Severity of upper limb injuries in snowboarding

A 40-year Study of the Factors Associated with Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Skiers and Snowboarders

BACKGROUND

Skiing and snowboarding are popular sports that are associated with a high number of orthopaedic injuries. Diaphyseal forearm fractures are an important subset of these injuries. To our knowledge, factors associated with these injuries, the mechanisms that cause them, and their relative frequencies in skiers and snowboarders have not been described. In addition, it has been proposed that the use of wrist guards may increase the risk of sustaining a diaphyseal forearm fracture; therefore, we sought to explore the relationship between wrist guard use and diaphyseal forearm fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What are the relative frequencies and types of diaphyseal forearm fractures in skiers and snowboarders? (2) What factors are associated with these injuries? (3) Is the use of wrist guards associated with an increased risk of forearm fractures?

METHODS

This was an unmatched case-control study performed with an injury database from a university-run clinic at the base lodge of a major ski resort. Cases were injured skiers and snowboarders; controls were randomly selected uninjured skiers and snowboarders. Data were collected on the mechanism of injury; experience level; equipment; radiographs; skiing or snowboarding habits; and trail type, defined as green circle (easiest), blue square (intermediate), black diamond (difficult), and double black diamond (most difficult). From this database, we identified 84 patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures, one of which was a Monteggia fracture and was excluded. A logistic regression analysis was used to compare the injured and control groups to identify factors associated with diaphyseal forearm fractures, including wrist guard use.

RESULTS

When adjusted for participant days, diaphyseal forearm fractures were more common in snowboarders than skiers (0.03 injuries per 1000 person-days versus 0.004 per 1000 person-days). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with forearm fractures in skiers were younger age (odds ratio 1.08 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.14]; p < 0.01), being a man or boy (OR 11.9 [95% CI 2.5 to 57.2]; p < 0.01), lack of movement at the time of falling (OR 18.2 [95% CI 3.2 to 102.5]; p < 0.01), and skiing on green circle trails compared with black diamond trails (OR 3.6 [95% CI 1.4 to 12.5]; p = 0.04). Factors associated with forearm fractures in snowboarders were younger age (OR 1.08 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.15]; p = 0.01), decreased weight (OR 1.02 [95% CI 1.00 to 1.02]; p < 0.01), snowboarding on gentle terrain (OR 8.4 [95% CI 1.6 to 45.0]; p = 0.01), and snowboarding on groomed terrain compared with other (OR 7.2 [95% CI 1.9 to 28.0]; p < 0.01) or wet, heavy snow (OR 24.8 [95% CI 2.5 to 246.7]; p = 0.01). Wrist guard use was not associated with an increased odds of diaphyseal forearm fracture in skiers or snowboarders.

CONCLUSION

Diaphyseal forearm fractures occur more frequently in snowboarders than in skiers. Despite speculation in prior evidence that wrist guards may paradoxically increase the risk of sustaining these injuries, our study suggests that this is not the case and wrist guards are not unsafe to wear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Epidemiologic Study of Shoulder Injuries in the PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympic Games

Background

The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze the shoulder injuries in elite athletes during the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang.

Methods

To collect the data of all Olympic athletes who visited venue medical centers, polyclinics, and Olympic-designated hospitals for shoulder injuries during the Olympic Games (February 9 through 25, 2018), we reviewed Olympic electronic medical records and patient information obtained from Olympic medical service teams about athletes who complained of shoulder pain.

Results

During the Olympics, a total of 14 athletes visited clinics for shoulder-related symptoms. Five athletes were injured in games and nine were injured in training. The injury was due to overuse in four patients. Ten patients had trauma-related symptoms: one after being hit by an opponent and the other nine after a collision with the ground or an object. There were no patients who complained of symptoms related to pre-existing shoulder conditions. The most common cause of shoulder pain was snow-boarding (one big air and three slopestyle). The most common diagnosis was contusion (n = 6), followed by rotator cuff injuries (n = 3), superior labrum from anterior to posterior lesion (n = 1), sprain (n = 1), acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular injury (n = 1), dislocation (n = 1), and fracture (n = 1).

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first epidemiologic study of shoulder injury conducted during a huge sports event involving a variety of competitions for elite athletes. If the risk factors of shoulder injury can be established by continuing research in the future, it will be helpful to prevent injury and to prepare safety measures for athletes.

