An intuitive and simple technique for accurate insertion point selection and precise Poller (blocking) screw insertion

Comparative study of retrograde intramedullary nailing versus locking extramedullary plating in complete articular fractures with metaphyseal comminution of the distal femur

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the distal femur with metaphyseal comminution and complete intra-articular involvement (AO/OTA classifications 33C2 and 33C3) present challenges for reduction and fixation. However, an optimal fixation method remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of locking extramedullary plating (LEP) and retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIN) for complete distal femoral intra-articular fractures with metaphyseal comminution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2016 and May 2022, 80 patients (45 men and 35 women; average age, 56.7 years) diagnosed with AO/OTA 33C2 and 33C3 were treated with either LEP or RIN and followed up for at least one year. Post-operative evaluations included radiographic assessments of bone union rate, timing, and alignment. Clinically, the knee joint range of motion (ROM), lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), and Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grade were analyzed. The complications were also compared.

RESULTS

36 underwent LEP and 44 underwent RIN. Bone union was observed in 69.4% and 63.6% of the patients in the LEP and RIN groups, respectively (p = 0.64). The average union time was 6.9 months for the LEP group and 6.6 months for the RIN group (p = 0.51). A tendency toward varus deformity was observed in the RIN group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in knee ROM, LEFS, or KL grade. Complications included non-union (33.8%; RIN, 11; LEP, 16), varus deformity (5%; RIN, 4; LEP, 0), infection (1.3%; RIN, 0; LEP, 1), heterotrophic ossification (1.3%; RIN, 0; LEP, 1), and wound dehiscence (2.5%; RIN, 2; LEP, 0).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical fixation methods, RIN and LEP, for complete distal femoral intra-articular fractures with metaphyseal comminution showed similar clinical and radiological outcomes. However, regardless of the type of fixation device used, there was a reduced rate of bone union owing to high energy and a less favorable prognosis.

Clinical efficacy and complications of blocking screw in the treatment of lower limb long bone fracture: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Blocking screw technique has been widely applied in the treatment of long shaft fractures. However, the evidence with regard to whether intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw technique has better clinical efficacy over other is not clear. The aim of the study was to explore the clinical efficacy and complications of intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw technique in the treatment of femoral or tibial shaft fractures.

METHODS

The PuMed, Embase, OVID, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI and Weipu data were searched for studies of intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw in treatment of femoral or tibial shaft fracture published up to Aug 31 2023. Methodological quality of the trials was assessed, relevant data were extracted, and RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.0 software were used to perform the meta-analysis of parameters related to the consequences.

RESULT

Twenty articles were included, including 1267 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the non-blocking screw group, the blocking screw group had longer operation time (WMD = 13.24; 95% CI = 5.68-20.79, P = .0006) and more intraoperative fluoroscopy times (WMD = 57.62; 95% CI = 25.82-89.42, P = .0002). However, the postoperative therapeutic response rate was higher (OR = 5.60; 95% CI = 2.10-14.93, P = .0006), postoperative ankle joint function was better (OR = 3.48; 95% CI = 1.20-10.13, P = .02), and fracture healing rate was higher (OR = 3.56; 95% CI = 1.43-8.89, P = .006), fracture healing time was shorter (WMD = -3.59; 95% CI = -4.96 to -2.22, P < .00001), intraoperative blood loss was less (WMD = -54.80; 95% CI = -88.77 to -20.83, P = .002), hospitalization time was shorter (WMD = -1.66; 95% CI = -2.08 to -1.24, P < .00001), and complications were less (OR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.16-0.89, P = .01). There was no statistical significance in the range of motion of knee joint between the 2 groups (WMD = 10.04; 95% CI = -1.51 to 21.59, P = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence shows that intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw technique in the treatment of lower limb long bone fracture has the advantages of good clinical efficacy, high fracture healing rate, short fracture healing time, good joint function, less complications and so on, which is worthy of clinical recommendation.

Blocking screw (pin) technique to achieve an acceptable reduction in intramedullary of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Subtrochanteric femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails present biomechanical benefits, early weight-bearing, and reduced soft tissue damage, promoting bone union. However, improper reduction due to muscular forces and fragmented proximal bone increases nonunion risk. This study evaluates the efficacy of the blocking screw technique in preventing malalignment during intramedullary nailing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In cases of subtrochanteric femoral fractures where malalignment, such as varus and anterior angulation, was anticipated during intramedullary nailing, proper reduction was ensured using blocking screw technique on the proximal bone fragment from the coronal or sagittal plane. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 25 patients (14 males, 11 females; average age 55.12 years) who were followed up for more than 1 year. The postoperative neck-shaft angle, anterior angulation angle, and limb length discrepancy were compared radiologically with those on the healthy side, and the presence and duration of bone union were measured. The Harris hip score was used for functional evaluation, and complications, including infection, were analyzed.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, primary bone union was achieved in 21/25 patients (84%), with an average bone union time of 21.81 weeks (range, 14-42 weeks). Of the four nonunions, bone union was achieved in three cases through bone grafting and supplemental plating and in the other case through intramedullary exchange, supplemental plating, and bone grafting. The femoral neck-shaft angle and anterior angulation showed no statistically significant differences compared with the healthy side, with averages of - 1.15° and - 1.4°, respectively. The limb length discrepancy was an average of - 2.4 mm. Regarding functional outcomes, the Harris hip score averaged 89.52 points (range 82-94 points).

