Migration pattern of cemented Exeter short stem in Dorr type A femurs. A prospective radiostereometry study with 2-year follow-up

Influence of bone mineral density on femoral stem subsidence after cementless THA

INTRODUCTION

Femoral stem subsidence can lead to aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for stem subsidence as it can affect the initial stability and osteointegration. We evaluated whether reduced bone mineral density is related to higher subsidence of the femoral stem after primary cementless THA with enhanced recovery rehabilitation.

METHODS

79 patients who had undergone primary cementless THA with enhanced recovery rehabilitation were analyzed retrospectively. Subsidence of the femoral stem was measured on standing pelvic anterior-posterior radiographs after 4-6 weeks and one year. Patient individual risk factors for stem subsidence (stem size, canal flare index, canal fill ratio, body mass index (BMI), demographic data) were correlated. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were performed of the formal neck and the lumbar spine including the calculation of T-score and Z-score. Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Stem subsidence appeared regardless of BMD (overall collective 2.3 ± 1.64 mm). Measure of subsidence was even higher in patients with normal BMD (2.8 ± 1.7 mm vs. 2.0 ± 1.5 mm, p = 0.05). High BMI was correlated with increased stem subsidence (p = 0.015). Subsidence had no impact on improvement of patient-related outcome measures (WOMAC, EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS) after THA. Patients with low BMD reported lower quality of life 12 month postoperatively compared to patients with normal BMD (EQ-5D-5L 0.82 vs. 0.91, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Stable fixation of a cementless stem succeeds also in patients with reduced BMD. Regarding stem subsidence, enhanced recovery rehabilitation can be safely applied in patients with low BMD.

Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs

Aims

The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems.

Methods

In this case-control study, 25 patients (22 female) at mean age of 78 years (70 to 89) received cemented Exeter short stem (case group). Cases were selected based on Dorr type A femora and matched first by Dorr type A and then age to a control cohort of 21 patients (11 female) at mean age of 74 years (70 to 89) who received with cemented Exeter standard stems (control group). Preoperatively, all patients had primary hip osteoarthritis and no osteoporosis as confirmed by dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning. Patients were followed with radiostereometry for evaluation of stem migration (primary endpoint), evaluation of cement quality, and Oxford Hip Score. Measurements were taken preoperatively, and at three, 12, and 24 months and a minimum five-year follow-up.

Results

At three months, subsidence of the short stem -0.87 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.07 to -0.67) was lower compared to the standard stem -1.59 mm (95% CI -1.82 to -1.36; p < 0.001). Both stems continued a similar pattern of subsidence until five-year follow-up. At five-year follow-up, the short stem had subsided mean -1.67 mm (95% CI -1.98 to -1.36) compared to mean -2.67 mm (95% CI -3.03 to -2.32) for the standard stem (p < 0.001). Subsidence was not influenced by preoperative bone quality (osteopenia vs normal) or cement mantle thickness.

Conclusion

The standard Exeter stem had more early subsidence compared with the short Exeter stem in patients with Dorr type A femora, but thereafter a similar migration pattern of subsidence until minimum five years follow-up. Both the standard and the short Exeter stems subside. The standard stem subsides more compared to the short stem in Dorr type A femurs. Subsidence of the Exeter stems was not affected by cement mantle thickness.

Are we getting better at cementing femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty? A 5-year institutional trend

INTRODUCTION

Femoral stem cementation provides excellent implant longevity with a low periprosthetic fracture rate among patients with compromised bone quality or abnormal anatomy. We radiologically evaluated the quality of the femoral cement mantle in patients undergoing THA to examine whether cementation quality improved with increased institutional experience.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 542 primary elective THAs performed using cemented stems from 2016 to 2021 at a high-volume orthopedic specialty center was conducted. Immediate post-operative anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were evaluated to assess cement mantle quality based on the Barrack classification. Cement mantles were deemed satisfactory (Barrack A and B) or unsatisfactory (Barrack C and D). Regression was performed to identify predictors of unsatisfactory cementation quality.

RESULTS

The annual cemented primary THA volume increased throughout the study period from 14 cases in 2016 to 201 cases in 2021. Overall, the majority of cement mantles were deemed satisfactory; 91.7% on AP radiographs and 91.0% on lateral radiographs. Satisfactory cementation on AP radiograph achievement rates improved during the study period, which coincided with greater annual volume (p < 0.001). No association was found between posterior and direct anterior surgical approaches and satisfactory cementation quality on both AP and lateral radiographs.

CONCLUSION

Majority of femoral stems had satisfactory cementation quality. Higher institutional annual cemented THA volume was associated with improved cementation quality. Residency and fellowship training programs should place greater emphasis on the importance of femoral stem cementation for appropriately indicated patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.