Cross-cultural validation and psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST-bp)

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool for the detection of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis

Objectives

The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) is a simple and useful questionnaire designed to screen arthritis in patients with psoriasis. This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the PEST questionnaire in Turkish patients with psoriasis.

Patients and methods

Between August 2019 and September 2019, a total of 158 adult patients with psoriasis (61 males, 68 females; mean age: 43.1±13.3 years; range, 29.8 to 56.4 years) who were not previously diagnosed with PsA were included. The testing procedure for translation and cultural adaptation was carried out according to the following steps: preparation, forward translation, reconciliation, back-translation/back-translation review, harmonization, finalization, and proofreading. Patients' demographic parameters, comorbidities, PEST, and Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screen (ToPAS 2) results were recorded. The patients were, then, assessed by a rheumatologist who was blinded to their PEST scores. The diagnosis of PsA was made according to the Classification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was assessed to obtain the sensitivity and specificity of the PEST questionnaire.

Results

Of the patients, 42 had PsA, while 87 did not. Each parameter of PEST showed a low-high internal consistency ranging from 0.366 to 0.781. When the Question 3 was excluded, Cronbach alpha value increased to 0.866. The Cronbach alpha value of the whole scale was 0.829. The test-retest reliability of the Turkish version of PEST was determined as 0.86 for the total score (ICC=0.866 95% CI: 0.601-0.955; p<0.0001). There was a strong positive correlation between PEST and ToPAS 2 (r=0.763; p<0.001) and a moderate positive correlation between PEST and CASPAR (r=0.455; p<0.001). A cut-off value of ≥3 yielded a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 89% for the diagnosis of PsA with the highest Youden's index. The PEST scale was found to have a higher sensitivity, but lower specificity in the head-to-head comparison with ToPAS 2.

Conclusion

The Turkish version of PEST is a reliable and valid tool for screening PsA in Turkish patients with psoriasis.

Brazilian Society of Rheumatology 2020 guidelines for psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic and systemic immune disease characterized by inflammation of peripheral and/or axial joints and entheses in patients with psoriasis (PsO). Extra-articular and extracutaneous manifestations and numerous comorbidities can also be present. These recommendations replace the previous version published in May 2013. A systematic review of the literature retrieved 191 articles that were used to formulate 12 recommendations in response to 12 clinical questions, divided into 4 sections: diagnosis, non-pharmacological treatment, conventional drug therapy and biologic therapy. These guidelines provide evidence-based information on the clinical management for PsA patients. For each recommendation, the level of evidence (highest available), degree of strength (Oxford) and degree of expert agreement (interrater reliability) are reported.

Psoriatic arthritis screening: A systematic literature review and experts' recommendations

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the performance of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) screening tools, examine their implementation in daily practice, and reach a consensus about the best screening tool for implementation in daily practice in different medical settings.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR), structured telephone interviews to hospitals, and a multidisciplinary nominal group meeting were all conducted. The SLR employed sensitive search strategies using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2020. Two reviewers independently selected articles that reported data on PsA screening tools and that included sufficient data to at least calculate the sensitivity and specificity of those tools (e.g., questionnaires, algorithms, specific questions, and biomarkers). The hospital interviews collected data regarding the process of suspected PsA diagnosis and referral to rheumatology, the implementation of PsA screening tools, and barriers and facilitators to implementation of those tools. In the nominal group meeting, a multidisciplinary team of experts discussed all these data and subsequently recommended a screening tool for implementation.

RESULTS

The SLR included 41 moderate-quality studies that analyzed 14 PsA screening tools, most of which were questionnaire-based tools. All of these studies reported a moderate-good performance but presented different characteristics regarding the time to completion or the number and type of items or questions. The implementation of screening tools was low (30.5%). The experts ultimately recommended regular use of a PsA screening tool, preferably the PURE-4 questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of PsA screening tools like the PURE-4 questionnaire in daily practice likely improves the prognosis of PsA patients.

Validation of Sinhala version of Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) occurs in one-third of patients with psoriasis and mostly remains undetected leading to debilitating deforming arthritis, eventually. The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) is a quick and valid tool, widely used to detect PsA in clinical practice, and it has been validated to many languages. In this study, we intended to validate a Sinhala version of the PEST and assess its psychometric properties.

METHODS

The Sinhala version of the questionnaire was tested on 199 patients with psoriasis attending the dermatology clinic at a tertiary care National Hospital in Sri Lanka. Patients who were detected to have PsA previously (n = 5) and those with other rheumatologic conditions (n = 12) were excluded. All patients were examined by a dermatologist, and demographic and disease characteristics were obtained. All patients were assessed by two rheumatologists who were blinded to the answers provided in the questionnaire. The diagnosis of PsA was made based on the CASPAR criteria.

RESULTS

We observed the total PEST score of 3 or more to be the best cutoff value to screen for PsA. This cutoff value showed the highest Youden index (sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.95). In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve of the PEST_sv was 0.95 (SE 0.02, p < 0.001). PEST_sv total score showed a significant correlation with body surface area involved but not with Dermatology Life Quality Index or Psoriasis area and severity index score.

CONCLUSION

The Sinhala version of PEST demonstrated satisfactory performance as a screening tool for PsA. Key Points • Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is the most debilitating complication of psoriasis and lack of quick, valid screening tool is a limiting factor for early identification in Sri Lankan context. • Sinhala version of the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST_sv) was tested on 199 patients with psoriasis and examined for the diagnosis of PsA according to Classification of Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. • PEST_sv score of 3 or more was observed to be the best cutoff value to screen for PsA with sensitivity and specificity of 0.89 and 0.95 respectively. • PEST_sv demonstrated satisfactory performance as a screening tool for PsA.