When to do intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective comparison

The use of ICSI in ART: evidence for practice

This article reviews the evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). It provides evidence-based clinical and laboratory guidelines and recommendations for use of ICSI within an assisted reproductive technology (ART) service. The guidelines address the evidence for the use of ICSI rather than conventional IVF (cIVF); the use of ART techniques supplementary to ICSI; and risks associated with ICSI. This article is not intended to be the only approved standard of practice or to dictate an exclusive course of treatment. Other plans of management may be appropriate, taking into account the needs and medical history of the patient, available resources, and institutional or clinical practice limitations.

The influence of morphologic grading and COS protocol on the outcomes of Day 5 versus Day 6 single fresh blastocyst transfers: a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes from one center experience

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the blastocyst morphologic grading and the protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) would influence pregnancy outcomes, aiming to provide guidance when choosing blastocyst transfer.

METHODS

The clinical data of 612 patients who received single fresh blastocyst transfer for first cycle, as well as the data of 253 patients who had already delivered were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to blastocyst formation time (D5 or D6). The following subgroup analyses were performed: (i) the morphologic grading of blastocyst and (ii) the protocol of COS.

RESULTS

We observed that D5 single embryo transfer (SET) were associated with higher clinical pregnancy rate (CPR, 59.04% vs. 31.73%, P < 0.001) and live birth rate (LBR, 43.90% vs. 24.04%, P < 0.001) than D6 SET following fresh cycle. Patients in D5 group experienced more good blastocysts transfer (45.47%vs. 13.46%, P < 0.001) and less poor blastocysts transfer (9.64%vs. 45.19%, P < 0.001) than patients in D6 group. As to early stage and good quality blastocysts, the CPR and LBR were similar between D5 and D6 group. GnRH antagonist protocol had a demonstrable inferiority comparing with the early-follicular-phase long-acting GnRH-agonist long protocol (EFLL) or the mid-luteal-phase long-acting GnRH-agonist long protocol (MLLL) with regard to the CPR and LBR in D6-SET group.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis found that ovarian reserve of patients in D6-SET group was comparatively worse than that of patients in D5-SET group and D6-SET patients represented a subgroup of infertility patients usually having relatively poor embryo quality. The results should be interpreted with caution as the very low numbers in the respective group limited the use of statistical tests and the real significance values.

Fertilization and neonatal outcomes after early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a retrospective analysis of 16,769 patients

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of short-term insemination and early-rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), an approach that rescued oocytes with unclear second polar body 6 h after initial insemination by ICSI (early R-ICSI) to avoid total or near-total fertilization failure in conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Methods

We performed a retrospective study in 16,769 patients (short-term IVF, n = 12,094; ICSI, n = 3452; early R-ICSI, n = 1223) who received IVF/ICSI treatment in our hospital from January 2009 to October 2018. Fertilization and clinical outcomes were compared among those three groups.

Results

When considering the R-ICSI embryos in the early R-ICSI group independently, the rates of fertilization and day-3 cleaved embryos in 2PN oocytes were comparable, the rates of fertilization (2PN) and high-quality embryos were lower, whereas the multi-PN fertilization rate (3.27%) was significantly higher than the ICSI group (1.26%). The difference of clinical pregnancy rate between the part of transferred R-ICSI embryos (40.81%) and the ICSI group (44.73%) remained nonsignificant. Furthermore, the rate of congenital birth defects in the early R-ICSI group (0.99%) was not significantly different from those in the short-term IVF (0.76%) and ICSI groups (1.07%).

Conclusion

Despite the multi-PN fertilization rate, our study highlights early R-ICSI as a safe and effective alternative in assisted reproduction to decrease complete IVF fertilization failure and reduce ICSI utilization. Additional large amount and long-term follow-up studies are needed to further validate the use of early R-ICSI.

Placental histology and pregnancy complications following intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male factor infertility

PURPOSE

To assess obstetric outcomes and placental histology following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), for non-male infertility.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort of live born singleton deliveries after in vitro fertilization (IVF) at a single university affiliated medical center between 2009 and 2017. Excluded were IVF cycles with male infertility and oocyte recipients. We compared obstetric outcomes and placental histology in cases ICSI was performed (ICSI group) and cases with no ICSI (IVF group).

RESULTS

A total of 400 deliveries following ICSI were compared to 218 in the IVF group. Maternal age was similar between the groups, while diminished ovarian reserve was more common among ICSI patients and tubal disease less common (p < 0.001). The rate of blastocyte transfer was also significantly lower in the ICSI group-67.5% vs. 77%, p = 0.01. Pregnancies following ICSI were characterized by similar rates of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and small for gestational age neonates. Although cesarean delivery rate was significantly higher in the group, this did no attain significance after adjustment for confounders. Placentas in the ICSI group were notable for a lower rate of villitis of unknown etiology (1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.007) and a higher rate of maternal surface calcifications (33% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.01) after adjustment for confounders.

CONCLUSION

The employment of ICSI with no male indication is associated with similar obstetric outcomes. Despite isolated placental differences among many investigated, placental histology seems overall comparable as well. These results are reassuring to clinicians and patients.

Is controlled ovarian stimulation and insemination an effective treatment in older women with male partners with decreased total motile sperm counts?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of the total motile sperm counts (TMSC) on the success of controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) and intra-uterine insemination (IUI) in women 38-42 years of age.

STUDY DESIGN

A database of all women aged 38-42 years who underwent IUI with stimulation at a University Reproductive Centre between 2009 and 2018 inclusive was developed. Including stimulation with clomiphene citrate, letrozole or gonadotropins and divided into TMSC 5.00-10.0 mil and < 5.00 mil. Statistics were compared with multivariate logistic regression, t tests or Chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

A total of 397 cycles of IUI in 397 patients were included, of which, 190 cycles with TMSC 5.00-10.0 and 207 cycles with TMSC < 5.00. There were no statistical differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups including: age (P = 0.2), gravidity (P = 0.7), parity (P = 0.6), basal FSH (P = 0.2), basal E2 (P = 0.4), antral follicular count (P = 0.5) and the number of mature follicles stimulated (P = 0.2). As expected, TMSC was 7.6 ± 1.5 mil in the first group and 2.4 ± 1.6 mil in the second group (P < 0.0001). The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle in the 5.01-10.00 TMSC group was 9.5 vs. 3.4% when TMSC < 5.00 (P = 0.01). When evaluating only women 40-42 years of age (99 women in the 5.00-10.00 TMSC group and 95 in the group of TMSC < 5.00); the pregnancy rates were not statistically different between the two groups (7 vs. 7.3%, P = 1), nor was the clinical pregnancy rate (5 vs. 6.3%, P = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Women 38-39 years of age have poorer outcomes at COH/IUI when TMSC < 5 million than if it is 5-10 million. Once a woman is 40 years of age, this effect is lost. With TMSC 5-10 million, women 38-39 years of age have respectable outcomes at COH/IUI. Clinical pregnancy rates are very low in women 40 years of age with TMSC ≤ 10 million or 38-39 years old with TMSC < 5 million and other treatments should be offered.