1
|
Berger L, Grimm A, Sütterlin M, Spaich S, Sperk E, Tuschy B, Berlit S. Major complications after intraoperative radiotherapy with low-energy x-rays in early breast cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:276-286. [PMID: 37591980 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02128-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe and analyze major local complications after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy x‑rays during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in early breast cancer. METHODS Ten women out of 408 who were treated with IORT between 2002 and 2017 and subsequently developed a severe local complication requiring surgical intervention were retrospectively identified and analyzed. Demographic, clinical, and surgical parameters as well as complication characteristics and treatment methods were evaluated. RESULTS At initial presentation, eight patients (80%) showed redness, six (60%) seroma, six (60%) wound infection, six (60%) suture dehiscence, and four (40%) induration of the former surgical area. Hematoma and necrosis were observed in one case (10%) each. Time interval until appearance of the first symptoms ranged from directly postoperative until 15 years postoperatively (median 3.1 months). Initial treatment modalities comprised antibiotic therapy (n = 8/80%) and transcutaneous aspiration of seroma (n = 3/30%). In the majority of patients, smaller surgical interventions (excision of a necrotic area/fistula [n = 6/60%] or secondary suture [n = 5/50%]) were sufficient to overcome the complication, yet larger interventions such as complex flap surgery and mastectomy were necessary in one patient each. CONCLUSION IORT is an efficient and safe treatment method as < 2.5% of all IORT patients experienced major local complications. However, it seems to pose the risk of causing severe local complications that may require lengthy and burdensome treatment. Thorough preoperative counseling, implementation of recommended intraoperative precautions, and high vigilance for first symptoms of complications during follow-up appointments are necessary measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Berger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Anja Grimm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marc Sütterlin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Saskia Spaich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Elena Sperk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Benjamin Tuschy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sebastian Berlit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jambhekar A, Wong A, Taback B, Rao R, Horowitz D, Connolly E, Wiechmann L. Complication Rates After IntraOperative Radiation Therapy: Do Applicator Size and Distance to Skin Matter? J Surg Res 2021; 268:440-444. [PMID: 34416416 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has gained popularity for early stage breast cancer treatment. Few studies have examined the relationship between complications and both demographic and technical factors. The objective of the current study was to determine if applicator size or distances to the skin were significant risk factors for complications. METHODS Data was prospectively collected on patients who underwent lumpectomy followed by IORT from November 1, 2013 to August 31, 2018. Exclusion criteria included any prior radiation exposure or personal history of breast cancer. Comorbid conditions such as body mass index, diabetes, and smoking as well as technical specifications such as applicator size and distances to the skin were included for investigation. Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test, and odds ratios were utilized for statistical analysis. RESULTS The study was comprised of 219 patients. None developed Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or above complications. Of 21.0% (n = 46) had minor complications. The most common complication was a palpable breast seroma (n = 37). Diabetes was the only comorbid condition with increased risk for complications (OR 3.2; 95% CI1.3-7.5; P = 0.008). The applicator sizes and average skin distances were similar between groups. Surprisingly, the closest skin distance was not a significant risk factor for post-operative complications (1.4 +/- 1.6 versus 1.4 +/- 1.9 cm; P = 1.0). CONCLUSION Neither applicator size nor the closest skin distance were associated with increased complications. Traditionally described risk factors such as BMI and smoking were not predictive. This data provides support for potentially expanding the utilization for IORT without increasing complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amani Jambhekar
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Abby Wong
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Bret Taback
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Roshni Rao
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - David Horowitz
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Eileen Connolly
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Lisa Wiechmann
