Surgical tips and tricks for coronal shear fractures of the elbow

Outcome of Complex Coronal Shear Fractures of the Distal Humerus (Dubberley Type 3) Managed by the Transolecranon Approach

Introduction

Complex distal humerus coronal shear fractures are rare injuries. These fractures involve small articular fragments and are challenging to fix.

Design

Aprospective case series of 10 patients was done at a level 1 trauma centre between February 2017 and July 2021. Dubberley type 3 fractures were included in the study.

Intervention

All patients underwent ORIF using posterior approach with olecranon osteotomy by a single surgeon. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months postoperatively.

Outcome Measures

The primary outcome measures were radiographic union and functional status of the limb (DASH score and MEPI score).

Results

All patients achieved radiographic union of fracture as well as the osteotomy. The mean DASH score as measured on the final follow-up was 12.6 ± 10.2 and the mean MEPI score was 90 ± 8.2. None of the cases needed reoperation.

Conclusion

Consistently good functional outcomes can be obtained in complex coronal shear fractures by posterior approach with olecranon osteotomy. Dubberley type 3b patients should undergo additional plate fixation.

Surgical treatment of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus with an intact lateral epicondyle by the lateral combined approach

BACKGROUND

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are not only rare and prone to misdiagnosis, but their surgical treatment can be challenging. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of exposing distal humeral coronal shear fractures with a combined lateral approach that preserves the extensors and lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) and to analyze the clinical efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of these injuries.

METHODS

We included 45 patients who sustained coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus with the lateral epicondyle intact and were treated with open reduction and internal fixation from January 2013 to August 2020. The fractures were exposed by the lateral combined approach in which the tendons involving the common extensor, the extensor carpi ulnaris, and the LUCL were preserved. Two observation windows were formed anterior to and posterior to these tendons and the LUCL was used to achieve fracture reduction. Countersunk screws, with or without a plate placed on the posterior lateral condyle, were used to fix the fragments. The functional outcomes of these patients were reviewed and assessed with physical and radiographic examinations, range of motion measurements, and self-evaluation Mayo Elbow Performance Index and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores.

RESULTS

In total, 40 patients were followed up with for over 1 year and were included in the final analysis. The mean follow-up duration was 42 ± 30 months (range, 12-107 months). The patients' mean age was 42 years (range, 14-74 years). According to the Dubberley Classification, there were 15 type I, 17 type II, and 8 type III fractures. At the final follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arc was 131° (range, 65-150) and mean pronation and supination was 73° (range, 45-80) and 71° (range, 40-80), respectively. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index score was 88 (range, 61-97) points; the results were excellent in 21, good in 13, fair in 4, and poor in 2 patients. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 11 (range, 0-42) points. Neither functional score nor range of movement was associated with age, sex, fracture type, injury type, or surgical timing.

CONCLUSION

Reduction and stable fixation with internal fixation for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus can be achieved by the lateral combined approach. Early functional mobilization allows for satisfactory restoration of elbow function.

Clinical Outcomes and Management Strategies for Capitellum and Trochlea Fractures: A Systematic Review

Purpose

Capitellum and trochlea fractures, also referred to as coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus, are infrequent yet challenging intra-articular fractures of the elbow. There are a variety of surgical approaches and fixation methods with often variable outcomes. This systematic review investigates interventions, outcomes and complications of capitellum and trochlea fractures.

Methods

A systematic review of studies published in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health literature (CINAHL) was conducted to assess the clinical outcomes of capitellum and trochlea fractures managed surgically. Data on patient demographics, surgical approach, implant usage, postoperative outcomes and complications were compiled.

Results

Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 700 patients. Surgical interventions primarily utilized either the lateral (79%) or antero-lateral (15%) approaches with headless compression screws as the most common fixation method (68%). Clinical outcomes were measured using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) with a mean score of 89.9 (±2.6) and the DASH score with a mean of 16.9 (±7.3). Elbow range of motion showed a mean flexion of 126.3° (±19.4), extension of 5.71° (±11.8), pronation of 75.23° (±12.2), and supination of 76.6° (±9.8). The mean flexion-extension arc was 113.7° (±16.9), and the mean pronation-supination arc was 165.31° (±9.41). Complications occurred in 19.8% of cases, with re-interventions required in 8.3% of cases, mainly due to symptomatic implants and elbow stiffness requiring surgical release. Other complications included implant removal (10.4%), overall reported stiff elbows (6%), nerve palsies (2%), non-union (1.5%), and infection (1.2%).

