Survival in patients with carcinomas presenting with bone metastasis at diagnosis: a SEER population-based cohort study

Management of Long Bones Metastatic Disease: Concepts That We All Know but Not Always Remember

Bones are the third most common site of metastatic disease. Treatment is rarely curative; rather, it seeks to control disease progression and palliate symptoms. Imaging evaluation of a patient with symptoms of metastatic bone disease should begin with plain X-rays. Further imaging consists of a combination of (PET)-CT scan and bone scintigraphy. We recommend performing a biopsy after imaging workup has been conducted. Metastatic bone disease is managed with a combination of systemic treatment, radiotherapy (RT), and surgery. External beam RT (EBRT) is used for pain control and postoperatively after fracture stabilization. Single-fraction and multiple-fractions schemes are equally effective achieving pain control. Adequate assessment of fracture risk should guide the decision to stabilize an impending fracture. Despite low specificity, plain X-rays are the first tool to determine risk of impending fractures. CT scan offers a higher positive predictive value and can add diagnostic value. Surgical management depends on the patient's characteristics, tumor type, and location of fracture/bone stock. Fixation options include plate and screw fixation, intramedullary (IM) nailing, and endoprostheses. Despite widespread use, the need for prophylactic stabilization of the entire femur should be individually analyzed in each patient due to higher complication rates of long stems.

Clinical features and prognostic indicators in upper-tract urothelial carcinoma with bone metastasis

Purpose

With the gradual increase in the incidence of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), its metastatic disease has attracted much attention. The prognosis of UTUC patients with bone metastasis is worse than that of UTUC patients with other metastases. Therefore, the current study is performed to analyze the clinicopathologic features and survival predictors among UTUC patients with bone metastasis.

Patients and methods

We reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to select cases diagnosed with UTUC and bone metastasis at present from 2010 to 2016. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were first performed by applying univariate Cox regression analysis. Then we performed multivariate Cox analysis to determine independent predictors of survival. Forest plots were drawn by GraphPad 8.0.1 and used to visually display the results of multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to intuitively show the prognosis difference of each independent risk factor.

Results

We finally identified 380 UTUC patients with bone metastasis for survival analysis, of which 230 males (60.5%) and 150 females (39.5%). The mean and median age at diagnosis were 71 and 72 years, respectively. Simultaneous lung metastasis (33.4%) and liver metastasis (31.1%) were more common in UTUC patients with bone metastasis. The 1-year OS and CSS rates of this research population were 23.8% and 26.6%, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling controlling for surgery, chemotherapy, brain metastasis, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and marital status, revealed that surgery, chemotherapy, no liver metastasis, no lung metastasis, and married status predicted for better OS and CSS.

Conclusion

Surgery and chemotherapy are optimal management of UTUC patients with bone metastasis. Active treatments on lung and liver metastases should be performed. The prognosis of patients with unmarried status or others should be further improved.

Mortality factors in recurrent parathyroid cancer: a pooled analysis

INTRODUCTION

Parathyroid cancer is a rare disease with high recurrence rate. The prognostic factors for recurrent parathyroid cancer are yet to be ascertained. We aimed to establish the association between recurrent parathyroid cancer and previously reported prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a PubMed search using the keywords 'parathyroid cancer', 'parathyroid neoplasm', and 'hypercalcemia' during 1966-2019 and included 3272 articles. We focused on 73 patients with recurrent parathyroid cancer from 55 studies. We conducted a survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

For the 73 patients included in the analysis, the mean age (± standard deviation) was 44 ± 13.2 years, wherein 36 patients were women (49.3%). During the 5236 person-months at risk (mean follow-up 71.7 months, range 3-264), 38 patients died. The incidence of local recurrence, lymph-node metastasis, lung metastasis, and bone metastasis were 60.3, 12.3, 56.2, and 24.7, respectively. Bone metastasis, disease-free interval < 1 year, and total surgeries < 3 were significant prognostic factors in univariate analysis (log-rank test P = 0.0063, P = 0.0006, and P = 0.0056, respectively). In the multivariate-adjusted analysis, the mortality risk was significantly increased in patients with bone metastasis with a hazard ratio (HR) of 4.83 (95% CI 1.16-20.2; P = 0.03), disease-free interval <=1 year of 5.92 (95% CI 1.85-18.99; P = 0.003), and total surgeries <3 of 11.29 (95% CI 2.82-45.22; P = 0.001), considering these as possible predictive prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Bone metastasis, duration of disease-free interval, and total number of surgeries predict survival in recurrent parathyroid cancer.

