Comparison of the spread of three botulinum toxin type A preparations

Botulinum Toxin Accessory Proteins: Are They Just an Accessory?

BACKGROUND

Botulinum neurotoxins produced by Clostridium botulinum consist of a complex of a core neurotoxin protein and one or more nontoxin accessory proteins. The accessory proteins are generally thought to protect the neurotoxin from the gastric environment in botulism poisoning, dissociating away upon absorption. Other than their questionable immunogenicity, they are rarely mentioned in botulinum toxin therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To review evidence that accessory proteins potentially play a role in neurotoxin activity.

RESULTS

Evidence suggests that the accessory proteins do not dissociate from the neurotoxin complex and enhance neurotoxin activity. Complexed type A botulinum toxin has dramatically higher endopeptidase activity than noncomplexed neurotoxin. A primary accessory protein, hemagglutinin-33, exhibits this same effect on both type A and type E core neurotoxin proteins, the latter not natively having this accessory protein. A clinical study using an objective computer assessment assay has shown a correlation between type A complex size and glabellar strain reduction, which reflects increasing clinical efficacy. Finally, a systematic review found no correlation between type A complex size and neutralizing antibody formation.

CONCLUSION

Accessory proteins may play a role in the efficacy of botulinum toxin and could remain complexed to the neurotoxin for longer than previously reported.

A novel hybrid BonT-A and hyaluronic acid cannula-based technique for eyelid ptosis and periorbital rejuvenation

BACKGROUND

Eyelid ptosis is characterized by an inferior displacement of the upper eyelid when the eye assumes its primary position. Besides its aesthetic implications, ptosis can also adversely affect visual acuity.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the simultaneous administration of IncobotulinumtoxinA (IncoBonTA) and hyaluronic acid effect in eyelid ptosis and ocular rejuvenation.

METHODS

A novel, non-surgical technique for eyelid ptosis management involving IncoBonTA and hyaluronic acid the co-administration within a single syringe, and applied using a cannula.

RESULTS

The dual action of IncoBonTA and hyaluronic acid in conjunction with the exact injection sites approaches improves overall aesthetic outcomes but also optimizes the restoration of eyelid functionality in palpebral ptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The functional balance achieved among the contributory muscles-primarily the orbicularis oculi (OO) and its antagonists, the frontal muscle and levator palpebrae superioris (LPS), yields to both, cosmetic and functional.

The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Rosacea: A Systematic Review

The off-label use of botulinum toxin type-A (BoNT-A) in treating rosacea seems encouraging, but the evidence is still lacking regarding its efficacy and safety. This study was conducted to summarize the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of BoNT-A in the treatment of rosacea patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in several databases, and 17 studies were included. Before-after and split-face comparisons showed that BoNT-A significantly alleviated the symptoms of facial erythema and flushing and improved the patient's quality of life/satisfaction. However, the symptoms recurred three to six months post-injection, requiring repeated treatments in some patients. The pooled rates of post-injection localized erythema, ecchymosis, and facial muscle affection represented 24.6%, 5.1%, and 4.3%, respectively. BoNT-A seems to be effective in alleviating the symptoms of rosacea with a low rate of adverse events. However, the recurrence of the symptoms a few months after the injection requires repeated sessions, which may raise cost-effectiveness issues. Large-scale clinical trials are required to confirm the effectiveness and define the optimal dosing regimen and the rate of recurrence. Future studies should allow for an adequate follow-up after the treatment, with repeated measurements of the outcomes.

Tailored Indications for Different Neurotoxins

Background

Minimally invasive procedures have become increasingly popular because they require minimal downtime and are effective for achieving a more youthful appearance. All U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved neurotoxins are indicated for achieving similar effects, even though they are different in regard to structure, manufacturing technique, and storage requirements. It is agreed upon that each neurotoxin is unique and therefore not interchangeable. The aim of the author is to provide an approach for choosing the optimal toxin in different indications regarding the area of treatment, the age and characteristics of the patient, potential risks, and ultimate goals.

Methods

As the country that the author practices carries onabotulinum (ONA), prabotulinum (PRA), and abobotulinum (ABO) toxin type-A, one of these three toxins was preferred for each category. ABO toxins were preferred in wide areas due to the broader action halo. Typical examples include hyperhidrosis treatment, wide forehead area, and calf slimming. In areas where very precise and targeted treatment is required, PRA and ONA toxins were preferred to limit potential side effects due to wider diffusion. First-time patients were typically treated with PRA toxins for a softer trial periods where as "repeat" patients were successfully treated with ABO toxins.

Results

No toxin is superior to the other in terms of producing effects. Yet, small differences in their properties can allow the plastic surgeon to cater to each patient's needs while yielding the most optimal results.

Conclusions

This study is meant to serve as a guideline for choosing the ideal toxin in different patient settings and indications.

Consensus Statement on the Use of Botulinum Neurotoxin in the Middle East

Background

Aesthetic minimally invasive procedures have become very popular and culturally acceptable among Middle Eastern populations. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA) is a valuable treatment modality for many cosmetic as well as therapeutic indications. The presence of BoNTA in our toolkit has revolutionized the field of aesthetic medicine to the point where it is now one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures worldwide. This consensus considers popular on- and off-label BoNTA indications in the Middle East.

