1
|
Zhang L, Wang M, Zhang S, Han D, Guo L, Feng L. The efficacy and safety of cervical polypectomy with vaginoscopy in pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024:10.1007/s00404-024-07583-2. [PMID: 39103619 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07583-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSES This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of cervical polypectomy performed via vaginoscopy in pregnant women. METHODS Pregnant patients diagnosed with cervical polyps were retrospectively included in Beijing Tiantan Hospital between April 2017 and April 2023. Group A underwent cervical polypectomy using a vaginoscopy technique without speculum, cervical forceps and anesthesia, while Group B received conservative management. The incidence of spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, preterm rupture of membranes (PROM), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, timing and method of delivery, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Of 90 pregnant patients included in the study, 48 patients receiving polypectomy under vaginoscopy were included into group A while 42 patients receiving conservative treatment were assigned into group B. At baseline, group A exhibited higher rates of vaginal bleeding pre-operation, as well as larger cervical polyp dimensions compared to group B. The median interval between vaginal bleeding and polypectomy was 3.5 weeks, with the median procedure typically performed at gestational week 19 in group A. There was no significant difference in the incidence of spontaneous abortion between the two groups (4.2% vs. 4.8%, p = 1.000). However, group A showed a significantly lower frequency of preterm birth (4.2% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.030) and premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (18.8% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.025) compared to group B. No disparities were observed in the timing, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The utilization of vaginoscopy for cervical polypectomy has been shown to decrease the likelihood of preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes in pregnant women with symptomatic cervical polyps. Therefore, performing cervical polypectomy via vaginoscopy without anesthesia provide a feasible and optimal ways in the management of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luping Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Ming Wang
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100006, China
| | - Shengpeng Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Dan Han
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Lei Guo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Limin Feng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu X, Zhang M, Sun P, Jiang JJ, Yan L. Pregnancy and Adverse Obstetric Outcomes After Hysteroscopic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2022; 9:889696. [PMID: 35832500 PMCID: PMC9271824 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.889696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveAlthough the randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the efficacy of hysteroscopic resection in women with uterine septum has not shown any significant correlation in recent research, motivation for deeper study remains insufficient. In this study, the objective was to determine pregnancy-related outcomes, along with adverse obstetric outcomes, following hysteroscopic resection and also to determine whether women with hysteroscopic resection bear the same outcomes as women with normal uterine cavities.Search MethodsFrom January 1995 to February 2022, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify all studies published concerning the gestation outcomes of women with and without hysteroscopic resection while comparing the gestation outcomes of women after hysteroscopic resection and with a normal uterine cavity. Our primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). The secondary outcomes were term delivery, preterm delivery, spontaneous miscarriage, malpresentation, cesarean section, and other adverse obstetric outcomes.Results22 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The control groups of 14 studies were treated women, and the control groups of the other 8 studies were patients bearing a normal uterine cavity. Hysteroscopic resection was related to a higher rate of term delivery (OR = 2.26, 95% CI, 1.26–4.05), and a lower rate of spontaneous abortion (OR = 0.50, 95% CI, 0.27–0.93), and a lower rate of malpresentation (OR = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.19–0.50). Nevertheless, in comparison with the normal uterus group, the rates of preterm birth, cesarean section, and postpartum hemorrhage after resection did not return to normal levels.ConclusionHysteroscopic resection can effectively reduce the risk of abortion and malpresentation in patients possessing a uterine septum while increasing the term delivery rate. Although well-designed RCTs should confirm our meta-analysis, it still bears recommending to patients
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Wu
- School of Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Mei Zhang
- Qufu Maternity and Infant health Hospital, Qufu, China
| | - Ping Sun
- School of Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jing-jing Jiang
- School of Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology, Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Medicine Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Correspondence: Lei Yan Jing-jing Jiang
| | - Lei Yan
- School of Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology, Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Medicine Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Correspondence: Lei Yan Jing-jing Jiang
| |
Collapse
|