Severe injuries associated with skiing and snowboarding: A national trauma data bank study

BACKGROUND

Injuries after skiing and snowboarding accidents lead to an estimated 7,000 hospital admissions annually and present a significant burden to the health care system. The epidemiology, injury patterns, hospital resource utilization, and outcomes associated with these severe injuries need further characterization.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank was queried for the period 2007 to 2014 for admissions with Injury Severity Score > 15 and International Classification of Diseases Codes-9th Revision codes 885.3 (fall from skis, n = 1,353) and 885.4 (fall from snowboard, n = 1,216). Demographics, emergency department data, diagnosis and procedure codes, and outcomes were abstracted from the database.

RESULTS

Severe (Injury Severity Score > 15) ski-associated and snowboard-associated injuries differed with respect to age distribution (median age, 38; interquartile range, 19-59 for skiers and median age, 20; interquartile range, 16-25 for snowboarders; p < 0.001) and sex (78.9% and 86.4% males, respectively, p < 0.001). Traumatic brain injury was common for both sports (56.8% of skiers vs. 46.6% of snowboarders, p < 0.001). Injuries to the spine (28.9%), chest (37.6%), and abdomen (35.0%) were also common. Eighty percent of patients used emergency medical services (50% ambulance, 30% helicopter) with a median emergency medical services transport time of 84 minutes. 50.8% of patients required interhospital transport. 43.2% of injuries required surgical intervention (21.3% orthopedic, 12.5% neurosurgical, 10.5% thoracic, 7.8% abdominal). Median hospital length of stay was 5.0 days. 60.0% of patients required intensive care unit admission with median intensive care unit length of stay 3.0 days. Overall mortality was 4.0% for skiers and 1.9% for snowboarders.

CONCLUSION

Severe injuries after ski and snowboard accidents are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Differences in injury patterns, risk factors for severe injury, and resource utilization require further study. Increased resource allocation to alpine trauma systems is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/epidemiologic, level III.

Characterizing the mechanical parameters of forward and backward falls as experienced in snowboarding

Wrist injuries are frequently observed after falls in snowboarding. In this study, laboratory experiments mimicking forward and backward falls were analysed. In six different falling scenarios, participants self-initiated falls from a static initial position. Eighteen volunteers conducted a total of 741 trials. Measurements were taken for basic parameters describing the kinematics as well as the biomechanical loading during impact, such as impact force, impact acceleration, and velocity. The effective mass affecting the wrist in a fall also was determined. The elbow angle at impact showed a more extended arm in backward falls compared to forward falls, whereas the wrist angle at impact remained similar in forward and backward falls. The study results suggest a new performance standard for wrist guards, indicating the following parameters to characterize an impact: an effective mass acting on one wrist of 3-5 kg, an impact angle of 75 degrees of the forearm relative to the ground, and an impact velocity of 3 m/s.

The epidemiology of acute sports-related fractures in adults

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and epidemiology of acute sports-related fractures in adults.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database containing all in-patient and out-patient fractures in a defined patient population in 2000.

SETTING

Orthopaedic Trauma Unit.

RESULTS

There were 5953 fractures in 2000 of which 761 (12.8%) were caused in sporting accidents. The overall incidence was 142/10(5) with 261/10(5) in males and 35/10(5) in females. The mean age was 25.6 years. 41 sports caused the fractures but 10 sports accounted for 86.8% of fractures. In 40 sports the highest prevalence of fractures were in the upper limb and the commonest fractures seen were in the distal radius, metacarpus and finger phalanges although the highest prevalence was in the clavicle. Sports fractures comprised 16.5% of upper limb fractures and 7.5% of lower limb fractures. Our results suggest that there are 80,000-85,000 sports fractures annually in the United Kingdom of which about 18,000 require operative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Sporting activities are the third most common cause of fractures. With increasing affluence it is likely that they will increase. Fractures of the wrist and hand are the most common but in some sports there are a number of higher energy fractures. Our results suggest that, even in sport, there are a number of osteoporotic fractures usually occurring in women.

The epidemiology of sports-related fractures of the hand

OBJECTIVE

To describe the incidence and epidemiology of acute sports-related hand fractures in the adult general population.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database recording all inpatient and outpatient fractures in a well-defined population during 2000.

SETTING

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK.

RESULTS

During 2000, 1430 hand fractures were recorded, 320 of which (22.4%) were sports injuries. Males were more commonly injured (86%). The overall incidence was 60/10(5)(104/10(5) among males and 17/10(5) among females). The average age was 24 years. There were 39 (12.2%) carpal, 108 (33.8%) metacarpal and 173 (54.1%) phalangeal fractures. Damage to the first and fifth rays was most common. Open fractures were uncommon (n=7; 2.2%). Eight sports were responsible for 87.8% of fractures, each sport displaying a characteristic pattern of injury within the hand. The majority of fractures (87.2%) were treated on an outpatient basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sporting activity accounts for 22.4% of all hand fractures, with relatively few requiring operative intervention. Young males are most commonly affected. Certain sports are associated with distinct fracture patterns, allowing appropriate preventive measures to be taken.

