Oxytocin augmentation in grandmultiparous parturients: to give or not to give?

Partogram of Grandmultiparous Parturients: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Sparse and conflicting data exist regarding the normal partogram of grand-multiparous (GMP, defined as parity of 6+) parturients. Customized partograms may potentially lower cesarean delivery rates for protraction disorders in this population. In this study, we aim to construct a normal labor curve of GMP women and compare it to the multiparous (MP, defined as parity of 2-5) partogram. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of deliveries between the years 2003 and 2019. Eligible parturients were the trials of labor of singletons ≥37 + 0 weeks in cephalic presentation with ≥2 documented cervical examinations during labor. Exclusion criteria were elective cesarean delivery without a trial of labor, preterm labor, major fetal anomalies, and fetal demise. GMP comprised the study group while the MP counterparts were the control group. A total of 78,292 deliveries met the inclusion criteria, comprising 10,532 GMP and 67,760 MP parturients. Our data revealed that during the first stage of labor, cervical dilation progressed at similar rates in MPs and GMPs, while head descent was a few minutes faster in GMPs compared to MPs, regardless of epidural anesthesia. The second stage of labor was faster in GMPs compared to MPs; the 95th percentile of the second stage duration of GMPs (48 min duration) was 43 min less than that of MPs (91 min duration). These findings remained similar among deliveries with and without epidural analgesia or labor induction. We conclude that GMPs' and MPs' cervical dilation progression in the active phase of labor was similar, and the second stage of labor was shorter in GMPs, regardless of epidural use. Thus, GMPs' uterus function during labor corresponds, and possibly surpasses, that of MPs. These findings indicate that health providers can use the standard partogram of the active phase of labor when caring for GMP parturients.

The effect of the implementation of institutional checklist on expert opinion of oxytocin use in labor

PURPOSE

Oxytocin is a commonly used drug in the labor and delivery unit. There are wide variations in oxytocin use between countries and medical centers, which may reflect the lack of structured guidelines. The aim of our study was to evaluate the need of oxytocin checklist in labor and delivery unit, while assessing the management of oxytocin with and without such a checklist.

METHODS

This study was conducted in a single, university-affiliated medical center in two phases: before and after the implementation of an oxytocin checklist in the labor and delivery unit (2016-2017). Six experts reviewed cardiotocographs of deliveries performed in an urgent Cesarean delivery due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate, after completing at least 4 h of oxytocin infusion for induction or augmentation of labor. The experts included three obstetricians, a midwife, and two obstetrical expert nurses, who were tasked to conclude whether oxytocin was managed properly or not. Each case was reviewed by two reviewers separately. A total of 100 cases were reviewed; 50 before the oxytocin checklist implementation, and 50 after that implementation.

RESULTS

We did not find a difference in the reviewers' assessment of oxytocin management before and after the institutional implementation of the checklist. Additionally, there were significant inconsistencies and inter-observer variations in their assessment before and after the checklist implementation.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of an institutional oxytocin checklist did not affect expert assessment of the use of oxytocin in labor.

Induction of labor in women with a scarred uterus: does grand multiparity affect the risk of uterine rupture?

BACKGROUND

Previous cesarean delivery is the most important risk factor for subsequent uterine rupture. Data are inconsistent regarding grand multiparity (≥6th delivery) and a risk for uterine rupture. Specifically, no data exist regarding the risk that is associated with labor induction or augmentation in grand multiparous women after cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine whether grand multiparity elevates the risk for uterine rupture in trials of labor after 1 previous cesarean that involved induction or augmentation of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective multicenter study was conducted that included all trials of labor after cesarean delivery at 24-42 gestational weeks with vertex presentation between the years 2003-2015. The study groups were defined in the following manner: (1) grand multiparous parturients (current delivery ≥6) who underwent labor induction or augmentation; (2) multiparous parturients (delivery 2-5) who underwent induction or augmentation; (3) grand multiparous parturients with no induction or augmentation of labor. The primary outcome was uterine rupture rate, which was defined as complete separation of all uterine layers. Secondary outcomes were obstetric and neonatal complications.

RESULTS

A total of 12,679 labors were included in the study. The study group included 1304 labors of grand multiparous parturients after 1 previous cesarean delivery, of which 800 parturients underwent induction of labor and 504 parturients received labor augmentation. The multiparous group included 3681 parturients with either labor induction or augmentation. The third group included 7694 grand multiparous parturients without induction or augmentation. Incidence of uterine rupture was similar among the 3 study groups (0.3%, 0.3%, and 0.2%, respectively; P=.847). In the multivariable model that was adjusted for maternal age, ethnicity, diabetes mellitus, birthweight, and prolonged second stage of labor, no association was found between grand multiparity and uterine rupture in women with a scarred uterus who underwent labor induction or augmentation.

CONCLUSION

Labor induction/augmentation during trial of labor after cesarean delivery in grand multiparous parturients appears to be a reasonable option that has a similar uterine rupture risk as in multiparous parturients. Avoiding a mandatory cesarean delivery enables reduction of the risk for future multiple cesarean deliveries.