1
|
Sarcoma of the Uterus. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/074, April 2021). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:1337-1367. [PMID: 36467974 PMCID: PMC9715351 DOI: 10.1055/a-1897-5124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This is an official guideline, published and coordinated by the Germany Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG). Because of their rarity and heterogeneous histopathology, uterine sarcomas are challenging in terms of their clinical management and therefore require a multidisciplinary approach. To our knowledge, there are currently no binding evidence-based recommendations for the appropriate management of this heterogeneous group of tumors. Methods This S2k guideline was first published in 2015. The update published here is once again the result of the consensus of a representative interdisciplinary committee of experts who were commissioned by the Guidelines Committee of the DGGG to carry out a systematic search of the literature on uterine sarcomas. Members of the participating professional societies achieved a formal consensus after a structured consensus process. Recommendations 1.1 Epidemiology, classification, staging of uterine sarcomas. 1.2 Symptoms, general diagnostic workup, general pathology or genetic predisposition to uterine sarcomas. 2. Management of leiomyosarcomas. 3. Management of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas. 4. Management of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas. 5. Management of adenosarcomas. 6. Rhabdomyosarcomas of the uterus in children and adolescents. 7. Follow-up of uterine sarcomas. 8. Management of morcellated uterine sarcomas. 9. Information provided to patients.
Collapse
|
2
|
Developing a Preoperative Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10100735. [PMID: 32977421 PMCID: PMC7598216 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10100735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Early diagnosis of the rare and life-threatening uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is essential for prompt treatment, to improve survival. Preoperative distinction of LMS from benign leiomyoma remains a challenge, and thus LMS is often diagnosed post-operatively. This retrospective observational study evaluated the predictive diagnostic utility of 32 preoperative variables in 190 women who underwent a hysterectomy, with a postoperative diagnosis of leiomyoma (n = 159) or LMS (n = 31), at the Liverpool Women’s National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, between 2010 and 2019. A total of 7 preoperative variables were associated with increased odds of LMS, including postmenopausal status (p < 0.001, OR 3.08), symptoms of pressure (p = 0.002, OR 2.7), postmenopausal bleeding (p = 0.001, OR 5.01), neutrophil count ≥7.5 × 109/L (p < 0.001, OR 5.72), haemoglobin level <118 g/L (p = 0.037, OR 2.22), endometrial biopsy results of cellular atypia or neoplasia (p = 0.001, OR 9.6), and a mass size of ≥10 cm on radiological imaging (p < 0.0001, OR 8.52). This study has identified readily available and easily identifiable preoperative clinical variables that can be implemented into clinical practice to discern those with high risk of LMS, for further specialist investigations in women presenting with symptoms of leiomyoma.
Collapse
|
3
|
Schuttringer E, Beleche T. The impact of recent power morcellator risk information on inpatient surgery and patient outcomes. J Comp Eff Res 2019; 9:53-65. [PMID: 31840551 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2019-0093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: We examine the impact of the new risk information about a surgical device on surgery and patient outcomes for hysterectomy in the inpatient setting. Methods: We utilize a difference-in-differences approach to assess the impact of new risk information on patient outcomes in the inpatient setting between 2009 and 2014. The inpatient data come from a nationally representative sample of hospitalizations in the USA. We use the likelihood of laparoscopic surgery, measures of resource use and surgical complications as outcome variables. Results: We estimate a three-percentage point decrease in the likelihood of receiving laparoscopic hysterectomy, a one-percentage point increase in the likelihood of experiencing a surgical complication and no impact on resource use, relative to pre-existing means. Conclusion: Our findings show that there was movement away from laparoscopic surgery in the months following the dissemination of new risk information. These changes had limited effect on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehren Schuttringer
- Food & Drug Administration Office of the Commissioner, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, Maryland, MD 20993, USA
| | - Trinidad Beleche