Methods

A multinational group of ten key opinion leaders, experts in facial plastic surgery and dermatology, convened the Middle East Aesthetics Consensus Group and reviewed the aesthetic applications of BoNTA. Recommendations and position statements were drafted based on the integration of the panel's clinical experience with published data, targeted to the practices implemented in the Middle Eastern and the global population.

Results

Guidance statements are presented covering Middle Eastern facial characteristics and beauty ideals, BoNTA characteristics, pre-operative counselling, treatment indications and anatomical considerations, off-label and special uses including high-dose recommendations, and post-treatment advice. Throughout, an evidence-based approach to selection of products and injection techniques is provided, supplemented by the experts' advice on injections dosages and placement.

Conclusion

This consensus reflects the knowledge and expertise of physicians practicing in the Middle East. The panel acknowledged the use of on-label indications and variability in the toxin formulations and immunogenicity and agreed upon a wide use of "off-label" indications.

SAMCEP Society consensus on the treatment of upper facial lines with botulinum neurotoxin type A: A tailored approach

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA) treatments are well established, but injection techniques, target muscles, and toxin doses continue to evolve, with each refinement producing improvements in treatment outcomes. The recommendations in this consensus move away from standard templates and illustrate how to tailor treatments to individual patterns and strengths of muscle activity, and patient preferences.

METHODS

Seventeen experts in the fields of plastic surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, otorhinolaryngology, and neurology convened in 2022 to develop consensus-based recommendations for the use of botulinum toxin A for the treatment of horizontal forehead lines, glabellar frown lines, and crow's feet lines that reflect current clinical practice. The focus was on how to tailor injections to individual patients to optimize treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

For each upper face indication, consensus members describe how to perform a dynamic assessment to optimize the dose and injection technique for each patient. A tailored treatment protocol is presented for commonly observed patterns of dynamic lines. Units of Inco are defined and the precise location of injection points, illustrated with the use of anatomical images.

CONCLUSION

This consensus provides up-to-date recommendations on the tailored treatment of upper facial lines based on the latest research and collective clinical experience of the expert injectors. Optimal outcomes require thorough patient evaluation, both at rest and during animation, using both visual and tactile cues; detailed understanding of facial muscular anatomy and how opposing muscles interact; and use of a BoNTA with high precision to target identified zones of excess muscle activity.

A look at the future-new BoNTs and delivery systems in development: What it could mean in the clinic

Despite the expanding clinical utility of botulinum neurotoxins, there remain problems to be solved for attaining the best outcome. The efficacy and safety need to be reconsidered for commercially available preparations all derived from subtype A1 or B1. Emerging new toxins include A2 or A6 subtypes or engineered toxins with less spread, more potency, longer durations of action, less antigenicity and better safety profile than currently used preparations. Non-toxic BoNTs with a few amino acid replacements of the light chain (LC) may have a role as a drug-delivery system if the toxicity is abolished entirely. At present, efficacy of these BoNTs in animal botulism was demonstrated.

Addressing the Real-World Challenges of Immunoresistance to Botulinum Neurotoxin A in Aesthetic Practice: Insights and Recommendations from a Panel Discussion in Hong Kong

With increasing off-label aesthetic indications using higher botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) doses and individuals starting treatment at a younger age, particularly in Asia, there is a greater risk of developing immunoresistance to BoNT-A. This warrants more in-depth discussions by aesthetic practitioners to inform patients and guide shared decision-making. A panel comprising international experts and experienced aesthetic practitioners in Hong Kong discussed the implications and impact of immunoresistance to BoNT-A in contemporary aesthetic practice, along with practical strategies for risk management. Following discussions on a clinical case example and the results of an Asia-Pacific consumer study, the panel concurred that it is a priority to raise awareness of the possibility and long-term implications of secondary non-response due to immunoresistance to BoNT-A. Where efficacy and safety are comparable, a formulation with the lowest immunogenicity is preferred. The panel also strongly favored a thorough initial consultation to establish the patient's treatment history, explain treatment side effects, including the causes and consequences of immunoresistance, and discuss treatment goals. Patients look to aesthetic practitioners for guidance, placing an important responsibility on practitioners to adopt risk-mitigating strategies and adequately communicate important risks to patients to support informed and prudent BoNT-A treatment decisions.

