Return to sports and short-term follow-up of 101 cases of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using gracilis tendon autograft in children and adolescents

Fear of Re-Injury, Psychological Factors, and Sport Played Have Negative Impact on Return to Sport Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Patellar Instability

PURPOSE

To analyze factors that affect return to sport after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR), such as psychological factors, sport played, and a positive apprehension test following surgery, and to determine the average return to sport rates and time to return to sport.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Included studies met the following criteria: patients underwent MPFLR for patellar instability, return to sport was recorded, and a factor that affected return to sport was mentioned. Search terms included medial patellofemoral ligament, tibial tubercle osteotomy, tibial tubercle transfer, return to play, and return to sport.

RESULTS

18 of 632 identified studies met inclusion criteria. 1,072 patients that underwent MFPLR were recorded. Return to sport rates and mean/median time ranged from 60.0-100% and 3-10.4 months, respectively. 55.6-84.0% of patients returned to sport without decreasing level of competition. Six of 12 studies (50.0%) reported fear of re-injury as the top reason for patients not returning or returning at a lower level of sport. Volleyball/handball had the lowest return to the same level following surgery (18.2-50.0%).

CONCLUSION

Athletes that underwent MPFLR following recurrent patellar instability returned to sport at a range of 60.0-100%. Return to sport at the same level or higher was found to have a lower maximum rate at 55.6-84.0%. Fear of re-injury and sport played were found to have a substantial impact on ability to return to sport. Surgeons can use this information to advise patients on expectations following surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Physeal Sparing Approaches for MPFL Reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To update and concepts for pediatric physeal-sparing patellofemoral stabilization surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated positive results in patellofemoral stabilization in pediatric populations with physeal-sparing techniques that limit the potential for physeal damage. Comprehensive analysis remains limited by population and technique heterogeneity. Physeal-sparing patellofemoral stabilization, most significantly through physeal-sparing reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament complex remains a viable option for pediatric patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability.

The adductor magnus tendon is a viable option for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, but with a busy surrounding neurovascular topography

PURPOSE

To describe the proximity of the neurovascular structures surrounding the adductor magnus (ADM), to delineate a safe boundary focusing on the techniques used during graft harvest and to evaluate whether the length of the ADM tendon is sufficient for safe medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Sixteen formalin-fixed cadavers were dissected. The area surrounding the ADM, the adductor tubercle (AT) and the adductor hiatus was exposed. The following measurements were performed: the (1) total length of MPFL, (2) distance between the AT and the saphenous nerve, (3) the point where the saphenous nerve pierces the vasto-adductor membrane, (4) the point where the saphenous nerve crosses the ADM tendon, (5) the musculotendinous junction of the ADM tendon, and (6) the point where the vascular structures exit the adductor hiatus. Additionally, (7) the distance between the ADM musculotendinous junction and the nearest vessel (popliteal artery), (8) the distance between the ADM (at the level where the saphenous nerve crosses) and the nearest vessel, (9) the length between the AT and the superior medial genicular artery, and finally (10) the depth between the AT and the superior medial genicular artery were analyzed.

RESULTS

The in situ length of the native MPFL was 47.6 ± 42.2 mm. The saphenous nerve pierces the vasto-adductor membrane at a mean distance of 100 mm, although it crosses the ADM itself at an average of 67.6 mm. The vascular structures, on the other hand, become vulnerable at a distance of 89.1 ± 114.0 mm from the AT. After harvesting the ADM tendon, the mean length was found to be 46.9 mm, which was insufficient for fixation. Partial release from the AT resulted in a more adequate length for fixation (65.4 ± 88.7 mm).

CONCLUSION

The adductor magnus tendon is a viable option for the dynamic reconstruction of the MPFL. Knowledge of the surrounding busy neurovascular topography is paramount for a procedure typically performed in a minimally invasive way. The study results are clinically relevant, as they suggest that tendons should be shorter than the minimum distance from the nerve. If in some cases the length of the MPFL is longer than the distance of the ADM from the nerve, the results suggest that a partial dissection of the anatomical structures might be needed. Direct visualization of the harvesting region might be considered in such cases.

