Minifragment plating of the fibula in unstable ankle fractures

Functional outcome of routine versus on-demand removal of the syndesmotic screw

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to present the mid-term follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) which compared the functional outcome following routine removal (RR) to the outcome following on-demand removal (ODR) of the syndesmotic screw (SS).

Methods

All patients included in the 'ROutine vs on DEmand removal Of the syndesmotic screw' (RODEO) trial received the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Out of the 152 patients, 109 (71.7%) completed the mid-term follow-up questionnaire and were included in this study (53 treated with RR and 56 with ODR). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 43.0 to 56.0) since the initial surgical treatment of the acute syndesmotic injury. The primary outcome of this study consisted of the OMAS scores of the two groups.

Results

The median OMAS score was 85.0 for patients treated with RR, and 90.0 for patients treated with ODR (p = 0.384), indicating no significant difference between ODR and RR. The secondary outcome measures included the AOFAS (88.0 in the RR group and 90.0 for ODR; p = 0.722), FAOS (87.5 in the RR group and 92.9 for ODR; p = 0.399), and EQ-5D (0.87 in the RR group and 0.96 for ODR; p = 0.092).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated no functional difference comparing ODR to RR in syndesmotic injuries at a four year follow-up period, which supports the results of the primary RODEO trial. ODR should be the standard practice after syndesmotic screw fixation.

Screw-only fibular construct for Weber B ankle fractures: A retrospective clinical and cost comparison to assess feasibility for resource-limited settings

INTRODUCTION

Ankle fractures are one of the most common injuries sustained worldwide, with the majority being isolated lateral malleolus fractures. The majority of the world's population live in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC), where implant cost may limit surgical treatment of ankle fractures. We investigate if Weber B ankle fractures could be effectively treated with a lower-cost technique using two screws between the fibula and the tibia to neutralize an interfragmentary lag screw.

METHODS

After IRB approval, consecutive patients from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 with Weber-B ankle fractures were treated using AO technique (AOT) with plate osteosynthesis neutralizing an interfragmentary screw. Syndesmotic injuries, as well as injuries to the medial malleolus or foot were treated according to the surgeon's preferences. From January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 these injuries were treated with a screw-only technique (SOT) with two fibula pro tibia screws to neutralize an interfragmentary screw. Patient demographics including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, associated rheumatoid arthritis, and associated diabetes mellitus were recorded. The primary outcome variable was a stable radiographic mortise at six weeks post-surgery, secondary outcome variables included clinical union, infection, hardware removal, and implant cost for lateral malleolar fixation charged to the hospital.

RESULTS

Seventeen AOT and 10 SOT constructs were included. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. All fractures maintained a stable mortise with clinical union at 6 weeks without infection. There was a statistically significant difference in hardware removal (17.6% AOT, 50% SOT, p = 0.012). The average implant cost to the hospital of the lateral malleolar fixation was significantly less in the SOT group ($592 (SD $229)), compared to the AOT group ($1,949.97 (SD $562)), (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We introduce proof of concept of a novel lower-cost fixation strategy for Weber B ankle fractures that maintained a stable mortise with clinical union at six weeks post-surgery. However, there was a significantly higher rate of hardware removal following fixation with a screw-only construct.

Intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within CT-based classification systems

Introduction

Complex ankle fractures frequently include the posterior malleolus (PM). Despite advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies, PM fracture involvement still predisposes to worse outcomes. While not incorporated into the most common PM fracture classifications, the presence of an intercalary fragment (ICF) complicates treatment. This study aims to describe the incidence, morphology, and location of ICFs in PM fractures.

Materials and methods

A total of 135 patients with a mean age of 54.4 (SD ± 18.9) years and PM fractures were analyzed for the presence of an ICF. Patients with an ICF were compared to those without in terms of age, gender, and treatment received. Characteristics of the ICFs in terms of location and size were assessed. Furthermore, the presence of an ICF in relation to the PM fracture classification according to Haraguchi et al., Bartoníček/Rammelt et al., and Mason et al. was investigated.

Results

ICFs presented in 55 (41%) of the 135 patients. Patients with an ICF were younger, and the PM was more often operatively treated when compared to patients without an ICF. A posterolateral approach was used significantly more often in patients with an ICF. Almost all ICFs were found in the posterolateral (58%) and posterocentral (35%) regions. The majority of fragments were found in Bartoníček/Rammelt type 2 fractures, the most common fracture type. Bartoníček/Rammelt type 3 fractures had the highest relative frequency of ICFs.

Conclusion

ICFs are frequently found in PM fractures; however, they are not incorporated into any of the common classifications. They are generally found in younger patients and associated with more complex PM fractures. As they can complicate reduction of the main fragment and may require direct exposure to restore joint congruency, ICFs should be considered in PM fracture classifications. Due to their location, the majority of ICFs are able to be accessed using a posterolateral approach.