Effects of lidocaine incorporation (without epinephrine) on pain and 2-week complications of botulinum toxin: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

No study has assessed the effects of the incorporation of isolated lidocaine into botulinum toxin for reducing its pain or complications. Studies on the dilution of botulinum toxin with other materials are as well extremely few, small, and limited methodologically. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate, for the first time, the effects of the incorporation of lidocaine alone into botulinum toxin type A on post-injection pain and complications. In this 2-week prospective, multicenter, double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, 729 participants (667 females) were enrolled. They were randomized into placebo and lidocaine dilutions (about 2:1), and then into two brands of toxins (Dysport versus Xeomin). Hence, there were 4 subgroups. In the 2 experimental subgroups, botulinum toxin was diluted with 2% lidocaine without adrenaline; in the 2 control subgroups, botulinum toxin was diluted with normal saline as a placebo. After injection, the pain level was recorded (as an 11-scale numerical rating scale from 0 to 10). After 2 weeks, post-injection complications were assessed based on the participants' reports and the surgeon's observations. Data were analyzed using 3-way ANCOVA, multiple binary logistic regression, and bivariable analyses (α = 0.05, β ≤ 0.1). The mean ± SD pain levels in the lidocaine group (n = 263) and the placebo group (n = 466) were 3.51 ± 2.04 and 4.15 ± 2.35, respectively. The mean ± SD pain levels in the subgroups 'Xeomin-Lidocaine (n = 61), Dysport-Lidocaine (n = 202), Xeomin-Placebo (n = 133), and Dysport-Placebo (n = 333)' were respectively 3.39 ± 1.86, 3.55 ± 2.09, 4.61 ± 2.49, and 3.97 ± 2.24. Lidocaine incorporation (P = 0.001), Dysport brand (P = 0.030), and younger age (P = 0.032) [but not sex (P = 0.406)] reduced pain. The only significant findings for 2-week complications were for the associations observed between aging with increased asymmetry (P = 0.022, OR = 1.032) and a need for a retouch (P = 0.039, OR = 1.021). Botulinum toxin dilution with lidocaine alone (without adrenaline or other ingredients) can reduce pain without affecting postinjection complications. Toxin brands may cause different extents of pain. Aging, but not sex, may increase pain. Two-week complications were not affected by any factors, except aging in the case of asymmetry and the need for a botulinum toxin retouch.

Immunogenicity of botulinum toxin

Botulinum toxin treatment is the most common non-surgical cosmetic treatment. Although there are many available treatments using botulinum toxin, their effects are temporary and repeated injections are required. These frequent injections can trigger an immunological response. In addition, botulinum toxin acts as an antigen in the body; thus, its effect disappears progressively due to this immunological reaction, which may cause treatment failure. Active botulinum toxin consists of a core neurotoxin and complexing proteins, the exact effects of which remain unclear. However, the complexing proteins are closely related to the immune response and the formation of neutralizing antibodies. Since neutralizing antibodies can lead to treatment failure, their formation should be prevented. Furthermore, various methods of detecting neutralizing antibodies have been used to predict treatment failure.

Dose conversion ratio, comparative efficacy, and adverse events after switching from onabotulinum toxin A to abobotulinum toxin A for neurological conditions

OBJECTIVES

Onabotulinum toxin A (ONA, Botox®) and abobotulinum toxin A (ABO, Dysport®) are most frequently used in the treatment of movement disorders. The aim of this study was to identify the dose conversion ratio (ABO dose:ONA dose), comparative efficacy, and adverse events in patients who switched from ONA to ABO.

METHODS

There were 64 patients with cervical dystonia (39), hemifacial spasm (16), oromandibular dystonia (5), blepharospasm (3), and extremity dystonia (1) who switched from ONA to ABO. The efficacy, adverse events, duration of action, and severity of the adverse events after the final dose of ONA, initial dose of ABO, and second dose of ABO were investigated in these patients.

RESULTS

The mean dose conversion ratio was 4.70 (2.27-9.62). The mean efficacy of the final ONA injection was 70.62%; initial ABO injection, 72.27%; and second ABO injection, 73.52%, which showed improvement on a visual analog scale (p = 0.71, p = 0.5). Incidence of adverse events after the final ONA injection was 18.8%; this increased to 39.1% after the initial ABO injection (p < 0.001) and decreased to 14.1% after the second ABO injection (p = 0.77). After the initial ABO injection, 20% of the adverse events were trivial, 36% were mild, and 32% were severe. After the second ABO injection, 7.8% of the adverse events were mild and 6.3% were severe.

CONCLUSION

Although the mean dose conversion ratio was 4.70, the range was very wide (approximately 2-9). Therefore, we conclude that after the switch from Botox to Dysport, the doses should be tailored to the patients' clinical situation at treatment initiation, without using a dose conversion ratio.

A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial to Determine Effects of Increasing Doses and Dose-Response Relationship of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Glabellar Rhytids

BACKGROUND

IncobotulinumtoxinA is an effective neuromodulator for treating glabellar rhytids. The relationship between dose and reduction in rhytid severity is well established. However, the effects of escalating doses on the treatment duration response are less understood.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of increasing doses of incobotulinumtoxinA on the treatment duration for glabellar rhytids.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, Phase IV study was conducted at a fully accredited, outpatient surgical facility. Subjects (31 female, 7 male) with moderate to severe glabellar rhytids were randomized to 1 of 3 incobotulinumtoxinA dose groups: 20, 60, or 100 U. Effect duration was determined by calculating the time to return to baseline for dynamic glabellar lines during maximal contraction. Follow-up was completed through 1 year, and adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS

The median duration of effect was 120 days (95% confidence interval [CI] [90, 180 days]), 180 days (95% CI [180, 210 days]), and 270 days (95% CI [240, 330 days]) for the 20-, 60-, and 100-U groups, respectively. A Wald chi-square test from the Cox regression on the primary efficacy variable indicated a statistically significant effect of dose group on time to baseline (chi square = 54.63; df = 2; P < 0.001). Hazard ratios were HR = 0.21 (95% CI [0.10; 0.43] for the 60-U vs the 20-U group, and HR = 0.06 (95% CI [0.10; 0.43]) for the 100-U vs the 20-U group, indicating a statistically longer return to baseline for both the 60- and 100-U cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a dose-dependent relationship between incobotulinumtoxinA and duration of effect in the glabella.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

The mechanisms of action and use of botulinum neurotoxin type A in aesthetics: Key Clinical Postulates II

BACKGROUND

The literature on botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is extensive, often contradictory, and confounded by a competitive market of products and research attempting to distinguish brand individuality.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of literature on the principles of BoNT-A in aesthetics as well as clinical examples.

RESULTS

In 2017, the Eight Key Clinical Postulates were formulated as a guide for the aesthetic practitioner in understanding BoNT-A pharmacodynamics and to compare different toxins. These are now updated to include (a) All type A toxins act identically; (b) The mathematical relationship between toxin and receptor is the basis of efficacy, and clinical efficacy is influenced by molecular potency and patient attributes including muscle mass, gender, age, and ethnicity; (c) Efficacy, onset, and duration are functions of "molecular potency" defined as the number of active 150 kDa molecules available for binding; (d) "Molecular potency" is difficult to objectively quantify for commercially available toxins; (e) Up to a point, increased molecular potency decreases time to onset and increases duration of effect, and the "Molecular Potency Quotient" is a construct for comparing molecular potency commercial cost; (f) The area of effect of a toxin injection is dependent upon molecular potency, diffusion (passive), and spread (active); (g) Differing reconstitution volumes; and (h) Increased number of injection sites can affect spread, onset, and duration of effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The principles of BoNT-A use in aesthetics are complex yet understandable as outlined in the framework of the updated Eight Key Clinical Postulates and serves as a useful tool for providing the most effective treatment and interpreting research on present and future toxin formulations.

Advanced Techniques for the Use of Neurotoxins in Non-Surgical Facial Rejuvenation

BACKGROUND

Neurotoxins initially were used to treat hyperfunctional rhytids of the face, but now have been expanded to improve facial shaping, correct facial asymmetry and even improve skin texture and tone.

METHODS

The clinical approach to non-surgical facial rejuvenation is approached into four anatomical regions: the upper face, midface, lower face and neck.

RESULTS

The key muscles of the upper face include frontalis, orbicularis oculi, corrugator supercilii, procerus, depressor supercilii and temporalis. The muscles in the midface to be discussed include the levator labii superioris, levator labii superioris alaeque nasi, depressor anguli oris, depressor septi nasi and nasalis. Treatment of the lower face focuses on the orbicularis oris, mentalis, depressor anguli oris and masseter muscles. Finally, treatment of the neck region will be reviewed with emphasis on platysmal bands and necklace lines as well as the Nefertiti lift.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-surgical facial rejuvenation using neurotoxins should be performed safely and effectively in order to avoid and treat complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Efficacy of Incobotulinum toxin-A for the treatment of masseter muscle hypertrophy in Asian Indian patients: A 2-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

With the changing trends, more and more patients are opting for nonsurgical or minimally invasive options for reshaping the face. Noninvasive treatments such as incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin Cosmetic^® ; Merz Pharma Canada Ltd., Burlington, ON, Canada) are a preferred modality for reducing the volume of the muscle and therefore reducing the width of masseter.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of Xeomin treatment in long-term management of bilateral masseter hypertrophy in Asian Indian patients.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A total of 30 patients were enrolled in the study and were injected with 30 U Xeomin on each side of face, at baseline. Fifteen patients received a second session of Xeomin injection at 12th week, and remaining 15 patients received an additional third session, at 12th and 24th weeks post the first injection, respectively. Follow-up was done at 4th-, 12th-, 24th-, and 36th-week and at first- and second-year follow-ups.

RESULTS

For the patients who received two injections, the maximum reduction of 26.85% was observed at 24th week, which was maintained as 20.04% reduction until second follow-up year. The patients who received three injections exhibited very high reduction of 43.12% of masseter volume at 36th week, which was maintained at 38.72 % until the second follow-up year. Three sessions of Xeomin injections were proved to be more effective in long-term maintenance of reduced masseter volume than 2 sessions of injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Xeomin injections were found to be effective in long-term management of bilateral masseter hypertrophy. This is the first of its kind paper, which evaluates the long-term effects of Xeomin injections for the treatment of masseter hypertrophy.

