Short-course postpartum (6-h) magnesium sulfate therapy in severe preeclampsia

Evaluation of antihypertensives for post partum management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of evidence that directly shows the best antihypertensive treatment options for post partum management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Our objective was to analyze the safest and most effective antihypertensive drugs post partum for patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and MEDLINE were searched to find relevant articles published from inception to Feb 2024. We included randomized control trials, in English, featuring a population of postnatal women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or postpartum women with de novo hypertension with a follow-up of up to 6 months in which any antihypertensive medication was compared with Placebo or a comparison between different doses of antihypertensives was done. The statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed that almost all antihypertensives are effective in treating postpartum hypertension. However, some medications had alternating roles in controlling specific outcomes. Using calcium channel blockers resulted in a faster time to sustain BP control than the control (SMD: -0.37; 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.01; P = 0.04). In contrast, using ACE inhibitors or ARBs demanded the use of other antihypertensives in contrast to all other drugs assessed (RR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.07 to 4.07; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Timely management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy postpartum is life-saving. All the traditional antihypertensives we assessed effectively manage hypertension postpartum, thus allowing the physician to tailor the particular drug regimen according to the patient's needs and comorbidities without any hindrance.

Alternative magnesium sulphate regimens for women with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia

BACKGROUND

Magnesium sulphate is the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of women with eclampsia. Regimens for administration of this drug have evolved over the years, but there is no clarity on the comparative benefits or harm of alternative regimens. This is an update of a review first published in 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To assess if one magnesium sulphate regimen is better than another when used for the care of women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both, to reduce the risk of severe morbidity and mortality for the woman and her baby.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (29 April 2022), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials and cluster-randomised trials comparing different regimens for administration of magnesium sulphate used in women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both. Comparisons included different dose regimens, intramuscular versus intravenous route for maintenance therapy, and different durations of therapy. We excluded studies with quasi-random or cross-over designs. We included abstracts of conference proceedings if compliant with the trustworthiness assessment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, two review authors assessed trials for inclusion, performed risk of bias assessment, and extracted data. We checked data for accuracy. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

For this update, a total of 16 trials (3020 women) met our inclusion criteria: four trials (409 women) compared regimens for women with eclampsia, and 12 trials (2611 women) compared regimens for women with pre-eclampsia. Most of the included trials had small sample sizes and were conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Eleven trials reported adequate randomisation and allocation concealment. Blinding of participants and clinicians was not possible in most trials. The included studies were for the most part at low risk of attrition and reporting bias. Treatment of women with eclampsia (four comparisons) One trial compared a loading dose-alone regimen with a loading dose plus maintenance dose regimen (80 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsions or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial compared a lower-dose regimen with standard-dose regimen over 24 hours (72 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsion, severe morbidity, perinatal death, or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (137 women) compared intravenous (IV) versus standard intramuscular (IM) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either route has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, death of the baby before discharge (stillbirth and neonatal death), or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (120 women) compared a short maintenance regimen with a standard (24 hours after birth) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, severe morbidity, or side effects such as nausea and respiratory failure. A short maintenance regimen may reduce the risk of flushing when compared to a standard 24 hours maintenance regimen (risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.93; 1 trial, 120 women; low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials. Prevention of eclampsia for women with pre-eclampsia (five comparisons) Two trials (462 women) compared loading dose alone with loading dose plus maintenance therapy. Low-certainty evidence suggests an uncertain effect with either regimen on the risk of eclampsia (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.61 to 6.54; 2 trials, 462 women) or perinatal death (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.36; 2 trials, 462 women). One small trial (17 women) compared an IV versus IM maintenance regimen for 24 hours. It is uncertain whether IV or IM maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia or stillbirth (very low-certainty evidence). Four trials (1713 women) compared short postpartum maintenance regimens with continuing for 24 hours after birth. Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be a wide range of benefit or harm between groups regarding eclampsia (RR 1.99, 95% CI 0.18 to 21.87; 4 trials, 1713 women). Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be little or no effect on severe morbidity (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.29; 2 trials, 1233 women) or side effects such as respiratory depression (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.61; 2 trials, 1424 women). Three trials (185 women) compared a higher-dose maintenance regimen versus a lower-dose maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on eclampsia (very low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests that a higher-dose maintenance regimen has little or no effect on side effects when compared to a lower-dose regimen (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.01; 1 trial 62 women). One trial (200 women) compared a maintenance regimen by continuous infusion versus a serial IV bolus regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia, side effects, perinatal death, maternal death, or other neonatal morbidity (very low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite the number of trials evaluating various magnesium sulphate regimens for eclampsia prophylaxis and treatment, there is still no compelling evidence that one particular regimen is more effective than another. Well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed to answer this question.

