Diagnosis and management of heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer: clinical analysis of 55 cases from a single institution

Study on diagnosis and management strategies on heterotopic pregnancy: a retrospective study

Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is a rare but potentially life-threatening event with a high risk of maternal death, which also jeopardise the coexisting intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), thus an early accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment can decrease adverse complications. We aimed to explore the early predictors for pregnancy outcomes of HP. We reviewed patients with HP following assisted reproductive technology in our institution between January 2013 and December 2020. The relationships between pregnancy outcomes and clinical features were analysed by logistic regression. We found that 29 patients (72.5%) of HP were accurately diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS). Eighteen patients in the surgery group had live births, three of whom delivered preterm. Additionally, the miscarriage rate was lower for patients with IUP cardiac activity than those without (16.7% vs. 90.0%, p < .001). Further by logistic regression analysis, an IUP with cardiac activity at HP diagnosis was identified as favourable independent predictor of live birth (p < .001). Therefore, early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention are recommended to prevent the development of HP.Impact of statementWhat is already known on this subject? Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) has long been thought to be a rare but potentially life-threatening event with a high risk of complications. The early diagnosis of HP is challenging due to the co-existence of a viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and the absence of typical clinical symptoms.What do the results of this study add? This stduy showed that symptoms combined with routine transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) scans reduce the rates of misdiagnosis of HP and prompt surgical intervention after diagnosis may minimise the incidence of miscarriage of the IUP.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? An IUP with cardiac activity at HP diagnosis is a predictor of a favourable prognosis of HP, and laparoscopy under general anaesthesia is effective and safe during the first trimester of pregnancy. Awareness, assessment and early interventions in view of symptoms combined with routine TVS is recommended to reduce the risk of miscarriage and ensure a favourable live birth rate.

Treatment effects of laparoscopy versus laparotomy on heterotopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the treatment effects of laparoscopy versus laparotomy on heterotopic pregnancy (HP) after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

METHODS

The retrospective case-control study enrolled 109 patients diagnosed with HP after IVF-ET treatment in our hospital from January 2009 to March 2020. All patients received surgical treatment by either laparoscopy or laparotomy. Data for general characteristics, diagnostic features, surgical parameters, as well as perinatal and neonatal outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients received laparoscopy and 47 received laparotomy. Significantly lower percentage of large hemoperitoneum (P = 0.001), shorter surgery duration (P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.001), higher rates of general anesthesia (P < 0.001), and lower cesarean section rates for singletons (P = 0.003) were found in the laparoscopy group. The perinatal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups. When interstitial pregnancy was considered alone, the surgical blood loss was significantly reduced in the laparoscopy group (P = 0.021), but there was no significant difference in hemoperitoneum, surgery duration, or perinatal and neonatal outcomes in singletons.

CONCLUSION

Both laparoscopy and laparotomy are effective surgical treatments for HP after IVF-ET. Laparoscopy is minimally invasive but laparotomy can be an alternative in emergency situations.

Quadruplet Heterotopic Pregnancy Following In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer with Laparotomic Removal of Ruptured Twin Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Case Report

Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is a rare occurrence in natural pregnancies. However, it can be a life-threatening condition and should be taken into account in all assisted reproductive treatments. Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy are challenging issues in patients with HP. Here, we report a rare case of quadruplet HP following an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with a viable twin intrauterine pregnancy and ruptured live twin left tubal ectopic pregnancy. A 35-year-old woman (gravida 5, para 1, ectopic pregnancies 2, and abortion 1) was presented to the Emergency Department of Arash Women's Hospital (Tehran, Iran) in March 2021 with abdominal pain. The patient was at six weeks and five days of pregnancy following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) revealed a live twin intrauterine pregnancy with a ruptured live twin left tubal ectopic pregnancy. The latter was removed via laparotomy to preserve the intrauterine pregnancy. The patient subsequently delivered a female infant at 38 weeks of pregnancy.

