Standard radiographic assessments of distal radius fractures miss involvement of the distal radioulnar joint: a diagnostic study

Displaced dorsal rim fragment in distal radius fracture: what is the size threshold for compromise?

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to explore the effect of displaced dorsal rim fragments under defined size threshold on the clinical outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients with an acute distal radius fracture accompanied by a dorsal rim fragment comprising less than 10% of the radiocarpal articular surface were included in the study. The size of the dorsal rim fragment was measured by axial CT scans and three-dimensional (3D) CT scans, and the correlation between these two methods was analyzed to evaluate the reliability of axial CT scan measurements. Based on the displacement (> 2 mm) of dorsal rim fragments measured by sagittal CT scans, the patients were divided into two groups, namely the displaced group (17 patients) and the control group (23 patients). The radiographic parameters and wrist function at final follow-up were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Mean radiocarpal joint involvement of the included dorsal rim fragment was 8.6%±1.0% (range, 5.7-9.9%) assessed by axial CT scans. There was a strong correlation in the radiocarpal articular involvement of the dorsal rim fragment between axial CT scans and 3D CT models (correlation coefficient r = 0.819). Mean displacement of the dorsal rim fragment was 2.2 (2.1, 2.5) mm (range, 2.0-3.2) in the displaced group and 0.9 (0, 1.5) mm (range, 0-1.9) in the control group. There were no significant differences in any radiographic parameter and wrist function between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For dorsal rim fragments comprising less than 10% of the radiocarpal articular surface in distal radius fracture, mild displacement does not significantly affect the recovery of wrist function.

Displaced sigmoid notch fracture and higher patient age are associated with distal radioulnar joint subluxation

Background/aim

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are frequently associated with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the sigmoid notch and ulna styloid fracture types on DRUJ subluxation following closed reduction and casting of DRFs via calculating radioulnar ratio (RUR) on postreduction computed tomography (CT) images.

Materials and methods

In our study, postreduction CT images of 202 patients with distal radius fractures were evaluated retrospectively. CT images were evaluated for RUR, sigmoid notch fracture, and ulna styloid types. Sigmoid notch fractures were classified as nondisplaced in the sigmoid notch fractures (NDS) and displaced sigmoid notch (DS) fractures; ulna styloid fractures were grouped as the proximal half ulna styloid (PHUS) and distal half ulna styloid (DHUS) fractures.

Results

The mean age of Rozental type 3b (62.8 years) was significantly higher among others. The mean RUR value was significantly higher in Rozental type 3a in compared to type 1a and type 2 fractures. PHUS fractures were more common with DS fractures than DHUS fractures.

Conclusion

DS fractures and higher patient age are associated with DRUJ subluxation on postreduction CT images following DRFs. DS fractures are seen more commonly with PHUS fractures than DHUS. Patients with PHUS should be carefully assessed for sigmoid notch fractures and DRUJ congruency. These findings could be helpful for preoperative decision making in the treatment of DRFs.

