Biomechanical analysis of helical versus straight plating of proximal third humeral shaft fractures

Does helical plating for proximal humeral shaft fractures benefit bone healing? - an in silico analysis in fracture healing

OBJECTIVES

Helical plating is an established alternative to straight plating for humeral shaft fractures in order to prevent iatrogenic radial nerve damage. However, a previous biomechanical investigation indicated differences in fracture healing for helical plating due to a potential shift of interfragmentary movements compared to straight plating. Therefore, fracture healing simulations were performed to assess any differences in bone healing of helical vs. straight plating.

METHODS

A systematic workflow for fracture healing analytics was created, covering essential steps of bone modelling, implant modelling, finite element modelling, fracture healing simulation and result analysis. Computational humerus models with an AO12C2 fracture and straight and helical osteosynthesis were created. An established fracture healing model was used to simulate callus formation over 112 days under physiological loading. The predicted tissue differentiation and interfragmentary movement (IFM) was tracked over the entire simulated healing course.

RESULTS

Helical plating resulted in larger interfragmentary movements for compression and shear components, and in a greater proportion of near and far cortical movement. Vascularization and tissue formation were deferred, but cortical bridging was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Helical plating resulted in slightly deferred bone healing due to larger interfragmentary shear movements. Considering the advantage of helical plating in clinical context, a slightly deferred bone healing is justifiable.

45° helical plates are a valid alternative to straight plates for treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures

Helical plates used for proximal humeral shaft fracture fixation avoid the radial nerve distally as compared to straight plates. To investigate in a human cadaveric model the biomechanical competence of straight lateral plates versus 45° helical plates used for fixation of proximal comminuted humeral shaft fractures, eight pairs of human cadaveric humeri were instrumented using either a long straight PHILOS plate (Group 1) or a 45° helical plate (Group 2) for treatment of an unstable proximal humeral shaft fracture. All specimens were tested under non-destructive quasi-static loading in axial compression, internal and external rotation, and bending in four directions. Subsequently, progressively increasing cyclic loading in internal rotation was applied until failure and interfragmentary movements were monitored by motion tracking. Axial displacement (mm) was 3.13 ± 0.31 in Group 1 and 2.60 ± 0.42 in Group 2, p = 0.015. Flexion/extension deformation (°) in Group 1 and Group 2 was 0.56 ± 0.42 and 0.43 ± 0.23, p = 0.551. Varus/valgus deformation (°) was 6.39 ± 0.44 in Group 1 and 5.13 ± 0.87 in Group 2, p = 0.012. Shear (mm) and torsional (°) displacement were 5.36 ± 0.76 and 17.75 ± 1.06 in Group 1, and 5.03 ± 0.46 and 16.79 ± 1.36 in Group 2, p ≥ 0.090. Cycles to catastrophic failure were 10000 ± 1401 in Group 1 and 9082 ± 1933 in Group 2, p = 0.708. From a biomechanical perspective, 45° helical plating is associated with lower axial and varus/valgus displacement under axial loading and demonstrates comparable resistance to failure versus straight plating. Therefore, 45° helical plates can be considered as a valid alternative to straight plates for treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures.

Straight and helical plating with locking plates for proximal humeral shaft fractures - a biomechanical comparison under physiological load conditions

OBJECTIVES

Helical plating is an established method for treating proximal humeral shaft fractures, mitigating the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve damage. However, biomechanical test data on helical plates under physiological load condition is limited. Hence, the aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of helical and straight PHILOS® Long plates in AO12C2 fractures using static and cyclic implant system testing.

METHODS

Helical and straight PHILOS® Long plates on artificial bone substitutes were tested under physiological axial static (n=6) and cyclic loading (n=12). The axial construct stiffness was the main parameter for comparing the biomechanical performance of the two groups. Mimicking a clinical scenario, the helical deformation was performed consecutively by an experienced surgeon using iron bending tools. The torsional angle was determined computationally from 3D-scanning models afterwards.

RESULTS

Helical plating resulted in a significantly reduced axial construct stiffness in all test scenarios compared to conventional straight plating (static testing: p=0.012; cyclic testing: p≤0.010). No failure occurred within the range of physiological loading in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Helical plating favors multidimensional deformation of the test sample in lateral-ventral direction under axial loading, resulting in a reduced axial construct stiffness and in an increased interfragmentary movement. No biomechanical failure is to be expected within physiological load boundaries.

Sacroiliac joint pain: what treatment and when

INTRODUCTION

Spinal and non-spinal pathologies can cause low back pain. Non-spinal sources of low back pain include the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and the hip. SIJ pain can be treated either conservatively or surgically. Current strategies for managing sacroiliac joint pain are debated, and limited evidence exists.

AREAS COVERED

The present expert opinion updates current evidence on conservative and surgical modalities for SIJ pain.