Comparison of laparoscopic and open approach in the treatment of heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer

PURPOSE

Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is a rare disease with the coexistence of an intrauterine and ectopic embryos. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of HP at present. This research aimed to compare the perioperative and pregnancy outcomes of laparoscopic (LA) and open approach (OA) in patients with HP after embryo transfer.

METHODS

Women with HP receiving surgical treatment (LA or OA) were retrospectively recruited in this study between October 2006 and December 2020. The demographic, perioperative and obstetric data were collected and compared between LA and OA group.

RESULTS

Totally, 86 patients were included in this study. Among these patients, 62 underwent LA and 24 underwent OA. There was an increase in the adoption of LA between the 2006-2012 period and the 2013-2020 period [25% (6/24) vs. 90% (56/62), p < 0.001]. Compared with OA, patients treated by LA had much less blood loss [20 (10-50) vs. 30 (20-50) ml, p = 0.036] and fewer days of hospital stay [5.0 (4.0-7.3) vs. 9.5 (7-15.3) days, p < 0.001], but a relatively higher cost (15,580 ± 3196¥ vs. 11,717 ± 3820¥, p < 0.001). During the laparoscopic procedure, no one needed to be converted to open surgery. However, the rates of first trimester miscarriage, preterm, cesarean section, birth weight, 1- and 5-min Apgar were similar between LA and OA group (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with open approach, laparoscopy was shown to provide a comparable pregnancy outcomes and a better performance on perioperative outcomes in the treatment of HP patients with embryo transfer.

Should expectant management of heterotopic pregnancy be considered?

KEY MESSAGE

Both expectant and interventional managements are acceptable in selected cases, when heterotopic pregnancy is diagnosed, with high ongoing intra-uterine pregnancy rate and term deliveries.

PURPOSE

Heterotopic pregnancy, though relatively rare, is potentially a life-threatening condition. The aim of the study is to compare expectant versus interventional management of heterotopic pregnancies.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study including all women diagnosed with heterotopic pregnancy on ultrasound from March 2011 to December 2020 in a single medical center. Expectant and interventional management outcomes were compared. Primary outcome was defined as live birth.

RESULTS

Forty-one women were diagnosed with heterotopic pregnancy during the study period. Management was expectant in 10 (24.4%) and interventional in 31 (75.6%) of the women. Expectant management was considered when the patient was stable, and the attending physician decided that the ectopic pregnancy did not continue to develop. Interventions included laparoscopic salpingectomy (n = 26), laparoscopic cornual resection (n = 2), laparotomic cornual resection (n = 1) and gestational sac aspiration (n = 2). The intra-uterine pregnancy continued to develop in 6 (60.0%) and 22 (81.5%) of the women in the expectant and interventional groups, respectively (p = 0.52). All women managed expectantly reached term delivery, as opposed to 17/22 (77.3%) in the intervention management group (p = 0.60). Multivariate analysis found serum β-hCG level as the only independent parameter associated with ongoing pregnancy rate (B = 0.001, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Both expectant and interventional management were found to be acceptable when heterotopic pregnancy was diagnosed, with high ongoing intra-uterine pregnancy rate and term deliveries.

Intramural pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Intramural pregnancy is a rare type of ectopic pregnancy, which is diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Management strategies vary depending on the site of the pregnancy, the gestational age and the desire to maintain fertility. The incidence of intramural pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology is higher than that in natural pregnancy.

CASE SUMMARY

We present a case of intramural pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and elective single embryo transfer following salpingectomy. The patient was completely asymptomatic and her serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin level increased from 290 mIU/mL to 1759 mIU/mL. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound indicated a heterogeneous echogenic mass arising from the uterine fundus which was surrounded by myometrium and a slender and extremely hypoechoic area stretching to the uterine cavity which was thought to be a fistulous tract. Therefore, we considered a diagnosis of intramural pregnancy and laparoscopic surgery was conducted at 7 wk gestation.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and treatment of intramural pregnancy is significant for maintaining fertility.

