Anesthetic management of prophylactic cervical cerclage: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

Cervical cerclage: An evolving evidence base

Cervical cerclage is an established intervention for the management of pregnancies at high risk of preterm birth. Although studies exist to support its use in certain situations, particularly in singleton pregnancies, many questions such as adjunct therapies and efficacy in specific subgroups of high-risk women have not been fully elucidated. This review will assess the current evidence as well as areas where there is currently a paucity of data and an urgent requirement for further research.

Median effective dose of ropivacaine for prophylactic cervical cerclage in Chinese women: a dose-finding study

BACKGROUND

Although intrathecal ropivacaine has been widely used for caesarean delivery, there are limited data for the use of ropivacaine for prophylactic cervical cerclage. We sought to determine the median effective dose of intrathecal ropivacaine for prophylactic cervical cerclage in 50% of patients (ED50) and the calculated dose required for successful block in 95% of patients (ED95).

METHODS

We included Chinese women scheduled for prophylactic cervical cerclage under combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anaesthesia in the first or second trimester. A predetermined dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine was administered. If this determined dose achieved an effective block at a level not lower than T12, the next dose was decreased by 0.5 mg. Otherwise, the next dose was increased by 0.5 mg. The primary outcome was the ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine. Secondary outcomes included the calculated ED95, time from CSE to the start of surgery and so on.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included in the study, 23 (57.5%) of 40 received an effective block only with intrathecal ropivacaine, while 17 (42.5%) patients needed extra epidural lidocaine to achieve a successful block. The ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine confirmed by isotonic regression was 6.9 mg (95% CI, 6.68 to 7.12 mg), and the calculated ED95 was 7.8 mg (95% CI, 7.69 to 10.05 mg). When an effective block was achieved with intrathecal ropivacaine alone, the time to resolution of the sensory and motor blocks was 90 (75-100) min and 90 (60-100) min, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine for prophylactic cervical cerclage was 6.9 mg. Intrathecal ropivacaine (7.8 mg) is likely to produce successful anaesthesia in 95% of patients undergoing prophylactic cervical cerclage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100051418.

Prenatal anesthetic exposure and offspring neurodevelopmental outcomes—A narrative review

While it is common for pregnant women to take anesthesia during surgery, the effects of prenatal anesthesia exposure (PAE) on the long-term neurodevelopment of the offspring remain to be clarified. Preclinical animal research has shown that in utero anesthetic exposure causes neurotoxicity in newborns, which is mainly characterized by histomorphological changes and altered learning and memory abilities. Regional birth cohort studies that are based on databases are currently the most convenient and popular types of clinical studies. Specialized questionnaires and scales are usually employed in these studies for the screening and diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders in the offspring. The time intervals between the intrauterine exposure and the onset of developmental outcomes often vary over several years and accommodate a large number of confounding factors, which have an even greater impact on the neurodevelopment of the offspring than prenatal anesthesia itself. This narrative review summarized the progress in prenatal anesthetic exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes in the offspring from animal experimental research and clinical studies and provided a brief introduction to assess the neurodevelopment in children and potential confounding factors.

ED 90 of Intrathecal Chloroprocaine With Fentanyl for Prophylactic Cervical Cerclage: A Sequential Allocation Biased-Coin Design

BACKGROUND

Chloroprocaine is a short-acting local anesthetic that has been used for spinal anesthesia in outpatient surgery. There is limited experience with spinal chloroprocaine for prophylactic cervical cerclage placement. We sought to determine the effective dose of intrathecal chloroprocaine for 90% of patients (ED90) undergoing prophylactic cervical cerclage placement. We hypothesized that the ED90 of intrathecal chloroprocaine when combined with 10-ug fentanyl would be between 33 and 54 mg.

