1
|
Chizen DR, Rislund DC, Robertson LM, Lim HJ, Tulandi T, Gargiulo AR, De Wilde RL, Velygodskiy A, Pierson RA. A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Proof-of-Concept Study of Alanyl-Glutamine for Reduction of Post-Myomectomy Adhesions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 284:180-188. [PMID: 37023559 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that intraperitoneal instillation of a single bolus dose of l-alanyl-l-glutamine (AG) will reduce the incidence, extent and/or severity of adhesions following myomectomy and establish preliminary safety and tolerability of AG in humans. DESIGN Phase 1,2 Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (DBRCT). SETTING Tertiary care gynecology surgical centre. PATIENTS Thirty-eight women who underwent myomectomies by laparoscopy (N = 38; AG-19 vs Placebo-19) or laparotomy (N = 10; AG-5 vs Placebo-5) with a scheduled second-look laparoscopy (SLL) 6-8 weeks later. Thirty-two patients in the laparoscopy arm completed SLL. INTERVENTIONS Bolus dose of AG or normal saline solution control (0.9% NaCl) administered intraperitoneally immediately prior to suture closure of the laparoscopic ports. The average dose was 170 mL of AG or control based on a dosing scheme of 1 g/kg bodyweight. MEASUREMENTS Digital recordings obtained for all procedures. The primary endpoint was reduction in the incidence, severity and extent of post-operative adhesions analyzed by intention-to-treat (ITT) approach. Three independent, blinded reviewers evaluated all operative video recordings to assess presence of adhesions. Post-hoc analysis assessed presence or absence of adhesions in the peritoneal cavity. Secondary endpoints assessed safety and tolerability of AG. MAIN RESULTS Administration of AG reduced the incidence, severity and/or extent of post-operative adhesions (p = 0.046). The presence of adhesions in the AG group was lower than in the Control group (p = 0.041). Adhesion improvement was achieved in 15 of 15 (100%) in the AG group versus 5 of 17 (29.6%) in the placebo group. No serious adverse events were reported. No differences in safety parameters were observed. CONCLUSIONS Intraperitoneal l-alanyl-l-glutamine reduced adhesion formation in all patients following laparoscopic myomectomy. Complete absence of adhesions was achieved at all abdominal sites in 93% of patients. Results confirm AG's known effects on cellular mechanisms of adhesiogenesis and lay the foundation for new adhesion prophylaxis research and treatment.
Collapse
|
2
|
Mercorio A, Della Corte L, Boccia D, Palumbo M, Reppuccia S, Buonfantino C, Cuomo L, Borgo M, Zitiello A, De Angelis MC, Laganà AS, Bifulco G, Giampaolino P. Myomectomy in infertile women: More harm than good? Front Surg 2023; 10:1151901. [PMID: 37139194 PMCID: PMC10150951 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1151901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Adhesion formation following gynecological surgery remains a challenge. The adoption of minimally invasive surgical approaches, such as conventional or robotic-assisted laparoscopy combined with meticulous microsurgical principles and the application of adhesion-reducing substances, is able to reduce the risk of de novo adhesion formation but do not eliminate it entirely. Myomectomy is the most adhesiogenic surgical procedure and postoperative adhesions can have a significant impact on the ability to conceive. Therefore, when surgery is performed as infertility treatment, attention should be paid to whether the benefits outweigh the risks. Among several factors, the size and the location of fibroids are the most accountable factors in terms of adhesion development and post surgical infertility; therefore, the search for effective strategies against adhesion formation in this setting is of paramount importance. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the incidence and factors of adhesion formation and the best preventive measures current available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Mercorio
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
- Correspondence: Antonio Mercorio
| | - Luigi Della Corte
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Dominga Boccia
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Palumbo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Sabrina Reppuccia
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Cira Buonfantino
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lara Cuomo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Borgo
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Zitiello
- Department of Woman Mother Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli”, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Bifulco
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guo C, Zhang C. Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and CA125 Level as a Combined Biomarker for Diagnosing Endometriosis and Predicting Pelvic Adhesion Severity. Front Oncol 2022; 12:896152. [PMID: 35800055 PMCID: PMC9255667 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.896152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Adhesion is a significant biological characteristic of endometriosis, and accurate evaluation of the pelvic adhesion is necessary for surgical treatment. Serum CA125 is yet the most common used biomarker in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with endometriosis despite of its high false-positive rate and low specificity. Herein, we aimed to examine the diagnostic value of the combination of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and CA125 for patients with different stages of endometriosis and their correlations with pelvic adhesion. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and blood count parameters of patients with both endometriosis and other benign ovarian tumors. The mean level of CA125, the PLR and the combined marker (the CA125 level multiplied by the PLR) in the EMs group were significantly higher than those in the Cyst group (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis was used to compare the diagnostic values of serum PLR, CA125, and the combined marker in ovarian endometriosis. The cut-off value of the PLR was 176.835, with 28.3% sensitivity and 96.9% specificity. The cut-off value of CA125 was 31.67 U/mL, with 84.1% sensitivity and 87.4% specificity. The cut-off value of the combined marker was 3894.97, with 83.4% sensitivity and 95.8% specificity. It was found that the severity of adhesion in endometriosis was positively correlated with the PLR (r = 0.286, P < 0.01), CA125 (r = 0.276, P < 0.01), and combined marker (r = 0.369, P < 0.01). The combined marker showed the highest AUC value (0.751, 95% CI: 0.666–0.837), with a sensitivity of 56.0% and a specificity of 89.6%, and the cut-off value was 9056.94. Besides, the levels of CA125, PLR, and their combination were significantly elevated in patients with endometriosis. The combined marker was not only positively correlated with pelvic adhesion but also showed a greater diagnostic value and specificity than CA125 alone. These findings indicate that the combined marker may be a potential inflammatory biomarker playing an important role in the diagnosis and assessment of adhesion in endometriosis.