Intramural pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Intramural pregnancy is a rare type of ectopic pregnancy, which is diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Management strategies vary depending on the site of the pregnancy, the gestational age and the desire to maintain fertility. The incidence of intramural pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology is higher than that in natural pregnancy.

CASE SUMMARY

We present a case of intramural pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and elective single embryo transfer following salpingectomy. The patient was completely asymptomatic and her serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin level increased from 290 mIU/mL to 1759 mIU/mL. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound indicated a heterogeneous echogenic mass arising from the uterine fundus which was surrounded by myometrium and a slender and extremely hypoechoic area stretching to the uterine cavity which was thought to be a fistulous tract. Therefore, we considered a diagnosis of intramural pregnancy and laparoscopic surgery was conducted at 7 wk gestation.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and treatment of intramural pregnancy is significant for maintaining fertility.

The risk of miscarriage following surgical treatment of heterotopic extrauterine pregnancies

STUDY QUESTION

What is the risk of loss of a live normally sited (eutopic) pregnancy following surgical treatment of the concomitant extrauterine ectopic pregnancy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

In women diagnosed with heterotopic pregnancies, minimally invasive surgery to treat the extrauterine ectopic pregnancy does not increase the risk of miscarriage of the concomitant live eutopic pregnancy.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Previous studies have indicated that surgical treatment of the concomitant ectopic pregnancy in women with live eutopic pregnancies could be associated with an increased risk of miscarriage. The findings of our study did not confirm that.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective observational case–control study of 52 women diagnosed with live eutopic and concomitant extrauterine pregnancies matched to 156 women with live normally sited singleton pregnancies. The study was carried out in three London early pregnancy units (EPUs) covering a 20-year period between April 2000 and November 2019.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All women attended EPUs because of suspected early pregnancy complications. The diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy was made on ultrasound scan and women were subsequently offered surgical or expectant management.

There were three controls per each case who were randomly selected from our clinical database and were matched for maternal age, mode of conception and gestational age at presentation.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In the study group 49/52 (94%) women had surgery and 3/52 (6%) were managed expectantly. There were 9/52 (17%, 95% CI 8.2–30.3) miscarriages <12 weeks’ gestation and 9/49 (18%, 95% CI 8.7–32) miscarriages in those treated surgically. In the control group, there were 28/156 (18%, 95% CI 12.2–24.8) miscarriages <12 weeks’ gestation, which was not significantly different from heterotopic pregnancies who were treated surgically [odds ratio (OR) 1.03 95% CI 0.44–2.36]. There was a further second trimester miscarriage in the study group and one in the control group. The live birth rate in the study group was 41/51 (80%, 95% CI 66.9–90.2) and 38/48 (79%, 95% CI 65–89.5) for those who were treated surgically. These results were similar to 127/156 (81%, 95% CI 74.4–87.2) live births in the control group (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.39–1.94).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study is retrospective, and the number of patients is relatively small, which reflects the rarity of heterotopic pregnancies. Heterotopic pregnancies without a known outcome were excluded from analysis.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study demonstrates that in women diagnosed with heterotopic pregnancies, minimally invasive surgery to treat the extrauterine pregnancy does not increase the risk of miscarriage of the concomitant live eutopic pregnancy. This finding will be helpful to women and their clinicians when discussing the options for treating heterotopic pregnancies.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work did not receive any funding. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Research Registry: researchregistry6430.

Management of 14 patients with cornual heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer: experience from the past decade

OBJECTIVE

There are two major management approach for cornual heterotopic pregnancy, transvaginal cornual embryo reduction with ultrasound guidance, or laparoscopic cornual resection. This no consensus on the optimal management for cornual heterotopic pregnancy. Here, we are trying to determine the optimal management approach for patients with viable cornual heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at the locally largest reproductive center of a tertiary hospital. A total of 14 women diagnosed as viable cornual heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer. Six patients were treated with cornual pregnancy reduction under transvaginal ultrasound guidance without the use of feticide drug (treatment 1), and eight patients were treated with laparoscopic cornual pregnancy resection (treatment 2).

