1
|
Heesakkers JPFA, Toozs-Hobson P, Sutherland SE, Digesu A, Amundsen CL, McCrery RJ, De Wachter S, Kean ER, Martens F, Benson K, Ferrante KL, Cline KJ, Padron OF, Giusto L, Lane FL, Dmochowski RR. A prospective study to assess the effectiveness and safety of the BlueWind System in the treatment of patients diagnosed with urgency urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2024. [PMID: 38634481 DOI: 10.1002/nau.25477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overactive bladder (OAB) affects one in six adults in Europe and the United States and impairs the quality of life of millions of individuals worldwide. When conservative management fails, third-line treatments including tibial neuromodulation (TNM) is often pursued. TNM has traditionally been accomplished percutaneously in clinic. OBJECTIVE A minimally invasive implantable device activated by a battery-operated external wearable unit has been developed for the treatment of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), mitigating the burden of frequent clinic visits and more invasive therapies that are currently commercially available. METHODS A prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, pivotal study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the device in adult females with UUI (i.e., wet OAB) (BlueWind Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation [iTNM] system; IDE number #G200013; NCT03596671). Results with the device were previously published under the name RENOVA iStim, which has been since renamed as the Revi™ System. Approximately 1-month post-implantation of the device, participants delivered therapy at their convenience and completed a 7-day voiding diary before visits 6- and 12-months post-treatment initiation. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were the proportion of responders to therapy ( ≥ 50% improvement on average number of urgency-related incontinence episodes) and incidence of adverse events from implantation to 12-month post-activation. RESULTS A total of 151 participants, mean age 58.8 (SD: 12.5), were implanted; 144 and 140 completed the 6- and 12-month visits, respectively. The participants demonstrated mean baseline of 4.8 UUI/day (SD 2.9) and 10 voids/day (SD 3.3). Six and 12-months post-activation, 76.4% and 78.4% of participants, respectively, were responders to therapy in an intent-to-treat analysis. Of the 139 participants with completed 12-month diaries, 82% were responders, 50% were classified as "dry" (on at least 3 consecutive diary days), and 93.5% of participants reported that their symptoms improved. No implanted participant experienced an SAE related to the procedure or device. CONCLUSIONS iTNM, delivered and powered by a patient-controlled external wearable communicating with an implant, demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in UUI symptoms and a high safety profile. This therapy highlights the value of patient-centric therapy for the treatment of UUI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Suzette E Sutherland
- Department of Urology, UW Medicine Pelvic Health Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Alex Digesu
- St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Cindy L Amundsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Stefan De Wachter
- Department of Urology, ASTARC Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Emily R Kean
- Adult Pediatric Urology & Urogynecology, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Frank Martens
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin Benson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, FPMRS Division, Sanford Health, University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
| | | | - Kevin J Cline
- Louisiana State University Medical Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | | | - Laura Giusto
- Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Felicia L Lane
- Urogynecology and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li T, Wei Z, Jin F, Yuan Y, Zheng W, Qian L, Wang H, Hua L, Ma J, Zhang H, Gu H, Irwin MG, Wang T, Wang S, Wang Z, Feng ZQ. Soft ferroelectret ultrasound receiver for targeted peripheral neuromodulation. Nat Commun 2023; 14:8386. [PMID: 38104122 PMCID: PMC10725454 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44065-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Bioelectronic medicine is a rapidly growing field where targeted electrical signals can act as an adjunct or alternative to drugs to treat neurological disorders and diseases via stimulating the peripheral nervous system on demand. However, current existing strategies are limited by external battery requirements, and the injury and inflammation caused by the mechanical mismatch between rigid electrodes and soft nerves. Here we report a wireless, leadless, and battery-free ferroelectret implant, termed NeuroRing, that wraps around the target peripheral nerve and demonstrates high mechanical conformability to dynamic motion nerve tissue. As-fabricated NeuroRing can act as an ultrasound receiver that converts ultrasound vibrations into electrostimulation pulses, thus stimulating the targeted peripheral nerve on demand. This capability is demonstrated by the precise modulation of the sacral splanchnic nerve to treat colitis, providing a framework for future bioelectronic medicines that offer an alternative to non-specific pharmacological approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tong Li
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China
- Research Center for Nature-inspired Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China
| | - Zhidong Wei
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China
| | - Fei Jin
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China
| | - Yongjiu Yuan
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China
| | - Weiying Zheng
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China
| | - Lili Qian
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China
| | - Hongbo Wang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China
| | - Lisha Hua
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China
| | - Juan Ma
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China
| | - Huanhuan Zhang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China
| | - Huaduo Gu
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China
| | - Michael G Irwin
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China
| | - Ting Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.
| | - Steven Wang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China.