Collapse
|
4
|
Göhring J, Drewes M, Kalder M, Kostev K. Germany Endometriosis Pattern Changes; Prevalence and Therapy over 2010 and 2019 Years: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY 2022; 16:85-89. [PMID: 35639651 PMCID: PMC9108293 DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2021.528397.1113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate whether the prevalence and the therapy patterns of endometriosis differ in 2010 and 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cross-sectional study was based on the data from the IQVIA Disease Analyzer database and included women with at least one visit to one of the 136 private gynecologist practices in Germany in 2010 or 2019. The prevalence of endometriosis as well as prevalence of each endometriosis therapy such as Dienogest, other Progestins than Dienogest, and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormones, was calculated in both years. RESULTS The present study included 346,249 women documented in 2010 and 343,486 women documented in 2019. The prevalence of endometriosis increased from 0.53% in 2010 to 0.66% in 2019 (P<0.001). The proportion of endometriosis patients treated with Dienogest increased significantly between 2010 and 2019 (18.1 vs. 35.0%). The proportion of women prescribed other Progestins than Dienogest has not significantly changed between 2010 and 2019 (8.4 vs. 8.3%). Gonadotropin-releasing hormones were prescribed only rarely in both 2010 and 2019, with a significant decrease in prescriptions between these two years (3.7 vs. 2.0%). CONCLUSION There were significant changes in the prevalence and medical therapeutic patterns of endometriosis in 2010 versus 2019 reflecting changes in therapy guidelines and possibly in diagnostic methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Göhring
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Maja Drewes
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Kalder
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Karel Kostev
- Epidemiology, IQVIA, Frankfurt, Germany,EpidemiologyIQVIAFrankfurtGermany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ziegler N, De Wilde RL. Reduction of adhesion formation after gynaecological adhesiolysis surgery with 4DryField PH - a retrospective, controlled study with second look laparoscopies. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2021; 42:658-664. [PMID: 34392782 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1928030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Adhesions are a common consequence of abdomino-pelvic surgery. Efficacy of available adhesion prevention agents is discussed controversially. Here, we used the adhesion barrier 4DryField PH: a powder, which is transformed into a barrier gel with saline solution. The study includes 40 consecutive patients with surgeries for adhesiolysis, endometriosis and other gynaecological pathologies and subsequent second look interventions. The intervention group (n = 17) received 4DryField PH gel while control patients (n = 23) did not receive any adhesion prevention. Severity and extent of adhesion formation were scored during both interventions using an established score. Direct comparison between first and second interventions showed that extent and severity of adhesions could be reduced significantly using 4DryField PH gel. In contrast, in the control group, extent was not reduced and severity was even significantly higher. Direct comparison of second look laparoscopies revealed that adhesion extent and severity were significantly lower in the 4DryField PH than in the control group.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Adhesion formation after gynaecologic surgeries is known to be frequent and highly problematic as it directly induces complications and additionally makes subsequent surgeries more difficult. The effectiveness of established adhesion barriers is not sufficient to tackle these problems adequately.What the results of this study add? This is the first controlled study using the relatively new adhesion barrier 4DryField PH. It yields a significant reduction of extent as well as severity of adhesions, while adhesiolysis surgery alone does not solve the problem.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Usage of 4DryField PH gel seems to be a good approach to solve the adhesion problem of gynaecologic surgery in general and the reformation problem of adhesiolysis surgery specifically. The results should be confirmed in a larger prospective randomised controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Ziegler
- Pius Hospital, University Hospital for Gynaecology, Medical University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Rudy Leon De Wilde
- Pius Hospital, University Hospital for Gynaecology, Medical University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ziegler N, Torres-de la Roche LA, Devassy R, De Wilde RL. Changed inflammatory markers after application of 4DryField PH for adhesion prevention in gynecological surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 304:951-955. [PMID: 34357446 PMCID: PMC8429371 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06095-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The development of peritoneal adhesions and the effects of different antiadhesion agents on such mechanisms are not fully understood. Temporary rises of the C-reactive protein (CRP) level have been reported after antiadhesion agent application. We present the changes of inflammation markers observed after use of a starch-based polysaccharide certified for adhesion prevention and hemostasis 4DF (4DryField® PH). Method Retrospective comparative analysis of inflammation markers in 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic adhesiolysis with or without adhesion prophylaxis was conducted. Statistical comparisons were performed by means of paired or unpaired t tests (for normally distributed continuous data), Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank tests or Mann–Whitney tests (for not-normally distributed continuous data), Mantel–Cox tests (for continuous data describing time intervals), and Fisher’s exact tests (for discrete data). Results The maximum post-operative CRP level was significantly elevated in the 4DF group (87 vs. 29%; p < 0.001), whereas leukocyte concentration and body temperature did not differ between groups. No signs of infection were detected in any of the patients and CRP levels spontaneously dropped to normal values within few days. No side effects or complications were observed in both groups. In second-look surgeries performed for other diagnoses 1–56 weeks after the first interventions, no remnants of 4DF or any peritoneal inflammatory reactions were observed. Conclusion The starch-based polysaccharide 4DF can be considered safe and does not induce inflammatory reactions of clinical significance. Further studies regarding 4DF degradation are recommended and, apart from macrophage migration, could also examine corresponding markers such as IL-6 and PCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Ziegler