Comparison of Zuspan regimen and its 12-hour modification in women with severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia in two hospitals in Abeokuta

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) are leading causes of maternal mortality (with severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia [SPE/EC] being causes of death). Magnesium sulphate (MgSO₄) has proven to be the drug of choice for SPE/EC management. However, its availability and cost remain a drawback to its use in developing countries. This study aimed to compare Zuspan regimen with its 12-hour modification for SPE/EC management in two major hospitals in Abeokuta, Ogun state, South Western Nigeria.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial of non-inferior parallel design carried out at Federal Medical Centre and Sacred Heart Hospital, Abeokuta involving 148 consenting women who were randomized into two groups A and B. Both groups had 4 g loading dose of MgSO4, but the duration of maintenance was reduced to 12-hours in Group A (intervention) while Group B received the standard Zuspan regimen (control). Outcome measures were the occurrence/recurrence of convulsions (primary), maternal side effects and perinatal outcomes (secondary).

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence/recurrence of seizures between the two groups for both SPE/EC. No signs of maternal toxicity were observed in both arm of the study. There were no statistically significant differences in the perinatal/neonatal death and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min. However, there was a significant increase in the number of days on admission in the control group of those neonates delivered to mothers with eclampsia.

CONCLUSION

A 12-hr modification of Zuspan regimen was found to be non-inferior to the standard Zuspan regimen in the management of SPE/EC.

Duration of Postpartum Magnesium Sulphate for the Prevention of Eclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the optimal duration of postpartum magnesium sulphate to prevent eclampsia.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception until January 2020 and limited to English-language human randomized controlled trials. Search strategy included the key works "eclampsia," "magnesium sulphate," and "postpartum."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Title, abstract, and full-text review was performed using Covidence data-management software. Of the 3,629 articles screened, 10 studies were included in the final review. Studies were included if they compared two different time points of magnesium sulphate postpartum in women with either preeclampsia or eclampsia.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS

Two authors reviewed studies independently. RevMan software was used to calculate risk difference (RD) for categorical outcomes and mean difference for continuous outcomes. Shorter duration of magnesium sulphate (12 hours or less) was not associated with increased risk of eclampsia compared with 24-hour postpartum regimens (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.01, I2 70%). Studies randomizing women with preeclampsia did not show increased risk of eclampsia with shorter regimens (RD 0, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, I2 0%), nor did trials randomizing those with eclampsia (RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.07, I2 87%). Secondary outcomes, including flushing, duration of Foley catheter insertion, time to ambulation, and duration of hospital stay, were all reduced with shorter-duration magnesium sulphate.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that a shorter duration of postpartum magnesium sulphate does not increase the risk for eclamptic seizure; however, data remain underpowered to render firm conclusions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42020182432.

Duration of postpartum magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis in women with preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Pregnant women diagnosed with preeclampsia are at increased risk of eclampsia. Magnesium sulfate is the standard of care for maternal seizure prophylaxis. Traditional regimens of magnesium sulfate have continued infusions for 24 h postpartum. More recent evidence suggests shortened courses of postpartum magnesium sulfate. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate whether the duration of postpartum magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis in women with preeclampsia affects the incidence of seizures postpartum.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were reviewed from inception until 1 May 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Two hundred and fifty-three studies were reviewed by three individual authors. Inclusion criteria were as follows: published, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included pregnant women diagnosed with preeclampsia who received a maintenance infusion of magnesium sulfate in the postpartum period. Studies were excluded if either arm did not provide maintenance dosing of magnesium sulfate in the postpartum period. We also excluded ongoing, unpublished, and non-randomized trials.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs (n = 1369) were included in the systematic review. Data were abstracted and reviewed by three authors, then entered into Review Manager data software. The primary outcome of eclampsia was reported in all nine studies. An eclamptic event occurred in 2/696 women who received <24 h of postpartum magnesium compared to 0/673 events in women who received ≥24 h of postpartum magnesium (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01, 0.01; p=.71). Women who received <24 h of postpartum magnesium sulfate had a significantly faster time to ambulation postpartum (MD -10.57, 95% CI -17.43, -3.71; p=.003) and shorter durations of indwelling urinary catheter placement (MD -18.97, 95% CI -34.64, -3.29; p=.02).