- Food & Drug Administration Office of the Commissioner, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, Maryland, MD 20993, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Denschlag D, Ackermann S, Battista MJ, Cremer W, Egerer G, Follmann M, Haas H, Harter P, Hettmer S, Horn LC, Juhasz-Boess I, Kast K, Köhler G, Kröncke T, Lindel K, Mallmann P, Meyer-Steinacker R, Mustea A, Petru E, Reichardt P, Schmidt D, Strauss HG, Tempfer C, Thiel F, Ulrich U, Vogl T, Vordermark D, Gass P, Beckmann MW. Sarcoma of the Uterus. Guideline of the DGGG and OEGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Register Number 015/074, February 2019). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79:1043-1060. [PMID: 31656317 PMCID: PMC6805182 DOI: 10.1055/a-0882-4116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims This is an official guideline published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG). Because of their rarity and heterogeneous histopathology, uterine sarcomas are challenging in terms of how they should be managed clinically, and treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach. To our knowledge, there are currently no binding evidence-based recommendations for the appropriate management of this heterogeneous group of tumors. Methods This S2k guideline was first published in 2015. The update published here is the result of the consensus of a representative interdisciplinary group of experts who carried out a systematic search of the literature on uterine sarcomas in the context of the guidelines program of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG. Members of the participating professional societies achieved a formal consensus after a moderated structured consensus process. Recommendations The consensus-based recommendations and statements include the epidemiology, classification, staging, symptoms, general diagnostic work-up and general pathology of uterine sarcomas as well as the genetic predisposition to develop uterine sarcomas. Also included are statements on the management of leiomyosarcomas, (low and high-grade) endometrial stromal sarcomas and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas and adenosarcomas. Finally, the guideline considers the follow-up and morcellation of uterine sarcomas and the information provided to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marco Johannes Battista
- Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Philipp Harter
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Lars-Christian Horn
- Abteilung für Mamma-, Urogenital, und Perinatalpathologie, Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ingolf Juhasz-Boess
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Universitätsklinik Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Günter Köhler
- Deutsches klinisches Kompetenzzentrum für genitale Sarkome und Mischtumoren, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Thomas Kröncke
- Klinik für Radiologie, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Peter Mallmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | | | | | - Edgar Petru
- Universitäts-Frauenklinik Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Peter Reichardt
- Klinik für interdisziplinäre Onkologie, Helios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Hans-Georg Strauss
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle/Saale, Germany
| | | | - Falk Thiel
- Frauenklinik, Alb Fils Kliniken, Göppingen, Germany
| | - Uwe Ulrich
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus Berlin, Paul Gerhardt Diakonie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle/Saale, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg; Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg; Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ebner F, Wiedenmann S, Bekes I, Wolfgang J, de Gregorio N, de Gregorio A. Results of an internal audit on the survival of patients with uterine sarcoma. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2018; 20:15-22. [PMID: 30299262 PMCID: PMC6501862 DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: In the last 5 years there has been much discussion about the surgical procedure for uterine fibroids, and essentially, also uterine sarcoma. Still there exists no reliable presurgical diagnostic tool to differentiate between benign fibroids and uterine sarcomas. The aim of this study was to confirm the suspected association between intraoperative spread of tumor by morcellation and impaired outcomes in patients with sarcoma. Material and Methods: After the local ethics commission positively reviewed the study protocol, the oncologic database of our university hospital was retrospectively reviewed for patients with uterine sarcomas over a time period of 13 years (2002-2015). Data was extracted from the medical files and survival information was collected by contacting the patient’s general practitioners if last follow-up-status was older than 6 months. For the analysis, patients were split into two groups with either intrasurgical morcellation (M+) or no morcellation (M-) regarding information provided by the surgical report. Results: Data on 57 patients with uterine sarcoma were available for further analysis. The median age and body mass index of the patients was 63 years and 27 kg/m², respectively. The sarcoma subtypes were 25 leiomyosarcoma, 19 carcinosarcoma, 9 endometrioid stroma sarcoma, 3 adenosarcoma, and one case without further differentiation. In the majority, no morcellation was performed (M- group, n=44) and 51 patients received open surgery (3 laparoscopic, 1 vaginal, and 2 incomplete surgeries). The median time of follow-up was 31 months. The disease-free survival was 50.5 months and the Cox regression analysis showed a hazard ratio of 3.06 [no significant difference between the two subgroups (p=0.079; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9-10.6)]. The overall survival was found as 62.2 months and the Cox regression analysis showed a hazard ratio of 3.216 with a statistically significant difference between the two subgroups (p=0.013; 95% CI: 1.3-8.1). Conclusion: Despite the efforts to find a pre-surgical diagnostic tool, the clinical situation remains unsatisfactory. Overall sarcoma prevalence is low during the last 13 years at our university center, but morcellation occurred in a relevant portion of patients (13 of 57). If sarcoma is suspected or diagnosed then en-bloc resection of the uterus can prolong survival. Thus, morcellation of the uterus and not the surgical technique (en-bloc resection) is the prognostic factor and should be avoided in any suspicious case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Ebner