Size and fixation options of dorsoulnar fragments in distal radius fractures

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the influence of size and fixation options of dorsoulnar fragments on the clinical outcomes of distal radius fractures (DRFs).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was performed on 94 patients with DFR accompanied by dorsoulnar fragments, spanning the period from October 2018 to November 2022. Mean follow-up was 15.5 (range, 12-20) months. Patients were divided into small- (<5 %, n = 28), middle- (5-15 %, n = 50), and large- (>15 %, n = 16) sized groups according to articular involvement of dorsoulnar fragments determined by three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) modeling. Subdivision also took place for the presence of postoperative fragment displacement (>2 mm) and fixation methods including volar locking plate (VLP), VLP combined with dorsal hollow compression screw (VDS), and VLP combined with dorsal low-profile mini plate (VDP). The radiographic parameters (volar tilt, radial inclination, and radial height) and functional outcome measures of wrist range of motion, wrist function (DASH, PRWE), and wrist pain (VAS) were evaluated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Fracture healing was observed in all patients at final follow-up. No instances of dorsoulnar fragment displacement were observed in patients undergoing VDS and VDP treatment and the incidence of the dorsoulnar fragment displacement was 35 % (n = 8) in small-sized group, 21 % (n = 7) in middle-sized group, and 7 % (n = 1) in large-sized group when patients were treated with VLP. In small-sized group, no significant differences were found between patients with and without dorsoulnar fragment displacement in dorsiflexion restriction (10.6 ± 2.8°, 9.1 ± 2.3°, P = 0.159), pronosupination restriction (9.6 ± 2.1°, 8.6 ± 1.7°, P = 0.188), DASH (11.5 ± 4.1, 10.7 ± 3.2, P = 0.562), PRWE (11.9 ± 4.2, 10.6 ± 3.6, P = 0.425), and VAS (1.1 ± 1.1, 0.9 ± 1.0, P = 0.528). In middle-sized combined with large-sized group, the functional outcome measures of dorsiflexion restriction (12.5 ± 3.7°, 9.8 ± 2.9°, P = 0.022), DASH (14.6 ± 5.2, 11.4 ± 3.7, P = 0.030), and PRWE (15.0 ± 4.5, 11.3 ± 3.9, P = 0.016) were superior in patients without dorsoulnar fragment displacement. In patients treated with VLPs, no significant differences were found in dorsiflexion restriction (9.8 ± 2.5°, 10.8 ± 3.5°, 9.4 ± 2.5°, P = 0.299), pronosupination restriction (9.2 ± 1.9°, 10.1 ± 2.8°, 8.9 ± 1.5°, P = 0.200), DASH (11.1 ± 3.5, 12.9 ± 4.3, 11.1 ± 3.6, P = 0.162), PRWE (11.1 ± 3.9, 12.8 ± 4.2, 10.8 ± 3.9, P = 0.188), and VAS (1.0 ± 1.0, 1.4 ± 1.1, 0.9 ± 0.9, P = 0.151) between small-sized, middle-sized, and large-sized groups. In middle-sized group, no significant differences were found in dorsiflexion restriction (10.8 ± 3.5°, 9.4 ± 2.2°, 9.4 ± 2.4°, P = 0.316); pronosupination restriction (10.1 ± 2.8°, 8.8 ± 1.9°, 9.0 ± 2.5°, P = 0.314), DASH (12.9 ± 4.3, 10.3 ± 3.7, 10.5 ± 3.7, P = 0.133), PRWE (12.8 ± 4.2, 10.4 ± 3.8, 10.6 ± 4.1, P = 0.199), and VAS (1.4 ± 1.1, 0.8 ± 0.7, 1.0 ± 1.1, P = 0.201) between subgroups of VLP, VDS, and VDP. No significant differences were found in radiographic parameters between all groups compared.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that the strict reduction and fixation of a dorsoulnar fragment might be not essential when its articular involvement was less than 5 %. The volar locking plate (VLP) fixation was commonly effective in treating distal radius fractures accompanied by a dorsoulnar fragment involving over 15 % of the articular surface. Additionally, the use of an additional dorsal hollow compression screw or a dorsal low-profile mini plate can get good wrist function in the early-term follow-up when the dorsoulnar fragment involve 5-15 % of the articular surface.

The Volar Cortical Hinge: An Independent Risk Factor for Distal Radius Fracture Displacement

Background  Displaced distal radius fractures are prone to redisplacement after manipulation. This can result in the need for delayed surgery. Several criteria have been studied to predict the likelihood of redisplacement. We hypothesized that reduction in the volar cortex would be an additional predictive factor. Purpose  The aim of this study was to assess whether the quality of the volar cortex reduction predicts the subsequent need for further intervention (surgery or remanipulation). As a secondary outcome, we assessed whether the quality of the reduction predicts the rate of malunion. Methods  A retrospective review was performed of displaced adult distal radius fractures over a 2-year period that had undergone closed reduction at presentation. We identified 105 patients and a review of their electronic notes and radiographs was then performed. The volar cortex reduction was defined as "anatomical," "opposed," or "displaced." We assessed the radial height, radial inclination, radial/ulnar translation, volar/dorsal angulation, teardrop angle, presence of dorsal comminution, quality of the cast (molding, cast index), and volar cortex reduction. These measurements were taken at five time points (prereduction, postreduction, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks). All patients that subsequently required surgical fixation or repeat reduction were identified as the primary outcome measure. The 6-week radiographs were assessed for radiographic malunion as our secondary outcome measure. A statistical analysis was then performed to assess the factors that influenced a loss of position and the need for delayed surgical intervention. Results  Of the 105 patients, 22 patients required delayed surgery, 3 patients underwent a repeat manipulation, and 12 patients had a radiographic malunion at 6 weeks. During the study period, the proportion of patients requiring surgery or repeat manipulation in the displaced group was 10/21 (47.6%), in the opposed group it was 11/50 (23.4%), and in the anatomic group it was 4/36 (11.1%; p  = 0.008). We then included the patients with a radiographic malunion and found the proportion of patients with an adverse outcome in the displaced group was 14/21 (66.7%), in the opposed group it was 17/47 (36.2%), and in the anatomic group it was 6/36 (16.7%; p  = 0.001). At the 1-week time point, this association was equally significant, as the proportion in the displaced group was 17/33 (51.5%), in the opposed group it was 15/45 (33.3%) and in the anatomic group it was 1/22 (4.5%; p  = 0.001). The patients' age, quality of cast, presence of dorsal comminution, and degree of initial displacement did not predict the subsequent need for surgery or remanipulation. Conclusion  The most important factor in our study for significant redisplacement of an initially dorsally displaced distal radius fracture is the association of the volar cortex. This parameter maintains significance at the 1-week time point. This data shows that volar cortex reduction is a useful clinical measurement in assessing which distal radius fractures will undergo delayed displacement requiring intervention. Level of evidence  Level 3-Retrospective comparative study.