METHODS

In this prospective 2-center double-blinded study, we enrolled women undergoing prophylactic cervical cerclage placement under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. A predetermined dose of intrathecal 3% chloroprocaine with fentanyl 10 ug was administered. The initial dose was 45-mg intrathecal chloroprocaine. Subsequent dose adjustments were determined based on the response of the previous subject using an up-down sequential allocation with a biased-coin design. A dose was considered effective if at least a T12 block was achieved, and there was no requirement for epidural activation or intraoperative analgesic supplementation during the procedure. The primary outcome was the ED90 of intrathecal chloroprocaine with fentanyl 10 ug. Secondary outcomes included duration of surgery, anesthetic side effects, time to resolution of motor and sensory block, time to achieve recovery room discharge criteria, and patient satisfaction with anesthetic care. Isotonic regression was used to estimate the ED90.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were enrolled into the study. Two patients were excluded (1 protocol violation and 1 failed block). In total, 45 patients completed the study. The estimated ED90 (95% confidence interval) for intrathecal chloroprocaine combined with fentanyl 10 ug was 49.5 mg (45.0-50.1 mg). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of surgery was 15 (10-24) minutes. Resolution of the motor (Bromage 0) and sensory block took a median time of 60 (45-90) minutes and 90 (75-105) minutes, respectively. The median time to achieve recovery room discharge criteria was 150 (139-186) minutes. Satisfaction with anesthetic management was high in all patients. There were no reports of postdural puncture headache or transient neurological symptoms postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ED90 of intrathecal chloroprocaine combined with fentanyl 10 ug was 49.5 mg. Intrathecal chloroprocaine was associated with rapid block recovery and high patient satisfaction, which makes it well suited for outpatient obstetric procedures.

Intrathecal 2-Chloroprocaine 3% Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.75% for Cervical Cerclage: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Cervical cerclage is a short ambulatory procedure. For spinal anesthesia, local anesthetic agents with rapid postoperative resolution are desired. We hypothesized that in combination with fentanyl, intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine would produce earlier resolution of motor block, resulting in shorter time to meet recovery room discharge criteria than hyperbaric bupivacaine.

METHODS

Women undergoing cervical cerclage with spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine 3% 50 mg or hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% 9 mg, both with fentanyl 15 µg. Doses were empirically selected. The onset and resolution of sensory and motor blockade and time to achieve recovery room discharge criteria were monitored. On postoperative day 1, patients rated their satisfaction with the anesthetic and reported on transient neurologic symptoms (TNS), back pain, or headache. The primary outcome was time from spinal injection to motor block resolution. The main secondary outcomes included times from spinal injection to (i) T12 dermatomal level, (ii) sensory block resolution, and (iii) ability to ambulate and void.

RESULTS

Forty-three women were enrolled and randomized to either the chloroprocaine (N = 23) or bupivacaine group (N = 20). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of surgery was 35.3 (11.4) minutes. There was no difference between groups for time to motor block resolution-the median [interquartile range] time for the bupivacaine group (N = 17) was 112 [97-143] minutes versus 109 [88-148] minutes in the chloroprocaine group (N = 22), P = .66, but there was a significant difference in median time to sensory block resolution: 143 [116-162] minutes in the chloroprocaine group versus 198 [152-263] minutes in the bupivacaine group, P = .002. The recovery room discharge criteria, which at our institution include the ability to ambulate unassisted and void urine, were met 76 (95% CI, 33-145) minutes earlier in the chloroprocaine group, P < .0005. One complete block failure occurred with hyperbaric bupivacaine and 2 subjects in each group received treatment for intraoperative discomfort. No patients reported TNS.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathecal 2-chloropocaine 3% provided similarly effective surgical anesthesia for cerclage placement. Although no difference in time to motor block resolution between groups was observed, the time to sensory block resolution and time to meet recovery room discharge criteria were both significantly shorter among patients who received chloroprocaine than patients who received bupivacaine. Future studies are needed to identify and compare equipotent doses of chloroprocaine and bupivacaine to confirm the superiority of chloroprocaine for this ambulatory obstetric procedure.

Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Preterm birth (PTB) remains the foremost global cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Thus, the prevention of spontaneous PTB still remains of critical importance. In an attempt to prevent PTB in singleton pregnancies, cervical cerclage, in combination with other treatments, has been advocated. This is because, cervical cerclage is an intervention that is commonly recommended in women with a short cervix at high risk of preterm birth but, despite this, many women still deliver prematurely, as the biological mechanism is incompletely understood. Additionally, previous Cochrane Reviews have been published on the effectiveness of cervical cerclage in singleton and multiple pregnancies, however, none has evaluated the effectiveness of using cervical cerclage in combination with other treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether antibiotics administration, vaginal pessary, reinforcing or second cerclage placement, tocolytic, progesterone, or other interventions at the time of cervical cerclage placement prolong singleton gestation in women at high risk of pregnancy loss based on prior history and/or ultrasound finding of 'short cervix' and/or physical examination. History-indicated cerclage is defined as a cerclage placed usually between 12 and 15 weeks gestation based solely on poor prior obstetrical history, e.g. multiple second trimester losses due to painless dilatation. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage is defined as a cerclage placed usually between 16 and 23 weeks gestation for transvaginal ultrasound cervical length < 20 mm in a woman without cervical dilatation. Physical exam-indicated cerclage is defined as a cerclage placed usually between 16 and 23 weeks gestation because of cervical dilatation of one or more centimetres detected on physical (manual) examination.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (26 September 2019), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included published, unpublished or ongoing randomised controlled trial (RCTs). Studies using a cluster-RCT design were also eligible for inclusion in this review but none were identified. We excluded quasi-RCTs (e.g. those randomised by date of birth or hospital number) and studies using a cross-over design. We also excluded studies that specified addition of the combination therapy after cervical cerclage because the woman subsequently became symptomatic. We included studies comparing cervical cerclage in combination with one, two or more interventions with cervical cerclage alone in singleton pregnancies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts of all retrieved articles, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence for this review's main outcomes. Data were checked for accuracy. Standard Cochrane review methods were used throughout.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified two studies (involving a total of 73 women) comparing cervical cerclage alone to a different comparator. We also identified three ongoing studies (one investigating vaginal progesterone after cerclage, and two investigating cerclage plus pessary). One study (20 women), conducted in the UK, comparing cervical cerclage in combination with a tocolytic (salbutamol) with cervical cerclage alone in women with singleton pregnancy did not provide any useable data for this review. The other study (involving 53 women, with data from 50 women) took place in the USA and compared cervical cerclage in combination with a tocolytic (indomethacin) and antibiotics (cefazolin or clindamycin) versus cervical cerclage alone - this study did provide useable data for this review (and the study authors also provided additional data on request) but meta-analyses were not possible. This study was generally at a low risk of bias, apart from issues relating to blinding. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for serious risk of bias and imprecision (few participants, few events and wide 95% confidence intervals). Cervical cerclage in combination with an antibiotic and tocolytic versus cervical cerclage alone (one study, 50 women/babies) We are unclear about the effect of cervical cerclage in combination with antibiotics and a tocolytic compared with cervical cerclage alone on the risk of serious neonatal morbidity (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.24; very low-certainty evidence); perinatal loss (data for miscarriage and stillbirth only - data not available for neonatal death) (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.64; very low-certainty evidence) or preterm birth < 34 completed weeks of pregnancy (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.40; very low-certainty evidence). There were no stillbirths (intrauterine death at 24 or more weeks). The trial authors did not report on the numbers of babies discharged home healthy (without obvious pathology) or on the risk of neonatal death.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is insufficient evidence to evaluate the effect of combining a tocolytic (indomethacin) and antibiotics (cefazolin/clindamycin) with cervical cerclage compared with cervical cerclage alone for preventing spontaneous PTB in women with singleton pregnancies. Future studies should recruit sufficient numbers of women to provide meaningful results and should measure neonatal death and numbers of babies discharged home healthy, as well as other important outcomes listed in this review. We did not identify any studies looking at other treatments in combination with cervical cerclage. Future research needs to focus on the role of other interventions such as vaginal support pessary, reinforcing or second cervical cerclage placement, 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate or dydrogesterone or vaginal micronised progesterone, omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation and bed rest.

Vaginal Cerclage: Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Management

The role of the cerclage procedure has expanded from its initial application as treatment or prevention of cervical insufficiency to prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Although recent prospective studies have clarified the indications for cerclage, additional prospective studies are needed to help define optimal perioperative management. Herein, we review the current data to provide the clinician with the most evidence-based approach to managing patients who require cerclage.