The functional outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with double-row knotless vs knot-tying anchors

Comparison of clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair utilizing suture-bridge procedures with or without medial knots: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This investigation aimed to compare the medical efficacy of the knotted and knotless suture-bridge procedures in rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

The Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library datasets were searched for all available publications comparing the medical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs utilizing knotted or knotless suture-bridge procedures. Two researchers utilized Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to evaluate the included studies. Employing Revman 5.3 software, meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA reporting guideline.

RESULTS

Eleven investigations with 1083 patients were considered suitable for the final meta-analysis. 522 individuals were assigned to the knotted group, whereas 561 were assigned to the knotless group. No statistical difference was found between the knotted and knotless groups, regarding VAS score (WMD, 0.17; 95% CI, - 0.10 to 0.44; P = 0.21); Constant score (WMD, -1.50; 95% CI, - 3.52 to 0.52; P = 0.14); American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (WMD, -2.02; 95% CI, - 4.53 to 0.49; P = 0.11); University of California Los Angeles score (WMD, -0.13; 95% CI, - 0.89 to 0.63; P = 0.73); ROM of flexion (WMD, 1.57; 95% CI, - 2.11 to 5.60; P = 0.37), abduction (WMD, 1.08; 95% CI, - 4.53 to 6.70; P = 0.71) and external rotation (WMD, 1.90; 95% CI, - 1.36 to 5.16; P = 0.25); re-tear rate (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.08; P = 0.12), and medical complications (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.37 to 2.20; P = 0.82).

CONCLUSION

For arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs, there were no statistical differences in medical results among knotted and knotless suture-bridge procedures. Overall, both techniques showed excellent clinical outcomes and could be safely utilized to treat rotator cuff injuries.

A comparison between knotted and knotless medial row of suture bridge technique in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The shoulder arthroscopic suture bridge technique is currently very popular, but scientific evidence relating to the clinical outcomes of the medial row with or without knots has not been systematic reviewed.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of knotted versus knotless double-row suture bridges for rotator cuff repairs.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHOD

Five databases that contain literature in English were searched (Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library), with a focus on works published between 2011 and 2022. Clinical data relating to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the suture bridge approach was examined and the outcomes of medial row knotting contrasted with that of the knotless technique. The search phrase used was: (double row) AND (rotator cuff) AND (repair), and the search method is subject term plus free word search. Literature quality evaluation was performed using the Cochrane "risk of bias" tool 1.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale quality assessment instrument.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial, four prospective cohort studies, and five retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Data pertaining to 1146 patients was drawn from these ten original papers and analyzed. Meta-analyses that were performed on 11 postoperative outcomes revealed that none of the differences were statistically significant (P > 0.05) and that the publications were unbiased (P > 0.05). Postoperative retear rate and postoperative retear categorization were the outcomes assessed. Scores on postoperative pain, forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation mobility were collated and evaluated. The University of California, Los Angeles scoring systems in the first year following surgery, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Constant scales in the first and second years after surgery were the secondary outcomes spotlighted in this study.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes of shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the suture bridge technique with or without a knotted medial row was proven to be equivalent. These outcomes are about postoperative retear, postoperative retear classification, postoperative shoulder function score, postoperative shoulder mobility, and postoperative pain, respectively. It should be noted that the conclusions are based on short-term clinical follow-up data.

H-loop Knotless Double-Row Repair Versus Knotted Suture Bridge for Rotator Cuff Tears: A Biomechanical and Histological Study in an Animal Model [Formula: see text]

BACKGROUND

Knotted suture bridge repair (KSBR) has been widely proven to be an effective method for rotator cuff repairs. However, the occurrence of type 2 failure after suture bridge repair remains a frequent problem because of the stress concentration and disturbance of tendon perfusion in the medial row. The authors have developed the H-loop knotless double-row repair (HLDR) to counteract these problems.

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical and histological outcomes of HLDR and KSBR for rotator cuff tear in the rabbit model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Acute bilateral supraspinatus tears were created on the shoulders of 46 New Zealand White rabbits. HLDR and KSBR were randomly performed on the left side or right side. Thirteen animals each were sacrificed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after surgery (n = 39), with 6 rabbits used for histological evaluation and the other 7 rabbits for biomechanical testing. The remaining 7 animals from the original 46 were only used for initial biomechanical evaluation at week 0.

RESULTS

Macroscopically, all repaired tendons were connected to their footprint on the greater tuberosity without postoperative complications at 8 weeks after surgery. The HLDR group had significantly better histological bone-to-tendon integration compared with the KSBR group in terms of fibrocartilage regeneration, collagen composition, and fiber organization. The biomechanical outcomes in the HLDR group were demonstrated to be better than those of the KSBR group at time 0 and 8 weeks after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Both repair techniques were effective for rotator cuff tears in a rabbit rotator cuff tear model; however, HLDR demonstrated more advantages in improving biomechanical properties and histological tendon-to-bone healing compared with KSBR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This animal study suggested that HLDR might be an alternative choice for rotator cuff tears in humans to increase tendon-to-bone healing and reduce the rate of failure to heal.