Three Column Fixation Through a Single Incision in Distal Radius Fractures

Purpose  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional results of 67 patients with distal radius fracture (DRF), treated with a modified surgical technique that allows three-column fixation through the same palmar approach. Patients and Methods  Between 2014 and 2019, we treated 67 patients using a particular surgical technique. All patients suffered DRF, classified using the universal classification system. Two different intervals were developed palmary: the first ulnarly to the flexor carpi radialis tendon for direct visualization of the distal radius and the second one radially to the radial artery for direct visualization of the styloid process. An anatomic volar locking compression plate was applied to all patients. The radial styloid process was fixed and stabilized either with Kirschner-wires or an anatomic plate through the same incision. Functional results were evaluated based on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Mayo wrist scores. Range of motion and grip strength of the injured wrist were statistically compared with the opposite side. Results  The mean follow-up was 47 months (13-84). All fractures were united, and all patients recovered to the preinjury level of activity. The mean flexion-extension range was 73.8° to 55.2° and the supination-pronation range 82.8° to 67°. No infection or nonunion occurred. No major complications were reported. Conclusion  Open reduction and internal fixation, under specific indications, is the best treatment option in DRF. The described technique provides excellent visualization to the distal radius surfaces and allows the internal fixation of the radial columns through the same skin incision. Therefore, it can constitute an efficient choice in the treatment armamentarium of DRF.

Does the pronator-sparing approach improve functional outcome, compared to a standard volar approach, in volar plating of distal radius fractures? A prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare functional outcomes of a volar plate osteosynthesis for distal radius fractures (DRF) performed with either a standard volar approach (SVA), which required detachment of the pronator quadratus muscle, or a pronator-sparing approach (PqSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled study included 106 patients scheduled for volar plate osteosyntheses. Patients were allocated to either the SVA group (n = 53) or the PqSA group (n = 53). Patients were blinded to treatment until completion of the study. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). Secondary outcome parameters were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and the Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS). Follow-up examinations were performed at 8 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Overall, 91 patients were included in the final analysis: 48 in the SVA group and 43 in the PqSA group. The two cohorts were not significantly different in demographic characteristics, including age, sex, injuries on the dominant side, type of injury, and fracture classification. We found significant differences between groups at 6 months in the mean PRWE (SVA: 12.3 ± 10.4, PqSA: 18.9 ± 14.11 points) and in the mean DASH score (SVA: 12.3 ± 11.9, PqSA: 19.3 ± 16.7 points), which favoured the SVA. We found no significant differences between groups in the MMWS or in the PRWE and DASH scores at any other time points.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized comparative clinical trial failed to demonstrate that a volar plate osteosynthesis performed with a PqSA could improve the outcome, compared to the SVA, in patients with DRF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II Trial registration Comparison of Two Volar Plating Systems for Distal Radius Fractures, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03474445), registered 22 March 2018, retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03474445?cond=radius&cntry=AT&draw=2&rank=1.