A Proposal for Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection Into the Temporal Region in Chronic Migraine Headache

Botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) injection for treating chronic migraine (CM) has developed into a new technique covering distinct injection points in the head and neck regions. The postulated analgesic mechanism implies that the injection should be administered to sensory nerves rather than to muscles. This study aimed to determine the topographical site of the auriculotemporal nerve (ATN) and to propose the effective injection points for treating CM. ATNs were investigated on 36 sides of 25 Korean cadavers. The anatomical structures of the ATN were investigated focusing on the temporal region. A right-angle ruler was positioned based on two clearly identifiable orthogonal reference lines based on the canthus and tragus as landmarks, and photographs were taken. The ATN appeared superficially in the anterosuperior region of the tragus. The nerve is located deeper than the superficial temporal artery. And it runs between the artery and the superficial temporal vein. In the superficial layer, it is divided into anterior and posterior divisions. The anterior division runs in a superior direction, while the posterior division runs in front of the ear and the several branches are distributed to the skin. We suggest that the optimal BTX-A injection points for CM are in the temporal region. The first point is about 2 cm anterior and 3 cm superior to two orthogonal reference lines defined based on the tragus and canthus, and the second point is about 4 cm superior to the first point. The third and fourth points are recommended about 2 cm superior to the first point, but respectively 1 cm anterior and posterior to it.

One21: A Novel, Customizable Injection Protocol for Treatment of the Forehead with IncobotulinumtoxinA

It is well known that incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO) is an effective approved treatment for dynamic wrinkles of the upper face caused by the action of mimetic muscles over time. In doing so, it is important to maintain a balance between muscle groups and a natural facial appearance. Patients differ enormously in their facial anatomy regarding structure and function, both within and between genders, ethnicities, and age. Therefore, treating all patients with the same injection pattern and the same doses can result in undesired outcomes. There is a need for a tailored approach to achieve optimal results, as well as to increase patient satisfaction. With this in mind, the novel one21 injection technique which allows for individualized treatment has been developed for the treatment of horizontal forehead lines using INCO, resulting in a positive impact on eyebrow position and shape. This technique is the next step in a customized approach, giving natural-looking results and high patient satisfaction.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/NPkpFwc8wbc

Six-Month Comparative Analysis Monitoring the Progression of the Largest Diameter of the Sweating Inhibition Halo of Different Botulinum Toxins Type-A

BACKGROUND

Excessive sweating is a clinical condition that can be improved with type-A botulinum toxin (BTX-A).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the largest diameter of sweating inhibition halo (SIH) of 5 different commercially available BTX-A, in five different doses, in a 6-month-long clinical evaluation.

METHODS

Twenty-five adult female volunteers were injected in the dorsal trunk area with both 100 units (100UI) and 500 units (500UI) BTX-A products, reconstituted in a ratio of 1:2.5 IU, respectively. Products were applied in five different concentrations (1:2.5U, 2:5U, 3:7.5U, 4:10U, and 5:12.5U). After 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 days, a starch-iodine test was performed to obtain the largest diameter of each SIH.

RESULTS

The higher the number of units used, the larger the SIH p < 0.05 for all BTX-A. However, Botox®, Botulift®, Dysport®, and Prosigne® have pretty likewise SIH along the study, with some few differences for some doses and months between one and another. However, Xeomin® is the BTX-A with the smallest SIH, in comparison with all others, in any dose and period.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences were observed among all brands of BTX-As, based on dose and time after injection. Xeomin® provides the smallest SIH in comparison with others BTX-A.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Botulinum Toxin Type A Overdoses: Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database

INTRODUCTION

Published literature on overdoses related to botulinum toxin A (BtxA) agents is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the BtxA drug class' respective agents for associations with overdose.

METHODS

United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database was utilized to search for overdoses. The analysis was conducted on data between second quarter 2014 and third quarter 2017. BtxA cases were included when they were considered the "Primary Suspect" drug. Overdose was defined as presence of 'overdose' being reported as an adverse event. Primary outcome was incidence of 'overdose' compared within the respective agents. Additionally, a disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing reporting odds ratio (ROR) versus onabotulinumtoxinA as a referent while controlling for confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 3,837,406 unique adverse events were reported during the study period for all drugs in the FAERS database. Of which, 13,078 were BtxA cases. The rate of adverse events involving overdose for abobotulinumtoxinA (20.2%; 215/1065) was significantly higher than both onabotulinumtoxinA (0.4%; 48/11,323; p < 0.0001) and incobotulinumtoxinA (0.1%; 1/690; p < 0.0001). In the regression analysis, abobotulinumtoxinA (ROR 73.26; 95% CI 51.17-104.90) had a significant association with overdose, whereas incobotulinumtoxinA (ROR 0.73; 95% CI 0.10-5.36) did not, versus the referent onabotulinumtoxinA.

CONCLUSION

The present analysis showed adverse events of abobotulinumtoxinA were significantly associated with overdose versus the other two BtxA agents. Overdose can be difficult to research, particularly for in-clinic administered drugs. Future studies should venture to confirm these results in new and novel ways.

Botulinum neurotoxin formulations: overcoming the confusion

Botulinum toxin A is produced by anaerobic spore-forming bacteria and is used for various therapeutic and cosmetic purposes. Botulinum toxin A injections are the most popular nonsurgical procedure worldwide. Despite an increased demand for botulinum toxin A injections, the clinical pharmacology and differences in formulation of commonly available products are poorly understood. The various products available in the market are unique and vary in terms of units, chemical properties, biological activities, and weight, and are therefore not interchangeable. For safe clinical practice and to achieve optimal results, the practitioners need to understand the clinical issues of potency, conversion ratio, and safety issues (toxin spread and immunogenicity). In this paper, the basic clinical pharmacology of botulinum toxin A and differences between onabotulinum toxin A, abobotulinum toxin A, and incobotulinum toxin A are discussed.

