1
|
Shin W, Park SY, Kang S, Lim MC, Seo SS. How to manage synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer patients? BMC Cancer 2021; 21:489. [PMID: 33933018 PMCID: PMC8088669 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08220-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds We aimed to evaluate the prognosis in patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) by comparing the differences between double primary cancer (DPC) and metastatic cancer (MC). Methods The medical records of 47 patients diagnosed synchronously with endometrial and ovarian cancer between January 2006 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-eight and 19 patients were diagnosed with DPC and MC, respectively. Demographics, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and 5-year overall survival (OS) were compared. The clinical factors affecting survival were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The demographics were not different between both groups. Endometrioid histology and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade were higher in the MC group than in the DPC group (42.1% vs. 10.7%; P = 0.018, P = 0.002, respectively). The ratio of post-operative adjuvant therapy was not different in both groups. Recurrence occurred in five patients with DPC and seven with MC. The difference in RFS was not significantly different (P = 0.131) but the OS was different between both groups (P = 0.020). Histology and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were associated wtih RFS in univariate analysis, but no difference was found in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Although DPC patients had longer OS, multivariate analysis did not identify any influential factors. Focus should be placed on defining the appropriate adjuvant treatment for high-risk patients, which will improve prognosis, rather than on discriminating between DPC and MC. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08220-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wonkyo Shin
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10408, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chungnam national university sejong hospital, Sejong, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Yoon Park
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10408, Republic of Korea.,Common Cancer Branch, Research Institute Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sokbom Kang
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10408, Republic of Korea.,Precision Medicine Branch, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.,Department of Cancer Control & Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10408, Republic of Korea.,Center for Clinical Trials, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.,Cancer Healthcare Research Branch, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Soo Seo
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10408, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Preoperative predictive factor analysis of ovarian malignant involvement in premenopausal patients with clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:1219. [PMID: 33441576 PMCID: PMC7806745 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78953-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Earlier literature suggests that ovarian preservation in young premenopausal clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma patients does not negatively impact prognosis. The main purpose of this study was to clarify the incidence of ovarian malignant involvement in this group and further identify potential preoperative predictive factors of ovarian malignant involvement. A total of 511 premenopausal (age ≤ 50 years) patients were enrolled for the study at Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between January 2002 and December 2016. Ovarian malignant involvements were detected in 23 of the patients (4.5%). Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis validated preoperative imaging of myometrial invasion depth and preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) level as independent risk predictors of postoperative ovarian malignant involvement. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was generated for a combination of the two factors. The area under curve (AUC) was 0.772 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.661–0.884) for the combined two factors. The incidence of postoperative ovarian malignant involvement was relatively minimal. Preoperative imaging of myometrial invasion depth and serum CA125 level were independent risk predictors of ovarian malignant involvement. These findings may facilitate preoperative counseling of patients and informed clinical decision-making on ovarian preservation in these patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
The prognosis of stage IA synchronous endometrial endometrioid and ovarian carcinomas. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 300:1045-1052. [PMID: 31520260 PMCID: PMC6759754 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05288-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Little is known about the prevalence and prognosis of synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. This report explores the survival outcomes of synchronous stage IA endometrioid endometrial and stage IA ovarian carcinomas in a retrospective cohort study. Methods All cases of pathological confirmed synchronous stage IA endometrial endometrioid and ovarian carcinomas from June 1, 2010, to June 1, 2017, in a teaching hospital were reviewed. Patients were followed up to February 1, 2019. Survival outcomes were compared between patients with and without synchronous carcinomas. Results In total, 841 cases with confirmed FIGO stage IA endometrioid endometrial carcinomas were included in the study; 33 patients (3.9%) had synchronous stage IA ovarian carcinomas, including 27 (81.8%) and 6 (18.2%) cases of endometrioid and mixed endometrioid/clear cell subtypes, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 56.8 months, 829 patients (97.9%) had definitive survival outcomes. Synchronous ovarian carcinomas had no impact on disease-free, overall or cancer-specific overall survival in univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusion In these patients with stage IA endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, the genuine incidence of synchronous stage IA ovarian carcinoma was very low, and synchronous carcinoma had no significant effects on survival outcomes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-019-05288-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
4
|
Perrone AM, Girolimetti G, Procaccini M, Marchio L, Livi A, Borghese G, Porcelli AM, De Iaco P, Gasparre G. Potential for Mitochondrial DNA Sequencing in the Differential Diagnosis of Gynaecological Malignancies. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19072048. [PMID: 30011887 PMCID: PMC6073261 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19072048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