EXPERT OPINION

Surgical management for SIJ pain is effective. However, it exposes patients to surgery and, therefore, related complications. Conservative management may be implemented in patients with moderate SIJ pain, with less than six months of symptoms, or not eligible for surgery. Several noninvasive modalities are available, mostly centered on intra-articular injections. Corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, and stem cells have only midterm lasting effects, at most for nine months. Radiofrequency ablation is another methodology for pain relief. Both continuous and pulsatile radiofrequency ablation are associated with good outcomes. SIJ fusion can be performed using different techniques; however, a clear recommendation on the most appropriate modality for the management of SIJ pain is still debated.

Is augmented femoral lateral plating with helically shaped medial plates biomechanically advantageous over straight medial plates?

Dual plating of comminuted distal femoral fractures allows for early patient mobilization. An additional helically shaped medial plate avoids the medial vital structures of the thigh. The aim of this study is to investigate the biomechanical competence of an augmented lateral locking compression plate distal femur (LCP-DF) using an additional straight versus a helically shaped medial LCP of the same length. Ten pairs of human cadaveric femora were instrumented with a lateral anatomical 15-hole LCP-DF. Following, they were pairwise instrumented with either an additional medial straight 14-hole LCP (group 1) or a 90°-helical shape LCP (group 2). All specimens were biomechanically tested under quasi-static and progressively increasing combined cyclic axial and torsional loading until failure. Initial interfragmentary axial displacement and flexion under static compression were significantly smaller in group 1 (0.11 ± 0.12 mm and 0.21 ± 0.10°) versus group 2 (0.31 ± 0.14 mm and 0.68 ± 0.16°), p ≤ 0.007. Initial varus deformation under static compression remained not significantly different between group 1 (0.57 ± 0.23°) and group 2 (0.75 ± 0.34°), p = 0.085. Flexion movements during dynamic loading were significantly bigger in group 2 (2.51 ± 0.54°) versus group 1 (1.63 ± 1.28°), p = 0.015; however, no significant differences were observed in terms of varus, internal rotation, and axial and shear displacements between the groups, p ≥ 0.204. Cycles to failure and load at failure were higher in group 2 (25,172 ± 6376 and 3017 ± 638 N) compared to group 1 (22,277 ± 4576 and 2728 ± 458 N) with no significant differences between them, p = 0.195. From a biomechanical perspective, helical double plating may be considered a useful alternative to straight double plating, demonstrating ameliorated damping capacities during flexion deformation and safer application as the medial neurovascular structures of the thigh are avoided.

New generation of superior single plating vs. low-profile dual minifragment plating in diaphyseal clavicle fractures: a biomechanical comparative study

BACKGROUND

Recently, a new generation of superior clavicle plates was developed featuring the variable-angle locking technology for enhanced screw positioning and a less prominent and optimized plate-to-bone fit design. On the other hand, minifragment plates in dual plating mode have demonstrated promising clinical results. The aim of the current study was to compare the biomechanical competence of single superior plating using the new-generation plate vs. dual plating using low-profile minifragment plates.

METHODS

Sixteen paired human cadaveric clavicles were pairwise assigned to 2 groups for instrumentation with either a superior 2.7-mm variable-angle locking compression plate (group 1), or with one 2.5-mm anterior combined with one 2.0-mm superior matrix mandible plate (group 2). An unstable clavicle shaft fracture (AO/OTA 15.2C) was simulated by means of a 5-mm osteotomy gap. Specimens were cyclically tested to failure under craniocaudal cantilever bending, superimposed with bidirectional torsion around the shaft axis, and monitored via motion tracking.

RESULTS

Initial construct stiffness was significantly higher in group 2 (9.28 ± 4.40 N/mm) compared to group 1 (3.68 ± 1.08 N/mm), P = .003. The amplitudes of interfragmentary motions in terms of axial and shear displacement, fracture gap opening and torsion, over the course of 12,500 cycles were significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2, P ≤ .038. Cycles to 2 mm shear displacement were significantly lower in group 1 (22,792 ± 4346) compared to group 2 (27,437 ± 1877), P = .047.

CONCLUSION

From a biomechanical perspective, low-profile 2.5/2.0-mm dual plates could be considered as a useful alternative for diaphyseal clavicle fracture fixation, especially in less common unstable fracture configurations.

Medial helical versus straight lateral plating of distal femoral fractures-a biomechanical comparative study

BACKGROUND

Distal femoral fractures are commonly treated with lateral straight plates. However, the lateral approach may not always be desirable, and 180°-helical plates may be an alternative.

AIM

To investigate the biomechanical competence of 180°-helical plating versus standard straight lateral plating of unstable fractures at the distal femur.

METHODS

Twelve left artificial femora were instrumented with a 15-hole Locking Compression Plate-Distal Femur, using either 180°-helical plates (group 1) or conventional straight lateral plates (group 2). An unstable distal femoral fracture AO/OTA 33-A3.3 was simulated. All specimens were biomechanically tested under quasi-static and progressively increasing combined cyclic axial and torsional loading in internal rotation until failure.