CONCLUSIONS

In subtrochanteric femoral fractures, the blocking screw technique effectively prevents malalignment during intramedullary nailing, ensuring not only appropriate reduction but also high bone union rates.

Use of a Minimally Invasive Traction Repositor versus Conventional Manual Traction for the Treatment of Tibial Fractures: A Comparative Study from a Tertiary Hospital in China

Background

Closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation of tibial fractures may not utilize a fracture table or reduction aids like a femoral distractor, and only manual traction will help aid the reduction process. This study aimed to describe and further investigate the effectiveness of an originally designed minimally invasive traction repositor (MITR) for the treatment of tibial fractures.

Methods

From January 2018 to April 2021, a total of 119 eligible patients with tibial shaft fractures were included and retrospectively assigned to two groups according to different reduction methods: MITR group vs conventional manual traction (CMT) group. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable, including age, gender, BMI, residence, smoking history, drinking history, injury mechanism, fracture type, ASA, method of anesthesia, and surgical delay (all P > 0.05). The operation time, fracture reduction duration, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, VAS, HSS, fracture healing time, and complications were compared.

Results

All patients completed the follow-ups with an average of 18.5 months (range 12-42 months). The operation time, fracture reduction duration, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, and number of fluoroscopies were significantly decreased in the MITR group (all P < 0.05). At one month postoperatively, the VAS score was statistically lower in the MITR group (1.8±0.8) than in the CMT group (2.6±1.5). At 6 months postoperatively, the HHS score was statistically higher in the MITR group (90.8±2.3) than in the CMT group (86.4±3.8). We observed no statistical difference in the mean fracture healing time, bone nonunion, implant failure, and infection between the two groups (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with CMT, MITR facilitates the minimally invasive treatment of tibial fractures and has the advantages of operation time, fracture reduction duration, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, number of fluoroscopies, and satisfactory VAS and HSS scores.

Poller (blocking) screw with intramedullary femoral nailing for subtrochanteric femoral non-unions: clinical outcome and review of concepts

INTRODUCTION

Surgery to treat nonunion resulted from malalignment is challenging since correction and bone union should be achieved simultaneously. To report the clinical outcomes achieved through reconstruction of sub-trochanteric femoral fractures by femoral nailing using a poller screw and to review the current concepts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients (11 men and 3 women; mean age 56.4 years) who were diagnosed with non-union of subtrochanteric femoral fractures and who underwent intramedullary nailing with blocking screws between August 2013 and March 2019, with at least 1 year follow-up, were analyzed retrospectively. The preoperative and postoperative Centrum-Collum-Diaphyseal angle and anterior angulation angle were measured. Bone union time, position and number of poller screws used, and complications were analyzed. Functional assessment was performed by evaluating the Harris hip score. The related literature was searched, and 14 clinical studies on the treatment of sub-trochanteric non-union were analyzed.

RESULTS

Bone union was achieved in 12/14 cases (85.7%) at the final follow-up within a mean of 6.52 (3-12) months. Bone union was also achieved in two patients lacking bone union at the final follow-up through bone grafting and augmented plating. No cases developed complications, including infection and bone necrosis, and the varus deformity and anterior angulation significantly improved from a preoperative mean of 12.4° and 9.4° to postoperative mean 3.8° and 2.4°, respectively. The mean Harris hip score at the final follow-up was 87.07 (73-98) points. Analysis of published literature revealed high rates of bone union (78-100%) through various fixation methods.

CONCLUSION

Correction with blocking screws and rigid fixation with intramedullary nailing to treat sub-trochanteric-non-union-caused malalignment can yield good clinical and radiological outcomes.

Outcome Analysis of Intramedullary Nailing Augmented with Poller Screws for Treating Difficult Reduction Fractures of Femur and Tibia: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Poller screws may serve as an adjunctive reduction tool and aid fracture reduction while augmented with intramedullary (IM) nailing for treating diaphyseal or metaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia. However, there is no consistent conclusion about whether the method of using IM nailing augmented with poller screws is more advantageous than using IM nailing alone.

Methods

A total of 96 patients who received IM nailing with or without supportive poller screw for treating long-bone fractures in lower limbs and who experienced difficulties in performing reduction or IM insertion during the surgical process were included in this retrospective cohort study (33 patients with poller screws in group A versus 63 patients without poller screws in group B). Patient demographics including age, gender, and body mass index; injury-related data including fracture location, classification, and injury mechanism; operation-related data including American Society of Anesthesiologists, duration of operation, poller screw time, method of anesthesia, and volume of intraoperative hemorrhage; outcomes including fracture healing time; and incidence of outcomes of nonunion, malunion, infection, and secondary surgical procedures were evaluated.

Results

Fracture healing time of patients in group A was significantly shorter than that of group B (18.3 ± 4.8 weeks versus 24.3 ± 3.0 weeks, p = 0.023). Union rate was higher (100.0% versus 87.3%, p = 0.048), and malunion rate and secondary surgical procedure rate were lower (both are 3.0% versus 19.0%, p = 0.031) in group A than that of group B.

Conclusion

Poller screw augmentation of IM nailing is a favourable option to shorten fracture healing time and to reduce complication rates in terms of nonunion, malunion, and secondary surgical procedure in the treatment of both diaphyseal/metaphyseal fractures of the femur or tibia while compare with those treated by IM nailing alone.