In the event of multiple synchronous gynecological lesions, a fundamental piece of information to determine patient management, prognosis, and therapeutic regimen choice is whether the simultaneous malignancies arise independently or as a result of metastatic dissemination. An example of synchronous primary tumors of the female genital tract most frequently described are ovarian and endometrial cancers. Surgical findings and histopathological examination aimed at resolving this conundrum may be aided by molecular analyses, although they are too often inconclusive. High mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variability and its propensity to accumulate mutations has been proposed by our group as a tool to define clonality. We showed mtDNA sequencing to be informative in synchronous primary ovarian and endometrial cancer, detecting tumor-specific mutations in both lesions, ruling out independence of the two neoplasms, and indicating clonality. Furthermore, we tested this method in another frequent simultaneously detected gynecological lesion type, borderline ovarian cancer and their peritoneal implants, which may be monoclonal extra-ovarian metastases or polyclonal independent masses. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the potential use of mtDNA sequencing in distinguishing independent and metastatic lesions in gynecological cancers, and to compare the efficiency of molecular analyses currently in use with this novel method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Myriam Perrone
- Unit of Oncologic Gynecology, Sant Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, via Massarenti 13, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Giulia Girolimetti
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Sant Orsola Hospital, Pav.11, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Martina Procaccini
- Unit of Oncologic Gynecology, Sant Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, via Massarenti 13, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Lorena Marchio
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Sant Orsola Hospital, Pav.11, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Alessandra Livi
- Unit of Oncologic Gynecology, Sant Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, via Massarenti 13, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Giulia Borghese
- Unit of Oncologic Gynecology, Sant Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, via Massarenti 13, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Anna Maria Porcelli
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FABIT), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Unit of Oncologic Gynecology, Sant Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, via Massarenti 13, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Gasparre
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Sant Orsola Hospital, Pav.11, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
- Center for Applied Biomedical Research (CRBA), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Narin MA, Karalok A, Basaran D, Ureyen I, Turkmen O, Turan T, Tulunay G. Does synchronous endometrioid endometrial cancer have any prognostic effect on Stage I endometrioid ovarian cancer? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 200:113-6. [PMID: 27017531 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Revised: 01/07/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of synchronous endometrial endometrioid cancer (SEEC) on the prognosis of patients with Stage 1 endometrioid ovarian cancer (EOC). STUDY DESIGN Clinicopathological data of cases with Stage 1 EOC from January 2000 to November 2013 were retrieved from the computerized database of Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health and Research Hospital. Of the 31 patients included in the study, 15 patients had primary synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) (Group 1) and 16 patients had EOC alone (Group 2). RESULTS Ovarian cancer substage and grade were compared between the two groups, and no significant differences were found. Most of the patients with SEEC had Grade 1 tumours (n=13, 86.7%). In Group 1, nine (60.0%) patients had endometrial tumours with superficial myometrial invasion, and six (40.0%) patients had deep myometrial invasion. Median follow-up was 94 months. Ten-year disease-free survival rates were 92.9% for Group 1 and 84.6% for Group 2 (p=0.565). CONCLUSION Patients with Stage 1 EOC have excellent long-term survival. The presence of SEEC does not influence the prognosis of patients with Stage 1 EOC, even in the presence of deep myometrial invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Narin
- Erzincan University Faculty of Medicine, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Erzincan, Turkey.
| | - A Karalok
- Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Etlik, Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey
| | - D Basaran
- Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Etlik, Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey
| | - I Ureyen
- Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Etlik, Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey
| | - O Turkmen
- Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Etlik, Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey
| | - T Turan
- Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Etlik, Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey
| | - G Tulunay
- Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Etlik, Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Synchronous Primary Cancers of the Endometrium and Ovary With the Same Histopathologic Type Versus Endometrial Cancer With Ovarian Metastasis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:394-406. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
|
7
|