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tejera Hernández AA, Vega Benítez VM, Rocca Cardenas JC, Ortega Pérez N, Rodriguez Ibarria N, Díaz Chico JC, García-Granados Alayón JJ, Pérez Correa P, Hernández Hernández JR. Complications and local relapse after intraoperative low-voltage X-ray radiotherapy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res 2020; 98:299-306. [PMID: 32528909 PMCID: PMC7263891 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2020.98.6.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To study those factors that influence the occurrence of surgical complications and local relapse in patients intervened for breast cancer and receiving intraoperative radiotherapy. Methods Observational study on patients intervened for breast cancer with conservative surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy with low-voltage X-ray energy source (INTRABEAM), from 2015 to 2017 with 24 months minimum follow-up. Variables possibly associated to the occurrence of postoperative complications were analyzed with the Student t-test and the Fisher exact test; P < 0.05 considered significant. Subsequently, the construction of multiple multivariate analysis models began, thus building a logistic regression analysis using the IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 23 software. Local relapse was described. Results The study included 102 patients, mean age of 61.2 years; mean global size of tumor, 12.2 mm. Complications occurred in 29.4%. Fibrosis was the most frequently observed complication, followed by postoperative seroma. Using a 45 mm or larger applicator were significantly associated with the occurrence of complications. Tumor size 2 cm or larger and reintervention showed borderline significant association. Only one case of local relapse was observed. Conclusion Certain factors may increase the risk of complication after the use of intraoperative radiotherapy. Using external complementary radiotherapy does not seem to increase the rate of complications. Select patients and the involvement of a multidisciplinary team are essential for achieving good results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Alicia Tejera Hernández
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Víctor Manuel Vega Benítez
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | - Neith Ortega Pérez
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Nieves Rodriguez Ibarria
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | - Juan José García-Granados Alayón
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,Service of Radiophysics and Radiological Protection, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Pedro Pérez Correa
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Juan Ramón Hernández Hernández
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Efficacy and safety of two post-operative drains: results of a prospectively randomized clinical study in breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 300:1687-1692. [PMID: 31686184 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05360-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of two post-operative drains in breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery. METHODS This was a prospectively randomized comparative study of two drains investigated in breast cancer patients after breast conserving therapy. The Redon drain ends in a tip with 28 double perforations while the Quadrain drain features 4 flexible flaps of about 0.15 m length. The drains cost 0.28 € and 3.54 €, respectively. Primary target parameter was the duration of the drains staying in the surgical site. Secondary target parameters were pain post-surgery, seroma volume, final cosmetic result and surgical site infections. RESULTS A total of 88 patients were randomized, 47 and 41 received the Redon drain and the Quadrain drain, respectively. The mean duration of the drains staying in the surgical site was not different between the Redon and the Quadrain drain, 42.6 h (± 25.8 h) and 50.1 h (± 28.5 h), respectively (p = 0.1959). The post-operative pain score, seroma size, cosmetic result and surgical site infections were not different for both systems. CONCLUSION The Redon drain and the new Quadrain drain were not significantly different with respect to duration in the surgical site, post-operative pain, seroma volume and cosmetic result.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mi Y, Lv P, Wang F, Li L, Zhu M, Cao Q, Liu J, Dong M, Shi Y, Fan R. Efficacy, late complications, and cosmetic outcomes of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy in breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer: a single-centre study in China. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2019; 49:1120-1125. [PMID: 31665413 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyz128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, late complications, and cosmetic outcomes of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy for the treatment of Chinese patients with early-stage breast cancer.
Methods
Between September 2014 and May 2017, breast cancer patients undergoing targeted intraoperative radiotherapy at our facility were retrospectively recruited for this study. Intraoperative radiotherapy was performed with a 50-kV X-ray source in an Intrabeam system (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany). The one-time prescribed irradiation dose to the tumour bed was 20 Gy. Recurrence, death, late complications, and cosmetic outcomes were recorded. Late radiotoxicity was assessed based on the grading criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.
Results
A total of 77 patients who were treated with targeted intraoperative radiotherapy only were recruited. The cohort had a mean age of 58 years; patients with T1, N0, and invasive ductal carcinoma accounted for 75.3, 89.6, and 84.4%, respectively; the median follow-up duration was 40 months; there were 2 patients of recurrence and 2 patients of death. There were no patients of cardiac toxicity or skin or lung radiotoxicity of grade 2 or above. The main complications were breast oedema (18.2%), seroma (15.6%), chromatosis (9.1%), induration (7.8%), pain (5.2%), skin depression (2.6%), mild dry cough (2.6%), delayed wound healing (1.3%), and wound infection (1.3%). Seventy-three patients participated in the cosmetic outcome evaluation, which yielded an excellent or good rate of 95.9%.