RESULTS

All 14 patients of cornual heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer due to fallopian tubal factor, among which, 12 patients had cornual pregnancy occurred in the ipsilateral uterine horn of tubal pathological conditions. Nine (64.29%) showed a history of ectopic pregnancy. Thirteen (92.86%) patients were transferred with two embryos and only one patient had single embryo transferred. Six patients received treatment 1, and 2 (33.33%) had uterine horn rupture and massive bleeding which required emergency laparoscopic surgery for homostasis. No cornual rupture occurred among patients received treatment 2. Each treatment group had one case of spontaneous miscarriage. The remaining 5 cases in treatment 1 group and the remaining 7 cases in treatment 2 group delivered healthy live offspring.

CONCLUSION

Patients with tubal factors attempting for embryo transfer, especially those aiming for multiple embryos transfer, should be informed with risk of cornual heterotopic pregnancy and the subsequent cornual rupture. Compared with cornual pregnancy reduction under transvaginal ultrasound guidance, laparoscopic cornual resection might be a favorable approach for patients with viable cornual heterotopic pregnancy.

Vaginal Delivery at Term in a Woman with a Spontaneous Heterotopic Pregnancy Treated with Laparoscopic Salpingectomy

Background. The coexistence of an intrauterine pregnancy and an ectopic pregnancy (heterotopic pregnancy) is an extremely rare, yet major, complication during pregnancy. The early diagnosis of a heterotopic pregnancy is of great importance for fetal viability, maternal safety, and the progression of an uncomplicated intrauterine pregnancy. Case Presentation. We report a case of a naturally conceived heterotopic tubal pregnancy in a 37-year-old primigravida. The patient presented with continuous, dull, lower abdominal pain and a positive urine pregnancy test which was conducted a week prior to the start of the pain. The patient was hospitalized, and based on the clinical image and after strict monitoring, she was diagnosed with a heterotopic pregnancy. She was treated with laparoscopic salpingectomy after the rupture of the ectopic pregnancy while the desired intrauterine gestation continued without any complications. The pregnancy resulted in the birth of a healthy infant through vaginal delivery. Discussion. Strict monitoring with multiple sonographic evaluations should always be conducted in women with abnormal serum beta-hCG, adnexal abnormalities, or clinical symptoms, while heterotopic pregnancy should be in differential diagnosis and treatment should not be delayed since emerge management is important for the progression of the intrauterine pregnancy.

Treatment of tubal heterotopic pregnancy with viable intrauterine pregnancy: Analysis of 81 cases from one tertiary care center

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to analyze the treatment and pregnancy outcome of tubal heterotopic pregnancy (HP) patients with a viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) in our center.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis of 81 patients with tubal HP and a viable IUP. Patients were divided into either an expectant treatment group (29 patients) or a surgical treatment group (52 patients, 36 laparoscopy and 16 laparotomy). Data related to the basal clinical characteristic of all patients, rescue treatment and ectopic pregnancy (EP) rupture rate in the expectant treatment group, operation details in the surgical treatment group and pregnancy outcomes were collected and analyzed. Subgroup analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

In the expectant treatment group, the abortion rate, EP rupture rate and rescue treatment rate were 10.34 % (3/29), 21.14 % (7/29) and 34.48 % (10/29), respectively; subgroup analysis revealed that the rescue treatment rate in patients with EP mass enlargement ≥50 % was 71.43 % (5/7), which was significantly higher than that in patients with EP mass enlargement <50 % (15.00 %, 3/20), with P = 0.011. In the surgical treatment group, the abortion rate of all patients was 15.38 % (8/52); the abortion rate was 22.22 % (8/36) in the laparoscopy subgroup, which was significantly higher than that in the laparotomy subgroup (0.00 %, 0/16), with P = 0.038.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment is a safe treatment option for tubal HP with a viable IUP, and laparoscopic surgery may be a potential risk factor for abortion. A high risk of failure exists for expectant management of tubal HP with a viable IUP, and EP mass enlargement ≥50 % may be a potential predictor of rescue treatment.

