Does intraoperative periprosthetic occult fracture of the acetabulum affect clinical outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty?

Clinical study of occult fractures around the prosthesis in primary total hip arthroplasty

Objective To determine the prevalence, prevention measures, and risk factors for occult periprosthetic fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), as well as to determine whether or not they are the root of early THA failure. Methods From January 2014 to December 2018, 755 patients (769 hips) underwent primary total hip arthroplasty were retrospectively analyzed, including 327 males (339 hips) and 428 females (430 hips). X-ray, CT and 3D reconstruction of hip were performed before and after operation. By using CT to diagnose the occult fractures, the patients were then monitored and evaluated. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative diagnosis, osteoporosis, kind of prosthesis, and the surgeon's experience should all be considered. Patients with occult fracture were followed up, the fracture healing and prosthesis stability were recorded and analyzed. Results There are 23 of 769 cases (23/769) had occult fracture around the prosthesis, with an incidence of 2.99% (23/769);. The total revision rate was 0.52% (4/769). The revision patients accounted for 17.39% (4/23) of the patients with occult femoral fractures. The remaining patients received conservative care and successfully joined without their prostheses slipping. Osteoporosis, body mass index, and the surgeon's experience were identified as the risk variables for periprosthetic occult fractures by univariate analysis (P < 0.05). Conclusion Periprosthetic occult fracture was a complication that can not be ignored in primary total hip arthroplasty. It is the cause of early failure of prosthesis. Osteoporosis, BMI and the surgeon's experience are all risk factors for periprosthetic occult fractures.

Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Management and Functional Outcomes

PURPOSE

Intraoperative acetabular fracture (IAF) is a non-common complication of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite the prevalence of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures are increasing, little has been written about this type of fracture. The main objective is to analyze possible risk factors, treatment options and functional outcomes associated with IAF.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2020, 4 senior arthroplasty surgeons performed 5540 uncemented primary THA. We reviewed our Total Joint Registry and found 18 cases with an IAF. We analyzed demographic factors, medical history, preoperative diagnose, acetabular cups designs, anatomic location of the fracture, treatment, associated complications and functional outcomes. The minimum duration of follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

The prevalence of an IAF was 0,3%. All the acetabular cups were hemispherical modular. The most frequent acetabular cup associated with an IAF was the CSF Plus (JRI). In two cases the acetabular components were judged to be stable and no additional treatment was done. In the other sixteen patients, various surgical procedures were carried out. Almost 30% of patients that sustained an IAF had some complication during their follow up. Moreover, poor functionality outcomes were obtained (12.1 ± 4.1). in the final follow up accordance to Postel Merle d'Aubingé score.

CONCLUSION

Although IAF is a rare complication of THA, maintaining a high index of suspicion is important as they can be difficult to identify. Still with an adequate early treatment they have poor functionality and high risk of associated complications.

Management of Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Current Concept Review

Intraoperative acetabular fractures (IAFs), a complication seldomly encountered in total hip arthroplasty, are typically a result of the impact of insertion of a cementless press-fit cup. Factors that contribute to the risk of these types of fractures include poor bone quality, highly sclerotic bone, and the use of a press-fit cup that is excessively large. The approach to management of these fractures is dependent on when they are identified. Immediate stabilization measures should be implemented for management of fractures detected during surgery. When fractures are detected postoperatively, the decision regarding conservative treatment is dependent on the stability of the implant and the specific fracture pattern. In the majority of cases, effective treatment of an acetabular fracture detected intraoperatively can be administered using a multi-hole revision cup along with anchoring screws in the various regions of the acetabulum. Selection of plate osteosynthesis of the posterior column is recommended when there is a large posterior wall fragment or pelvic discontinuity. In cases where anatomical dimensions allow, cup-cage reconstruction may offer a promising alternative to a combined hip procedure. The number of reports addressing the management of IAFs is limited. This review focuses on outlining the strategies that are currently available for management of this seldomly encountered complication.

Ipsilateral pubic ramus fracture during total hip arthroplasty is not rare: does it matter?

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been well described and studied. However, there is a lack of reports on ipsilateral pubic ramus fractures during THA due to the rare occurrence of such fractures and ambiguity of symptoms. With the use of postoperative computed tomography (CT) examinations, we have identified that asymptomatic ipsilateral pubic ramus fractures occur frequently during THA. This study aims to evaluate the incidence, location, clinical outcomes, and risk factors of ipsilateral pubic ramus fractures during THA.

METHODS

From May 2022 to March 2023, a single surgeon performed 203 THAs in 183 patients at a single institution. All patients underwent postoperative CT scans three days after THA. The patients with ipsilateral pubic ramus fractures were followed up for a minimum of six months. Basic demographics, osteoporosis, general conditions of the operations, and outcomes of THA were investigated in all patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-two cases (10.8%) of ipsilateral pubic ramus fractures were identified on postoperative CT scans. All fractures were located near the origin of the superior or inferior pubic ramus. Five fractures were detected on simple postoperative radiographs. The fractures did not cause any further complications at a minimum of six-month postoperative follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses did not identify any risk factors associated with these fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the incidence of ipsilateral pubic ramus fractures during THA is high, treatment is not required as they do not cause any significant clinical symptoms or affect the prognosis of THA. However, the possibility of occurrence of these fractures must be explained to the patients before surgery.

Intraoperative Acetabular Fracture

Intraoperative acetabular fracture is a rare complication in total hip arthroplasty. It occurs mainly as a result of impaction of a cementless press-fit cup. Risk factors include decreased bone quality, highly sclerotic bone, and a press-fit that was relatively too large. The timing of the diagnosis determines the therapeutic approach. Fractures detected intraoperatively should be treated with appropriate stabilisation. Postoperatively, the stability of the implants as well as the fracture pattern determine whether a conservative treatment is initially feasible. Most acetabular fractures diagnosed intraoperatively are to be treated with a multi-hole cup, with additional screws anchoring in the different acetabular regions. In cases of large posterior wall fragments or pelvic discontinuity, plate osteosynthesis of the posterior column is indicated. Alternatively, cup-cage reconstruction can be utilised. Especially in elderly patients, the therapeutic goal must be rapid mobilisation through adequate primary stability, in order to minimise the risk of complications, revision, and mortality.

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures as a complication of total hip arthroplasty

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are rare but potentially devastating complications of total hip arthroplasty. As the number of total hip arthroplasties performed annually increases, so has the incidence of periprosthetic fractures, with the topic being spotlighted more frequently in the orthopaedic community. There is a particular sparsity of literature regarding periprosthetic acetabular fractures, with periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty being traditionally far more commonly reported. This article aims to provide an up-to-date review of the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic challenges, classifications, and management strategies for periprosthetic acetabular fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

Acetabular Peri-Prosthetic Fractures—A Narrative Review

Acetabular peri-prosthetic fractures are rare but their incidence is rising due to the increased prevalence of total hip arthroplasty, the increasing life expectancy and the growing functional demand of an ageing population, the incidence of primary total hip arthroplasty is increasing. They are either intra-operative or post-operative and have various aetiologies. Several factors such as implant stability, bone loss, remaining bone stock, fracture pattern, timing, age and co-morbidities of the patients must be considered for adequate treatment. To date, the literature on this subject has been sparse and no universally recognized treatment algorithm exists. Their rarity makes them a little-known entity and their surgical management represents a challenge for most orthopaedic surgeons. This review aims to present an update on epidemiology, the diagnostic work up, existing classification systems, surgical approaches and therapeutic options for acetabular peri-prosthetic fractures.