The impact of p16ink4a positivity in invasive vulvar cancer on disease-free and disease-specific survival, a retrospective study

Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA and p16INK4a positivity in vulvar cancer and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and p16^INK4a positivity have crucial roles in the pathogenesis of vulvar cancer and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. We aimed to examine the pooled prevalence of HPV DNA and p16^INK4a positivity in vulvar cancer and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia worldwide.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases for studies published between Jan 1, 1986, and May 6, 2022, that reported the prevalence of HPV DNA, or p16^INK4a positivity, or both, in histologically verified vulvar cancer or vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Studies on a minimum of five cases were included. Study-level data were extracted from the published studies. Random effect models were used to examine the pooled prevalence of HPV DNA and p16^INK4a positivity in both vulvar cancer and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, which were further investigated using stratified analyses by histological subtype, geographical region, HPV DNA or p16^INK4a detection method, tissue sample type, HPV genotype, publication year, and age at diagnosis. Additionally, meta-regression was applied to explore sources of heterogeneity.

FINDINGS

We retrieved 6393 search results, of which 6233 were excluded for being duplicates or after application of our inclusion and exclusion criteria. We also identified two studies from manual searches of references lists. 162 studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The prevalence of HPV in vulvar cancer (91 studies; n=8200) was 39·1% (95% CI 35·3-42·9) and in vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (60 studies; n=3140) was 76·1% (70·7-81·1). The most predominant HPV genotype in vulvar cancer was HPV16 (78·1% [95% CI 73·5-82·3]), followed by HPV33 (7·5% [4·9-10·7]). Similarly, HPV16 (80·8% [95% CI 75·9-85·2]) and HPV33 (6·3% [3·9-9·2]) were also the most two predominant HPV genotypes in vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. The distribution of type-specific HPV genotypes in vulvar cancer among geographical regions was different, with HPV16 varying between regions, showing a high prevalence in Oceania (89·0% [95% CI 67·6-99·5]) and a low prevalence in South America (54·3% [30·2-77·4]). The prevalence of p16^INK4a positivity in patients with vulvar cancer was 34·1% (95% CI 30·9-37·4; 52 studies; n=6352), and it was 65·7% (52·5-77·7; 23 studies; n=896) in patients with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Furthermore, among patients with HPV-positive vulvar cancer, p16^INK4a positivity prevalence was 73·3% (95% CI 64·7-81·2), compared with 13·8% (10·0-18·1) in HPV-negative vulvar cancer. The prevalence of double positivity for HPV and p16^INK4a was 19·6% (95% CI 16·3-23·0) in vulvar cancer and 44·2% (26·3-62·8) in vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Most analyses had large heterogeneity (I²>75%).

INTERPRETATION

The high prevalence of HPV16 and HPV33 in vulvar cancer and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia emphasised the importance of nine-valent HPV vaccination in preventing vulvar neoplasm. Additionally, this study highlighted the potential clinical significance of double positivity for HPV DNA and p16^INK4a in vulvar neoplasm.

FUNDING

Taishan Scholar Youth Project of Shandong Province, China.

Changes in HPV prevalence in Danish women with vulvar cancer during 28 years - A nationwide study of >1300 cancer cases

OBJECTIVE

A substantial proportion of vulvar cancers are caused by high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV), but hrHPV prevalence in vulvar cancer has mainly been investigated in smaller studies which did not evaluate time trends. Our aim was to assess hrHPV prevalence in >1300 Danish vulvar cancers diagnosed during 1990-2017, including changes in hrHPV prevalence over time.

METHODS

In a nationwide pathology register, we identified women diagnosed with vulvar cancer at thirteen hospitals from all Danish regions. Archival tumor tissue was collected from local repositories and, upon pathology review, sent to a central laboratory for HPV testing using INNO-LiPA. We calculated hrHPV prevalence according to time, age and histology, and evaluated the overall and age-specific estimated annual percentage change (EAPC).

RESULTS

We included 1308 vulvar cancer cases, with a median age of 72 years at diagnosis. The overall hrHPV prevalence was 52.0% (95% CI: 49.3-54.7). HPV types 16/18 were found in 39.6% of cases, whereas nine-valent HPV (9vHPV) vaccine types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 were found in 50.8%. The hrHPV prevalence showed an increasing trend over time, with an EAPC of 0.35% (95% CI: 0.00-0.71). The hrHPV prevalence was higher in younger women throughout the study period, and increasing trends over time were seen in both older (age ≥ 60) and younger (age < 60) women. The hrHPV prevalence was higher in non-keratinizing (71.0%) and warty/basaloid (78.0%) carcinomas than in keratinizing (39.4%) and verrucous (36.4%) carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the 9vHPV vaccine could potentially prevent a substantial proportion of vulvar cancers in Denmark.

Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma (CAP) as a New Tool for the Management of Vulva Cancer and Vulvar Premalignant Lesions in Gynaecological Oncology

Vulvar cancer (VC) is a specific form of malignancy accounting for 5–6% of all gynaecologic malignancies. Although VC occurs most commonly in women after 60 years of age, disease incidence has risen progressively in premenopausal women in recent decades. VC demonstrates particular features requiring well-adapted therapeutic approaches to avoid potential treatment-related complications. Significant improvements in disease-free survival and overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with post-stage I disease have been achieved by implementing a combination therapy consisting of radical surgical resection, systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Achieving local control remains challenging. However, mostly due to specific anatomical conditions, the need for comprehensive surgical reconstruction and frequent post-operative healing complications. Novel therapeutic tools better adapted to VC particularities are essential for improving individual outcomes. To this end, cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) treatment is a promising option for VC, and is particularly appropriate for the local treatment of dysplastic lesions, early intraepithelial cancer, and invasive tumours. In addition, CAP also helps reduce inflammatory complications and improve wound healing. The application of CAP may realise either directly or indirectly utilising nanoparticle technologies. CAP has demonstrated remarkable treatment benefits for several malignant conditions, and has created new medical fields, such as “plasma medicine” and “plasma oncology”. This article highlights the benefits of CAP for the treatment of VC, VC pre-stages, and postsurgical wound complications. There has not yet been a published report of CAP on vulvar cancer cells, and so this review summarises the progress made in gynaecological oncology and in other cancers, and promotes an important, understudied area for future research. The paradigm shift from reactive to predictive, preventive and personalised medical approaches in overall VC management is also considered.