The effectiveness of inositol and metformin on infertile polycystic ovary syndrome women with resistant to letrozole

Effectiveness of dual combination therapy of acarbose plus metformin and acarbose plus myo-inositol in ameliorating the metabolic and endocrinologic complications of polycystic ovary syndrome - A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

PCOS, beyond being characterized by reproductive disturbances, is a complicated rapid expanding metabolic and endocrinologic disorder of the recent times. Nearly 70% PCOS women show resistance to insulin.

AIM

The aim of the study is to determine and compare the effectiveness of acarbose plus metformin and acarbose plus myo-inositol combination therapy in alleviating the metabolic and endocrinologic complications of PCOS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An open labelled RCT was conducted on 168 PCOS women attending the gynaecology clinic at SRM MCH & RC, Chengalpattu and the trial was registered in CTRI (No. CTRI/2022/04/041877). Group A (n = 56) received metformin 500 mg/TID alone; group B (n = 54) received (acarbose 25 mg/TID for 4 weeks then 50 mg/TID for other 20 weeks) along with metformin 500 mg/TID and group C (n = 54) received (acarbose 25 mg/TID for 4 weeks then 50 mg/TID for other 20 weeks) along with myoinositol 1000 mg/BD. All parameters were measured at baseline and at the end of 6 months.

RESULTS

Significant reduction of LH, LH: FSH, TT, HOMA-IR was observed in all the groups. FSH increased only in metformin group. Increase in serum progesterone and reduction in FI, TGL, LDL were significant only in acarbose plus myo-inositol group. SHBG and HDL increased significantly only in acarbose plus metformin group. No changes in BMI, TC and VLDL were observed in any group.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, decrease in FI, HOMA-IR, TGL, LDL seen in acarbose plus myo-inositol group indirectly contributes to cardio-metabolic safety in PCOS. Similarly, a significant increase in SHBG levels with acarbose plus metformin group shows correction of the excess androgen and restoration of ovulation.

Inositol for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Inform the 2023 Update of the International Evidence-based PCOS Guidelines

CONTEXT

Insulin resistance is common in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Inositol may have insulin sensitizing effects; however, its efficacy in the management of PCOS remains indeterminate.

OBJECTIVE

To inform the 2023 international evidence-based guidelines in PCOS, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of inositol, alone or in combination with other therapies, in the management of PCOS.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, All EBM, and CINAHL from inception until August 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Thirty trials (n = 2230; 1093 intervention, 1137 control), with 19 pooled in meta-analyses were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted for hormonal, metabolic, lipids, psychological, anthropometric, reproductive outcomes, and adverse effects by 1 reviewer, independently verified by a second.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirteen comparisons were assessed, with 3 in meta-analyses. Evidence suggests benefits for myo-inositol or D-chiro-inositol (DCI) for some metabolic measures and potential benefits from DCI for ovulation, but inositol may have no effect on other outcomes. Metformin may improve waist-hip ratio and hirsutism compared to inositol, but there is likely no difference for reproductive outcomes, and the evidence is very uncertain for body mass indexI. Myo-inositol likely causes fewer gastrointestinal adverse events compared with metformin; however, these are typically mild and self-limited.

CONCLUSION

The evidence supporting the use of inositol in the management of PCOS is limited and inconclusive. Clinicians and their patients should consider the uncertainty of the evidence together with individual values and preferences when engaging in shared decision-making regarding the use of inositol for PCOS.

Insulin-sensitizing agents for infertility treatment in woman with polycystic ovary syndrome: a narrative review of current clinical practice

PURPOSE

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine, metabolic, and reproductive disorder which, according to the Rotterdam criteria, affects up to 24% of women of childbearing age. Although the prevalence of infertility in this subpopulation of women is high, the optimal treatment has not been fully established yet. Insulin resistance is considered to be an important mechanism involved in the development of PCOS; hence, the aim of this narrative review is to present an overview of the current pharmacological insulin-sensitizing treatment modalities for infertile women with PCOS.

METHODS

A MEDLINE and PubMed search for the years 1990-2023 was performed using a combination of keywords. Clinical trials with insulin sensitizers used for infertility treatment as well as analyses of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were evaluated. When deemed necessary, additional articles referenced in the retrieved papers were included in this narrative review.

RESULTS

Several insulin-sensitizing compounds and various therapeutical protocols are available for infertility treatment of women with PCOS. Metformin is the most common adjuvant medication to induce ovulation in infertile women with PCOS and is more frequently administered in combination with clomiphene citrate than on its own. Recently, inositol and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have emerged as possible options for infertility treatment in PCOS.

