Learning curve for laparoscopic staging of early and locally advanced cervical and endometrial cancer

The learning curve of laparoscopic single-site salpingectomy with conventional laparoscopic instruments: A retrospective cohort study

Tubal pregnancy is a common cause of maternal mortality in early pregnancy. Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) has gained popularity due to its safety and aesthetic advantages. However, the lack of affordable disposable entry platforms hinders its widespread adoption. This study aimed to investigate the learning curve of tubal pregnancy removal using single-incision multiport (SIMP) laparoscopy and provide guidance for novice gynecologists. A retrospective analysis was conducted on cases of ectopic pregnancy (EP) diagnosed at Dongguan Songshan Lake Central Hospital from June 2020 to June 2022. The analysis included 50 cases, with 25 undergoing single-port laparoscopy and 25 undergoing conventional laparoscopy (CL). Various indicators, including body mass index (BMI), previous pregnancies, mass size, hemoglobin levels, surgical duration, and complications, were collected. Learning curve analysis using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) technique was performed to assess procedural proficiency. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or complications between the 2 groups. However, the single-port laparoscopy group exhibited a statistically significant longer average surgical time (41.60 ± 13.38 minutes) compared to the conventional laparotomy group (32.96 ± 7.32 minutes). The CUSUM analysis demonstrated a decline in surgical time after the completion of approximately 11 cases, indicating an improvement in SIMP laparoscopy surgical proficiency. SIMP laparoscopy for tubal pregnancy removal achieved similar safety outcomes as CL. Notably, the CUSUM analysis revealed that proficiency in single-port laparoscopy could be achieved after approximately 11 cases, leading to stable surgical times. These findings serve as valuable guidance for novice gynecologists interested in adopting single-incision laparoscopy.

Hysteroscopic suture of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: learning curve for in vitro simulation training

OBJECTIVE

To simulate hysteroscopic suturing in vitro and analyze the learning curve of gynecologists with different experience levels.

METHODS

Three gynecologists were trained on uterine models in a circulating water box. The posterior uterine wall was sutured 10 times under hysteroscopy for 5 consecutive days, and the time of each suture procedure was recorded.

RESULTS

Doctors A, B, and C completed 50 posterior uterine sutures. After Dr. C completed 50 sutures on the posterior wall, he added 50 sutures on the anterior wall (Group D). The mean suturing time was 71.54 ± 68.158 s in Group A, 50.10 ± 28.060 s in Group B, 34.04 ± 10.457 s in Group C, and 30.38 ± 8.734 s in Group D. The difference between Groups C and B and between Groups B and A was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between Groups C and D. Simulation curves were created using the number of features as the abscissa and cumulative sum as the coordinate, with peak curves of 19, 27, and 18 cases for Group A, B, and C, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Doctors with experience in single-hole laparoscopic surgery or hysteroscopic suture surgery can significantly shorten the hysteroscopic suturing time.

The Beginner Laparoscopists Trends in the Learning Process of Laparoscopy for Adnexal Gynecological Pathologies-The Experience of Our Center

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy for benign ovarian pathology is the appropriate surgical approach and it has many well-known advantages. Minimal invasive gynecological surgery increases the quality of life of the patient. The learning process of laparoscopy is difficult and requires many interventions to acquire manual skills. The objectives of the study were to assess the learning process of laparoscopy for adnexal pathology surgery performed by beginner laparoscopists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included three gynecological surgeons who were beginners in laparoscopy and who were named A, B, and C. We collected information about patients, diagnosis, surgical technique, and complications.

RESULTS

We have analyzed the data from 159 patients. The most frequent primary diagnosis was functional ovarian cyst, and the laparoscopic cystectomy was performed in 49.1% of interventions. The need to convert a laparoscopy into laparotomy was necessary in 1.3% of patients. There were no cases of reintervention, blood transfusion, or ureteral lesions. The duration of the surgical intervention varied statistically significantly according to patient's BMI and to the surgeon. After 20 laparoscopic interventions, a significant improvement was found in the time needed to perform ovarian cystectomy (operators A and B) and salpingectomy (operator C).

CONCLUSIONS

The process of learning laparoscopy is laborious and difficult. We found a significant decrease in operating time after a twenty laparoscopic interventions.