Early intervention for heterotopic caesarean scar pregnancy to preserve intrauterine pregnancy may improve outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the best intervention time and method for patients who are diagnosed with heterotopic caesarean scar pregnancy (HCSP) wishing to preserve intrauterine pregnancy.

DESIGN

Four patients diagnosed with HCSP from January 2014 to May 2019 were enrolled. Because HCSP is rare, data on 27 published cases were extracted to augment the analysis. Clinical characteristics and medical documents related to fetal reduction and subsequent maternal-neonate outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

The intervention time was significantly earlier in the full-term birth group (6.76 ± 1.05 weeks) compared with pre-term birth group (8.02 ± 1.55 weeks; P = 0.042). The cumulative full-term delivery rate was 91.48% when the intervention was at 6 weeks' gestation and decreased to 42.02% at 8 weeks. The maternal-neonate outcome was similar among the selective fetal reduction and surgical removal groups as was delivery time (34.68 ± 3.12 versus 34.80 ± 6.64 weeks; P = 0.955). In the four cases undergoing selective fetal reduction, the residual mass grew by 1.16-7.07 times compared with the area before reduction. The maximum size of the residual mass was observed at 12-13 weeks and 22-25 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with HCSP who choose to keep intrauterine pregnancy will be able to carry the fetus to term. Selective fetal reduction would be the first intervention of choice and should take place immediately after diagnosis. The residual mass after reduction could continue to grow throughout the whole pregnancy, although this should not be considered as an indication for termination. With good supervision and careful management, the pregnancy could be maintained and carried to term.

Transvaginal Reduction of a Heterotopic Cornual Pregnancy with Conservation of Intrauterine Pregnancy

Here we report a case of heterotopic cornual pregnancy after in vitro fertilization who was diagnosed at 6 weeks after frozen embryos transfer. The heterotopic pregnancy was successfully terminated by transvaginal ultrasound-guided selective fetal reduction. At 38+1 weeks, she underwent a cesarean section and delivered a healthy 3300 g male infant with Apgar score of 10-10' evaluated at 1 min and 5 min.

Two cases of intrauterine pregnancy with tubal stump pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer following ipsilateral salpingectomy: A case report

RATIONALE

The recently increased rate of heterotopic pregnancies (HPs) has been largely attributed to the increased use of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs). HP is a rare and potentially life-threatening condition. It is unusual in natural conception cycles, occurring in 1:10,000 to 1:50,000 pregnancies. However, with the increased use of ART such as in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET), the incidence has risen to 0.5-1%.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Case 1 was a 28-year-old woman who presented to our center complaining of a sudden onset of right-side lower abdominal pain with a small amount of vaginal bleeding. She had undergone IVF-ET and received a thawed embryo transfer with two embryos 23 days previously. She had a history of right salpingectomy for an ectopic pregnancy during the downregulation of her ovulatory cycle 1 year ago. Case 2 was a 25-year-old woman who presented to our center complaining of a sudden onset of right-side lower abdominal pain. She had also undergone thawed embryo transfer following IVF-ET with two embryos 35 days previously. She had a history of right salpingectomy for an ectopic pregnancy 1.5 years previously.

DIAGNOSES

Both patients were diagnosed as having a heterotopic pregnancy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patient 1 underwent emergency laparoscopy; patient 2 underwent emergency laparotomy and both were treated medically to prevent abortion of the intrauterine pregnancies.

OUTCOMES

Patient 1 had an incomplete abortion and underwent uterine curettage on the day 10 after the operation. Patient 2 experienced no further complications during pregnancy and a healthy baby girl was born at the 38th gestational week.

LESSONS

Reproductive physicians need to pay more attention to patients who have received more than one embryo at transfer, especially those with a history of salpingectomy.

The Management of Heterotopic Pregnancy with Transvaginal Ultrasound-Guided Local Injection of Absolute Ethanol

Aims:

The aim of the study is to present five cases of heterotopic pregnancy (HP) patients who received transvaginal ultrasound-guided local injection of absolute ethanol (AE).