- Research Center for Nature-inspired Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China.
| | - Zuankai Wang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, 999077, China.
| | - Zhang-Qi Feng
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Holmes-Martin K, Zhu M, Xiao S, Arab Hassani F. Advances in Assistive Electronic Device Solutions for Urology. MICROMACHINES 2022; 13:mi13040551. [PMID: 35457855 PMCID: PMC9028141 DOI: 10.3390/mi13040551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Recent technology advances have led urology to become one of the leading specialities to utilise novel electronic systems to manage urological ailments. Contemporary bladder management strategies such as urinary catheters can provide a solution but leave the user mentally and physically debilitated. The unique properties of modern electronic devices, i.e., flexibility, stretchability, and biocompatibility, have allowed a plethora of new technologies to emerge. Many novel electronic device solutions in urology have been developed for treating impaired bladder disorders. These disorders include overactive bladder (OAB), underactive bladder (UAB) and other-urinary-affecting disorders (OUAD). This paper reviews common causes and conservative treatment strategies for OAB, UAB and OUAD, discussing the challenges and drawbacks of such treatments. Subsequently, this paper gives insight into clinically approved and research-based electronic advances in urology. Advances in this area cover bladder-stimulation and -monitoring devices, robot-assistive surgery, and bladder and sphincter prosthesis. This study aims to introduce the latest advances in electronic solutions for urology, comparing their advantages and disadvantages, and concluding with open problems for future urological device solutions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Alghafees M, Ghazwani Y, Alqahtani M, Aldarrab R. Trends and Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation: A Saudi Tertiary Care Center Experience. JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.4274/jus.galenos.2021.2021.0068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
|
5
|
Dudding TC, Lehur PA, Sørensen M, Engelberg S, Bertapelle MP, Chartier-Kastler E, Everaert K, Van Kerrebroeck P, Knowles CH, Lundby L, Matzel KE, Muñoz-Duyos A, Rydningen MB, de Wachter S. Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Neuromodulation 2021; 24:1247-1257. [PMID: 34264542 PMCID: PMC9291141 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Objectives In some patients treated for urinary or fecal incontinence with sacral neuromodulation (SNM) persistence of symptoms, a reduction in efficacy or adverse effects of stimulation can occur. In such situations, further programming of the SNM device can help resolve problems. Infrequently hardware failure is detected. This article aims to provide practical guidance to solve sub‐optimal outcomes (troubleshooting) occurring in the course of SNM therapy. Materials and Methods A systematic literature review was performed. Collective clinical experience from an expert multidisciplinary group was used to form opinion where evidence was lacking. Results Circumstances in which reprogramming is required are described. Actions to undertake include changes of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency, and pulse width. Guidance in case of loss of efficacy and adverse effects of stimulation, developed by a group of European experts, is presented. In addition, various hardware failure scenarios and their management are described. Conclusions Reprogramming aims to further improve patient symptoms or ensure a comfortable delivery of the therapy. Initial changes of electrode configuration and adjustment of stimulation parameters can be performed at home to avoid unnecessary hospital visits. A logical and stepwise approach to reprogramming can improve the outcome of therapy and restore patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas C Dudding
- Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul A Lehur
- Coloproctology Unit, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Michael Sørensen
- Department of Surgical and Medical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | | | - Maria Paola Bertapelle
- Neurourology Maria Adelaide Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Karel Everaert
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philip Van Kerrebroeck
- Pelvic Care Centre Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Charles H Knowles
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London & Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Lilli Lundby
- Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Klaus E Matzel
- Chirurgische Klinik, Sektion Koloproktologie, Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos
- Coloproctology Unit, Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain
| | - Mona B Rydningen
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Incontinence and Pelvic Floor Health, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Stefan de Wachter
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital Antwerpen, University Antwerpen, Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Agnello M, Vottero M, Bertapelle P. Removal of sacral neuromodulation quadripolar tined-lead using a straight stylet: description of a surgical technique. Tech Coloproctol 2021; 25:957-963. [PMID: 33886009 PMCID: PMC8289802 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02403-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Up to 7.5% of tined-lead removals in patients having sacral neuromodulation (SNM) therapy are associated with a lead breakage. It is still unclear what adverse effects can be caused by unretrieved fragments. The aim of our study was to describe the lead removal technique we have been using for the last 2 years in our centre. Methods We retrospectively enrolled patients who had lead removal between January 2018 and January 2020 using our standardized technique. The novelty of the technique is in the use of the straight stylet, which is available in the quadripolar tined-lead kit. The stylet gives the electrode greater stiffness, reducing interactions with surrounding tissues and probability of damage or breakage during removal. Results In 59 patients (42 women, mean age 57.2 years [range 40–79 years]) the lead was removed using our standardized technique. In 44 of 59 patients, the tined-lead was removed within 2 months from the SNM-test, due to lack of beneficial effects. In 15 patients the electrode was removed because of failure of definitive implantation. Meantime from definitive implantable pulse generator (IPG) implantation to lead removal was 67.9 months. We recorded only 1 case of lead-breakage during removal: a female patient with a non-tined lead fixed on sacral bone, placed 18 years previously using an open technique. Conclusions Lead breakage during removal is not uncommon and adverse effects of retained fragments may occur. Our technique has been safely used for the last 2 years in our centre, with no episodes of lead breakage or retained fragments, except for one non-tined electrode. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10151-020-02403-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Agnello
- Scuola di Medicina, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, SC Neuro-Urologia, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
| | - M Vottero
- SC Neuro-Urologia, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - P Bertapelle
