1
|
Le MK, Omori M, Oishi N, Oi M, Fukasawa H, Hirata S, Kondo T. High-grade uterine sarcoma with osteosarcomatous differentiation arising from a MED12-mutated leiomyoma, a case report. Pathol Int 2021; 71:199-203. [PMID: 33444473 DOI: 10.1111/pin.13065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Uterine osteosarcoma has been reported, but it is an extremely rare tumor with highly aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. The pathogenesis of uterine osteosarcoma is not fully understood. Herein, we report on a high-grade uterine sarcoma with focal osteosarcomatous differentiation that developed from a long-standing MED12-mutated leiomyoma. A 47-year-old nulligravida woman, with known uterine leiomyoma presented with abdominal pain and distention. Imaging analyses revealed a tumor with a large cystic area in the uterine corpus and multiple metastases in intrapelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes, left ovary and left lung. With a clinical diagnosis of uterine sarcoma the patient underwent abdominal total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, partial omentectomy and removal of the left obturator lymph node. Despite postoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy, the tumor progressed rapidly. She died 18 weeks after the surgery. Histopathologic examination identified a high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma in which focal osteoid production was observed. This high-grade sarcoma with focal osteosarcomatous differentiation was located within the uterine leiomyoma, and Sanger sequencing showed the identical MED12 L36R mutation in both the osteosarcomatous and leiomyomatous components supporting the shared origin of these two components. We, therefore, concluded that the high-grade sarcoma with osteosarcomatous differentiation arose from the transformation of the precedent leiomyoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minh-Khang Le
- Department of Pathology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Makiko Omori
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Naoki Oishi
- Department of Pathology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Megumi Oi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukasawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Shuji Hirata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Kondo
- Department of Pathology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, Elishaev E, Yunokawa M, Sheridan TB, Bush SH, Klobocista MM, Blake EA, Takano T, Baba T, Satoh S, Shida M, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Takekuma M, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Iwasaki K, Johnson MS, Yoshida M, Hakam A, Machida H, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kajiwara H, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Miyake TM, Moriya T, Yuba Y, Morgan T, Fukagawa T, Pejovic T, Nagano T, Sasaki T, Richmond AM, Post MD, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Yoshida H, Omatsu K, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Karabakhtsian RG, Roman LD. Characterizing sarcoma dominance pattern in uterine carcinosarcoma: Homologous versus heterologous element. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:433-440. [PMID: 30217299 PMCID: PMC7526039 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine significance of sarcoma dominance (SD) patterns in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). METHODS This is a secondary analysis of multicenter retrospective study examining women with stages I-IV UCS who underwent primary surgery. SD was defined as >50% of sarcoma component in uterine tumor. SD patterns were grouped as homologous sarcoma without SD (homo/non-dominance, n = 351), heterologous sarcoma without SD (hetero/non-dominance, n = 174), homologous sarcoma with SD (homo/dominance, n = 175), and heterologous sarcoma with SD (hetero/dominance, n = 189), and correlated to tumor characteristics and survival. RESULTS SD patterns were significantly associated with age, body habitus, carcinoma type, tumor size, depth of myometrial invasion, and nodal metastasis (all, P < 0.05). On univariate analysis, SD was associated with decreased progression-free survival (PFS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) in homologous cases (both, P < 0.05) but not in heterologous cases. On multivariate models, both homologous and heterologous SD patterns remained independent prognostic factors for decreased PFS (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] ranges: homo/dominance 1.35-1.69, and hetero/dominance 1.47-1.64) and CSS (adjusted-HR ranges: 1.52-1.84 and 1.66-1.81, respectively) compared to homo/non-dominance (all, P < 0.05). Among stage I-III disease, when tumors had SD, adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved PFS (adjusted-HR: homo/dominance 0.49, and hetero/dominance 0.45) and CSS (0.36 and 0.31, respectively) compared to chemotherapy alone (all, P < 0.05); contrary, this association was not observed with absence of SD (all, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION In UCS, SD impacts survival in homologous but not in heterologous type. Regardless of sarcoma types, SD was associated with decreased survival in UCS; adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy may be an effective postoperative strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
| | - Yutaka Takazawa
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B Sheridan
- Department of Pathology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, USA
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Yuba
- Department of Pathology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | | | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Miriam D Post
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, USA
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Department of Gynecology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, USA; Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heterologous and rare homologous sarcomas of the uterine corpus: a clinicopathologic review. Adv Anat Pathol 2011; 18:60-74. [PMID: 21169739 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0b013e3182026be7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Pure sarcomas of the uterine corpus are uncommon, constituting less than 3% of all malignancies at this site, and most of them are leiomyosarcomas and endometrial stromal sarcomas. Rare histotypes of homologous sarcomas and heterologous sarcomas are occasionally encountered, and the absence of significant accumulated experience with these histotypes at this location may potentially raise diagnostic and patient management difficulties. In this article, the clinicopathologic attributes of all earlier reported sarcomas of the uterine corpus other than leiomyosarcomas and endometrial stromal sarcomas are summarized. Included are embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma, angiosarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas), osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, liposarcomatous tumors, malignant extrarenal rhabdoid tumors, Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor, and other rare histotypes. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (20%), Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (17%), angiosarcoma (14%), and pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (13%) appeared to be more common than the others, although there was no single overwhelmingly prevalent histotype in the group. A subset, including embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, and PEComas, peak in the premenopausal years, but most of the others were observed in postmenopausal women. Favorable outcomes have been reported for the patients diagnosed with alveolar soft part sarcoma, and the prognosis for their counterparts with PEComa remains a matter of debate. Multimodal therapeutic approaches to contemporary patients with embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas have resulted in significantly improved outcomes. Unfortunately, most of the other sarcomas have been associated with rapid tumor progression and unfavorable patient outcomes. The differential diagnosis for these sarcomas is often extensive and varies by histotype, but their accurate diagnosis fundamentally requires the careful exclusion of biphasic malignancies.
Collapse
|