- Frauenklinik, HELIOS Amper Klinikum, Dachau, Germany
| | - Saskia Wiedenmann
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Inga Bekes
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Janni Wolfgang
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Amelie de Gregorio
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Wong M, De Wilde RL, Isaacson K. Reducing the spread of occult uterine sarcoma at the time of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 297:285-293. [PMID: 29128980 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4575-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This review covers the most recent evidence to discuss the incidence of occult uterine sarcoma, whether morcellation increases tumor dissemination or mortality, and whether there is a difference between different types of morcellation. We will also discuss techniques to reduce the spread of an undiagnosed uterine sarcoma. METHOD A comprehensive literature search was made in Pubmed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for articles related to the incidence of occult uterine sarcoma after morcellation. RESULTS Fibroids are benign uterine tumors and are a common indication for gynecologic surgery. Increasingly, gynecologists are approaching these surgeries with minimally invasive techniques. Uterine sarcomas are rare malignant mesenchymal tumors that are difficult to distinguish preoperatively from uterine fibroids. CONCLUSION During a minimally invasive surgery, there is a risk of disseminating an occult sarcoma during tissue extraction. Minimally invasive gynecologists are tasked with balancing taking a minimally invasive approach, which is shown to result in better patient outcomes, with minimizing the risk of spreading an occult sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marron Wong
- Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Center for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Newton, MA, USA
| | - Rudy Leon De Wilde
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology at Pius Hospital, University Hospital for Gynecology-Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
| | - Keith Isaacson
- Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Center for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Newton, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Spontaneous rupture of infarcted leiomyoma into endometrial cavity in a perimenopausal woman. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296:609-611. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4454-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
9
|
Nemec W, Inwald EC, Buchholz S, Klinkhammer Schalke M, Gerken M, Ortmann O. Effects of morcellation on long-term outcomes in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 294:825-31. [PMID: 27105972 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4086-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2015] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical long-term outcomes of women with uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) with different types of hysterectomy (open abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and switch from laparoscopic to open abdominal) were compared according to morcellation and other factors. MATERIALS The clinical cancer registry Regensburg (Germany) registered 64 patients between 2004 and 2013 with ULMS. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate 5-year overall survival (OAS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and recurrence rates. To compare surgery with or without morcellation log rank test was used. To adjust for age, FIGO stage, grading and other factors multivariable Cox regression models were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HR). RESULTS In the cohort of 64 patients 15 underwent morcellation, preferably during laparoscopic surgery. Although numbers were small we performed analysis for OAS and RFS. Median OAS for morcellation was 10.6 vs. 6.4 years for non morcellation. 5y-OAS was 76.0 % for morcellation compared to 54.8 % in patients without morcellation (p = 0.115). Cox regression models rendered an unadjusted (univariable) HR 0.428 for morcellation vs. non-morcellation (p = 0.125) and an adjusted (multivariable) HR 0.644 (p = 0.406). 5y-RFR was 64.0 % compared to 42.8 % in patients without morcellation (p = 0.104; unadjusted HR 0.484, p = 0.111; adjusted HR 0.607, p = 0.306). CONCLUSION In general, the prognosis of patients with ULMS is poor. In our cohort, women who underwent hysterectomy with morcellation had a better cumulative OAS and RFS than women without morcellation. Although we adjusted for differences between women with and without morcellation regarding age, grading and stage, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Nemec
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - E C Inwald
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - S Buchholz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - M Gerken
- Tumor Center Regensburg e.V., University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - O Ortmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|