Incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Ain-shams University Maternity Hospital, Egypt: a retrospective study

Indications, risk factors, and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A 7-year retrospective study at a tertiary center in Turkey

Objective

To determine the incidence, indications, the risk factors, complications, maternal morbidity and mortality of emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH), and perinatal outcomes at a tertiary hospital, Turkey.

Methods

We analyzed 71 cases of EPH from 2012 to 2019 at a tertiary hospital in a retrospective study. There were 142 control patients.

Results

There were 71 EPH out of 69,504 deliveries, for an overall incidence of 1.02 per 1000 births. The main indication for peripartum hysterectomy was abnormal placentation (67.6%), followed by uterine atony (28.1%), and uterine rupture (4.2%). Cesarean section (CS) and previous CS are major risk indicators for EPH. Other risk indicators are advanced maternal age (≥ 35 years) and multiparity. All patients with abnormal placentation had a previous CS. 93% of EPH were performed during and/or after CS, and 7% after vaginal delivery. 69% of EPH were made in total and 31% were subtotal. The three most common maternal morbidity included: wound infection and febrile morbidity (26.7%), bladder injury (16.9%), and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (11.2%). There were no maternal deaths but perinatal mortality was 4%.

Conclusion

The most common indication for EPH was abnormal placentation. Also, CS and previous CS are major risk factors of EPH. Other risk factors for EPH are advanced maternal age (≥ 35 years) and multiparity. Moreover, all unnecessary CS should be avoided.

Incidence, Indications, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the incidence, indications, risk factors, outcomes, and management of emergency peripartum hysterectomy globally and to compare outcomes among different income settings.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Emcare databases up to December 10, 2021.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Update of a systematic review and meta-analysis (2016). Studies were eligible if they reported the incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy, defined as surgical removal of the uterus for severe obstetric complications up to 6 weeks postpartum. Title and abstract screening and full-text review were performed using Endnote data-management software. Of 8,775 articles screened, 26 were included that were published after 2015, making the total number of included studies 154. A subanalysis was performed for the outcomes of interest per income setting.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 154 studies: 14,409 emergency peripartum hysterectomies were performed in 17,127,499 births in 42 countries. Overall pooled incidence of hysterectomy was 1.1 per 1,000 births (95% CI 1.0-1.3). The highest incidence was observed in lower middle-income settings (3/1,000 births, 95% CI 2.5-3.5), and the lowest incidence was observed in high-income settings (0.7/1,000 births, 95% CI 0.5-0.8). The most common indications were placental pathology (38.0%, 95% CI 33.9-42.4), uterine atony (27.0%, 95% CI 24.6-29.5), and uterine rupture (21.2%, 95% CI 17.8-25.0). In lower middle-income countries, uterine rupture (44.5%, 95% CI 36.6-52.7) was the most common indication; placental pathology (48.4%, 95% CI 43.5-53.4) was most frequent in high-income settings. To prevent hysterectomy, uterotonic medication was used in 2,706 women (17%): 53.2% received oxytocin, 44.6% prostaglandins, and 17.3% ergometrine. Surgical measures to prevent hysterectomy were taken in 80.5% of women, the most common being compressive techniques performed in 62.6% (95% CI 38.3-81.9). The most common complications were febrile (29.7%, 95% CI 25.4-34.3) and hematologic (27.5%, 95% CI 20.4-35.9). The overall maternal case fatality rate was 3.2 per 100 emergency peripartum hysterectomies (95% CI 2.5-4.2) and was higher in lower middle-income settings (11.2/100 emergency peripartum hysterectomies 95% CI 8.9-14.1) and lower in high-income settings (1.0/100 emergency peripartum hysterectomies 95% CI 0.6-1.6).

CONCLUSION

Substantial differences across income settings exist in the incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Women in lower-income settings have a higher risk of undergoing emergency peripartum hysterectomy and suffer more procedure-related morbidity and mortality. The frequency of emergency peripartum hysterectomy is likely to increase in light of increasing cesarean delivery rates.

Prevalence, Indications, Risk Indicators, and Outcomes of Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare prevalence, indications, risk indicators, and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy across income settings.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases up to March 30, 2015.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies including emergency peripartum hysterectomies performed within 6 weeks postpartum. Not eligible were comments, case reports, elective hysterectomies for associated gynecologic conditions, studies with fewer than 10 inclusions, and those reporting only percentages published in languages other than English or before 1980. Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed by χ test for heterogeneity; a random-effects model was applied whenever I exceeded 25%.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

One hundred twenty-eight studies were selected, including 7,858 women who underwent emergency peripartum hysterectomy, of whom 87% were multiparous. Hysterectomy complicated almost 1 per 1,000 deliveries (range 0.2-10.1). Prevalence differed between poorer (low and lower middle income) and richer (upper middle and high income) settings: 2.8 compared with 0.7 per 1,000 deliveries, respectively (relative risk 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-4.5). Most common indications were placental pathology (38%), uterine atony (27%), and uterine rupture (26%). Risk indicators included cesarean delivery in the current pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 11.38, 95% CI 9.28-13.97), previous cesarean delivery (OR 7.5, 95% CI 5.1-11.0), older age (mean difference 6.6 years between women in the case group and those in the control group, 95% CI 4.4-8.9), and higher parity (mean difference 1.4, 95% CI 0.7-2.2). Having attended antenatal care was protective (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06-0.25). Only 3% had accessed arterial embolization to prevent hysterectomy. Average blood loss was 3.7 L. Mortality was 5.2 per 100 hysterectomies (reported range 0-59.1) and higher in poorer settings: 11.9 compared with 2.5 per 100 hysterectomies (relative risk 4.8, 95% CI 3.9-5.9).