Conclusion

The treatment of capitellum and trochlea fractures yields satisfactory outcomes but has a considerable rate of complications and reoperations primarily due to symptomatic implants and elbow stiffness. There is noteworthy variability in the achieved range of motion, suggesting unpredictable outcomes. Deficits in functionality and range of motion are common after surgery, especially with more complex injury patterns.

Surgical Management of a Three-Month-Old Mal-United Dubberley Type 2A Distal Humerus Fracture: A Case Report

Fractures of the capitellum and trochlea are not common in orthopedic trauma and pose certain difficulties to address and manage. On primary x-rays, these fractures are commonly missed, and patients may be treated inadequately resulting in a restricted range of motion. The current case report presents the surgical outcome and challenges faced while managing a 30-year-old male patient with a mal-united capitellum, trochlea, and lateral condyle of humerus fracture. The patient had come with complaints of a restricted range of motion in his dominant hand which affected his livelihood. After undergoing adequate investigations, the patient was posted for an open reduction and internal fixation. The approach used for the procedure and the challenges faced during the surgery have been elaborated in the case report. The patient had shown an increase in the range of motion which was maintained at six- and nine-month follow-ups. Thus, it states that patients with trochlea and capitellum fractures presenting late and having a restricted range of motion can be managed adequately with good outcomes after proper planning.

Choice of treatments of the coronal shear fractures of the humerus. A national survey of Italian AO members

INTRODUCTION

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are uncommon injuries representing 6% of distal humeral fractures. There is no univocal consensus about the correct management of this type of fracture. A national survey was conducted to gain more insight into the current classification, diagnosis and treatment of coronal shear fractures in Italy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A postal survey was sent to all AO Italian members including residency orthopaedic surgeons. The survey consisted of general questions about personal experience in the management of these fractures: types of classification systems used, surgical approaches, treatment options and rehabilitation programs.

RESULTS

114 orthopaedic surgeons answered a 13-items questionnaire. The most used classification system was AO/OTA (72,8%). Independent screws and if necessary plates were the most answered regarding surgical treatment (81,6%). The most encountered post-surgical complication was stiffening of the elbow (81,6%).

CONCLUSION

An algorithm of treatment has been proposed. To better classify coronal shear fractures, the authors recommended the integration of two classification systems: AO and Dubberley classifications. In the case of posterior wall comminution, a Kocher extensile approach is recommended, otherwise, if a posterior wall is intact, Kocher or Kaplan approach can be used. The posterior transolecranic approach can be reserved to Dubberley type III or AO 13B3.3. The best treatment choice is represented by independent screws and plates placed according to fracture patterns while arthroplasty is indicated when a stable ORIF is not possible. Mobilization is postponed for about 2 weeks.

[Clinical treatment of dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow joint]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the possible injury mechanisms in patients with dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow joint, and to discuss their treatment and prognosis.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 4 patients with dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow joint admitted between September 2014 and September 2020, including 3 males and 1 female with an average age of 20.7 years (range, 13-32 years). There were 2 cases of dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial dislocation of the elbow joint and 2 cases of dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum and anterior medial fracture of the coronoid process combined with posterior medial subluxation of the elbow joint. Closed reduction was performed in 3 patients with fresh fracture combined with dislocation, then 2 cases were fixed with tension band and 1 case was fixed with tension band combined with Acumed coronoid anatomic plate. And in patient with old fracture nonunion, the coronoid process was fixed with 1 screw, then the humeral sclerotic bone mass was removed, and finally the lateral collateral ligament was repaired and a hinged external fixator was added.

