Prognostic value of the number of the metastatic lymph nodes in locally early-stage cervical cancer: squamous cell carcinoma versus non-squamous cell carcinoma

Exploring the Potential of Ellagic Acid in Gastrointestinal Cancer Prevention: Recent Advances and Future Directions

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a significant global health concern with diverse etiologies and limited treatment options. Ellagic acid (EA), a natural polyphenolic compound, exhibits promising anticancer properties against various GI malignancies. In this article, we have reviewed recent research on the anticancer potential of EA across esophageal, gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, and liver cancers. In esophageal cancer, EA inhibits the formation of O6-methylguanine (O6-meGua) adducts induced by carcinogens like N-nitrosomethylbenzylamine (NMBA), thereby suppressing tumor growth. Additionally, EA inhibits STAT3 signaling and stabilizes tumor suppressor proteins, showing potential as an anti-esophageal cancer agent. In gastric cancer, EA regulates multiple pathways involved in cell proliferation, invasion, and apoptosis, including the p53 and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways. It also demonstrates anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, making it a promising therapeutic candidate against gastric cancer. In colorectal cancer (CRC), EA inhibits cell proliferation, induces apoptosis, and modulates the Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/Akt pathways, suggesting its efficacy in preventing CRC progression. Furthermore, EA has shown promise in pancreatic cancer by inhibiting nuclear factor-kappa B, inducing apoptosis, and suppressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In liver cancer, EA exhibits radio-sensitizing effects, inhibits inflammatory pathways, and modulates the tumor microenvironment, offering potential therapeutic benefits against hepatocellular carcinoma. Studies on EA potential in combination therapies and the development of targeted delivery systems are required for enhanced efficacy against gastrointestinal cancers.

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Combined with Intracavitary Posterior Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Medium-Term and Advanced Cervical Cancer: Efficacy, Safety and Prognostic Factors

Objective

To explore the efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) combined with intracavitary posterior radiotherapy for medium-term and advanced cervical cancer.

Methods

Retrospectively analyze the clinical data of 104 patients with medium-term and advanced cervical cancer who were treated in the radiotherapy department of our hospital from September 2015 to March 2017. According to the different radiotherapy techniques, they were divided into the IMRT combined with intracavitary posterior radiotherapy group (n = 52) and the 3D-CRT combined with intracavitary posterior radiotherapy group (n = 52). Observe and compare the short-term efficacy, occurrence of adverse reactions and overall survival rate of the two groups. The clinicopathological characteristics of the survival group and the death group were compared, and univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between the clinicopathological characteristics and the patient’s prognosis.

Results

The total effective rate of IMRT combined with intracavitary posterior radiotherapy group was 96.15%, which was higher than that of 3D-CRT combined with intracavitary posterior radiotherapy group (88.46%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The incidence of digestive system injury, thrombocytopenia, and radiation proctitis in the IMRT combined intracavitary posterior radiotherapy group was lower than that of the 3D-CRT combined intracavitary posterior radiotherapy group, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The prognosis and survival of the two groups of patients were similar, and the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Pathological classification, clinical stage, and lymph node metastasis are independent influencing factors of 3-year prognosis in patients with medium-term and advanced cervical cancer (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

IMRT combined with intracavitary posterior radiotherapy is equivalent to 3D-CRT combined with intracavitary posterior radiotherapy, but it can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions in patients with medium-term and advanced cervical cancer, and has higher safety. Pathological typing, clinical staging, Lymph node metastasis were independent factor affecting the prognosis of patients. In clinical treatment, IMRT combined with intracavitary posterior radiotherapy is more recommended as a treatment plan for patients with medium-term and advanced cervical cancer.

Oncologic outcomes of patients with FIGO 2014 stage IB-IIA cervical adenocarcinoma who underwent radical surgery

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors of early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma in patients with FIGO IB-IIA, who were treated with radical surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data of 64 patients with stage IB-IIA cervical adenocarcinoma who underwent radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy with or without adjuvant therapy between 1993 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathologic factors that affect the oncological outcomes were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the assessment of survival outcomes. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The 5-year recurrence-free survival and 5-year disease-specific survivals were 83% and 98%, respectively. Tumor size, stage of disease and uterine spread were significantly related prognostic factors for shorter recurrence-free survival. During the follow-up, nine (14.1%) patients recurred. Five of them were extrapelvic recurrence. No correlation was identified between histopathologic subtype and extrapelvic recurrence (p = 0.265). There was no difference between adjuvant only radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy on recurrence-free survival in a univariate analysis adjusting for prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

It is important to determine the prognostic factors that predict disease outcome in surgically treated cervical adenocarcinoma for tailored adjuvant treatment. Tumor size, stage and uterine spread are determinant factors for recurrence. Risk stratifications, including uterine spread may especially be useful for patients with AC.