The Misgav-Ladach method of cesarean section: a step forward in operative technique in obstetrics

FIGO good practice recommendations for cesarean delivery: Prep-for-Labor triage to minimize risks and maximize favorable outcomes

Cesarean delivery is an abdominal surgical procedure performed for child delivery when the vaginal route is not feasible or desired due to maternal/fetal indications. All childbirth facilities should be able to safely perform a cesarean, which is not the current reality. For planned cesarean delivery, the facility must be prepared for the patient. In contrast, for unplanned arrivals at the facility, FIGO's Prep-for-Labor triage method allows rapid decision-making on whether cesarean delivery can be safely performed on site or whether transfer to an advanced care center is needed. A checklist of staff/tools for safe on-site cesarean delivery is provided to enable timely decision-making. Maternal complications following cesarean are three-fold higher than vaginal delivery. To prevent nonmedically indicated cesarean by favoring vaginal delivery, up-to-date safe and effective guidance is provided, defining labor, second stage length, and status before an arrested labor is confirmed. Whether cesarean delivery is planned or emergency, the Misgav Ladach simplified procedure is proposed as it is suitable for both low- and high-risk cases, including twins, thereby reducing both operative morbidity and postoperative recovery. A trial of labor after first cesarean (TOLAC) should be pursued when feasible, for which the indications, contraindications, safeguards, and steps of safe labor induction are delineated. Implementation of these good practice recommendations will improve childbirth by reducing excessive nonindicated cesareans, while precisely defining the resources and postoperative care required for safe performance on site. Enabling safe childbirth by cesarean and TOLAC, even at sites with low rates currently, will significantly improve maternal and fetal outcomes.

Modified Stark's (Misgav Ladach) caesarean section: 15 - year experience of the own techniques of caesarean section

OBJECTIVE

A 15-year-experience of the personal modification of Misgav Ladach (ML) caesarean section in relation to the Dörffler method.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective clinical randomized observational study included 822 transperitoneal cesarean sections: 557 were performed via modified ML (without bladder catheterization, small transverse fascial incision with muscular stretching and non-preparation of vesicouterine plica) vs. 265 Dörffler (Pfannenstiel - Kerr) method.

RESULTS

Perioperative and postoperative complications were significantly more frequent in the Dörffler method (p < 0.0005) (perioperative hemorrhage, more frequent adhesions, plastic peritonitis in repeated caesarean sections, as well as two bladder lesions). Postoperative febrility, dehiscence and wound seroma were more frequent in the first study group (p < 0.0005). More frequent paralytic ileus, uroinfections and bladder atony, which we did not observe in our own technique (p < 0.0005). The use of antibiotics and analgesics was prolonged until the fifth postoperative day in the first group compared to the second group where it was reduced to only 10 % on the second day (p < 0.0005). Also, the incidence of anemia and the need for blood transfusions were higher in the first study group, as well as the need for revision behind caesarean section and two hysterectomies due to massive postoperative intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal bleeding (p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Our fifteen-year study highlighted the importance of our own published modified ML caesarean section in minimizing technique of surgery and the reduction of perioperative morbidity and significantly faster recovery of operated patients in the current era of enormous caesarean section increase.

The effect on perioperative bleeding of placental extraction from an exteriorized uterus during caesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect on perioperative bleeding of an alternative technique for Caesarean section, in which placental extraction is performed while the uterus is exteriorized.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective matched cohort study using data obtained through chart review. Group 1 included women who had CS performed using the technique of placental removal while the uterus was exteriorized, and group 2 included women who had CS performed using the conventional method of placental removal from a non-exteriorized uterus. Women in each group were matched for number of previous Caesarean sections, indications for CS, and gestational age. The primary outcome was the difference between preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin concentrations. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of blood transfusion, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, the incidence of postoperative endometritis, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

A total of 90 charts were reviewed (45 per group). Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean decrease in hemoglobin concentration was 22% less in women who had placental extraction from an exteriorized uterus than in those who had the conventional placental extraction (13.2g/L vs. 16.9 g/L, P=0.016). Among secondary outcomes, women in group 1 had a lower mean EBL (531.1 mL vs. 691.1 mL, P<0.05) and a shorter mean duration of surgery (28.0 minutes vs. 40.5 minutes, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Exteriorizing the uterus prior to removal of the placenta during CS may decrease intraoperative and immediate postoperative bleeding compared with the conventional technique. Further studies on this technique are indicated.