Retrospective analysis of the efficacy of perioperative use of the cell salvage and autologous blood recovery system during laparoscopic myomectomy

Safety of Same-Day Discharge Versus Hospital Admission in Minimally Invasive Myomectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare postoperative complication rates between same-day discharge patients and patients admitted to hospital after minimally invasive myomectomy, stratified by patient demographics and perioperative variables including myoma burden.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study. Setting Hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from January 2015 to December 2019.

PATIENTS

Female patients aged ≥18 years undergoing minimally invasive myomectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were categorized into either the same-day discharge or admitted patient cohort. Univariate comparisons of demographics, perioperative variables, and 30-day postoperative complications were performed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to 1) identify demographic and perioperative factors associated with admission, and 2) compare postoperative complication rates of same-day discharge patients with those of admitted patients while adjusting for demographic and perioperative factors.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Eight thousand one hundred patients were recruited during the study period. The overall rate of same-day discharge was 57.2% in 2015 and 65.0% in 2019. The same-day discharge rate was 64.6% for patients with a smaller myoma burden (1-4 fibroids and ≤250 grams, Current Procedural Terminology 58545) and 56.8% for larger myoma burden (≥5 fibroids or >250 grams, Current Procedural Terminology 58546). Age, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III or IV, preoperative hematocrit <36%, hypertension, diabetes, bleeding disorder, and increasing operative time were associated with admission to hospital. After adjusting for these variables, composite postoperative complication rates were similar between admitted patients and patients who were discharged the same day regardless of myoma burden (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-2.47 for low myoma burden and aOR, 0.91; 95% CI 0.18-4.63 for high myoma burden). Admitted patients with both low (aOR, 9.1; 95% CI 2.27-37.04) and high (aOR, 8.24; 95% CI 1.59-42.49) myoma burdens were significantly more likely to receive a blood transfusion compared to same-day discharge patients.

CONCLUSION

Same-day discharge after minimally invasive myomectomy, regardless of myoma burden, is associated with low complication rates. Our findings may aid in shared decision making on discharge planning.

Utilization and cost of cell salvage in minimally invasive myomectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utilization and cost of intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) in minimally invasive myomectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent minimally invasive myomectomy at a quaternary care academic hospital. Patients were classified into: ICS setup vs no ICS setup, ICS setup with reinfusion vs ICS setup without reinfusion.

RESULTS

Of 382 patients who underwent minimally invasive myomectomy, 67 (17.5 %) had ICS setup, 30 (44.8 %) of those patients reinfused. Median volume of reinfusion per patient was 300 mL (range 125-1000 mL). Patients who ultimately underwent ICS reinfusion, compared to those with ICS setup only, had significantly larger mean maximum fibroid size (9.8 cm vs 8.0 cm, p = 0.02), higher median total specimen weight (367 vs 304 g, p = 0.03), higher median estimated blood loss (575 vs 300 mL, p < 0.0001), longer mean operative time (261 vs 215 min, p = 0.04). No perioperative complications were associated with ICS. Higher costs are associated with universal use or complete lack of ICS; lowest cost is associated with ICS setup only for those ultimately reinfused.

CONCLUSION

ICS might reduce requirements for allogeneic blood transfusions in patients undergoing minimally invasive myomectomy, and may contribute to cost savings. Uterine and maximum fibroid sizes are possible preoperative indicators for patients who require cell salvage reinfusion.

The importance of autologous blood transfusion in lung transplantation and cardiovascular surgeries

Background

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of using autologous blood recovery systems on transfusion-related complications in patients undergoing lung transplantation and cardiovascular surgeries.

Methods

Between May 2016 and May 2019, a total of 104 patients (90 males, 14 females; mean age: 59.3±16.4 years; range, 12 to 89 years) in whom cell-saver and autologous blood recovery systems were used during lung transplantation or cardiovascular surgeries were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as Group 1 (n=61) consisting of patients who received autologous blood transfusion and as Group 2 (n=43) consisting of patients who did not. Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, operation data, and postoperative complications were recorded.

Results

The total amount of transfused blood/blood product was found to be significantly higher in Group 1 (p=0.018). However, transfusionrelated complications were found to be higher in Group 2 (p=0.0261). There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the groups.

