Uterine folding hemostasis: a simpler and safer technique for controlling atonic postpartum hemorrhage

Hysteroscopy after conservative surgical treatment of severe postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine atony: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of intrauterine anomalies, primarily intrauterine adhesions (IUAd), after conservative surgical treatment of severe postpartum hemorrhage with uterine atony (SPPH-UA) and determine patient eligibility for hysteroscopy.

METHODS

PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched by combining keywords "postpartum hemorrhage", "uterine atony", and "hysteroscopy" to perform a literature review. Articles in French and English with more than five cases of hysteroscopy following SPPH-UA were selected. All cases that had hysteroscopy after conservative surgical treatment of SPPH-UA were collected. A blinded statistical analysis revealed IUAd risk factors.

RESULTS

In all, 83% of patients agreed to hysteroscopy and 38% of 71 cases had an IUAd. Age was not a risk factor (P = 0.950). Other factors included multiparity (odds ratio [OR] 1.93, P = 0.039), cesarean delivery (OR 3.58, P = 0.584) and postpartum infection (OR 3.33, P = 0.04). Risk was at 57% after uterine padding with multiple transfixing square stitches (Cho-technique) (P = 0.001), 6% after non-transfixing uterine folding brace suture (B-Lynch technique) when used alone, 29% after uterine artery embolization and after internal iliac artery ligation (OR 0.98, P = 0.645); uterine vascular ligation (OR 0.69, P = 0.253) and more than two procedures (OR 0.69, P = 2.53). Disparity between authors was observed (P = 0.015) and concerned only the surgical techniques used.

CONCLUSION

A classification is proposed for deciding post-SPPH hysteroscopy. Further studies are required to determine appropriateness.

Ring compression suture for controlling post-partum hemorrhage during cesarean section

AIM

To avoid complications associated with uterine compression sutures, we devised a ring compression suture (RCS).

METHODS

The RCS was performed on 12 patients with post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) during cesarean section. The suture was inserted 0.5 cm below the attachment point of the uterosacral ligament into the uterine cavity and pushed downward through the cervical canal into the vagina. The other end of the stitch was threaded through the lower abdominal wall, from the inside of the abdomen cavity to the outside of the abdominal wall, emerging at the external surface of the lower abdomen 2 cm lateral to the ventral median line and 1 cm above the symphysis pubis. Then, the two ends of the suture (the end in the vagina had been pulled out in advance) were tied tightly on the pudendum. The same stitch was repeated on the contralateral side. After 48 h postoperatively, the suture was removed through the vagina under sterilization.

RESULTS

All 12 women with PPH who underwent RCS achieved hemostasis, and complications related to RCS were not seen. Two of them had successful pregnancies postoperatively. The remaining women had no desire for a further pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

The procedure can be used as an alternative to peripartum hysterectomy and also as a prophylactic application in PPH.