Epidemiology and risk factors of humerus fractures among skiers and snowboarders

BACKGROUND

The incidence of humerus fractures while participating in snowboarding and skiing is undefined. Very little is known about the risk factors associated with these fractures.

HYPOTHESIS

Snowboarders are at increased risk for sustaining humerus fractures when compared with skiers. In addition, the types of fractures, laterality, and risk factors differ between the 2 groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

At a major ski area clinic, 318 humerus fractures were evaluated over 34 seasons. Radiographs were classified according to the AO and Neer systems. Patient data were analyzed and compared with that of a control population of uninjured skiers and snowboarders to determine incidence and risk factors.

RESULTS

The incidence of humerus fractures among snowboarders (0.062 per 1000 snowboarder days) was significantly higher than that of skiers (0.041 per 1000, P < .05). Skiers were more likely to sustain proximal fractures, and snowboarders were relatively more likely to sustain diaphyseal and distal fractures (P < .05). Of glenohumeral dislocations, 6.56% were associated with proximal humerus fractures among skiers (1.7% among snowboarders). Snowboarders who lead with their left foot were more likely to fracture their left humerus (P = .023). Helmet use and gender were not risk factors for humerus fractures among either skiers or snowboarders. Jumping was involved in 28.3% of humerus fractures among snowboarders and in 5.4% among skiers. Skiers with humerus fractures were more skilled, older, and fell less frequently than controls. Snowboarders were less skilled, younger, and fell at a similar rate compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

Snowboarders are at significantly higher risk of sustaining humerus fractures than skiers. In skiers, humerus fractures show no laterality and most often involve the proximal humerus. In contrast, snowboarders more often fracture the left humerus at the diaphysis.

The effect of wrist guards on wrist and arm injuries among snowboarders: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review studies that examined the effectiveness of wrist guards in preventing wrist injuries among snowboarders.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE (1966-March 2005), EMBASE (1988-March 2005), Cochrane (2005 Issue 1), Sport Discus (1975-March 2005) were searched using variations of the term "snowboard." PubMED was searched for the year 2005 to capture any recently published studies not yet indexed in MEDLINE. The reference lists of included studies and conference proceedings were also searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if the number of wrist injuries between wrist guarded and unguarded snowboarders could be ascertained. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies were included. Six studies were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information regarding study design, patient characteristics, wrist guard characteristics, data source (for cohort and case-control studies), and results (type and severity of injury, compliance, and adverse events) were extracted. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data from RCTs and cohort studies were expressed as relative risks with odds ratios presented for case-control studies. The risk of wrist injury (RR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.41), wrist fracture (RR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.87), and wrist sprain (RR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.41) was significantly reduced with the use of wrist guards. Among the case-control studies, wrist guards significantly lowered the odds of sustaining a wrist injury (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.62). In an RCT, the risk ratio suggested wrist guards protect the shoulder (RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.01, 4.60). Nonexperimental data suggested the possibility that wrist guards may increase the risk of finger and elbow-shoulder injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Wrist guards reduce the risk of wrist injuries among snowboarders. For every 50 snowboarders who were a wrist guard, one wrist injury will be averted. Future research should focus on determining the optimal type of wrist guard and if they increase the risk of other upper extremity injuries.

The effect of wrist guard use on upper-extremity injuries in snowboarders

The objective of this investigation was to determine the effect of wrist guard use on all upper-extremity injuries in snowboarders. This matched case-control study was conducted at 19 ski areas in Quebec, Canada. Cases were 1,066 injured snowboarders who reported upper-extremity injuries to the ski patrol during the 2001-2002 season. Controls were 970 snowboarders with non-upper-extremity injuries who were matched to cases on ski area and the nearest date, age, and sex, in that order. The response rate was 71.8% (73.5% for cases and 70.1% for controls). Cases were compared with controls with regard to wrist guard use. The prevalence of wrist guard use among snowboarders with hand, wrist, or forearm injuries was 1.6%; for those with elbow, upper arm, or shoulder injuries, it was 6.3%; and for controls, it was 3.9%. Thus, wrist guard use reduced the risk of hand, wrist, or forearm injury by 85% (adjusted odds ratio = 0.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.05, 0.45). However, the adjusted odds ratio for elbow, upper arm, or shoulder injury was 2.35 (95% confidence interval: 0.70, 7.81). These results provide evidence that use of wrist guards reduces the risk of hand, wrist, and forearm injuries but may increase the risk of elbow, upper arm, and shoulder injuries.