The Use of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A in Aesthetics: Key Clinical Postulates

BACKGROUND

The most common aesthetic procedure performed worldwide is the injection of botulinum neurotoxin Type A (BoNT-A). Aesthetic providers must fully comprehend the objective scientific data, theoretical mechanisms of action, and differences between brands of BoNT-A.

OBJECTIVE

To determine and review the relevant clinical postulates for the use of botulinum toxin in aesthetics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The BoNT-A clinical postulates presented here discuss how each brand of BoNT-A acts identically, how the molecular potency may vary between the different products, how patient age, gender, genetics, and muscle mass cause variation in toxin receptor number and density, and how both practitioner and patient can affect toxin distribution.

RESULTS

A total of 8 clinical postulates have been identified that are key to understanding the use of botulinum toxin in aesthetics and to obtaining the best clinical results.

CONCLUSION

All of these factors affect the potential efficacy of the injected toxin and hence the aesthetic results obtained.

Tailored botulinum toxin type A injections in aesthetic medicine: consensus panel recommendations for treating the forehead based on individual facial anatomy and muscle tone

BACKGROUND

Facial lines and wrinkles are strongly influenced by individual differences in anatomy and muscle activity and no single injection protocol will suit all patients. However, there is only limited information in the published literature on how to develop a tailored approach to botulinum toxin treatment.

METHODS

An expert panel of physicians was convened to establish a consensus on developing an individualized approach to treatment of the forehead with incobotulinumtoxinA. Separate treatment protocols were developed for men and women and subdivided by background level of muscle activity: kinetic, hyperkinetic, and hypertonic. Each muscle tone category was then further subdivided to take account of individual characteristics that can influence treatment.

RESULTS

Consensus members describe how to perform a dynamic assessment to optimize the dose and injection technique for each patient. A tailored treatment protocol is described for men and women with a wide range of forehead presentations. For each presentation, units of toxin as well as the precise location of injection points were defined by creating a 12-zone map of the forehead.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations depart from traditional consensus documents by providing detailed incobotulinumtoxinA injection protocols for the forehead based on the major parameters that differ between patients, including muscular anatomy, size, and tone. It is expected that the use of this document will lead to more satisfactory, natural, and individualized aesthetic outcomes for patients.

Key Parameters for the Use of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Aesthetics: Onset and Duration

Time to onset of response and duration of response are key measures of botulinum toxin efficacy that have a considerable influence on patient satisfaction with aesthetic treatment. However, there is no overall accepted definition of efficacy for aesthetic uses of botulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A). Mechanical methods of assessment do not lend themselves to clinical practice and clinicians rely instead on assessment scales such as the Frontalis Activity Measurement Standard, Frontalis Rating Scale, Wrinkle Severity Scale, and Subject Global Assessment Scale, but not all of these have been fully validated. Onset of activity is typically seen within 5 days of injection, but has also been recorded within 12 hours with abobotulinumtoxinA. Duration of effect is more variable, and is influenced by parameters such as muscle mass (including the effects of age and sex) and type of product used. Even when larger muscles are treated with higher doses of BoNT-A, the duration of effect is still shorter than that for smaller muscles. Muscle injection technique, including dilution of the toxin, the volume of solution injected, and the positioning of the injections, can also have an important influence on onset and duration of activity. Comparison of the efficacy of different forms of BoNT-A must be made with the full understanding that the dosing units are not equivalent. Range of equivalence studies for abobotulinumtoxinA (Azzalure; Ipsen Limited, Slough UK/Galderma, Lausanne CH/Dysport, Ipsen Biopharm Limited, Wrexham UK/Galderma LP, Fort Worth, TX) and onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox; Allergan, Parsippany, NJ) have been conducted, and results indicate that the number of units of abobotulinumtoxinA needs to be approximately twice as high as that of onabotulinumtoxinA to achieve the same effect. An appreciation of the potential influence of all of the parameters that influence onset and duration of activity of BoNT-A, along with a thorough understanding of the anatomy of the face and potency of doses, are essential to tailoring treatment to individual patient needs and expectations.

The Practical Use of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Aesthetics

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been approved for aesthetic use since 2002. Since then, clinical studies and expert use have informed our understanding of how BoNT exerts its clinical effect and the practical use of this product across a number of aesthetic applications. This review discusses the clinical properties and characteristics of abobotulinumtoxinA, which patients are suitable for its use, and how it can be utilized to treat facial rhytides.