CONCLUSION

The future of medical treatment of PCOS women with infertility lies in a personalized pharmacological approach, which involves various compounds with different mechanisms of action that could modify ovarian function and endometrial receptivity, ultimately leading to better overall reproductive outcomes in these women.

Effects of myo-inositol vs. metformin on hormonal and metabolic parameters in women with PCOS: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome is the most prevalent hormonal disorder in females. Over the years, metformin (MET) has become the first-line choice of treatment; however, due to its gastrointestinal side effects, a more recent drug, myo-inositol (MI), has been introduced. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of MET and MI on hormonal and metabolic parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Authors extensively searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) until August 2021. Eight (n = 8) articles were included, with a total sample size of 1088, of which 460 patients received MET, 436 received MI, and 192 received a combination of both. Standard mean differences (SMDs) and Confidence Intervals (CIs) were used for data synthesis, and forest plots were made using Review Manager 5.4 for Statistical Analysis using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis indicates that there is no significant difference between MET and MI in terms of their effects on BMI (SMD = 0.16, 95% CI: - 0.11 to 0.43, p = 0.24), fasting insulin (SMD = 0.00, 95% CI: - 0.26 to 0.27, p = 0.97), fasting blood sugar (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI: - 0.31to 0.53, p = 0.60), HOMA index (SMD = 0.09, 95% CI: - 0.20 to 0.39, p = 0.50), and LH/FSH (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI: - 0.24 to 0.64, p = 0.37). BMI, fasting blood sugar, and LH/FSH ratio reported moderate heterogeneity because of the varying number of study participants.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis comparing hormonal and metabolic parameters between MET and MI did not show much significant difference, indicating both drugs are equally beneficial in improving metabolic and hormonal parameters in patients with PCOS.

Inositol is an effective and safe treatment in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Metformin is the gold standard insulin sensitizer, which is widely used to treat insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, metformin may induce gastrointestinal side effects.

OBJECTIVE

Inositols have long been debated as a potential alternative for metformin in treating PCOS. Therefore, the present systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inositols in treating PCOS.

METHODS

The present systematic search was performed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase from the inception until October 20th, 2021. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included women diagnosed with PCOS and compared any inositols with metformin or placebo. Our primary outcome was cycle normalization, whereas secondary outcomes were body mass index (BMI), parameters of carbohydrate metabolism and clinical and laboratory hyperandrogenism. Results are reported as risk ratios or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Twenty-six RCTs were identified, including data of 1691 patients (806 inositol, 311 with placebo, and 509 metformin groups). In patients treated with inositols, the risk (CI: 1.13; 2.85) of having a regular menstrual cycle was found by 1.79 higher than in the case of placebo. Moreover, the inositols showed non-inferiority compared to metformin in this outcome. In the case of BMI (MD = -0.45; CI: -0.89; -0.02), free testosterone (MD = -0,41, CI: -0.69; -0.13), total testosterone (MD = -20.39, CI: -40.12; -0.66), androstenedione (MD = -0.69, CI: -1,16; -0.22), glucose (MD = -3.14; CI: -5.75; -0.54) levels and AUC insulin (MD = -2081.05, CI: -2745.32; -1416.78) inositol treatment induced greater decrease compared to placebo. Inositol increased sex-hormone-binding globulin significantly compared to placebo (MD = 32.06, CI:1.27; 62.85).

CONCLUSION

Inositol is an effective and safe treatment in PCOS. Moreover, inositols showed non-inferiority in most outcomes compared to the gold standard treatment; metformin.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021283275.

Efficacy of Myo-inositol on Anthropometric, Metabolic, and Endocrine Outcomes in PCOS Patients: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common cause of female infertility, affecting 5-10% of women of reproductive age. Many studies have reported improvement in insulin resistance and thereby intracellular glucose uptake after myo-inositol treatment in PCOS patients, but these studies have a small sample size, varying methodology, and outcome analysis. Therefore, we designed a present meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to explore the effect of myo-inositol supplementation on anthropometric, metabolic, and endocrine outcomes in PCOS patients. Randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of myo-inositol were identified in electronic databases like PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and AMED. Listed references and citations of related articles were also screened manually to identify additional studies. Research papers for which full-text copies were not available on scientific databases were procured from respective authors. Thereafter, data were extracted from included studies and analyzed using RevMan 5.3 of the Cochrane Collaboration. A total of 17 randomized controlled trials with 1083 PCOS patients were included in this meta-analysis. Among the 17 trials, 7 trials compared myo-inositol with folic acid, 8 trials compared myo-inositol with metformin, and 2 trials compared myo-inositol with oral contraceptives. No significant improvement in body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, fasting insulin, fasting glucose, HOMA, LH, FSH, estradiol, sex hormone-binding globulin, dehydroepiandrosterone, and total testosterone levels were observed after myo-inositol treatment in PCOS patients except androstenedione and prolactin levels. Clinically significant improvement was not observed in anthropometric, metabolic, and endocrine outcomes after myo-inositol treatment in PCOS patients. However, heterogeneity between studies was high.

