Is limited shoulder abduction associated with poor scapulothoracic mobility after reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff arthropathy is associated with increased scapulothoracic motion: A longitudinal two-year kinematic study

BACKGROUND

Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a standard surgical procedure for the treatment of rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA), aimed at restoring active arm elevation. Shoulder elevation relies on both scapulothroacic (ST) and glenohumeral (GH) motion, but RTSA computer planning primarily focuses on the GH joint due to challenges in visualizing scapulothroacic (ST) motion.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the scapulohumeral rhythm, by means of the relative contributions of ST rotation and GH elevation per degree of arm elevation, in a longitudinal setting for up to two years postoperatively after RTSA for CTA change?

METHODS

In a prospective longitudinal study, shoulder kinematics were studied in 20 patients (22 shoulders) before and at three, six, 12, and 24 months after RTSA implantation for CTA. Skin markers were tracked using 3D motion analysis. The relative ST and GH contributions per degree of arm elevation were assessed and were compared using statistical non-parametric mapping with Bayesian inference.

RESULTS

Mean arm elevation was 89 ± 33° preoperatively, 135 ± 28° at 3 months, 161 ± 20° at 6 months, 169 ± 18° at 12 months, and 165 ± 19° at 24 months. Between 48-66°, 62-93°, 53-94°, 60-97° and 72-104° of arm elevation at the measurement time points pre, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months postoperatively, respectively, the ST rotation had a significantly greater contribution to arm elevation compared to GH elevation; a pattern that was not found in controls.

SIGNIFICANCE

While RTSA successfully restored active arm elevation through improved GH and ST motion, the scapulohumeral rhythm exhibited a consistent pattern up to two years postoperatively, resembling the preoperative state. In the midrange of motion, ST rotation dominated over GH elevation, potentially contributing to muscular fatigue and explaining the documented decline in functional outcomes over time after RTSA. The findings highlight the importance of incorporating ST kinematics into modern computer planning for RTSA.

Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

There is increasing interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a reliable treatment for arthritic, rotator cuff deficient shoulders. Humeral and glenoid version are controversial parameters that can influence internal and external rotation, muscular forces, and implant stability as outcomes of RTSA. The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on the effect of both humeral component version and glenoid component version and give recommendations on their most optimal degree for RTSA. A comprehensive quantitative review of the published literature on the effect of humeral version and glenoid version in RTSA was performed, to identify its influence on the range of movement, muscle forces, and intrinsic stability of the reverse prosthesis. Eleven studies were included: nine were biomechanical studies, one was a clinical-radiographic study, and one was an implant design consideration. Anterior stability can be improved by implanting the humeral component in neutral or with some anteversion. Glenoid component retroversion has been proven to reduce the likelihood of subluxation, while increasing ER and ROM at the same time. The study was conducted considering 5° anteversion; neutral; and 5°, 10°, and 20° retroversion of the glenoid component. Although a final opinion has not been yet expressed on the matter, the general consensus tends to agree on restoring 0° to 20° of retroversion of the humeral and glenoid component to yield the best outcomes.

Optical Motion Capture Systems for 3D Kinematic Analysis in Patients with Shoulder Disorders

Shoulder dysfunctions represent the third musculoskeletal disorder by frequency. However, monitoring the movement of the shoulder is particularly challenging due to the complexity of the joint kinematics. The 3D kinematic analysis with optical motion capture systems (OMCs) makes it possible to overcome clinical tests' shortcomings and obtain objective data on the characteristics and quality of movement. This systematic review aims to retrieve the current knowledge about using OMCs for 3D shoulder kinematic analysis in patients with musculoskeletal shoulder disorders and their corresponding clinical relevance. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to improve the reporting of the review. Studies employing OMCs for 3D kinematic analysis in patients with musculoskeletal shoulder disorders were retrieved. Eleven articles were considered eligible for this study. OMCs can be considered a powerful tool in orthopedic clinical research. The high costs and organizing complexities of experimental setups are likely outweighed by the impact of these systems in guiding clinical practice and patient follow-up. However, additional high-quality studies on using OMCs in clinical practice are required, with standardized protocols and methodologies to make comparing clinical trials easier.

Association Between Preoperative Shoulder Strength and Clinical Outcomes After Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to determine whether preoperative shoulder strength predicts postoperative values and improvement in strength, range of motion (ROM), and outcome scores after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 264 shoulders with a minimum of 2-year follow-up after primary rTSA. Preoperative external rotation (ER) strength, supraspinatus strength, and abduction strength were analyzed to establish their correlation with postoperative values and improvement in strength, ROM, and outcome scores (Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, and the University of California, Los Angeles score). Multiple linear regression models were used to identify the preoperative shoulder strength measures that most affected postoperative outcomes and improvement in outcomes.

RESULTS

Preoperative measures of shoulder strength were positively correlated with all measures of postoperative shoulder strength, active abduction and elevation, and all outcome scores studied. On multivariate analysis, greater preoperative ER, supraspinatus, and abduction strength were significantly associated with greater corresponding postoperative values (P = 0.009, P = 0.041, and P = 0.008, respectively); however, they were also associated with less respective improvement (P < 0.001 for all) because the weakest patients tended to see the largest improvements. Notably, preoperative values of ER and supraspinatus strength exceeding 17.5 and 20.5 lbs were associated with a decline in their respective values postoperatively, but no limit was identified for ROM or outcome score measures. On multivariate analysis, reduced preoperative abduction strength was markedly associated with greater improvement in 3 of 4 ROM measures and 4 of 5 outcome scores.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative shoulder strength, especially abduction strength, predicts superior postoperative outcomes and greater improvement in shoulder strength, ROM, and outcome scores after primary rTSA. However, a minority of patients with well-preserved strength may lose strength after surgery, and patients who are weaker preoperatively tend to see larger improvements in postoperative outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Ⅳ, prognostic study.