FINDINGS

Initial axial stiffness (N/mm) was significantly higher in group 1 (185.6 ± 50.1) compared to group 2 (56.0 ± 14.4), p < 0.001. Group 1 demonstrated significantly higher initial interfragmentary flexion (°) and significantly lower initial varus/valgus deformation (°) under 500 N static axial compression versus group 2 (2.76 ± 1.02 versus 0.87 ± 0.77 and 4.08 ± 1.49 versus 6.60 ± 0.47), p ≤ 0.005. Shear displacement (mm) under 6 Nm static torsion was significantly higher in group 1 versus group 2 in both internal (1.23 ± 0.28 versus 0.40 ± 0.42) and external (1.21 ± 0.40 versus 0.57 ± 0.33) rotation, p ≤ 0.013. Cycles to failure and failure load (N) (clinical/catastrophic) were significantly higher in group 1 (12,484 ± 2116/13,752 ± 1518 and 1748.4 ± 211.6/1875.2 ± 151.8) compared to group 2 (7853 ± 1262/9727 ± 836 and 1285.3 ± 126.2/1472.7 ± 83.6), p ≤ 0.001.

INTERPRETATION

Although 180°-helical plating using a pre-contoured standard straight lateral plate was associated with higher shear and flexion movements, it demonstrated improved initial axial stability and resistance against varus/valgus deformation compared to straight lateral plating. Moreover, the helical plates were associated with significantly higher endurance to failure. From a biomechanical perspective, 180°-helical plating may be considered as a valuable alternative to standard straight lateral plating of unstable distal femoral fractures.

Helical Plating Compared with Straight Plating and Nailing for Treatment of Proximal Third Humeral Shaft Fractures-A Biomechanical Study

Background and Objectives: The surgical treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures usually considers application of either long straight plates or intramedullary nails. By being able to spare the rotator cuff and avoid the radial nerve distally, the implementation of helical plates might overcome the downsides of common fixation methods. The aims of the current study were (1) to explore the biomechanical competence of different plate designs and (2) to compare their performance versus the alternative treatment option of using intramedullary nails. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four artificial humeri were assigned to the following four groups for simulation of an unstable proximal humeral shaft fracture and instrumentation: Group 1 (Straight-PHILOS), Group 2 (MULTILOC-Nail), Group 3 (45°-Helical-PHILOS), and Group 4 (90°-Helical-PHILOS). All specimens underwent non-destructive, quasi-static biomechanical testing under loading in axial compression, torsion in internal/external rotation, and pure bending in four directions, accompanied by motion tracking. Results: Axial stiffness/displacement in Group 2 was significantly higher/smaller than in all other groups (p ≤ 0.010). Torsional displacement in Group 2 was significantly bigger than in all other groups (p ≤ 0.017). Significantly smaller coronal plane displacement was identified in Group 2 versus all other groups (p < 0.001) and in Group 4 versus Group 1 (p = 0.022). Significantly bigger sagittal plane displacement was detected in Group 4 versus all other groups (p ≤ 0.024) and in Group 1 versus Group 2 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intramedullary nails demonstrated higher axial stiffness and smaller axial interfragmentary movements compared with all investigated plate designs. However, they were associated with bigger torsional movements at the fracture site. Although 90°-helical plates revealed bigger interfragmentary movements in the sagittal plane, they demonstrated improved resistance against displacements in the coronal plane when compared with straight lateral plates. In addition, 45°-helical plates manifested similar biomechanical competence to straight plates and may be considered a valid alternative to the latter from a biomechanical standpoint.

Pharmacological agents for bone fracture healing: talking points from recent clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacological strategies might influence bone healing in terms of time to union or quality of mature bone. This expert opinion discussed the current level I evidence on the experimental pharmacological agents used to favor bone fracture healing.

AREAS COVERED

This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the 2020 PRISMA statement. In April 2023, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase. All the randomized clinical trials investigating pharmacological agents for bone fracture healing were accessed. No time constraint was set for the search. The search was restricted to RCTs. No additional filters were used in the database search. Data from 19 RCTs (4067 patients) were collected. 78% (3160 of 4067) were women. The mean length of the follow-up was 9.3 months (range, 1-26 months). The mean age of the patients was 64.4 years (range, 8-84 years).

EXPERT OPINION

Calcitonin could favor bone fracture healing. Bisphosphonates (alendronate, zoledronate, clodronate), monoclonal antibodies (denosumab, romosozumab), statins, vitamin D and calcium supplementation, strontium ranelate, and ibuprofen did not influence bony healing. Concerning the effect of parathormone, current level I evidence is controversial, and additional studies are required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, systematic review of RCTs.