Settings and Design:

This was a case series and literature review in Reproductive Medicine Center of the 105^th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army.

Materials and Methods:

Five primary infertile women who underwent assisted reproductive technology were diagnosed with HP and treated with local injection of AE (1.0–2.5 ml) under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. The size of intrauterine (IU) and ectopic sacs and the level of serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin as well as pregnancy outcomes were monitored after treatment.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Not applicable.

Results:

Four of five cases presented with lack of Doppler flow in the injected area after AE injection. Meanwhile, IU pregnancy proceeded well after treatment and delivered a normal newborn. One case received emergency surgery 3 h after local injection of 2.5 ml AE because of the rupture of ectopic gestational sac (GS). An early abortion was identified 7 days after the surgery.

Conclusions:

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided local injection of AE is an alternative nonsurgical treatment for HP, yet overdose injection of AE will increase the risk of ectopic GS rupture.

Heterotopic pregnancy - how easily you can go wrong in diagnosing? A case study

Introduction: Heterotopic pregnancy is a rare, but potentially life-threatening pathology. The diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy is still one of the biggest challenges in modern gynecology. The incidence of those pregnancies in natural conception is about 1:30000. Case presentation: We present an unusual case of a heterotopic pregnancy which was misdiagnosed in the first trimester as a dichorionic twin pregnancy. At 13 weeks of gestation, the patient presented with an acute abdomen, she was diagnosed with a heterotopic pregnancy, and therefore was operated on, with the excision of the ruptured fallopian tube and the ectopic pregnancy performed. Discussion: The presence of an intrauterine pregnancy does not rule out the presence of a coexisting ectopic pregnancy. Clinicians should always keep in mind that a heterotopic pregnancy may occur in a woman of reproductive age. Careful ultrasound scan of the uterus and appendages is a must in all women of reproductive age with clinical symptoms.

Introduction: Heterotopic pregnancy is a rare, but potentially life-threatening pathology. The diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy is still one of the biggest challenges in modern gynecology. The incidence of those pregnancies in natural conception is about 1:30000. Case presentation: We present an unusual case of a heterotopic pregnancy which was misdiagnosed in the first trimester as a dichorionic twin pregnancy. At 13 weeks of gestation, the patient presented with an acute abdomen, she was diagnosed with a heterotopic pregnancy, and therefore was operated on, with the excision of the ruptured fallopian tube and the ectopic pregnancy performed. Discussion: The presence of an intrauterine pregnancy does not rule out the presence of a coexisting ectopic pregnancy. Clinicians should always keep in mind that a heterotopic pregnancy may occur in a woman of reproductive age. Careful ultrasound scan of the uterus and appendages is a must in all women of reproductive age with clinical symptoms.

The risk factors of miscarriage and obstetrical outcomes of intrauterine normal pregnancy following heterotopic pregnancy management

To investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors for miscarriage of intrauterine normal pregnancy of patients with a heterotopic pregnancy (HP) after treatment.This was a retrospective study of medical records from CHA Bundang Medical Center. Sixty-four patients who were diagnosed with a HP between February 2006 and July 2017 were included in this study. All analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.Forty-eight patients had tubal ectopic pregnancies (EP), 10 patients had cornual EPs, 1 patient had a cesarean section scar EP, 4 patients had an ovarian EP, and 1 patient had bilateral tubal EP. Among the 64 patients, 14.1% (9/64) miscarried before 10 weeks of gestation after management. Mean gestational age (GA) at treatment was 5.97 ± 0.50 weeks and 6.80 ± 1.04 weeks for miscarriage and nonmiscarriage group, respectively (P = .008). Significant differences were observed between 2 groups in terms of ultrasonographic features at the time HP was diagnosed (P = .040) Logistic regression models indicated that gestational age at treatment showed significant differences between 2 groups (OR: 0.003, 95% CI: 0.001-0.604).Immediate management after diagnosis could expect favorable prognosis of HP. GA at treatment was the only independent risk factor for miscarriage in patients with HP regardless of treatment methods.