Osteosarcoma and Metastasis Associated Bone Degradation-A Tale of Osteoclast and Malignant Cell Cooperativity

Cancer-induced bone degradation is part of the pathological process associated with both primary bone cancers, such as osteosarcoma, and bone metastases originating from, e.g., breast, prostate, and colon carcinomas. Typically, this includes a cancer-dependent hijacking of processes also occurring during physiological bone remodeling, including osteoclast-mediated disruption of the inorganic bone component and collagenolysis. Extensive research has revealed the significance of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption throughout the course of disease for both primary and secondary bone cancer. Nevertheless, cancer cells representing both primary bone cancer and bone metastasis have also been implicated directly in bone degradation. We will present and discuss observations on the contribution of osteoclasts and cancer cells in cancer-associated bone degradation and reciprocal modulatory actions between these cells. The focus of this review is osteosarcoma, but we will also include relevant observations from studies of bone metastasis. Additionally, we propose a model for cancer-associated bone degradation that involves a collaboration between osteoclasts and cancer cells and in which both cell types may directly participate in the degradation process.

Bone Metastasis in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients: Risk and Prognostic Factors and Nomograms

Background

Bone metastasis (BM) is one of the common sites of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and patients with BM have a poorer prognosis. We aimed to develop two nomograms to quantify the risk of BM and predict the prognosis of RCC patients with BM.

Methods

We reviewed patients with diagnosed RCC with BM in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent factors to predict BM in RCC patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors for BM in RCC patients. Two nomograms were established and evaluated by calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The study included 37,554 patients diagnosed with RCC in the SEER database, 537 of whom were BM patients. BM's risk factors included sex, tumor size, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, brain metastasis, N stage, T stage, histologic type, and grade in RCC patients. Currently, independent prognostic factors for RCC with BM included grade, histologic type, N stage, surgery, brain metastasis, and lung metastasis. The calibration curve, ROC curve, and DCA showed good performance for diagnostic and prognostic nomograms.

Conclusions

Nomograms were established to predict the risk of BM in RCC and the prognosis of RCC with BM, separately. These nomograms strengthen each patient's prognosis-based decision making, which is critical in improving the prognosis of patients.

Bone metastasis in extremity soft tissue sarcomas: risk factors and survival analysis using the SEER registry

INTRODUCTION

While lung is the most common site of metastasis, bone metastasis of soft tissue sarcoma is a part of the natural history affecting the prognosis of these patients. To date, no studies have analyzed the histologic subtypes more likely to metastasize to bone, the risk factors for bone metastasis at initial presentation, or the effect that bone metastasis has on the survival of these patients.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database with primary extremity STS between 2010 and 2015. Risk factors for early bone metastasis, survival based on different sites of metastasis, and prognostic factors of survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 8,234 STS, 2.2% (n = 180) presented with skeletal metastasis. Bone metastasis was more likely when regional lymph nodes were involved (OR = 4.48, p = 0.008). Deep and moderate or high-grade sarcomas had 5-12-fold tendency to present with bone and lung metastasis (p = 0.046, 0.006, 0.030, respectively). The 5-year survival rate was 41.2% (26.9-54.9%) for isolated bone metastasis and 32.9% (21.2-45.1%) for patients with bone and lung metastasis. Resection of the primary sarcoma was the only significant predictor of survival (HR = 0.44, p = 0.021) for patients with bone metastasis.

CONCLUSION

High tumor grade, deep location to fascia and regional lymph node metastasis are significant risk factors for skeletal metastasis at diagnosis of an extremity STS. While neither systemic chemotherapy nor radiotherapy of the primary sarcoma has a significant influence on survival in the presence of bone metastasis, radical resection of the primary STS is associated with increased survival.

Exosomal MicroRNAs and Organotropism in Breast Cancer Metastasis

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy for women in which one in eight women will be diagnosed with the disease in their lifetime. Despite advances made in treating primary breast cancer, there is still no effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer. Consequently, metastatic breast cancer is responsible for 90% of breast cancer-related deaths while only accounting for approximately one third of all breast cancer cases. To help develop effective treatments for metastatic breast cancer, it is important to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanisms by which breast cancer metastasizes, particularly, those underlying organotropism towards brain, bone, and lungs. In this review, we will primarily focus on the roles that circulating exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) play in organotropism of breast cancer metastasis. Exosomes are extracellular vesicles that play critical roles in intercellular communication. MicroRNAs can be encapsulated in exosomes; cargo-loaded exosomes can be secreted by tumor cells into the tumor microenvironment to facilitate tumor-stroma interactions or released to circulation to prime distant organs for subsequent metastasis. Here, we will summarize our current knowledge on the biogenesis of exosomes and miRNAs, mechanisms of cargo sorting into exosomes, the exosomal miRNAs implicated in breast cancer metastasis, and therapeutic exosomal miRNAs.