Comparison of the Cook vaginal cervical ripening balloon with prostaglandin E2 insert for induction of labor in late pregnancy

The infection, cervical and perineal lacerations in relation to postpartum hemorrhage following vaginal delivery induced by Cook balloon catheter

OBJECTIVE

To identify whether infection, cervical laceration and perineal laceration are associated with postpartum hemorrhage in the setting of vaginal delivery induced by Cook balloon catheter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The retrospective study included 362 women who gave birth vaginally at or beyond 37 weeks of gestation with a diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage between February 2021 to May 2022, of which including 216 women with induction of labor (Cook balloon catheter followed by oxytocin or oxytocin) and 146 women with spontaneous delivery. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage were collected and compared.

RESULTS

362 women were divided into three groups, group 1 with spontaneous delivery, group 2 with oxytocin, group 3 with Cook balloon catheter followed by oxytocin. There was no significant difference in incidence of infection within three groups (P > 0.05). The rate of cervical laceration and perineal laceration was significantly higher in group 3 compared with groups 2 and 1 (P < 0.05); Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that compared with group 1, either group 3 or group 2 was associated with increased risks of cervical laceration and perineal laceration (P < 0.05), and compared with group 2, group 3 was not associated with increased risks of cervical laceration and perineal laceration (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Infection, cervical laceration and perineal laceration are identified not to be independent risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage for women undergoing labor with Cook balloon catheter; Cervical laceration and perineal laceration increase the risk of postpartum hemorrhage in women with labor induction.

Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial

Background

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon (CCRB) for induction of labor (IOL) at term in primipara.

Methods

A total of 227 singleton full-term pregnancies with indications of IOL were enrolled and randomly divided into the control and study groups in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. In the control group, a conventional method was used. Both the uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 80 mL and removed after 12 h. In the study group, a modified method was used. The uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 120 mL and 40 mL respectively. Light traction was given to help CCRB to be discharged after 12 h placement. Oxytocin was administered in both groups after CCRB was discharged before labor starting. The improved Bishop scores, duration of labor, and spontaneous delivery rate were evaluated in the two groups.

Results

The improved Bishop scores in the study group were 3.06 ± 0.97 at 12 h placement of CCRB and 4.37 ± 0.87 when CCRB was discharged, which were significantly higher compared to the control group (2.52 ± 0.79, p < 0.05). Duration of the first stage of labor and the full labor in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group ((6.17 ± 2.85) h vs. (7.27 ± 2.90) h, p = 0.010; (7.07 ± 3.18) h vs. (8.09 ± 3.11) h, p = 0.028). No difference in spontaneous delivery rate between the two groups was observed. But the delivery rate within 24 h between the two groups was significantly different (79.79% vs. 55.91%, p < 0.05). For the cases with initial Bishop scores ≤ 3, the improved score was significantly increased, the first stage of labor and the full labor were significantly shorter in the study group than those in the control group (p < 0.05). Those results were not observed in cases with initial Bishop scores of 4–6.

Conclusions

The modified application of CCRB could benefit cervical ripening, shorten the duration of labor, especially for cases with poor cervical maturity, and improve the delivery rate within 24 h.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered: ChiCTR2200058270. Registered 04/04/2022.

Offering women a choice in induction of labour: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To evaluate women's choice in the method of labour induction between oral misoprostol, PGE2 pessary and the Foley catheter. To compare women's satisfaction according to their choice and to identify factors associated with patient satisfaction.

METHODS

We conducted a comparative, prospective cohort study of 520 women who chose their preferred method for labour induction, in a French tertiary hospital, from July 2019 to October 2020. Before and after the delivery, they were asked to argue their choice and to evaluate their satisfaction through the use of questionnaires. The primary outcome was global level of satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of the 520 women included, 67.5% of women chose oral misoprostol compared to 21% PGE2 pessary and 11.5% Foley catheter. Regarding global satisfaction, we found no significant difference between the three groups: 78.4%, 68.8% and 71.2% (p = 0.107) for, respectively, oral misoprostol, PGE2 pessary and Foley catheter. Factors that seem to improve women's satisfaction were nulliparity (aOR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.19-3.53]), delivery within 24 h after the start of induction (aOR = 3.46, 95% CI [2.02-6.14]) and adequate information (aOR = 4.21, 95% CI [1.869.64]). Factors associated with lower satisfaction rates were postpartum haemorrhage (aOR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.30-0.88]) and caesarean section (aOR = 0.31, 95% CI [0.17-0.54]).

CONCLUSION

Women satisfaction rates were not different between the three methods, when chosen by the patients themselves. These finding should encourage caregivers to promote shared decision making when possible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was approved by the French ethics committee for research in obstetrics and gynaecology (CEROG, reference number 2019-OBS-0602) on 1st June 2019.

Analgesic considerations for induction of labor

Induction of labor may be indicated to minimize maternal and fetal risks. The rate of induction is likely to increase as recent evidence supports elective induction at 39 weeks gestation. We review methods of induction and then analgesic options as they relate to indications and methods to induce labor. We specifically focus on parturients at high risk for anesthetic complications including those requiring anticoagulation, and those with cardiac disease, obesity, chorioamnionitis, prior spinal instrumentation, elevated intracranial pressure, known or anticipated difficult airway, thrombocytopenia, and preeclampsia. Guidelines regarding timing of anticoagulation dosing with neuraxial anesthetic techniques have been defined through consensus statements. Early epidural placement may be beneficial in patients with cardiac disease, obesity, anticipated difficult airway, and HELLP syndrome. Questions remain regarding how early is too early for epidural placement, what options are safest for patients with bacteremia, and what pain relief should be offered to those unable to tolerate cervical exams in early labor.

Is Unfavourable Cervix prior to Labor Induction Risk for Adverse Obstetrical Outcome in Time of Universal Ripening Agents Usage? Single Center Retrospective Observational Study

Cervical assessment on the Bishop scale prior to induction of labor (IOL) is one of the strongest prognostic criteria in relation to the success of the procedure. The commonly used preinduction methods are mainly aimed at reducing the percentage of cesarean sections. Our study has analyzed obstetric results of patients who had unripe cervix (Bishop score <7) before IOL and used preinduction (Foley catheter or misoprostol vaginal insert releasing 7 mcg of misoprostol per hour for 24 hours) with obstetric results of patients in whom, due to favourable cervix, only a low-dose infusion of oxytocin was used. We reviewed the medical records of 1010 single pregnancies in whom IOL was performed. We divided the patients into two groups: group A (where preinduction was used) and group B (Bishop score ≥7 points) where preinduction was not used. Patients in group A were more likely to complete the delivery by caesarean section (OR = 4.58, 95% CI 3.22-6.51), and more likely to have events that were indications for operative delivery: unreassuring fetal heart rate trace (OR = 3.29, 95% CI 2.07-5.23) and arrested labor or failed induction (OR = 3.4, 95% CI 2.06-5.62). The groups did not differ in the percentage of vacuum extraction, postpartum haemorrhage, and meconium stained amniotic fluid. In group B, more infants were born with umbilical cord blood pH <7.1 (1.38% vs. 0%), both groups included no deliveries of newborns with Apgar score ≤3 points, the groups did not differ in terms of the percentage of newborns with Apgar score between 4 and 7 at birth (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.29-1.49). The immature cervix and the need to use labor preinduction is a risk factor for caesarean section. The necessity of preinduction does not impair neonatological results.