Conclusion

Autologous blood transfusion may prevent the development of transfusion-related complications by reducing the amount of allogenic transfusion in major surgical procedures. In our study, the autologous blood transfusion was used in critical patients with major bleeding and, therefore, the total amount of transfused blood/blood product was higher in these patients. Nevertheless, lower complication rates in this patient group emphasize the importance of autologous blood transfusion.

Intraoperative cell salvage is associated with reduced allogeneic blood requirements and has no significant impairment on coagulation function in patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to examine the association between Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS), allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) and coagulation function in obstetrics.

METHODS

A total of 486 pregnant women undergoing cesarean delivery, of whom 157 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into ICS group (n = 101, ICS used during operation) and control group (n = 56, ICS not used during operation). Clinical data, including plasma prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (Fib) and thrombin time (TT) levels, were collected from all patients preoperatively (within 12-24 h) and postoperatively (within 6-12 h) and analyzed by t test, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA and Spearman's correlation.

RESULTS

The use of ICS is associated with lower requirement rate for ABT (P < .001), while the blood loss was similar between the two groups (P = .990). Mean volume of ICS transfusion was 432.65 mL. Compared to preoperative values, the postoperative PT and APTT levels were significantly increased, while Fib was decreased in the two groups (all P < .01). No significant difference in coagulation function was observed between groups in preoperative and postoperative phase (P > .05). Furthermore, PT, APTT and TT after surgery were not correlated with the transfused volume of salvaged blood (P > .05) while the levels of Fib were negatively correlated with the volume (P < .01). In addition, there were no transfusion reactions in both two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative cell salvage is correlated with reduced allogeneic blood requirements but did not impair blood coagulation significantly in patients undergoing cesarean delivery.

Optimizing surgical management of patients who decline blood transfusion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights the complexity of caring for gynecologic patients who refuse blood transfusion and discusses the importance of early, targeted perioperative and intraoperative medical optimization. We review alternative interventions and the importance of medical management to minimize blood loss and maximize hematopoiesis, particularly in gynecologic patients who may have significant uterine bleeding. The review also focuses on intraoperative interventions and surgical techniques to prevent and control surgical blood loss.

RECENT FINDINGS

With improvements in surgical technique, greater availability of minimally invasive surgery, and increased use of preop UAE and cell salvage, definitive surgical management can be safely performed. New technologies have been developed that allow for safer surgeries or alternatives to traditional surgical procedures. Many medical therapies have been shown to decrease blood loss and improve surgical outcomes. Nonsurgical interventions have also been developed for use as adjuncts or alternatives to surgery.

SUMMARY

The care of a patient who declines blood transfusion may be complex, but gynecologic surgeons can safely and successfully offer a wide variety of therapies depending on the patient's goals and needs. Medical management should be implemented early. A multidisciplinary team should be mobilized to provide comprehensive and patient-centered care.

Utility of cell salvage in women undergoing abdominal myomectomy

OBJECTIVE

We examined the use and cost of autologous blood cell salvage in women who undergo abdominal myomectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent abdominal myomectomy from 2007-2011 were identified. Use of the cell salvage system and reinfusion of autologous blood in women who had the system set-up were analyzed. Cost was examined by directly reported data.

RESULTS

We identified 607 patients who underwent abdominal myomectomy. Four hundred twenty-five women (70%) had the set-up of the cell salvage system. Cell-salvaged blood was processed and reinfused into 85 of these subjects (20%). In a multivariable model, performance of myomectomy by a gynecologic-specific surgeon (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-3.59), >5 myomas (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.27-4.89), and larger uterine size statistically were associated significantly with cell-salvage device set-up. Conversely, having a reproductive-endocrinology-infertility specialist as the surgeon was associated with a significant reduction in cell-salvage system set-up (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.66). For the women who had cell-salvage system set-up, uterine size of >15-19 weeks of gestation (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.56-8.95) or ≥20 weeks of gestation (OR, 4.62; 95% CI, 1.45-14.73), operating time of >120 minutes (OR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.70-9.29), and intraoperative blood loss of >1000 mL (OR, 26.31; 95% CI, 10.49-65.99) were associated significantly with a higher incidence of reinfusion of cell-salvaged blood.

CONCLUSION

The routine use of cell salvage in women who undergo abdominal myomectomy does not appear to be warranted. Cell-salvage set-up appears to be cost-effective only when reinfused, but clinical characteristics cannot predict accurately which women will require reinfusion of cell-salvaged blood.