Conclusions
Due to its low recurrence rates, lack of high-grade late radiotoxicity, and excellent cosmetic outcomes, targeted intraoperative radiotherapy may be a suitable treatment for select early-stage breast cancer patients in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Mi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Pengwei Lv
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Fang Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Mingzhi Zhu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qinchen Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Junqi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Meilian Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yonggang Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ruitai Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pez M, Keller A, Welzel G, Abo-Madyan Y, Ehmann M, Tuschy B, Berlit S, Sütterlin M, Wenz F, Giordano FA, Sperk E. Long-term outcome after intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost in breast cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 196:349-355. [PMID: 31641788 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01525-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate long-term oncological outcome and incidence of chronic side effects in patients with breast cancer and intraoperative radiotherapy given as an upfront boost (IORT boost). METHODS Retrospective analysis of 400 patients with an IORT boost with low-energy X‑rays (20 Gy), subsequent whole-breast irradiation (46-50 Gy), and annual oncological follow-up. Side effects were prospectively evaluated (LENT-SOMA scales) over a period of up to 15 years. Side effects scored ≥grade 2 at least three times during follow-up were judged to be chronic. RESULTS The median age was 63 years (30-85) and the median follow-up was 78 months (2-180) after IORT boost. In 15 patients a local recurrence occurred, resulting in a local recurrence rate at 5, 10, and 15 years of 2.0%, 6.6%, and 10.1%, respectively. The overall survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 92.1%, 81.8%, and 80.7%, respectively. The most common high-grade side effects were fibrosis (21%) and pain (8.6%). The majority of side effects occurred within the first 3 years. The actuarial rates of chronic fibrosis were 19.1% and 21.1% at 5 and ≥8 years, of chronic pain 8.6% at ≥4 years, of chronic edema of the breast 2.4% at ≥2 years, of chronic lymphedema 0.0% at 5 and 10 years, and of chronic hyperpigmentation 0.5% at ≥2 years. Side effects were similar or less than expected from an external beam boost. CONCLUSION IORT boost appears to be a highly efficient and safe method for upfront delivery of the tumor bed boost in high-risk breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Pez
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anke Keller
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Grit Welzel
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Yasser Abo-Madyan
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Ehmann
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Benjamin Tuschy
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sebastian Berlit
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marc Sütterlin
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frederik Wenz
- University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Elena Sperk
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
König L, Lang K, Heil J, Golatta M, Major G, Krug D, Hörner-Rieber J, Häfner MF, Koerber SA, Harrabi S, Bostel T, Debus J, Uhl M. Acute Toxicity and Early Oncological Outcomes After Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy (IOERT) as Boost Followed by Whole Breast Irradiation in 157 Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients-First Clinical Results From a Single Center. Front Oncol 2019; 9:384. [PMID: 31165041 PMCID: PMC6536702 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by postoperative whole breast irradiation (WBI) is the current standard of care for early stage breast cancer patients. Boost to the tumor bed is recommended for patients with a higher risk of local recurrence and may be applied with different techniques. Intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) offers several advantages compared to other techniques, like direct visualization of the tumor bed, better skin sparing, less inter- and intrafractional motion, but also radiobiological effects may be beneficial. Objective of this retrospective analysis of IOERT as boost in breast cancer patients was to assess acute toxicity and early oncological outcomes. Material and Methods: All patients, who have been irradiated between 11/2014 and 01/2018 with IOERT during BCS were analyzed. IOERT was applied using the mobile linear accelerator Mobetron with a total dose of 10 Gy, prescribed to the 90% isodose. After ensured woundhealing, WBI followed with normofractionated or hypofractionated regimens. Patient reports, including diagnostic examinations and toxicity were analyzed after surgery and 6-8 weeks after WBI. Overall survival, distant progression-free survival, in-breast and contralateral breast local progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Furthermore, recurrence patterns were assessed. Results: In total, 157 patients with a median age of 57 years were evaluated. Postoperative adverse events were mild with seroma and hematoma grade 1-2 in 26% and grade 3 in 0.6% of the patients. Wound infections grade 2-3 occurred in 2.2% and wound dehiscence grade 1-2 in 1.9% of the patients. Six to eight weeks after WBI radiotherapy-dependent acute dermatitis grade 1-2 was most common in 90.9% of the patients. Only 4.6% of the patients suffered from dermatitis grade 3. No grade 4 toxicities were documented after surgery or WBI. 2- and 3-year overall survival and distant progression-free survival, were 97.5 and 93.6, and 0.7 and 2.8%, respectively. In-breast recurrence and contralateral breast cancer rates after 3 years were 1.9 and 2.8%, respectively. Conclusion: IOERT boost during BCS is a safe treatment option with low acute toxicity. Short-term recurrence rates are comparable to previously published data and emphasize, that IOERT as boost is an effective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gerald Major
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F Häfner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Seroma in breast surgery: all the surgeons fault? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 298:951-959. [PMID: 30196358 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4880-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a trend for less radical surgical approaches in breast cancer due to better understanding of tumour biology and new treatment options such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT), seroma production remains one of the main surgical side effects that can result in prolonged recovery, delay of radiotherapy and patient discomfort. The aim of this study is to provide an update on risk factors for seroma production after breast cancer surgery considering the latest treatment options. METHODS A retrospective analysis of seroma production in primary breast cancer patients treated between 01.01.2010 and 31.12.2014 at the Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital Ulm, was performed. Patients with previous breast/axillary surgery or more than one intervention were excluded. Seroma formation was measured using wound drains placed in breast and axilla. RESULTS In total, 581 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age at diagnosis was 60 years, and median BMI 25.6 kg/m2. 60 (10.3%) patients had a mastectomy, 175 (30.1%) patients received IORT, and 72 (12.4%) patients received NAC. Median amount of seroma production was 82.5 ml (range 0-3012.5 ml). Multivariate analysis revealed that most of the observed variation in seroma production was due to type of surgery (mastectomy vs. breast conserving), length of surgery and number of removed lymph nodes. Both NAC and IORT explained a significant but very small amount of the observed variation in seroma production. CONCLUSION The most important factors for seroma production are extent and duration of breast surgery.
Collapse
|