Treatment failure following excision therapy of CIN: the impact of direct colposcopic vision during procedure

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with or without intraoperative colposcopy: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure is the standard surgical treatment for cervical dysplasia. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure is advised to be performed under colposcopic guidance to minimize adverse pregnancy outcomes. To date, there is no evidence from randomized trials for this recommendation.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the benefits of performing loop electrosurgical excision procedure under colposcopic guidance in women with cervical dysplasia.

STUDY DESIGN

In a prospective, randomized trial, we compared loop electrosurgical excision procedure with loop electrosurgical excision procedure performed under direct colposcopic vision in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was resected cone mass; the secondary endpoints were margin status, fragmentation of the surgical specimen, procedure time, time to complete hemostasis, blood loss, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. A sample size of 87 per group (n = 174) was planned (with an assumed type I error of 0.05 and drop-out rate of 5%) to achieve 90% power to detect a 25% reduction in cone mass (with an assumed cone mass of 2.5 ± 1.6 g in the control group) using a nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney U).

RESULTS

From October 2016 through December 2017, we randomized 182 women: 93 in the loop electrosurgical excision procedure group and 89 in the loop electrosurgical excision procedure-direct colposcopic vision group. Women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure-direct colposcopic vision had significantly smaller cone specimens than those undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure (weight: median 1.86 [interquartile range 1.20-2.72] vs median 2.37 [interquartile range 1.63-3.31] g, respectively, P = .006). Secondary outcome measures did not differ significantly between groups: resection margin status involved vs free margin: 12 (13%) vs 75 (82%) and 11 (12.4%) vs 75 (84.3%); fragmentation no vs yes: 85 (92.4%) vs 7 (7.6%) and 84 (94.4%) vs 5 (5.6%); procedure time: 190 (interquartile range 138-294) and 171 (interquartile range 133-290) seconds; time to complete hemostasis: 61 (interquartile range 31-108) and 51 (interquartile range 30-81) seconds; intraoperative blood loss (Δhemoglobin): 0.4 (interquartile range 0.2-1.0) and 0.5 (interquartile range 0.1-0.9); complication rate: 6 (6.5%) and 2 (2.2%). In a multivariate analysis, study group allocation (P = .021) and parity (P = .028), but not age, body mass index, type of transformation zone, and dysplasia degree independently influenced the amount of resected cone mass.

CONCLUSION

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with intraoperative colposcopy leads to significantly smaller cone specimens without compromising margin status.

Risk Factors of Post-Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone Recurrent High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Lesion: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to identify the risk factors of post-large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) recurrent disease and the impact of colposcopic guidance at the time of LLETZ on that risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From December 2013 to July 2014, 204 patients who had undergone LLETZ for the treatment of high-grade intraepithelial lesion with fully visible cervical squamocolumnar junction were included. The use of colposcopy during each procedure was systematically documented. The dimensions and volume of LLETZ specimens were measured at the time of the procedure before formaldehyde fixation. All participants were invited for a follow-up. The primary endpoint was the diagnosis of post-LLETZ recurrent disease defined as the histologic diagnosis of a high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion.

RESULTS

The median duration of post-LLETZ follow-up was 25.8 months. Recurrent disease was diagnosed in 8 (3.6%) patients. Older than 38 years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 11.9, 95% CI = 1.6-86.0), history of excisional therapy (aHR = 21.6, 95% CI = 3.5-135.3), and the absence of colposcopy for the guidance of LLETZ (aHR = 6.4, 95% CI = 1.1-37.7) were found to significantly increase the risk of post-LLETZ recurrent disease. The dimensions and volume of the specimen were not found to have any impact. Only positive endocervical margins were identified to significantly increase the risk of post-LLETZ recurrent disease (aHR = 14.4, 95% CI = 2.0-101.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors of post-LLETZ recurrent disease are older than 38 years, history of excisional therapy, positive endocervical margins, and lack of colposcopic guidance at the time of LLETZ.

Colposcopy Evaluation at the Time of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure May Avoid Unnecessary Treatment

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of colposcopy evaluation at the time of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) to identify women with a previous confirmatory diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesion/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (SIL/CIN) with low probability of dysplasia in the LEEP specimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively recruited a cohort of 162 women undergoing LEEP for histological high-grade SIL/CIN 2-3 or low-grade SIL/CIN 1 with high-grade SIL cytology showing a fully visible squamocolumnar junction in the colposcopy evaluation at the time of LEEP. At the referral visit cervical cytology, human papillomavirus and genotype detection, digital colposcopy, colposcopical lesion measurement, and 1 or more biopsies of the transformation zone were obtained. The uterine cervix was colposcopically evaluated intraoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty-four women (21.0%) had a normal colposcopy evaluation at the time of the LEEP, whereas the remaining 128 women showed abnormal findings. Absence of SIL/CIN in the LEEP specimen was confirmed in 28 (82.3%) of the 34 women with a normal colposcopy at the time of LEEP group and 8 (3.1%) of the 128 women showing abnormal colposcopy at the time of LEEP group (p < .001). A normal colposcopic evaluation at the time of LEEP was associated with an increase in the risk of absence of lesion in the cone specimen compared with cases presenting an abnormal colposcopy (95% CI = 33.8-1,555.1, p < .001). The colposcopy evaluation at the time of LEEP had a positive predictive value of 82.3% (95% CI = 66.5-91.5) and a negative predictive value of 96.9% (95% CI = 92.2-98.8) to predict low probability of SIL/CIN in the specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Colposcopic evaluation at the time of LEEP seems to be accurate to identify SIL/CIN postbiopsy regression; thus, its performance would be considered at the time of the treatment.