Prescribing patterns of anti-emetic drugs during pregnancy in Germany

What changes in prescription patterns of antiemetic medications in pregnant women in France?

BACKGROUND

In France, few data are available on the prescription patterns of antiemetic medications in pregnant women.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to describe antiemetic medication prescriptions and trends over time. Can we observe significant changes in pregnant woman prescriptions in recent years?

METHODS

We conducted a drug utilization study among pregnant women using data from the EFEMERIS database, including 135 574 pregnant women who had a pregnancy outcome between 2004 and 2017 in Haute-Garonne (France).

RESULTS

During the study period, 40 028 women (29.5%) received at least one antiemetic prescription during pregnancy. Metoclopramide (56.6%), domperidone (34.9%), and metopimazine (28.5%) were the most commonly prescribed antiemetics, whatever the trimester of pregnancy. Prescriptions of ondansetron only concerned 53 women (0.1%). The prevalence of women who received at least one prescription for an antiemetic decreased from 32.5% in 2010 to 21.6% in 2017. This decline mainly concerned domperidone prescriptions (from 13.1% in 2010 to 1.2% in 2017). Metoclopramide prescriptions also decreased slightly (18.3% in 2010 and 14.0% in 2017). Metopimazine prescriptions increased lowly (8.0% in 2010 and 9.0% in 2017).

CONCLUSION

This study showed a decrease of antiemetic prescriptions between 2010 and 2017, linked to the sharp decrease in domperidone use from 2011, probably related to warnings about the risk of cardiovascular adverse effects following exposure to domperidone. We could not observe real switches to other antiemetic medications. No switches to ondansetron could be noted either, with only rare exposure during pregnancy, contrary to other countries, like the United States.

Assessment of discharge treatment prescribed to women admitted to hospital for hyperemesis gravidarum

AIMS

Prescribing drug treatment for the management of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), the most severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, remains controversial. Since most manufacturers do not recommend prescribing antiemetics during pregnancy, little is known regarding which treatments are most prevalent among pregnant patients. Here, we report for the first time, evidence of actual treatments prescribed in English hospitals.

METHODS

A retrospective pregnancy cohort was constructed using anonymised electronic records in the Nottingham University Hospitals Trust system for all women who delivered between January 2010 and February 2015. For women admitted to hospital for HG, medications prescribed on discharge were described and variation by maternal characteristics was assessed. Compliance with local and national HG treatment guidelines was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 33 567 pregnancies (among 30 439 women), the prevalence of HG was 1.7%. Among 530 HG admissions with records of discharge drugs, cyclizine was the most frequently prescribed (almost 73% of admissions). Prochlorperazine and metoclopramide were prescribed mainly in combination with other drugs; however, ondansetron was more common than metoclopramide at discharge from first and subsequent admissions. Steroids were only prescribed following readmissions. Thiamine was most frequently prescribed following readmission while high dose of folic acid was prescribed equally after first or subsequent admissions. Prescribing showed little variation by maternal age, ethnicity, weight, socioeconomic deprivation, or comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Evidence that management of HG in terms of discharge medications mainly followed local and national recommendations provides reassurance within the health professional community. Wider documentation of drugs prescribed to women with HG is required to enable full assessment of whether optimal drug management is being achieved.

Early pregnancy exposure to antihistamines and risk of congenital heart defects: results of two case-control studies

We aimed to study the association between use of antihistamines in early pregnancy and congenital heart defects (CHD) in the offspring.

DESIGN

Two case-control studies.

SETTING

HAVEN study, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, and Eurocat Northern Netherlands (NNL), University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. We studied 361 children with CHD and 410 controls without congenital malformations from the HAVEN study and replicated the analyses in 445 children with CHD and 530 controls from the Eurocat NNL registry. Information about antihistamine use in early pregnancy and potential confounders was obtained from questionnaires postpartum. We calculated the association between antihistamines and CHD risk by multivariable logistic regression analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In the HAVEN study, 25 of 771 mothers used antihistamines that were associated with an increased CHD risk (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.3), particularly atrioventricular septal defects (AVSD) (OR 5.1, 95 % CI 1.3-20.5) and perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pVSD) (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.8-14.4). Mothers with severe nausea who did not use antihistamines had a reduced risk (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.98), whereas nauseous mothers using antihistamines showed an almost fivefold increased risk of pVSD (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.1-21.8). The association between antihistamines and AVSD was confirmed in the Eurocat cohort (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.4-8.7), but we could not replicate the association with overall CHD risk. We found a positive association between antihistamine use in early pregnancy and CHD risk, particularly AVSD, which seemed to be independent of nausea/vomiting.

Review on use of German health insurance medication claims data for epidemiological research

PURPOSE

The objective was to evaluate the use of German health insurance claims data on medications over the last 10 years by a review of published studies.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus were searched for relevant studies published in 1998 through 2007.

RESULTS

A total of 70 studies were included. Use of these data increased from 32 reports (45.7%) between 1998 and 2005 to 38 (54.3%) over the last 2 years (2006-2007). Over half of the studies (57.1%; n = 40) were written in English and the most frequent research types were health service utilization (51.4%; n = 36) and cost analyses (18.6%; n = 13). In most of the studies (65.7%; n = 46), medication data were linked with other health care utilization claims (e.g. hospitalization data and physicians' outpatient services). Data validity was not taken into consideration in 40.6% (n = 13) of the 32 studies that also analysed hospitalization or physicians' outpatient diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

German health insurance medication claims data were increasingly used for research purposes over the last 10 years. Especially methodological and validation studies are clearly needed.