RESULTS

All the incisions healed by first intention without early complications such as infection or peripheral nerve injury. The 4 patients were followed up 13-30 months (mean, 20.8 months). The fractures all healed with a healing time of 70-90 days (mean, 79.5 days). At 6 months after operation, heterotopic ossification was seen in the posterior aspect of the right elbow joint in 1 case, and the alkaline phosphatase level was normal (67 U/L); the tension band was removed to clear the heterotopic ossification and the elbow joint was released. The rest of the patients had no heterotopic ossification. At last follow-up, all patients had good functional recovery of the elbow joint, with a Mayo score of 85-100 (mean, 92.5), and the excellent and good rate was 100%. The elbow flexion range of motion was 120°-135°, the extension range of motion was 10°-20°, and the pronation and supination range of motion were all 75°-85°.

CONCLUSION

Dorsal avulsion fractures of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow may be due to simple varus stress. If an anteromedial coronoid facet fracture also occurs, it may be for the varus posteromedial rotatory instability, which is the opposite mechanism to that of an Osborne-Cotterill lesion. For fresh dorsal avulsion fractures of the capitellum, tension band fixation can be used with good results.

Coronal Shear Fractures of the Distal Humerus

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare, frequently comminuted, and are without consensus for treatment. The aim of this paper is to review the current concepts on the diagnosis, classification, treatment options, surgical approaches, and complications of capitellar and trochlear fractures. Computed Tomography (CT) scans, along with the Dubberley classification, are extremely helpful in the decision-making process. Most of the fractures necessitate open reduction and internal fixation, although elbow arthroplasty is an option for comminuted fractures in the elderly low-demand patient. Stiffness is the most common complication after fixation, although reoperation is infrequent.

ISOLATED CAPITELLAR FRACTURE FIXATION WITH HEADLESS SCREWS IN DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS

Introduction

We evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of capitellar fractures treated with modified screw insertion (inserting the first fixation screw anteroposteriorly and the second screw posteroanteriorly), a technique that can be applied with a minimally invasive lateral elbow approach.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-one isolated capitellum fractures that were surgically treated were included in the study. Fixation was achieved with two headless cannulated compression screws placed in anteroposterior and posteroanterior order using the modified lateral elbow approach. The Broberg-Morrey rating system was used to assess the post-operative functional status of the patients.

Results

According to the Broberg-Morrey criteria, the mean score was 92.7 (77-100) and 13 cases had excellent, 7 had good, and 1 had fair results. None of the patients developed avascular necrosis or heterotopic ossification. According to the Broberg-Morrey arthrosis score, two cases had Grade 1 and one had Grade 2 arthrosis. One patient had a superficial wound site infection that was treated with antibiotics, and in one case a 60° extension loss was observed in the elbow.

Conclusion

Treatment of isolated capitellar fractures with 2 headless screws placed anteroposteriorly and posteroanteriorly can provide stable fixation and is less traumatic for the elbow joint. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies - Investigating the results of treatment.

Involvement of the medial and lateral epicondyles in distal humeral coronal shear fractures: Case series and literature review

PURPOSE

Epicondyle involvement in capitellar and trochlear fractures is often considered a simple associated lesion that does not substantially change treatment or prognosis. Although theoretically predicted in reviews, case series almost never report elbow prosthesis use in comminuted coronal shear injuries associated with epicondylar fracture in the elderly. The purpose of this study is to focus on this underestimated injury pattern that can be a negative risk factor for treatment and prognosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cases with coronal shear fracture of the distal humerus treated from 2016 to 2019. Fractures were classified according to Dubberley. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were performed when possible. Partial or total elbow replacement was used in severely comminuted fractures with epicondylar involvement in four elderly patients.

RESULTS

Nineteen consecutive patients were selected (mean age: 62.4 years), of which 10 had type 3A/3B fractures, and seven had both medial and lateral epicondylar involvement. The mean follow-up duration was 31.78 months. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score was 81.05 points, with 7 excellent, 8 good, 1 fair, and 3 poor results. The average MEPI score of Dubberley's type 1 and type 2 was better than that of type 3 (mean: 92 vs. 72, p = 0.02). Further, the results of average range of motion were better in patients who had sustained Dubberley types 1 and 2 lesions than those with Dubberley type 3 lesion (mean: 133° vs. 85°, p = 0.002). Two patients out of three who required intra-operative conversion to total elbow arthroplasty had poor outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The simultaneous presence of fracture of one or both epicondyles are usually associated with severe joint comminutions and makes ORIF more challenging, especially among elderly women. In these cases, primary total elbow prosthesis implantation could be a valid treatment option.