Technical Considerations for Filler and Neuromodulator Refinements

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background: The toolbox for cosmetic practitioners is growing at an unprecedented rate. There are novel products every year and expanding off-label indications for neurotoxin and soft-tissue filler applications. Consequently, aesthetic physicians are increasingly challenged by the task of selecting the most appropriate products and techniques to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

Methods: We employed a PubMed literature search of facial injectables from the past 10 years (2005–2015), with emphasis on those articles embracing evidence-based medicine. We evaluated the scientific background of every product and the physicochemical properties that make each one ideal for specific indications. The 2 senior authors provide commentary regarding their clinical experience with specific technical refinements of neuromodulators and soft-tissue fillers.

Results: Neurotoxins and fillers are characterized by unique physical characteristics that distinguish each product. This results in subtle but important differences in their clinical applications. Specific indications and recommendations for the use of the various neurotoxins and soft-tissue fillers are reviewed. The discussion highlights refinements in combination treatments and product physical modifications, according to specific treatment zones.

Conclusions: The field of facial aesthetics has evolved dramatically, mostly secondary to our increased understanding of 3-dimensional structural volume restoration. Our work reviews Food and Drug Administration–approved injectables. In addition, we describe how to modify products to fulfill specific indications such as treatment of the mid face, décolletage, hands, and periorbital regions. Although we cannot directly evaluate the duration or exact physical properties of blended products, we argue that “product customization” is safe and provides natural results with excellent patient outcomes.

Comparison of different consensuses of BTXA in different countries

The most international dosing guidelines on the use of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) drugs support a 1:1 dose relationship between OnaBTXA and IncoBTXA and 1:2.5 between OnaBTXA and AboBTXA. However, different facial zones demonstrate different doses conversion ratios. The comparative analysis of nine consensuses on the use of Abo-, Ona-, and IncoBTXA in the United States, Russia, and Europe has been performed. We conducted a review of publications adopting the key words "botulinum toxin consensus," "botulinum toxin guideline." Information search has been carried out primarily in specialized databases (DB). To find the relevant RCTs and guidelines/consensuses, the following databases were used: PubMed and Medline that were screened up to May 2008. Results regarding dose ratios for OnaBTXA:AboBTXA and IncoBTXA:AboBTXA showed that in most cases it is characterized both by increase and by decrease compared to the ratio of 1:2.5. The mean value of dose ratios OnaBTXA:AboBTXA adopted in the United States is 1:2.8. The ratio IncoBTXA:AboBTXA according to international and Russian data is 1:1.9. There are some differences in clinical approach of BTXA use in certain countries. In Russia, low doses are recommended for "crow's feet" and forehead. The US consensus recommends a higher dosage to correct perioral wrinkles. Despite many years of experience in using BTXA, there is no strict international uniformity of clinical guidelines. The recommended doses for the individual areas of the face may differ in different countries. Therefore, physicians in their practice should be guided not by international consensuses, but prefer a national guidelines.

Pharmaceutical, biological, and clinical properties of botulinum neurotoxin type A products

Botulinum neurotoxin injections are a valuable treatment modality for many therapeutic indications and have revolutionized the field of aesthetic medicine so that they are the leading cosmetic procedure performed worldwide. Studies show that onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA, and incobotulinumtoxinA are comparable in terms of clinical efficacy. Differences between the products relate to the botulinum neurotoxin complexes, specific biological potency, and their immunogenicity. Protein complex size and molecular weight have no effect on biological activity, stability, distribution, or side effect profile. Complexing proteins and inactive toxin (toxoid) content increase the risk of neutralizing antibody formation, which can cause secondary treatment failure, particularly in chronic disorders that require frequent injections and long-term treatment. These attributes could lead to differences in therapeutic outcomes, and, given the widespread aesthetic use of these three neurotoxin products, physicians should be aware of how they differ to ensure their safe and effective use.

Botulinum toxin type A products are not interchangeable: a review of the evidence

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) products are injectable biologic medications derived from Clostridium botulinum bacteria. Several different BoNTA products are marketed in various countries, and they are not interchangeable. Differences between products include manufacturing processes, formulations, and the assay methods used to determine units of biological activity. These differences result in a specific set of interactions between each BoNTA product and the tissue injected. Consequently, the products show differences in their in vivo profiles, including preclinical dose response curves and clinical dosing, efficacy, duration, and safety/adverse events. Most, but not all, published studies document these differences, suggesting that individual BoNTA products act differently depending on experimental and clinical conditions, and these differences may not always be predictable. Differentiation through regulatory approvals provides a measure of confidence in safety and efficacy at the specified doses for each approved indication. Moreover, the products differ in the amount of study to which they have been subjected, as evidenced by the number of publications in the peer-reviewed literature and the quantity and quality of clinical studies. Given that BoNTAs are potent biological products that meet important clinical needs, it is critical to recognize that their dosing and product performance are not interchangeable and each product should be used according to manufacturer guidelines.