CONCLUSION

Emergency peripartum hysterectomy is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and is more frequent in lower-income countries, where it contains a higher risk of mortality. A (previous) cesarean delivery is associated with a higher risk of emergency peripartum hysterectomy.

Emergency hysterectomy for life-threatening postpartum haemorrhage: Risk factors and psychological impact

BACKGROUND

Emergency postpartum hysterectomy (EPH) is usually considered the final resort for the management of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). The aim of this observational study was to identify the risk factors for EPH, to evaluate the ability of EPH to stop bleeding and, finally, to estimate its psychological impact.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of postpartum hysterectomy in all patients with PPH admitted between 2004 and 2011 to Lariboisière Hospital. We compared women for whom EPH was successful and those who required an advanced interventional procedure (AIP) to stop the bleeding despite hysterectomy. We also evaluated the severe PPH (SPPH) score in this particular setting. The psychological impact of emergency hysterectomy was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 44 hysterectomies were performed among 869 cases of PPH. Twenty were successful, while an additional AIP was required in 22 others (50%). Prothrombin time<50% and a shorter interval between the onset of PPH and hysterectomy were independently associated with the need for an additional AIP. The area under the ROC curve of the SPPH score to predict the need for another AIP was 0.738 (95% confidence interval 0.548-0.748). Furthermore, 64% of the hysterectomized patients suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder.

CONCLUSION

Failure of postpartum hysterectomy to control bleeding was frequent, and it was associated with persistence of coagulopathy. Hysterectomy in this context had important psychological impacts.

Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: our experience

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence of and reasons for emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH) between 2009 and 2013 in our hospital, one of the three hospitals with the highest rates of delivery in Turkey.

METHODS

A retrospective study. Seventy-six peripartum hysterectomies were evaluated. We compared the modes of delivery and examined whether bilateral internal iliac artery ligation was performed.

RESULTS

The incidence of EPH was 0.77 in 1000. The majority of cases involved multiparity, uterine rupture, placenta praevia, or placental invasion abnormalities. The most frequent reason for EPH was uterine atony (64.5 %). There was no statistically significant relationship with mode of delivery; however, the complication rate and requirement for fresh frozen plasma were significantly (p < 0.01) related to whether bilateral internal iliac artery ligation was performed.

CONCLUSION

Uterine atony was the most common indication for EPH. The most important step to avoid performing EPH is to calculate patients' risks for postpartum bleeding. Postpartum haemorrhage may not be preventable, but when it happens, obstetricians must be prepared to perform EPH, and in high-risk patients, to perform internal iliac artery ligation.

Predictors of severity in primary postpartum hemorrhage

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors and etiologies leading to severe primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in women with PPH.

METHODS

Women who experienced PPH within the first 24 h after delivery over a 3-year period were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of severe PPH (n = 125) or non-severe PPH (n = 411). Risk factors and etiologies for severe PPH were explored using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

PPH and severe PPH complicated 2.1 and 0.49 % of all deliveries, respectively. Previous cesarean delivery (OR = 3.15, 95 % CI = 1.02-10.3; p = 0.001), prolonged labor (OR = 3.62, 95 % CI = 3.21-4.03; p < 0.001), oxytocin augmentation (OR = 3.32, 95 % CI 2.05-5.93; p < 0.001) and emergency cesarean delivery (OR = 4.75, 95 % CI 1.32-12.96; p < 0.001) were the factors independently associated with severe PPH. Etiologies significantly associated with severe PPH are uterine atony (OR = 2.72, 95 % CI 1.64-4.55; p < 0.001) and abnormal placentation (OR = 3.05, 95 % CI 1.56-6.27; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Previous cesarean delivery, prolonged labor, oxytocin augmentation and emergency cesarean delivery are strongest predictors of severe blood loss in women with PPH. In addition, uterine atony and abnormal placentation are the etiologies significantly associated with severe PPH.

Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: 2-year experiences in non-tertiary center

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors, indications and materno-fetal outcomes for emergency peripartum hysterectomy.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation was made of 23 cases. Maternal and neonatal outcomes, need for referral to the tertiary center and related complications were compared to those at the initial diagnosis for surgery, location of delivery, type of surgery and the admission diagnosis. The risk factors associated with emergency peripartum hysterectomy were also investigated. Significance was evaluated at p values of <0.01 and <0.05.

RESULTS

There was a correlation between peripartum hysterectomy and uterine atony or uterine rupture (p < 0.01). The referral rates of patients with home delivery were significantly higher than those of patients who delivered in hospital (p = 0.02) but no significant difference was observed in the neonatal outcomes (p = 0.38). There was no significant difference in the rates of maternal complications between home and hospital delivery (p = 0.068). According to the indication for surgery, no significant difference was observed between the rates of referral to the tertiary center, maternal outcomes, complications, or need for maternal intensive care (p > 0.05). However, a highly significant difference was observed between the neonatal outcomes (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed the most important risk factors associated with peripartum hysterectomy to be uterine atony, grand multiparity, and uterine rupture. Maternal intensive care, maternal death, neonatal death, or neonatal intensive care were associated with home delivery or delayed presentation at hospital.