CONCLUSIONS

As eclampsia is a rare occurrence, this review was not powered to show a difference in the rate of eclampsia. However, the two cases of eclampsia that were reported occurred in the group of women who received <24 h of postpartum magnesium sulfate. Therefore, the results of this systematic review support continued use of 24 h of postpartum magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis.

Shortened postpartum magnesium sulfate treatment vs traditional 24h for severe preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the benefits and risks of shortened magnesium sulfate with traditional 24 h for severe postpartum preeclampsia.Methods: We systematically searched the Cochrane, Embase, Web of science and Pubmed database from inception till May 15 2019. Studies included type is limited to randomized controlled trial (RCT). Pooled risks difference (RDs), odds risks (ORs), mean difference (MD), standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confifidence intervals (CIs) were used to summarize the effect sizes.Results: Totally studies included are 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Shortened magnesium sulfate treatment has the same risk as eclampsia (RD 0.00, 95%CI-0.01-0.01) and total complications (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.15), however, significant difference was observed in both groups pertaining to flushing (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.82), and the need for prolonged treatment (RD 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 - 0.1), Others factors,namely the benefits of shortened magnesium sulfate treatment,showed differences in both groups.Conclusions: Shortened postpartum magnesium sulfate treatment was as effective as traditional 24 h magnesium sulfate in seizure prevention and total complications. But flushing and needed for prolonged treatment in the shortened groups warrants further research.

Inadequate safety reporting in pre-eclampsia trials: a systematic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Randomised trials and their syntheses in meta-analyses offer a unique opportunity to assess the frequency and severity of adverse reactions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess safety reporting in pre-eclampsia trials.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Systematic search using bibliographic databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE, from inception to August 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials evaluating anticonvulsant or antihypertensive medication for pre-eclampsia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics appraising the adequacy of adverse reaction and toxicity reporting.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 60 randomised trials. Six trials (10%) were registered with the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, two registry records referred to adverse reactions, stating 'safety and toleration' and 'possible side effects' would be collected. Twenty-six trials (43%) stated the frequency of withdrawals within each study arm, and five trials (8%) adequately reported these withdrawals. Adverse reactions were inconsistently reported across eligible trials: 24 (40%) reported no serious adverse reactions and 36 (60%) reported no mild adverse reactions. The methods of definition or measurement of adverse reactions were infrequently reported within published trial reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-eclampsia trials regularly omit critical information related to safety. Despite the paucity of reporting, randomised trials collect an enormous amount of safety data. Developing and implementing a minimum data set could help to improve safety reporting, permitting a more balanced assessment of interventions by considering the trade-off between the benefits and harms.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research (DRF-2014-07-051), UK; Maternity Forum, Royal Society of Medicine, UK.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Developing @coreoutcomes could help to improve safety reporting in #preeclampsia trials. @NIHR_DC.

Elective delivery versus expectant management for pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of RCTs

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of elective delivery versus expectant management for women with pre-eclampsia (PE) and to assess neonatal outcomes before and after 34 weeks gestation.

METHODS

We searched Biomed Central, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, HMIC, Medline, and WHO trial registry, British Nursing Index, ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials, and Web of Science on 16 March, 2016. 1704 citations were identified. Randomised controlled trials comparing elective delivery with expectant management for women with PE were included. Seven studies were included (n = 1501). There were no maternal deaths.

RESULTS

Elective delivery lowered incidence of complications in women with PE or hypertension greater than 34 weeks gestation (n = 756; RR, 0.64; 95% CI 0.51-0.80). For women with severe PE less than 34 weeks gestation, elective delivery lowered the incidence of placental abruption (n = 483, 5 RCTs; RR, 0.43; 95% CI 0.19-0.98). For women with PE or hypertension greater than 34 weeks gestation, elective delivery also reduced the need for antihypertensive drug therapy. The need for ventilatory support and the risk of developing neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage or hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy may be increased in infants whose mothers undergo elective delivery for severe PE at less than 34 weeks gestation. However, there was no relevant evidence for women with severe PE over 34 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with PE or gestational hypertension beyond 34 weeks gestation, elective delivery can decrease the incidence of complications, severe hypertension and the need for antihypertensive drug therapy. Elective delivery can also lower the risk of placental abruption in women before 34 weeks gestation with severe PE, however, may be associated with increased risk of neonatal complications.