Palliative treatment for bowel obstruction in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

Palliative surgery: state of the science and future directions

Palliative surgical procedures are operations that aim to alleviate symptoms in a patient with serious, life-limiting illness. They are common, particularly within the field of surgical oncology. However, few high-quality studies have attempted to measure the durability of improvements in symptoms and quality of life after palliative surgery. Furthermore, many of the studies that do exist are outdated and employ highly inconsistent definitions of palliative surgery. Consequently, the paucity of robust and reliable evidence on the benefits, risks, and trade-offs of palliative surgery hampers clinical decision-making for patients and their surgeons. The evidence for palliative surgery suggests that, with effective communication about goals of care and careful patient selection, palliative surgery can provide symptomatic relief and reduce healthcare burdens for certain seriously ill patients.

Surgery for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review evidence around the value and challenges of surgery for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (ROC). Both cytoreductive and palliative aspects will be addressed RECENT FINDINGS: Prospective and retrospective evidence demonstrates a significantly longer remission derived from the combination of surgical and systemic modalities as opposed to systemic treatment alone in carefully selected ROC-patients who have relapsed more than 6 months from the end of their 1st line platinum-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, this benefit appears to be limited when total macroscopic tumor clearance is not achieved. Selection algorithms to identify optimal surgical candidates are of paramount importance to prevent surgical morbidity without the equivalent oncological benefit. In the palliative setting, the risks and benefits of salvage surgery need to be counterbalanced with the advances of conservative techniques for optimal care. Well-defined selection algorithms to identify those who will benefit from surgery in the relapsed setting appear to be the key to oncologic and surgical success.

Low anterior resection syndrome and its impact on quality of life of ovarian carcinoma patients: A prospective longitudinal study

OBJECTIVES

Bowel dysfunction is frequently reported in patients with ovarian carcinoma (OC). Our aim was to evaluate the incidence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) like symptoms in patients with primary OC and its impact on quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal observational cohort study was performed, including patients with newly diagnosed OC treated by primary or interval surgery with residual tumor <1 cm, from 2018 until 2021. Patients with a stoma or recurrence of disease were excluded. Intestinal dysfunction was assessed using the validated LARS score questionnaire pre- and postoperatively. There are 3 subgroups based on the results: no, minor, or major LARS. The impact on QoL was evaluated by an additional question to demonstrate the severity of patient's life impairment.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was answered by 78 patients pre- and post-operatively. LARS like symptoms were reported preoperatively in 34.6% (24.4% minor/10.2% major) and significantly increased postoperatively to 47.4% (28.2% minor/19.2% major; p = 0.011). Moderate to severe impairment of QoL correlated with LARS scores pre- (80%) and post-operatively (90%). Patients with two bowel anastomoses (mean score 18.6 pre- and 24.9 post-operatively, p = 0.041) showed a significant increase of the questionnaire score.

CONCLUSIONS

Major LARS like symptoms appear in 10% of OC patients preoperatively and significantly increase to almost two-fold postoperatively. Multiple bowel anastomoses had a significant risk for higher postoperative LARS score. QoL impairment correlates linearly with LARS positive scoring, independent on the timing of the complaints.

Cost-effectiveness of management strategies for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and inoperable malignant bowel obstruction

OBJECTIVES

Patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer often present with inoperable malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) from a large burden of abdominal disease. Interventions such as total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and chemotherapy may be used in this setting. We aim to describe the relative cost-effectiveness of these interventions to inform clinical decision making.

METHODS

Four strategies for management of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer with inoperable MBO were compared from a societal perspective using a Monte Carlo simulation: (1) hospice, (2) TPN, (3) chemotherapy, and (4) TPN + chemotherapy. Survival, hospitalization rates, end-of-life (EOL) setting, and MBO-related utilities were obtained from literature review: hospice (survival 38 days, 6% hospitalization), chemotherapy (42 days, 29%), TPN (55 days, 25%), TPN + chemotherapy (74 days, 47%). Outcomes were the average cost per strategy and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in US dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

RESULTS

In the base case scenario, TPN + chemotherapy was the most costly strategy (mean; 95% CI) ($49,741; $49,329-$50,162) and provided the highest QALYs (0.089; 0.089-0.090). The lowest cost strategy was hospice ($14,591; $14,527-$14,654). The TPN alone and chemotherapy alone strategies were dominated by a combination of hospice and TPN + chemotherapy. The ICER of TPN + chemotherapy was $918,538/QALY compared to hospice. With a societal willingness to pay threshold of $150,000/QALY, hospice was the strategy of choice in 71.6% of cases, chemotherapy alone in 28.4%, and TPN-containing strategies in 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

TPN with or without chemotherapy is not cost-effective in management of inoperable malignant bowel obstruction and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.