The comparative effectiveness of 55 interventions in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: A network meta-analysis of 101 randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affects up to 18% of reproductive-age females. The prevalence of obesity in PCOS patients reaches up to 80%, which is 2-fold higher than the general population.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of 55 pharmacological interventions across 17 different outcomes in overweight/obese PCOS patients with hyperandrogenism manifestations for both short- and long-term follow-ups. A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials comparing any conventional pharmacological intervention as a monotherapy or a combination in overweight/obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and hyperandrogenism manifestations. Extracted data included three main parameters; I. Anthropometric parameters (BMI, Waist and Hip circumferences, and Waist/HIP ratio), II. Hormonal parameters (FSH, LH, FSG, SHBG, Estradiol, Total Testosterone, Free testosterone, DHEAS, Androstenedione), and III. Metabolic parameters (Total Cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, Triglycerides, Fasting glucose, Fasting glucose, HOMA-IR). Critical appraisal and risk of bias assessments were performed using the modified Jadad scale, and the overall quality of this network meta-analysis was evaluated according to the CINeMA framework. We performed both a pairwise meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis to evaluate the effect sizes with 95% CI, and we calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for each intervention.

RESULTS

Our final search on May 15th 2021 retrieved 23,305 unique citations from searching six electronic databases. Eventually, 101 RCTs of 108 reports with a total of 8,765 patients were included in our systematic review and multi-treatments meta-analysis. 55 different interventions were included: 22 monotherapies, and 33 combinations. The two-dimensional cluster ranking of the average SUCRA values for metabolic and hormonal parameters with significant estimates revealed flutamide (77.5%, 70%; respectively) as the highest and rosiglitazone (38.2%, 26.3%; respectively) as the lowest, in terms of the overall efficacy in reducing weight and hyperandrogenism. However, cyproterone-acetate+ethinylestradiol exhibited a higher ranking in improving hormonal parameters (71.1%), but even a lower-ranking regarding metabolic parameters (34.5%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Current evidence demonstrated the superiority of flutamide in improving both metabolic and hormonal parameters, and the higher efficacy of cyproterone-acetate+ethinylestradiol only in improving hormonal parameters. Nearly all interventions were comparable in female hormones, FGS, HDL, glucose, and insulin levels improvements.

The function of metformin in endometrial receptivity (ER) of patients with polycyclic ovary syndrome (PCOS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis summarizes evidence from studies using metformin (Met) to improve endometrial receptivity (ER) in women with PCOS.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA protocol, we conducted a comprehensive search of academic literature from various databases, including PubMed, EMbase and Cochrane libraries. Studies published in English before Jan 27, 2021, were recruited for primary screening. Data on endometrial thickness (EMT), endometrial artery resistance index (RI), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and miscarriage rate (MR) were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-two eligible studies that included 6571 patients were evaluated in this meta-analysis. Primary indicators are EMT and endometrial aetery RI; secondary indicators include the clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate. Metformin significantly increased EMT (SMD = 2.04, 95% CI (0.96,3.12),P = 0.0002) and reduced endometrial artery RI compared to the non-Met group (SMD = - 2.83, 95% CI: (- 5.06, - 0.59), P = 0.01). As expected, metformin also improved CPR and reduced MR in PCOS patients as a result, clinical pregnancy rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.11-1.43, P = 0.0003), and miscarriage rate (RR = 0.73, 95% CI:0.58-0.91, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Metformin may improve endometrial receptivity (ER) in PCOS patients by increasing EMT and reducing endometrial artery RI. However, the level of most original studies was low, with small sample sizes. More large-scale, long-term RCTs with rigorous methodologies are needed.