Learning curve for laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy using the "chopstick" technique: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), as a promising minimally invasive surgery, is confronted with the obstacle of the "chopstick effect" which limits its further application. The "chopstick" technique is characterized by the usage of instruments of parallel and equal length, and in operations relying on double-fulcrum and unique surgeon position can play a key role in overcoming the above disadvantage effect. This study sought to explore the learning curve for the use of the novel "chopstick" technique in laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy (LESS-RH) and evaluate the technique's practicability.

METHODS

Consecutive cervical cancer patients who underwent LESS-RH with the "chopstick" technique by a surgeon with rich experience in laparoscopy from November 2016 to September 2018 were included in the study. The learning curve of his surgeries with the "chopstick" technique was evaluated using the cumulative summation (CUSUM) method by analyzing operation time (OT) which was the surrogate indicator of surgical ability. The patients were divided into Phase I and Phase II based on the learning curve peak, whose demographic and perioperative characteristics, such as tumor Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and histology, operation time, blood loss, and complications were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean OT was 231.5 min (range, 115-355 min). The division of the learning curve based on OT occurred after the first 15 cases were finished, dividing Phase I and Phase II. The mean OT for Phase I (259 min) was significantly longer than that of Phase II (219 min) (P=0.02). Only 1 intraoperative complication occurred in Phase I, and none occurred in Phase II. Major postoperative complications occurred more frequently in Phase I (N=3) than in Phase II (N=0). No significant differences were observed in terms of lymph nodes, blood loss, or pathological features.

CONCLUSIONS

The "chopstick" technique may help surgeons obtain stable LESS surgical performance through a relatively short learning curve, even in some complex surgeries, such as radical hysterectomy.

Introduction of gasless laparoscopic surgery as a minimally invasive procedure for endometrial cancer and its usefulness from the viewpoint of the learning curve

Background

We investigated the usefulness of gasless laparoscopic surgery (GLS) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method for endometrial cancer.

Methods

We studied 105 patients with early endometrial cancer who underwent GLS (55) or open surgery (50). A uterine manipulator was used in all GLS cases. We compared operative time, blood loss, number of lymph nodes removed, hospital stay, perioperative complications, cases converted to laparotomy, and recurrence and survival rates. We also studied the learning curve and proficiency of GLS.

Results

The GLS group had significantly longer operative time (265 vs. 191 min), reduced blood loss (184 vs. 425 mL), shorter hospital stay (9.9 vs. 17.6 days), and fewer postoperative complications (1.8 vs. 12.0%) than the open group. No case was converted to laparotomy. Disease-free and overall survival rates at 4 years postoperatively (GLS vs. open groups) were 98.0 versus 97.8 and 100 versus 95.7%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the groups. Regarding the learning curve for GLS, two different phases were observed in approximately 10 cases. Operator 2, who was not accustomed to laparoscopic surgery, showed a significant reduction in operative time in the later phase 2.

Conclusions

GLS for endometrial cancer results in less bleeding, shorter hospital stay, and fewer complications than open surgery. Recurrence and survival rates were not significantly different from those of open surgery. This technique may be introduced in a short time for operators who are skilled at open surgery but not used to laparoscopic surgery.

Could Adjuvant Chemotherapy Improve Prognosis for Cervical Cancer Patients with Elevated Pretreatment Serum Squamous-Cell Carcinoma Antigen?

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore whether adjuvant chemotherapy could improve prognosis for cervical cancer patients with elevated pretreatment serum squamous-cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag).

Methods

Propensity-score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to ensure balanced groups for patients with (arm A) and without adjuvant chemotherapy (arm B). All patients were treated between January 2012 and December 2014 at a single center. Study outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

In total, 81 patients were included in this study. By propensity-score matching, 35 patients were included in each group (arm A and arm B). Median follow-up was 60 months in arm A and 66 months in arm B. Overall, 85.7% of patients in arm A and 71.4% of those in arm B received adjuvant radiotherapy. DFS and OS curves were similar between arms A and B (P=0.971 and 0.633, respectively). With IPTW, arm A was not associated with prognosis in terms of DFS (HR 0.946, 95% CI 0.237–3.784; P=0.938) or OS (HR 1.020, 95%CI 0.357–2.913; P=0.970).

Conclusion

For patients with elevated pretreatment SCC-Ag, adjuvant chemotherapy was not found to improve prognosis. Also, a considerable proportion of these patients had postoperative indications for adjuvant radiotherapy. For these cervical cancer patients with elevated pretreatment SCC-Ag, the choice of radical hysterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy should be prudent.