Minimally Invasive Fixation with Dorsal Suspension Button and Volar Plate in Distal Radius Fractures with Dorsal Die Punch Fragments: A Preliminary Study

Objective  The objective of the study is to analyze the clinical and radiological results obtained using a minimally invasive fixation technique with a volar locking plate and a suspension system with a dorsal button in distal articular radius fractures with dorsal comminution. Materials and Methods  Six patients with distal radius fractures, between 19 and 68 years of age, were included in the study. Mean follow-up was of 15 weeks. Range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, pronation, supination, the strength in kilograms, and values on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and Mayo Wrist Score (MWS) scales were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperative. Correction of anteroposterior diameter of the radius and concordance between postoperative anteroposterior diameter and the contralateral wrist diameter were evaluated radiologically. Results  The following mean values were obtained at 12 weeks postoperative: ROM in flexion: 40.5°, ROM in extension: 49.5°, ROM in radial deviation: 24.5°, ROM in ulnar deviation: 15°, ROM in pronation: 87°, ROM in supination: 89°, strength: 37.5 kg, pain in VAS scale: 2 points, DASH: 54.5 points, and MWS: 67.5 points. At 12 weeks postoperative, the mean correction of anteroposterior diameter was 0.49 mm. The anteroposterior diameter and that of the contralateral wrist were strongly correlated. Conclusion  Fixation with the volar locking plate and dorsal suspension button could be considered an alternative to dorsal plate fixation for treatment of distal radius fractures with comminution or associated dorsal die punch fragments.

Radius distraction during volar plating of distal radius fractures may improve distal radioulnar joint stability at minimum 3-year follow-up: a retrospective case series study

BACKGROUND

The surgical technique of radius distraction for stabilization of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) if intraoperative DRUJ instability was found after the fixation of distal radius fracture has been previously described, but this surgical technique lacks clinical and radiographic effect in minimal 3 years follow-up. We therefore evaluated the clinical outcome and radiographic results of radius distraction in minimal 3 years follow-up as long-term evaluation.

METHODS

We reviewed the case series of distal radius fracture with concomitant DRUJ instability receiving radius distraction from the senior author over a 5-year period (January 1st, 2013, to June 30th, 2017) retrospectively. Radius distraction during volar plating was performed by moving the volar plate distally via compression screw loosening/fastening to achieve firm endpoint on the dorsopalmar stress test. The evaluations of radiographic, including bone union time and ulnar variance, and clinical outcomes, including grading of DRUJ instability, NRS of wrist pain, DASH score, MMWS score, and range of motion of operated wrist at final follow-up, were performed at clinic as minimum 3-year follow-up; a total 34 patients had been evaluated.

RESULTS

At minimal post-operative 36 months follow-up, all cases demonstrated acceptable wrist range of motion with stable DRUJs, low NRS of wrist pain (0.6, SD 0.7), and satisfactory DASH score (mean 9.1, SD 6.2) and MMWS score (mean 87, SD 10). There were no cases suffering from nonunion of distal radius. The mean ulnar variance of injured wrist and uninjured wrist were -1.2 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively (SD 1.0 and 0.6) with significant statistical difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Radius distraction during volar fixation of distal radius fracture should be considered if DRUJ instability was found by the dorsopalmar stress test intraoperatively, and the long-term DRUJ stability could be achieved by maintenance of normal-to-negative ulnar variance, with decreased wrist pain and satisfactory function outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Computer-assisted open reduction internal fixation of intraarticular radius fractures navigated with patient-specific instrumentation, a prospective case series

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular fractures are associated with posttraumatic arthritis if inappropriately treated. Exact reduction of the joint congruency is the main factor to avoid the development of arthrosis. Aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of computer-assisted surgical planning and 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for treatment of distal intraarticular radius fractures.

METHOD

7 Patients who suffered a distal intraarticular radius fracture were enrolled in this prospective case series. Preoperative CT-scan was recorded, whereupon a 3D model was computed for surgical planning and design of PSI for surgical navigation. Postoperative accuracy and joint congruency were assessed. Patients were followed-up 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 16 months. Over all range of motion was restored and flexion, extension and pronation showed significant recovery, p < 0.05. Biggest intraarticular joint step-off and gap reduced from average 2.49 (± 1.04) to 0.8 mm (± 0.44), p < 0.05 and 6.12 mm (± 1.04) to 2.21 mm (± 1.16), p < 0.05. Average grip strength restored (3-16 months) from 20.33 kg (± 7.12) to 39.3 kg (± 19.55) p < 0.05, 100% of the healthy contralateral side. 3D-accuracy for guided fragments was 2.07 mm (± 0.64) and 8.59° (± 2.9) and 2.33 mm (± 0.69) and 12.86° (± 7.13), p > 0.05 for fragments reduced with ligamentotaxis.

CONCLUSION

Computer-assisted and PSI navigated intraarticular radius fracture treatment is feasible, safe and accurate. The benefits of this method, however, do not outstand the additional effort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.