Management of the first episode of traumatic patellar dislocation: an international survey

PURPOSE

This international survey aimed to evaluate the potential controversies regarding the management of first patellar dislocation amongst experienced knee surgeries in the treatment of the first episode of patellar dislocation without osteochondral fragments.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted from February 2021 to December 2021 to assess the global trend in the diagnosis and management of first-time patellar dislocation without osteochondral fragments. The online survey was accessible on the homepage of the website of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA). The questionnaire consisted of multiple-choice questions and was divided into three sections. The first section consisted of eight questions regarding demographic information, professional activity, and responder experience. The second section consisted of 13 questions regarding the approach to a first patellar dislocation (clinical examination, imaging, and rehabilitation). The third section contained 2 questions concerning the relevance of patient characteristics to the therapeutic algorithm (age, sports, and pathoanatomical predisposing risk factors).

RESULTS

A total of 438 orthopaedic surgeons worldwide completed the questionnaire. At the first approach to diagnose a first-time patellar dislocation, 251 (57%) of the surgeons requested plain radiographs, and 158 (36%) requested magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In conservatively treated patients, 368 (84%) of the respondents recommended the use of a knee brace. Amongst them, 14 (3%) advocated its use for one week, 75 (17%) for two weeks, 123 (28%) for three weeks, 105 (24%) for four weeks, and 97 (22%) for six weeks. In conservatively treated patients, 215 (49%) of the surgeons recommended load to tolerance, 148 (34%) recommended 30% to 60% of the bodyweight, and 75 (17%) advised against weight-bearing. More than half of the surgeons considered a patient aged less than 35 years practising contact sports to be a candidate for the medial patello-femoral ligament (MPFL) procedure. In addition, a tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) distance of 15 to > 20 mm (for > 75% of the surgeons) and a trochlea types C and D (for > 70% of the surgeons) were considered possible indications for direct surgical management.

CONCLUSION

At the first approach to diagnose a first-time patellar dislocation, plain radiographs and MRI should be performed. In conservatively treated patients, most of the surgeons recommend weight-bearing to tolerance and a knee brace during the first four weeks, with range of motion of full extension to 30° during the first 15 days and up to 60° for an additional 15 days. Surgical management should be performed in patients in the second and third decades of life practising contact sports and in those patients who present types C and D trochlea dysplasia and patella alta.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction results in similar postoperative outcomes as medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and tibial-tubercle osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) versus concomitant MPFLR and tibial-tubercle osteotomy (TTO) on patient-reported functional outcomes, rate of patellar redislocation, and rate of return to sport in skeletally mature patients with recurrent patellar instability and lateralization as defined by elevated tibial-tubercle trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance.

METHODS

Three databases MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to July 10th, 2022 for literature outlining the management of patients with TT-TG indices greater than 15 mm with either isolated MPFLR or concomitant MPFLR and TTO procedures. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on functional outcomes via the Kujala anterior knee pain score, redislocation rates, return to sport rates, and complications were recorded. The MINORS score was used for all studies to perform a quality assessment of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies comprising 1405 patients (1452 knees) were included in this review. The mean Kujala score in 13 studies comprising 848 total patients in the isolated MPFLR group was 85.0 (range 80.9-97.5) compared to a score of 83.7 (range 77.2-94.0) in 14 studies comprising 459 patients in the concomitant group. The mean pooled redislocation rate in 19 studies examining isolated MPFLR procedures comprising 948 patients was 3.1% (95% CI 2.1-4.4%, I² = 7%) as opposed to 3.2% (95% CI 1.9-5.0%, I² = 0%) in 15 studies comprising 486 patients in the concomitant group. The mean pooled return to sport rate in seven studies with 472 total patients in the isolated MPFLR group was 82% (95% CI 78-86%, I² = 16%) compared to a score of 92% (95% CI 78-99%, I² = 58%) in four studies comprising 54 patients in the concomitant group. There were similar complication rates between both treatment groups, including range of motion deficits, fractures, infections, and graft failures.

CONCLUSION

Isolated MPFLR leads to similar anterior knee pain, similar redislocation rates and lower return to sport rates than concomitant MPFLR and TTO procedures in patients with TT-TG distances greater than 15 mm. Information from this review can aid surgeons in their decision to choose MPFLR versus concomitant procedures for this patient population, and can also guide future studies on this topic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.