Achievement of Surgical Proficiency in Laparoscopic Surgery for Early Endometrial Cancer by Gynecologic Oncologists

OBJECTIVE

Although studies have evaluated learning curves for laparoscopic surgery (LS), this issue has not yet been addressed in gynecologic oncologists. The present study aimed to evaluate LS proficiency for early-stage endometrial cancer among gynecologic oncologists.

METHODS

We examined 25 cases in which LS with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLA) for endometrial cancer was performed by two gynecologic oncologists undergoing training in LS. The LS duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), number of dissected pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs), and perioperative complications were assessed as measures of surgical proficiency.

RESULTS

Operators A and B performed 10 and 15 cases, respectively, with median LS durations of 348.5 and 378 minutes, respectively. Although the LS duration and number of procedures did not exhibit a significant correlation, the regression lines for both operators showed decreasing trends. Both operators had a consistently low median EBL (A, 57 ml; B, 60 ml). Operators A and B dissected a median of 21.5 and 22 PLNs, respectively. Although both operators dissected a relatively large number of PLNs, with a median of over 20 per patient after the introduction of LS, this number decreased as the number of LS increased for Operator B (p=0.009). However, no correlation was observed between the LS duration and number of PLNs dissected by Operator B (ρ=0.353, p=0.197). A severe perioperative complication, specifically perforation of the sigmoid colon requiring emergent laparotomy, occurred in one case; however, the association with surgical manipulation was not definitive.

CONCLUSION

The observed gynecologic oncologists were able to acquire early proficiency in LS for early-stage endometrial cancer.

Laparoscopic vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China

Study Objective: To compare the surgical and oncologic outcomes between open abdomen radical hysterectomy (ARH) and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for cervical cancer.

Methods: Retrospective observational study with propensity score matching was used to ensure balanced groups for ARH and LRH. One-hundred-and-ninety-eight women with cervical cancer, 99 treated using ARH and 99 using LRH, between January 2012 and December 2014. Outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), intra-operative factors, post-operator recovery, urinary retention, and adverse events. Moreover, the inverse probability of the treatment weighting (IPTW) method was also used.

Main Results: Compared with ARH, LRH was associated with a lower volume of blood loss (P < 0.001) and transfusion rate (P < 0.001), with a broader resection of the parametrium (P < 0.001). Post-operatively, the time to first flatus was shorter for LRH than ARH (P < 0.001) but the rate of urinary retention was higher for LRH (22.2%) than ARH (8.1%; P = 0.009). DFS and OS were similar between groups. By IPTW, laparoscopy was also not associated with poorer survival in terms of DFS (HR 1.52, CI 0.799–2.891, P = 0.202) or OS (HR 0.942, HR 0.425–2.09, P = 0.883).

Conclusion: Compared with ARH, LRH provided better intra-operative and post-operative outcomes, with no significant difference in oncologic outcomes and survival. Urinary retention remains a clinical issue to improve with LRH. The technology of LRH has been improved in China to address the inconsistent results of oncologic outcomes in previous studies. Whether these improvements could be effective needs to be investigated in the future.

Recurrence of Early Stage Cervical Cancer After Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare site and time to recurrence in patients affected by early stage cervical cancer (CC) treated with laparoscopy radical hysterectomy (LRH) versus abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH).

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in a university teaching, tertiary referral center hospital. We included patients undergoing either LRH or open ARH to treat CC.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty patients were included, 82 submitted to LRH and 68 submitted to ARH. Baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable, except for body mass index higher in ARH group. Patients undergoing LRH experienced less blood loss (100 vs 400 mL, P < 0.0001), less lymph nodes removed (20 vs 31, P = 0.001), and shorter recovery (4 vs 8 days, P = 0.0005) in comparison with the ARH group. No significant differences were found regarding recurrence rate (9 vs 13, P = 0.17) and time to recurrence (8 vs 17 months, P = 0.066) between LRH and ARH group.Sites of recurrence were also comparable between the 2 groups: 2/9 versus 2/13 (P = 1) local recurrence, 4/9 versus 8/13 (P = 0.66) pelvic recurrence, 4/9 versus 7/13 (P = 1) distant recurrence in LRH and ARH groups, respectively. The most frequent sites of recurrence were pelvic and distant (44.4%) in LRH group and pelvic (61.5%) in ARH group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that early stage CC can be treated with LRH with similar recurrence rates and patterns in comparison with ARH, reassuring its continuing clinical use.