- Pius Hospital, University Hospital for Gynecology, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, Georgstrasse 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany.
| | - Luz Angela Torres-de la Roche
- Pius Hospital, University Hospital for Gynecology, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, Georgstrasse 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Rajesh Devassy
- Pius Hospital, University Hospital for Gynecology, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, Georgstrasse 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Rudy Leon De Wilde
- Pius Hospital, University Hospital for Gynecology, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, Georgstrasse 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Torres-De La Roche LA, Campo R, Devassy R, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Hooker A, Koninckx P, Urman B, Wallwiener M, De Wilde RL. Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2019; 11:137-149. [PMID: 31824635 PMCID: PMC6897521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The peritoneal and intrauterine cavities are lined by fragile membranes with a high-wound healing capacity, e.g. repairing the endometrium in its cyclical "injury and scar-free repair process" during menstruation. However, peritoneal and intrauterine fibrosis and adhesions can develop after surgical trauma through activation of molecular, immune and genetic mechanisms. During procedures with a high-risk of adhesions, the use of new peritoneal and intrauterine conditions in combination with anti-adhesion substances are promising measures to preserve peritoneal and endometrial function and avoid the most common complication of gynecological surgery. Highlights of adhesions and anti-adhesion prevention techniques in laparoscopic, laparotomic and hysteroscopic surgeries are discussed in this paper. Unfortunately, evidence is lacking to prove the superiority of one technique over its counterparts in terms of postoperative adhesions, such as instrumentation, type of energy, distending media, and intracavitary pressure. Additionally, there is limited evidence about the efficacy and outcomes of techniques and adjuvant measures used during adhesiolysis. The definition of a universal intrauterine adhesions classification scheme as well as a prognostic scoring system to identify women at high risk of postoperative adhesions are necessary for advising those who could benefit the most of the use of antiadhesion barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LA Torres-De La Roche
- University Hospital for Gynecology, Pius Hospital, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26121, Germany
| | - R Campo
- Leuven Institute for Fertility and Embryology, Tiensevest, 3000, Leuven
| | - R Devassy
- Dubai London Clinic and Speciality Hospital, Dubai, 3371500, UAE
| | | | - A Hooker
- Zaans Medical Centre, Zaandam, 1502, Netherlands
| | - P Koninckx
- UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - B Urman
- Koç University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul, Turkey, 34330, Turkey
| | - M Wallwiener
- Heidelberg University Women's Hospital, Heidelberg, 69115, Germany
| | - RL De Wilde
- University Hospital for Gynecology, Pius Hospital, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26121, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reid R, Steel A, Wardle J, McIntyre E, Harnett J, Foley H, Adams J. The prevalence of self-reported diagnosed endometriosis in the Australian population: results from a nationally-representative survey. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12:88. [PMID: 30764858 PMCID: PMC6376711 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-019-4114-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Currently, it is estimated that one in 10 women of reproductive age are affected by the reproductive condition known as endometriosis. However, there has been limited research and policy attention on the prevalence of endometriosis in Australia. Utilising a nationally-representative Australian sample (N = 2025), this study aimed to report on the prevalence of endometriosis in the general population and to examine the sociodemographic factors associated with the condition. RESULTS The results identified a prevalence rate for endometriosis of 3.4%, which aligns with previous Australian research on this topic. However, the prevalence rate from this data set is lower than the estimate prevalence from the Global Burden of Disease Study. In addition, this study reported that women self-reporting diagnosis of endometriosis, were between 40-49 years of age, with a higher proportion living in South Australia (18.2%) compared to women within the general population (8.4%). The findings highlight endometriosis as a significant health care issue warranting further research and policy attention. While acknowledging some limitations, the study provides an important foundation for further large-scale research to be conducted on this important women's health topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Reid
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia. .,Endeavour College of Natural Health, Office of Research, Level 2, 269 Wickham Street, Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006, Australia.