The effect of Myo-inositol on fertility rates in poor ovarian responder in women undergoing assisted reproductive technique: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Poor ovarian response to gonadotropin is a significant challenge in assisted reproductive technique (ART) and affect 9-24% of ART cycles. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Myo-inositol on fertility rates in poor ovarian responder women undergoing assisted reproductive technique.

METHODS

This study is a double-blinded randomized controlled study that involved 60 poor ovarian responders included in an ICSI program and divided into two groups; intervention group: 30 patients who have been assuming Inofolic (4 g myo-inositol + 400 μg folic acid) for the before the enrollment day; control group: 30 patients assuming folic acid (400 μg) for the same period. Controlled ovarian stimulation was performed in the same manner in the two groups. The main outcomeswere the assessment of oocytes retrievednumber and quality, ovarian sensitivity index,required dose of Gonadotropinsunits × 1000), fertilization rate, biochemical, and clinical pregnancy rate.

RESULT

There is no significant difference in clinical characteristics between study groups. The number of oocytes retrieved, number of MII oocytes, number of embryos transferred, chemical, and clinical pregnancy were higher in the intervention group. However, they are not statistically significant in comparison to the control group. The ovarian sensitivity index and fertilization rate were significantly higher in the intervention group than the control group (P > 0.05). The required dose of gonadotropin significantly lower in the intervention group than the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the supplementation myo-inositol in poor ovarian responders significantly improved the ART outcomes such as fertilization rate gonadotropin, ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) and significantly reduced the required unities of gonadotropin. Additionally, more extensive randomized controlled studies are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20180515039668N1 , retrospectively registered since 2020-03-16.

A Properly Balanced Reduction Diet and/or Supplementation Solve the Problem with the Deficiency of These Vitamins Soluble in Water in Patients with PCOS

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an increasingly common problem for women in the reproductive age throughout the entire world. A reduction diet with a low glycaemic index (GI) has proved to support the treatment of PCOS. The aim of the study was to analyse the influence of the diet on the level of vitamins soluble in water. The study included 55 women, 40 of which suffered from PCOS (identified by means of the Rotterdam Criteria) and 15 healthy women of the Caucasian race. The level of vitamins before and after the dietary intervention was measured. The diet was a reduction diet with a reduced glycaemic index (GI). Biochemical analyses were made on the basis of liquid chromatography—Infinity 1260 Binary liquid chromatography (LC) Agilent Technology. The level of vitamins in the serum was analysed together with the consumption before and after the dietary intervention. A higher level of vitamin C in the plasma was observed before and after the dietary intervention in the PCOS group in comparison to the control group despite the lower intake of this vitamin in the PCOS group. The remaining vitamins were at a comparable or lower level (B1, B3, B5, B6 and B12). After the dietary intervention, only B1 and B9 were at a clearly lower level (a trend of p = 0.093 and p = 0.085). A properly balanced reduction diet with reduced GI improves the supply of vitamins in women with PCOS. An additional recommendation should be the additional supplementation of B1, niacinamide and the combination of folates with inositol. The level of vitamin C in the plasma may not be a good marker of its supply in the PCOS group.

The efficacy of different insulin-sensitizing agents on treatment outcomes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who underwent in-vitro fertilization: A retrospective, record-based, comparative study

INTRODUCTION

It is not clear which metformin or inositol is more effective on IVF results. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Metformin and Inositol co-treatments on IVF outcomes in Polycystic ovary syndrome patients.

METHODS

A retrospective examination was made of the demographic characteristics and the follicular-embryonic development results of PCOS patients applied with an antagonist protocol of ovarian hyperstimulation in the first cycle of IVF with co-treatment of Metformin at 2000 mg/day regularly for 3 months (Metformin co-treatment group, n:35) or Inositol at 4000 mg/day myo-inositol for 3 months (Inositol co-treatment group, n:34) and those not using any co-treatment (FSH only group [control group], n:40).

RESULTS

No significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of demographic characteristics. The HOMA-IR scores and hCG day E2 level were significantly higher in the control group than in both co-treatment groups (p = 0.021, p = 0.018, respectively). The M1 oocyte count was significantly lower in the Metformin group than in the Inositol and control groups (p = 0.001). The GVDJ oocyte count was significantly lower in both co-treatment groups than in the control group (p = 0.042). No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of other follicular and embryological development parameters, implantation, clinical pregnancy, live births and abortus rates.

CONCLUSION

Insulin-sensitizing agents may have positive effects on follicular development in PCOS patients applied with IVF.