Sadidi H, Izadi-Mood N, Sarmadi S, Yarandi F, Amini-Moghaddam S, Esfahani F, Sadidi M. Comparison of clinicopathologic variables in coexistence cancers of the endometrium and ovary: A review of 55 cases in an academic center in Iran. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES 2015; 20:727-32. [PMID: 26664418 PMCID: PMC4652304 DOI: 10.4103/1735-1995.168315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background: The coexistence primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary are relatively uncommon. The purpose of this study was to characterize patients diagnosed primary synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC), endometrial cancer (EC) with ovarian metastasis, and ovarian cancer (OC) with endometrial metastasis and compare clinicopathologic variables and prognosis. Materials and Methods: All the patients with diagnosis of both endometrium and OC, who hospitalized between 2002 and 2012 in an academic center affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, were evaluated with respect to different clinicopathologic variables, follow-up times, and outcomes. Results: Fifty-five patients had been diagnosed with both endometrium and OC. 17, 26, and 12 patients were diagnosed as SEOC, EC, and OC, respectively. The frequency of abnormal uterine bleeding was significantly lower in OC (16.7%) compared to others (58.8% in SEOC and 53.8% in EC). However, the abdominal/pelvic pain was significantly higher in OC (50%) compared to others (35.3% in SEOC and 34.6% in EC) (P < 0.05). Complex atypical hyperplasia (87.5%), endometriosis (88.8%), and endometrioid carcinoma (54.5%) was observed most in SEOC group. The duration of follow-up time was between 3 and 171 months with a mean of 16 months. There was no death in SEOC who followed. Survivals of patients between three group were statistically significant (P = 0.032). Conclusion: Our results showed that overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of SEOC patients is better than those with EC and OC (P = 0.032).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Sadidi
- Research Development Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Narges Izadi-Mood
- Department of Pathology, Women Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Soheila Sarmadi
- Department of Pathology, Women Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fariba Yarandi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Women Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Soheila Amini-Moghaddam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Firoozgar Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Esfahani
- Research Development Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Sadidi
- Research Development Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic factors in women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers. METHODS Medical records of 3240 patients with endometrial cancer who had undergone primary surgery were collected from 7 institutions and were retrospectively reviewed. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves and rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis to determine independent prognostic factors was performed using the Cox regression model. RESULTS The incidence of synchronous endometrial/ovarian cancer was 3.8% (123/3240 women). During the median follow-up period of 66 months, 33.3% and 26.1% of women developed recurrences and reported cancer-related deaths. The 5-year PFS and 5-year OS for all 123 women were 66.9% and 80.0%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, pretreatment CA-125 and tumor stage of the ovary showed prognostic significance about PFS (P = 0.043 and P = 0.027) and OS (P = 0.047 and P = 0.031), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment CA-125 and tumor stage of the ovary were independent prognostic factors for recurrence and survival.
Collapse
|
9
|
Park JY, Nam JH. Progestins in the fertility-sparing treatment and retreatment of patients with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer. Oncologist 2015; 20:270-8. [PMID: 25673106 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in developed countries. Approximately 3%-14% of endometrial cancers are diagnosed in young women under 40 who want to preserve their fertility. The incidence of endometrial cancer in this age group is increasing, for which fertility-sparing therapy is increasingly used because it is one of the most important quality of life issues in these women. Progestin therapy is the most common type of fertility-sparing therapy. In this review, the most up-to-date findings regarding fertility-sparing progestin therapy for young women with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer is addressed in terms of diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and oncologic and reproductive outcomes. Fertility-sparing progestin therapy is highly effective in selected young women with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer. The selection of appropriate patients through comprehensive pretreatment evaluation is of paramount importance to achieve the best outcomes without compromising survival. Because of the high rate of recurrence after successful fertility-sparing therapy, close surveillance is mandatory, and prophylactic hysterectomy is the best option for patients who have completed family planning. Pregnancy outcomes are very promising with the aid of assisted reproductive technologies. Continuous daily oral medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate are the preferred progestins for fertility-sparing therapy, but future studies should be performed to determine the optimal dose and treatment duration of these agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong-Yeol Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo-Hyun Nam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Song T, Seong SJ, Bae DS, Suh DH, Kim DY, Lee KH, Lim MC, Lee TS. Synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary in young women: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 131:624-8. [PMID: 24051220 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2013] [Revised: 09/10/2013] [Accepted: 09/11/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Some authors have recommended the use of diagnostic laparoscopy as a pretreatment assessment step for conservative hormonal treatment in young women with endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of synchronous primary cancer of the endometrium and ovary in young women. METHODS The medical records of 3240 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery between 1995 and 2010 were collected from 7 institutions and were retrospectively reviewed. Low-risk endometrial cancer was defined as tumors without myometrial invasion; normal or benign-looking ovaries; normal CA-125; grade 1 endometrioid histology; and early stage endometrial cancer on pretreatment assessment. RESULTS Fifteen percent (471/3240) were younger than 40 years of age. The incidence of synchronous ovarian cancer in young women with endometrial cancer was 4.5% (21/471). In patients with low-risk endometrial cancer, synchronous cancers were not identified. CONCLUSION The incidence of synchronous ovarian malignancies in young women with endometrial cancer was quiet low (4.5%), unlike previous studies have revealed (11-29%). Therefore, diagnostic laparoscopy is not mandatory in patients with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer selected for conservative treatment to confirm the absence of ovarian malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taejong Song
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Coexisting ovarian malignancy in patients with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286:1241-5. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2402-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2012] [Accepted: 05/29/2012] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|