| | - Amie Steel
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Jon Wardle
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Erica McIntyre
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Joanna Harnett
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.,Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Hope Foley
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.,Endeavour College of Natural Health, Office of Research, Level 2, 269 Wickham Street, Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Jon Adams
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Szubert M, Ziętara M, Suzin J. Conservative treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis: review of existing options. Gynecol Endocrinol 2018; 34:10-14. [PMID: 28952821 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1381837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometriosis with its estimated incidence rate of ∼7-10% of women of reproductive age is a disease with the wide spectrum of symptoms depending on form and localization of endometrial foci. One clinical form of endometriosis is deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), most difficult to manage and generating a lot of direct and indirect treatment costs. We search the literature from PubMed database to establish the role of conservative treatment of DIE. Randomised controlled trials are lacking but in experts opinion hormonal treatment should be the first-line treatment in DIE. After evaluation of pain or other symptoms, second-line therapy with GnRH analogs or danazol should be offered or minimally invasive surgery. Consensus is not made whether surgery is the best therapeutic treatment for affected patients. Strong depending on surgeon's experience conservative surgery should be offered if the total excision of DIE foci is possible, which is essential for a successful outcome. If available treatment options do not release pain associated with DIE, experimental treatment in clinical trials should be discussed with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Szubert
- a Clinic of Operative and Oncologic Gynecology, First Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , Medical University of Lodz, M. Pirogow's Teaching Hospital , Lodz , Poland
| | - Magdalena Ziętara
- b Students' Scientific Society at the First Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , Medical University of Lodz , Lodz , Poland
| | - Jacek Suzin
- a Clinic of Operative and Oncologic Gynecology, First Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , Medical University of Lodz, M. Pirogow's Teaching Hospital , Lodz , Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cheong Y, Bailey S, Forbes J. Randomized Controlled Trial of Hyalobarrier ® Versus No Hyalobarrier ® on the Ovulatory Status of Women with Periovarian Adhesions: A Pilot Study. Adv Ther 2017; 34:199-206. [PMID: 27900662 PMCID: PMC5216085 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0453-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Periadnexal adhesions are known to contribute to subfertility. The restoration of the tubo-ovarian anatomy is one the key principles in reproductive surgery, and this involves adhesiolysis. However, adhesion formation/reformation is very common after periovarian adhesiolysis. It is not known if the application of Hyalobarrier®, an anti-adhesion gel, around the adnexal region postsurgery influences ovulatory status. The study is a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) randomizing women into the application of Hyalobarrier® versus no Hyalobarrier® at the time of laparoscopy, where postsurgical ovulatory status and pregnancy rates were evaluated. Methods This was a pilot RCT where women were recruited from the gynecological and subfertility clinic who were deemed to require an operative laparoscopy. If intraoperatively they were found to have periovarian adhesions, they were randomized into having adhesiolysis with and without usage of Hyalobarrier®. Demographic details and intraoperative details including the severity, extent, and the ease of use of Hyalobarrier® were recorded. Prior to the surgery and postoperatively, the participants had their serum hormonal status (day 2 FSH, LH and day 21 progesterone) evaluated. Postoperatively, they underwent a follicular tracking cycle at 3 months. Results Fifteen women were randomized into use of Hyalobarrier® (study group) and 15 into the no Hyalobarrier® group (control group) between December 2011 and January 2014. There was no difference in the patient characteristics in terms of age, BMI, the number of previous pregnancies, or the extent, site, and severity of adhesions between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the study versus control groups in terms of the hormonal profile (day 2 FSH and day 21 progesterone) before or after surgery. The 3-month postoperative day 10–12 follicular tracking findings and endometrial thickness were similar between the study and control groups. Four women were pregnant in the study group (24%) and one in the control group (7%) cumulatively over 2 years. Conclusion The use of Hyalobarrier® post salpingo-ovariolysis did not influence follicular development as inferred from the results of the day 21 progesterone and folliculogram on day 10–12 3-month postsurgery. Trial Registration ISRCTN number, ISRCTN1833588. Funding Nordic Pharma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Cheong
- Southampton University Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Sarah Bailey
- Southampton University Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jane Forbes
- Southampton University Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|