- SC Neuro-Urologia, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oelke M, Addali M, Reisenauer C. What uro-gynecologists should know about sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 299:1243-1252. [PMID: 30941558 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05127-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To inform uro-gynecologists about the current standards and latest developments of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in women with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS Literature search in the PubMed database for articles published between 1988 and 2019 on SNM for OAB in women. RESULTS In total, 361 articles were identified and 51 articles retrieved for the review. SNM shows an objective success rate of 70-80%, OAB cure rate of 17-47% and a subjective satisfaction rate of 80-90%. These benefits have to be weighed against an adverse event rate of approx. 40%. SNM is significantly more successful than switching to another antimuscarinic after failed antimuscarinic drug therapy. Efficacy of SNM is slightly lower compared to bladder wall injections with 200 U botulinum toxin in the first months but efficacy of both treatments appears to be similar after 24 months. MRI examinations of patients with a sacral neurostimulator should only be performed after radiologist consultation. Sacral neurostimulators in patients with another pacemaker system should only be implanted after interdisciplinary consultation. The sacral neuromodulator should be turned off during pregnancy and delivery. SNM for OAB in patients with concomitant female sexual dysfunction or fecal incontinence seems to be beneficial. CONCLUSIONS SNM is a successful and recommended second-line treatment of OAB. Sacral neurostimulators should preferably be implanted in SNM-centers because complications and the frequency of revisions are significantly reduced with increasing experience of the surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Oelke
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Möllenweg 22, 48599, Gronau, Germany.
| | - Mustapha Addali
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Möllenweg 22, 48599, Gronau, Germany
| | - Christl Reisenauer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Mickle AD, Won SM, Noh KN, Yoon J, Meacham KW, Xue Y, McIlvried LA, Copits BA, Samineni VK, Crawford KE, Kim DH, Srivastava P, Kim BH, Min S, Shiuan Y, Yun Y, Payne MA, Zhang J, Jang H, Li Y, Lai HH, Huang Y, Park SI, Gereau RW, Rogers JA. A wireless closed-loop system for optogenetic peripheral neuromodulation. Nature 2019; 565:361-365. [PMID: 30602791 PMCID: PMC6336505 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0823-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 236] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The fast-growing field of bioelectronic medicine aims to develop engineered systems that relieve clinical conditions through stimulation of the peripheral nervous system (PNS)1–5. Technologies of this type rely largely on electrical stimulation to provide neuromodulation of organ function or pain. One example is sacral nerve stimulation to treat overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome4,6,7. Conventional, continuous stimulation protocols, however, cause discomfort and pain, particularly when treating symptoms that can be intermittent in nature (e.g. sudden urinary urgency)8. Direct physical coupling of electrodes to the nerve can lead to injury and inflammation9–11. Furthermore, typical therapeutic stimulators target large nerve bundles that innervate multiple structures, resulting in a lack of organ specificity. This paper introduces a miniaturized bio-optoelectronic implant that avoids these limitations, via the use of (1) an optical stimulation interface that exploits microscale inorganic light emitting diodes (μ-ILEDs) to activate opsins, (2) a soft, precision biophysical sensor system that allows continuous measurements of organ function, and (3) a control module and data analytics approach that allows coordinated, closed-loop operation of the system to eliminate pathological behaviors as they occur in real-time. In an example reported here, a soft strain gauge yields real-time information on bladder function. Data analytics algorithms identify pathological behavior, and automated, closed-loop optogenetic neuromodulation of bladder sensory afferents normalize bladder function in the context of acute cystitis. This all-optical scheme for neuromodulation offers chronic stability and the potential for cell-type-specific stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron D Mickle
- Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.,Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sang Min Won
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Kyung Nim Noh
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Jangyeol Yoon
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Kathleen W Meacham
- Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.,Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Yeguang Xue
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.,Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.,Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Lisa A McIlvried
- Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.,Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Bryan A Copits
- Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.,Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Vijay K Samineni
- Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.,Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kaitlyn E Crawford
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Do Hoon Kim
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Paulome Srivastava
- Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.,Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Bong Hoon Kim
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.,Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.,Simpson Querrey Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Center for Bio-integrated Electronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Seunghwan Min
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Young Shiuan
- Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.,Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Yeojeong Yun
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Maria A Payne
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.,Washington University Department of Surgery - Division of Urologic Surgery, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jianpeng Zhang
- Institute of Solid Mechanics, Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing, China
| | - Hokyung Jang
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Yuhang Li
- Institute of Solid Mechanics, Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing, China
| | - H Henry Lai
- Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.,Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.,Washington University Department of Surgery - Division of Urologic Surgery, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Yonggang Huang
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.,Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.,Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Sung-Il Park
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Robert W Gereau
- Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA. .,Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
| | - John A Rogers
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. .,Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. .,Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. .,Simpson Querrey Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. .,Center for Bio-integrated Electronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. .,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. .,Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. .,Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Response to the Letter to the Editor by Arndt van Ophoven. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296:131-132. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4395-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
11
|
Re: Management of device-related complications after sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract disorders in women: a single center experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296:129-130. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4393-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|