A comparative, prospective, split-face, blind study of the efficacy of two botulinum toxin type A drugs (Disport® and Xeomin®) used to correct lateral periorbital wrinkles

A prospective- blind- split-face- comparative study with evaluation of clinical efficacy- tolerability- and safety parameters of two botulinum toxin A (BTA) products (the one containing complexing proteins — Disport®- Ipsen- France/ abobotulinumtoxinA and the one free from complexing proteins — Xeomin®- Merz Pharma- Germany/incobotulinumtoxinA) used for correction of lateral periorbital wrinkles (crow's feet) was performed (at that- electromyographic evaluation of changes in functions of the orbicular muscle of eye was performed for the first time). Materials and Methods. Single injections of both BTA products with equal dose ratio of 3:1 (27 IU Disport® and 9 IU Xeomin®) were performed simultaneously to the right and left side half of the face (orbicular muscles of eye)- respectively- to each of 20 volunteers (women at the age of 40.9) with marked and moderate lateral periorbital wrinkles (2—3 degree according to 4-point Facial Wrinkle Scale/FWS). Clinical and electromyographic assessment was performed 2 weeks- 4 and 6 months after injections. Results. The effect of single dosing of Disport® and Xeomin® did not significantly differ at all assessment time points: both for primary efficacy criterion and for all secondary efficacy criteria; as well as for clinical evaluation by the investigator-subjects’ self-evaluation- and dynamics of M-response parameters for the orbicular muscle of eye. Good tolerability and safety were registered. Conclusion. Study results provided convincing evidence that Disport® and Xeomin® used in accordance with the proposed protocol had a comparable effect and duration of the effect on lateral periotbital wrinkles and the orbicular muscle of eye.

Review of Facial Fillers and Injectable Neurotoxins

Introduction:

Noninvasive cosmetic techniques continue to increase in popularity. In particular, dermal fillers and botulinum toxin injectables have consistently shown a rise in demand. Pharmaceutical companies have spent millions of dollars to develop these products to produce more achievable, predictable, and long-lasting results. As a result, multiple products were developed that differ in their physical and chemical properties. By understanding these characteristics, the cosmetic surgeon will achieve more safe and reliable results.

Materials and Methods:

A literature search on dermal fillers and botulinum toxin injectable treatments was completed from 2005 to 2013.

Results:

Injectables are a great resource for clinicians to improve a patient's appearance in a short time with relatively little discomfort to the patient. With a rise in the number of patients requesting these treatments, it is crucial that the surgeon and patient are aware of all of the risks and benefits of treatment. As the quest for the youthful image continues in our society, anti-aging therapies will continue to improve.

Conclusions:

Patients and cosmetic surgeons will continue to work with these and more advanced products as they are approved. With proper training and experience, the surgeon should be able to provide treatments that consistently benefit their patients. It is the purpose of the paper to provide the cosmetic surgeon with a description of the current products available as well as the complications that can arise when using these materials.

Differential characteristics of incobotulinumtoxinA and its use in the management of glabellar frown lines

Objectives

This review examines the pharmacologic and clinical characteristics of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin^®/Xeomeen^®/Bocouture^®/XEOMIN Cosmetic™; botulinum toxin type A [150 kDa]), which is free from complexing proteins, and discusses its efficacy and safety in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. Differences between incobotulinumtoxinA and other commercially available botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) products that have been approved by the European Medicines Agency, US Food and Drug Administration, and other regulatory agencies for this indication are also discussed.

Findings

IncobotulinumtoxinA differs from other commercially available BoNT/A preparations, in that it is free from complexing proteins and contains only active neurotoxin, minimizing foreign protein load. IncobotulinumtoxinA is commonly used at a 1:1 dose ratio with onabotulinumtoxinA and displays comparable efficacy and safety; furthermore, it is associated with early onset and long duration of effect, and high levels of subject satisfaction. In terms of practical considerations, incobotulinumtoxinA does not require cold storage and demonstrates low spread, enabling precise treatment and good tolerability.

Conclusion

IncobotulinumtoxinA is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for glabellar frown lines. It differs from other BoNT/A preparations, in that it is free from complexing proteins and contains only active neurotoxin, which is relevant clinically, as this reduces the foreign protein load and minimizes the risk of neutralizing antibody production. In practical terms, incobotulinumtoxinA has a long shelf-life, remaining stable without the need for refrigeration, and due to its limited spread is a precise localized treatment.

IncobotulinumtoxinA in clinical literature

IncobotulinumtoxinA is the third neurotoxin type A to be approved for aesthetic use in the United States. Because incobotulinumtoxinA has been in use in Europe for some time, the clinical literature is fairly replete with references to its properties and characteristics, as well as its safety and efficacy. In North America, 2 pivotal trials, referred to as GL-1 and GL-2, investigated the safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA in the glabellar region; both are currently in press with another journal. Other published studies of incobotulinumtoxinA are also described in depth in this article, including reports on aesthetic indications, diffusion, therapeutic indications, and studies pertaining to the preclinical and clinical pharmacology of incobotulinumtoxinA. Topics addressed include potency variability, mean concentration, stability and dissociation, and endopeptide immunoassay.

A review of AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport)

AbobotulinumtoxinA was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2009 as the second botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA) for use in facial aesthetics. This article provides an overview of abobotulinumtoxinA's applications and indications as well as safety and efficacy data. AbobotulinumtoxinA is generally well tolerated. Adverse events from abobotulinumtoxinA are similar to those reported with other BoNTA products. Clinical applications of the product are also discussed in this article. Information on handling, storage, and dosing is provided.