKA and a matched historical control group of 150 THA or TKA.

RESULTS

Significantly lower rate of Grade 1 and 2 complications in the ERAS short-stay group compared with the standard group (mean 0.8 vs 3.0, p<0.001). No difference was found between the 2 groups for Grade 3, 4, or 5 complications. The mean hospital LOS for the ERAS short-stay group decreased by 2.8 days for the THAs (0.1 vs 2.9 days, p<0.001) and 3.9 days for the TKAs (1.0 vs 4.9 days, p<0.001). The mean estimated direct health care costs reduction with the ERAS short-stay protocol was 1489 CAD per THA and 4158 CAD per TKA.

DISCUSSION

In many short-stay protocols, focus has shifted from ERAS goals of a reduction in complications and improved recuperation to use length of stay as the main factor of success. Implementation of an ERAS short-stay protocol for patients undergoing THA or TKA at our institution resulted not only in reduced hospital LOS, but also in improved patient care and reduced direct health care costs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

The Impact of Running, Monofilament Barbed Suture for Subcutaneous Tissue Closure on Infection Rates in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, running, monofilament barbed suture has become more popular as an efficient and economical alternative to traditional braided interrupted suture for wound closure following total joint arthroplasty. Its overall association with wound complications following surgery remains unknown at this time. Several studies have investigated its use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but there is limited literature surrounding use in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this retrospective cohort study, our primary objective was to determine whether the use of monofilament barbed suture in THA was associated with reduced rates of postoperative infection when compared to traditional braided suture.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary unilateral THA between November 2011 and December 2017 by a single senior surgeon with closure using either monofilament barbed suture (162 patients) or braided interrupted suture (429 patients) were retrospectively reviewed for postoperative wound complications during the first 90 days after surgery. Demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative data were also included to assess for risk factors for infection.

RESULTS

There was no difference between braided and barbed suture in overall rates of major complication, including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (0.47% vs 0.62%, P = .82) or revisions (1.86% vs 1.23%, P = .60). The overall rate of minor, superficial wound complications was also similar between both groups (6.1% vs 3.1%, P = .15). However, when superficial complications were categorized by type (dehiscence vs infection), the use of barbed suture was associated with a decreased rate of superficial wound infection (0% vs 5.4%, P = .003) and an increased rate of wound dehiscence (3.1% vs 0.7%, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

The use of monofilament barbed suture for superficial skin closure in THA leads to similar overall rates of both major and minor wound complications when compared to traditional interrupted braided suture. However, while barbed suture was associated with fewer superficial infections, there was an increased incidence of wound dehiscence. Overall, barbed suture demonstrated a cumulatively equivalent rate of superficial wound complications compared to braided suture. Based on this investigation, barbed suture appears safe to use in THA and may represent an efficient and effective alternative to braided suture for wound closure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; retrospective cohort study.