Influence of hindfoot alignment on postoperative lower limb alignment in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

Pathophysiology of abnormal compensation ability of the subtalar joint in the varus knee

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the involvement of the compensation ability of the subtalar joint in lower extremity alignment has been reported. We previously showed that hindfoot alignment angle (HAA) is an indicator of compensation ability of the subtalar joint. The abnormal compensation ability of the subtalar joint was defined by the mobility of the subtalar joint, and evaluation of the mobility of the subtalar joint may help to further clarify the pathophysiology of abnormal compensation ability of the subtalar joint. This study was performed to evaluate the mobility of the subtalar joint and clarify the pathophysiology of abnormal compensation ability of the subtalar joint in the varus knee.

METHODS

Seventy-two knees of 72 patients aged ≥40 years with varus knee were included in this study. Preoperative radiographs were used for measurement of this study parameters. Based on our previous study, we defined HAA of ≥15.9°as abnormal compensation ability of the subtalar joint. The patients were divided into an abnormal group (A-group) and normal group (N-group). All measurement parameters were compared between the groups, and correlations between the HAA and each measurement parameter were analyzed.

RESULTS

The weight-bearing hindfoot angle (WBHA) (p < 0.001) and non-weight-bearing hindfoot angle (non-WBHA) (p = 0.003), were significantly greater in the A-group than in the N-group. Conversely, the ratio of change in hindfoot alignment (p = 0.006), were significantly smaller in the A-group than in the N-group. The HAA was positively correlated with WBHA (r = 0.66) and non-WBHA (r = 0.43) and negatively correlated with the ratio of change in hindfoot alignment (r = -0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

The pathophysiology of abnormal compensation ability of the subtalar joint in the varus knee is thought to involve a state of increased valgus of hindfoot alignment and an inability to move into normal hindfoot alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅲ, retrospective study.

Hip abduction angle after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy is associated with the timed up & go test and recurrence of varus alignment

The aim of this study is to investigate the association between the hip abduction angle (HAA) and lower limb alignment as well as the clinical assessments in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) patients. A total of 90 patients who underwent OWHTO were included. The demographic characteristics and clinical assessments (the Visual Analogue Scale for activities of daily living, the Japanese knee osteoarthritis measure, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Knee Society score, the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test, the single standing (SLS) test and muscle strength) were recorded. The patients were divided into two groups according to the HAA at 1 month after operation: the HAA (-) group (HAA < 0°) and the HAA (+) group (HAA ≥ 0°). Clinical scores except for the SLS test and radiographic parameters except for the posterior tibia slope (PTS), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) were significantly improved at 2 years postoperatively. Regarding the two groups, scores on the TUG test in the HAA (-) group were significantly lower than those in the HAA (+) group (p = 0.011). The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), weight bearing line (WBLR) and knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) in the HAA (-) group were significantly higher than those in the HAA (+) group (p < 0.001, 0.001 and p = 0.025). In contrast, the LDFA in the HAA (-) group were significantly lower than those in the HAA (+) group (p < 0.001). The TUG test and the LDFA were weakly positively correlated with the HAA (r = 0.34, 0.42, p < 0.001 and 0.001). In contrast, the HKA, WBLR and KJLO had a weak negative correlation with the HAA (r = - 0.43, - 0.38 and - 0.37, p < 0.001, 0.001 and 0.001). This study showed the postoperative HAA was significantly associated with the TUG test and the HKA, WBLR, LDFA, and KJLO. A higher postoperative HAA might induce varus recurrence and poor outcomes of the gait parameter.

Definitions and Measurements of Hindfoot Alignment and Their Biomechanical and Clinical Implications

This article presents a critical review of the past and the current state of the art in defining and measuring hindfoot, ankle, and subtalar alignment. It describes the transition occurring at present from two-dimensional to three-dimensional (3D) alignment measurements, which accompany the emergence of new, functional, high-resolution imaging modalities such as the weight-bearing cone-beam computerized tomography (CT) imaging. To ease and enhance the transition and acceptability of 3D alignment measurements, new acceptable standards for different clinical application are highly desirable.

Evaluation of the hindfoot alignment before and after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alter the ankle joint line obliquity (AJLO) to be more horizontal relative to the ground and aligns the valgus subtalar joint (SJ) neutrally. A previous study of the hindfoot alignment angle (HAA) showed that lower limb alignment after OWHTO becomes under-corrected because of abnormal compensation by the SJ. However, because TKA can exclude effects of femorotibial joint instability, analysis of a post-TKA cohort enables a more accurate evaluation of SJ compensation than analysis of a post-OWHTO cohort. In the present study, we performed radiographic evaluations before and after TKA to analyze SJ compensation.

METHODS

Lower limb and hindfoot alignment were measured on plain radiographs in 46 patients (48 knees) who underwent TKA in our department. The patients were divided into Group A (postoperative AJLO within ±1°) and Group B (postoperative AJLO greater than ±1°), and various parameters were compared between the groups. The preoperative HAA that resulted in an abnormal postoperative AJLO was investigated.

RESULTS

Group A had a significantly smaller preoperative HAA (p = 0.03) and postoperative HAA (p < 0.01) than Group B. Differences in the preoperative HAA between the two groups showed a cut-off value of 9.06°.

CONCLUSION

Patients with an HAA of more than 9.06° are likely to have abnormal hindfoot compensation.

Evaluation of postoperative orientation of the knee and ankle joint after open wedge high tibial osteotomy

Background

Cases with varus knee osteoarthritis (OA) often present concomitant ankle joint deformity and poor tibial plafond inclination (TPI) in the coronal plane. Although changes to the TPI with respect to the ground after open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) have been described, reports on the relationship between the correction angle and severity of knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) are scarce. This study aimed to examine the correlation between the correction angle after OWHTO and the change in knee and ankle inclination with respect to the floor.

Methods

Between January 2016 and December 2019, 39 knees in 39 patients (mean age, 58.3 ± 9.7 years; male, 14 knees; female, 25 knees) underwent OWHTO for varus knee OA. The mean duration of follow up was 30.1 ± 9.8 months. Radiological severity of OA was evaluated for those with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-3. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative radiographs were used to examine the postoperative femorotibial angle, hip-knee angle, KJLO, TPI, talar tilt (TT), position of weight bearing line of the tibial plateau width (WBL ratio; %), and the relationship between the pre-to postoperative changes in each measured value and intraoperative correction angle. The relationship between the pre-to postoperative changes in each measured value and intraoperative correction angle were evaluated. Clinical evaluations were conducted before and 2 years after OWHTO using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale of pain.

Results

The mean pre-to post-operative changes were 3.2 ± 2.2 for KJLO and 3.1 ± 2.5 for TPI, both demonstrating significant differences as well as significant correlations with the correction angle. The knee joint demonstrated postoperative changes in the valgus direction and none in the varus direction with respect to the floor in all cases. Furthermore, the sum of changes to the KJLO and TPI showed a positive correlation that approximates the change in the correction angle. The mean pre- and postoperative 2-year KOOS subscale of pain were 50.2 ± 10.2 and 82.3 ± 9.1. There were no correlations between preoperative TPI, pre-to postoperative change in TPI, and 2-year postoperative of KOOS subscale of pain.

Conclusion

For those who underwent OWHTO for varus OA, the knee joint changed from a preoperative varus malalignment to mild valgus malalignment, and the ankle joint tended to improve from a preoperative valgus malalignment to the postoperative neutral alignment with respect to the floor. Although a positive correlation was found in which the correction angle approximates the sum of changes to the KJLO and TPI, no significant difference was found between changes in KJLO and TPI nor in the ratio between the correction angle and changes in each measured value.