The acetabular roof reinforcement plate for the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly: results in 59 patients

Acetabular fractures in geriatric patients: epidemiology, pathomechanism, classification and treatment options

The incidence of geriatric acetabular fractures has shown a sharp increase in the last decades. The majority of patients are male, which is different to other osteoporotic fractures. The typical pathomechanism generally differs from acetabular fractures in young patients regarding both the direction and the amount of force transmission to the acetabulum via the femoral head. Geriatric fractures very frequently involve anterior structures of the acetabulum, while the posterior wall is less frequently involved. The anterior column and posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT) fracture is the most common fracture type. Superomedial dome impactions (gull sign) are a frequent feature in geriatric acetabular fractures as well. Treatment options include nonoperative treatment, internal fixation and arthoplasty. Nonoperative treatment includes rapid mobilisation and full weighbearing under analgesia and is advisable in non- or minimally displaced fractures without subluxation of the hip joint and without positive gull sign. Open reduction and internal fixation of geriatric acetabular fractures leads to good or excellent results, if anatomic reduction is achieved intraoperatively and loss of reduction does not occur postoperatively. Primary arthroplasty of geriatric acetabular fractures is a treatment option, which does not require anatomic reduction, allows for immediate postoperative full weightbearing and obviates several complications, which are associated with internal fixation. The major issue is the fixation of the acetabular cup in the fractured bone. Primary cups, reinforcement rings or a combination of arthroplasty and internal fixation may be applied depending on the acetabular fracture type.

Management of Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Intraoperative fractures of the acetabulum are a rare but serious complication during total hip arthroplasty. Acute fractures generally require attention with plating, whereas chronic acetabular fractures may be approached with distraction, a Burch-Schneider cage, or a custom implant. It is imperative for arthroplasty surgeons to possess a thorough understanding of how to identify and manage these injuries. Collaborating with an orthopedic traumatologist for assistance with plating the anterior or posterior column, if necessary, can be invaluable. Management options encompass conservative management, revision style acetabular component, screw/plating of anterior/posterior column, and the use of a larger cup with multiple screw augmentation options.

New insights into the role of long non-coding RNAs in osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common disease in elderly individuals, and osteoporosis can easily lead to bone and hip fractures that seriously endanger the health of elderly individuals. At present, the treatment of osteoporosis is mainly anti-osteoporosis drugs, but there are side effects associated with anti-osteoporosis drugs. Therefore, it is very important to develop early diagnostic indicators and new therapeutic drugs for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), noncoding RNAs longer than 200 nucleotides, can be used as diagnostic markers for osteoporosis, and lncRNAs play an important role in the progression of osteoporosis. Many studies have shown that lncRNAs can be the target of osteoporosis. Therefore, herein, the role of lncRNAs in osteoporosis is summarized, aiming to provide some information for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Finite element analysis of the Union Plate in treating elderly acetabular fracture patients

BACKGROUND

Elderly acetabular fractures are one of the more difficult types of fractures to resolve. For patients at this age, the more common type of fracture is comminuted. How to better fix this type of fracture has always been an issue of concern. This study was performed to observe the mechanical properties of different internal fixation methods used in treating elderly acetabular fracture patients.

METHODS

A model of a comminuted acetabular fracture in osteoporosis was established, consisting of an anterior column-posterior hemitransverse fracture with disruption of the quadrilateral surface. Fixation of the acetabular fracture model using a reconstruction plate and Union Plates was simulated. For the different internal fixation methods, static and transient modal analyses were performed under different loads, with an action time of 0.21 s and an analysis time of 0.7 s. The stress of the model was observed in the static analysis, and the displacement of the nodes and the entire model in the U1 direction was observed in the transient modal analysis.

RESULTS

In the static analysis, the stress of the osteoporosis model, the suprapectineal pelvic reconstruction plate model, the infrapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate model, and the suprapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate model were 42.62 MPa, 37.49 MPa, 44.39 MPa, and 46.15 MPa, respectively. The stress was mainly distributed near the suprapubic branch. The corresponding displacement in the U1 direction was 0.1500 mm, 0.1020 mm, 0.0836 mm, and 0.0990 mm, respectively. In the transient modal analysis, there was a significant difference in displacement between the different models (P < 0.05). When different loads were applied with the same fixation method, there was no significant difference in model displacement (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Static and transient modal analyses show that the infrapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate or the suprapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate has an advantage in maintaining the stability of fracture fragments when fixing comminuted acetabular fractures in elderly individuals. The infrapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate also presents better biomechanical results.