Indwelling urinary catheterization was unnecessary in non-drainage total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Optimised fast-track protocols in total knee arthroplasty determine shorter hospitalisation time and lower perioperative/postoperative complications

PURPOSE

This literature review aims to present evidence-based clinical recommendations for the eight most debated topics related to perioperative management in total knee arthroplasty: counselling, prehabilitation, transfusion risk, tranexamic acid, drainage, analgesia, urinary catheter and compression stockings.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team conducted a systematic review on these topics. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for the literature review and result presentation. The research encompassed articles from 1 January 2009 to 28 February 2023, retrieved through the MEDLINE database via PubMed, Embase database and Cochrane Library.

RESULTS

Forty-five articles were selected. Preoperative counselling has limited evidence for its impact on postoperative outcomes; yet, it can help alleviate surgery-related anxiety and manage postoperative symptoms. Prehabilitation can also prepare patients for surgery, reducing hospital stays and improving postsurgery functionality. Numerous studies suggest that preoperative Hb levels are independently linked to transfusion risk, with a recommended level of 13 g/dL. Combining intravenous and local tranexamic acid administration is strongly advised to reduce perioperative blood loss, while drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty offers no functional advantages. Employing a multimodal analgesia approach yields better results with reduced opioid usage. Indwelling urinary catheters provide no benefit and avoiding them can lower the risk of urinary tract infections. As for compression stockings, there is insufficient evidence in the literature to support their efficacy in preventing venous thromboembolism.

CONCLUSION

The best-track protocol has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing hospitalisation time and perioperative/postoperative complications. It is success relies on a collaborative, resource-adaptive approach led by a multidisciplinary team. Both patients and hospitals benefit from this approach, as it enhances care quality and lowers costs. Several studies have highlighted the significance of a patient-centred approach in achieving high-quality care. Creating a novel treatment protocol could be a prospective goal in the near future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty May be Safe

Objectives  This study aims to analyze the safety of a simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA) and to investigate patients' satisfaction with the procedure performed concomitantly. Methods  In a prospective study, we evaluated 45 patients undergoing SBTKA performed by two surgical teams. The mean age of the patients was 66.9 years; 33 subjects were female (73.3%) and 12 (26.6%) were male. We followed a protocol of intra- and postoperatively measures to ensure the safety of this procedure. We evaluated the surgery time and blood loss by hematocrit (Ht) and hemoglobin (Hb) levels on the first postoperative day, the percentage of patients who received a transfusion of packed red blood cells, and the number of required units. We also recorded perioperative complications, and, at the end of 3 months, we asked patients about their preference between the simultaneous or staged procedure. Results  The mean surgery time was 169 minutes. In the postoperative period, there was an average decrease of 28.2% in Htc and 27.0% in Hgb. A total of 16 patients (35.5%) received a transfusion of packed red blood cells (mean, 1.75 units per patient requiring a transfusion). There were 12 minor complications (26.6%) and 2 major complications (4.4%); furthermore, no patient had a clinical diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, and there were no deaths. Conclusions:  The SBTKA procedure may be considered safe if performed in selected patients and with a care protocol to prevent complications. This type of procedure was unanimously approved by patients.

Short-Term Indwelling Foley Catheters Do Not Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Urinary Retention in Uncomplicated Primary THA and TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine whether a short-term Foley catheter (inserted in the operating room and removed upon arrival to the orthopaedic floor) would reduce the risk of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in patients undergoing primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Three hundred and eighty-eight patients undergoing inpatient primary TKA (n = 228) or THA (n = 160) with spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive a short-term Foley catheter (n = 194) or no Foley (n = 194). There were 143 male and 245 female patients. The primary outcome was POUR, defined as requiring ≥2 straight catheterizations or the placement of an indwelling urinary catheter when indicated by retention of ≥450 mL on bladder scans. Secondary outcomes included urinary tract infections (UTIs) within 3 weeks and the need for ≥1 straight catheterization. A power analysis determined that 194 patients per group were required to detect a 7% minimal clinically important difference in POUR rates at 80% power and alpha of 0.05. Intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses were performed (2 patients received the non-allocated treatment). Outcomes were compared between the groups using univariate and multivariate analyses, with alpha < 0.05.

RESULTS

Nine patients developed POUR: 4 in the short-term Foley group and 5 in the control group (2.1% versus 2.6%; p = 1.00). Of those who developed POUR, 8 were male and 1 was female (88.9% versus 11.1%; p = 0.002). Twenty-four patients required ≥1 straight catheterization: 10 in the Foley group and 14 in the control group (5.2% versus 7.2%; p = 0.40). Four patients developed UTIs: 3 in the Foley group and 1 in the control group (1.5% versus 0.5%; p = 0.62) on intention-to-treat analysis, and 4 in the Foley group and none in the control group (2.1% versus 0.0%; p = 0.12) on as-treated analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a short-term Foley catheter inserted in the operating room and removed on arrival to the orthopaedic floor does not decrease the rate of POUR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.